logo
Am I eligible for 'massively underclaimed' £5,700 health benefit?

Am I eligible for 'massively underclaimed' £5,700 health benefit?

Yahoo5 days ago
Martin Lewis has warned millions of pensioners could be missing out a "massively underclaimed" benefit that can be worth more than £5,000 a year.
Lewis highlighted the underutilised attendance allowance earlier this week, which provides money to pensioners with disabilities.
Writing in the Money Saving Expert newsletter, Lewis said: "For many older people who are ill or start to face mental or physical disability, life doesn't just get tougher, it gets costlier too.
'That's why 18 months ago we launched our attendance allowance guide and awareness campaign, and successes have flooded in since. Yet it remains massively underclaimed.'
A recent study by Policy in Practice found more than a million pensioners could be missing out on the benefit, meaning over £5bn of unclaimed benefits.
What is attendance allowance?
Attendance allowance – also known as pension age disability payment in Scotland – is a non-means-tested weekly payment to help cover the costs of pensioners who need support with some form of disability.
It is designed for pensioners over the age of 66 with a wide range of disabilities to cover the costs of someone assisting them with their day-to-day life.
There are two rates available depending on the severity of the disability. They are:
The lower rate of £73.90 a week, equivalent to £3,842 a year. This is for people who need help either during the day or the night.
The higher rate of £110.40 a week, equivalent to £5,740 a year. This is for people who need help during the day and the night.
Crucially, you do not need to actually be receiving care to get the benefit, you only need to have one of the listed disabilities.
How do I know which benefits I'm entitled to?
There are numerous different services that can tell you if you are possibly missing out on a benefit.
You will need to fill in an extensive form that will ask you questions about your income, assets, age, disabilities and dependents.
The government has its own calculator you can view here.
Citizens Advice also runs its own system that you can fill out online, or you can contact them over the phone.
Lewis's MoneySavingExpert website also has a '10 minutes benefit calculator' that you can fill out here.
How do I claim the allowance?
One of the biggest myths around attendance allowance is who qualifies for it.
To qualify, you only need to meet the following criteria:
Be over the age of 66
Have a qualifying disability
That is it, you don't need to be claiming state pension and as long as you are not earning more than £100,000 a year, you can claim the benefit.
There is no defined list of what conditions can qualify you for claiming attendance allowance.
Illnesses like Parkinson's, dementia and blindness are almost guaranteed to get you on the benefit, but if you can argue your condition means you need someone else to help you with your day-to-day life you may qualify for it.
To claim it, you will need to prove that a doctor or some other medical professional has said you could benefit from outside help.
This help could come in the form of assistance with food preparation, getting dressed, or communicating with others.
You can also qualify if you need supervision when carrying out tasks. This is usually for people with mental disabilities who may, for example, need to be supervised when taking their medicines.
You will automatically get the higher rate if you are terminally ill and not expected to live more than a year.
To claim the allowance, you will need to fill out a long form, but someone else, like a family member or carer, can help you with it. You can find it here on the government's website.
Once sent, you may have to attend an assessment, but not everyone is required to do this.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Row over NHS doctor strike deepens as poll suggests public support is waning
Row over NHS doctor strike deepens as poll suggests public support is waning

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Row over NHS doctor strike deepens as poll suggests public support is waning

The row between the British Medical Association (BMA) and health leaders over the upcoming doctor strike has deepened as research suggests public support for the action is waning. NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts, hit back at BMA claims that health leaders were putting patients at risk, saying it was actually the 'costly' BMA strike that was risking patient care. It comes as Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the House of Commons he 'sincerely hopes the BMA will postpone' the 'unnecessary and irresponsible' strikes to continue talks with the Government, which he said had been 'constructive' in recent days. He said, however, the Government stands 'ready' and 'responsive' if the five-day strike by resident doctors, which is scheduled to start at 7am on Friday, does go ahead. Earlier, the BMA said NHS England plans for managing the strike could put patients at risk owing to the fact it has ordered hospitals to continue with as much pre-planned care as possible. We've written to NHS England with concerns about inadequate planning ahead of possible strike action later this week. Attempts to run non-urgent services with fewer doctors risk patient safety. It's imperative that Trusts postpone work to protect urgent and emergency care. — The BMA (@TheBMA) July 21, 2025 Previous strikes by health workers have seen hundreds of thousands of operations and appointments cancelled, but NHS England is taking a different approach this time to managing the strike. In a letter to hospital trust leaders, it urges the health system to focus on maintaining emergency care, maintaining the flow of patients and 'maintaining elective care to the fullest extent possible' as well as 'priority treatments' such as cancer care. 'It will be important for systems and trusts to try and maintain normal levels of booked activity…' it said, adding: 'Reducing volumes of bookings and rescheduling of appointments and other activity should only happen in exceptional circumstances to safeguard patient safety.' On Tuesday morning, BMA deputy chairwoman Dr Emma Runswick told BBC Radio 4's Today programme this plan risked patient safety. She said: 'We've had proven systems over the last decade that have made sure that where we have to take strike action, senior doctors cover urgency and critical care. 'This time round, NHS England are pushing for the continuation of non-urgent and scheduled care in a way that we think at best is confusing and will create on-the-day cancellations – and at worst could be risky and lead to harm in emergency departments and on wards, because senior doctors cannot physically be in two places at once. 'We think that a notional guidance from NHS England which is saying that basically all scheduled work should continue to go ahead has potential to be seriously risky for patients… 'Senior doctors are needed to be freed up in order to provide urgency and critical care. 'We think the vast majority of planned and unscheduled care should be shifted.' NHS Providers hit back at the BMA's claims, saying it was the strike itself that posed a risk to patients. Its chief executive, Daniel Elkeles, said: 'The NHS, not the BMA, is putting patients' interests first. 'Given that some patients will be caused undoubted harm if the short-notice strike goes ahead, NHS trusts are doing the responsible thing by not cancelling people's care while talks to avert the strike are ongoing. 'Now is a time for cool heads in the BMA because it's not too late to avoid a damaging, costly strike. NHS trust leaders hope for a breakthrough from talks between Government and the union. 'If the strike goes ahead then NHS trusts will do everything they can to avoid any harm to patients and are planning for as many patients as possible to be cared for.' It comes as a new YouGov poll showed about half (52%) of people in the UK either 'somewhat oppose' (20%) or 'strongly oppose' (32%) the idea of resident doctors going on strike over pay. Meanwhile, a third (34%) of the 4,954 adults surveyed either 'somewhat support' (23%) or 'strongly support' (11%) doctor strikes. YouGov said the proportion supporting the strike over pay has dropped five points since it last asked the question in May. Then, 48% opposed resident doctors striking, while 39% supported them taking action. Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Streeting said that before he came into office, 'strikes were crippling the NHS'. He added: 'Costs ran to £1.7 billion in just one year, and patients saw 1.5 million appointments rescheduled. 'Strikes this week are not inevitable, and I sincerely hope the BMA will postpone this action to continue the constructive talks my team and I have had with them in recent days. 'Regardless, our priority is to keep patients safe, and we will do everything we can to mitigate the impacts of strikes on patients and the disruption that will follow should these totally unnecessary and avoidable strikes go ahead.' Quizzed by MPs, he said the 'approach we're taking is different from that taken in previous periods of strike action'. He added: 'NHS leaders have been clear to me that previous rounds of strike action caused much wider levels of harm than previously realised, and there is no reason why planned care in issues like cancer, for example, cancer appointments, as well as other conditions should be treated as somehow less important or second fiddle to other NHS services. 'That is why the chief executive of NHS England has written to NHS leaders asking them to keep routine operations going to the fullest extent possible, as well as continuing priority treatments. 'It will be for local leaders to determine what's possible given staffing levels. 'That's why it's really important that resident doctors do engage with their employers about their determination or not to turn up at work this week, and why again, I just spell out the serious consequences for patients that means that these avoidable and unnecessary strikes should not go ahead.' Consultants and SAS doctors in England – look out for your indicative ballot email from @TheBMA today! Wes Streeting called pay restoration "a journey, not an event" – so why have we stopped? Are you prepared to stand up to demand your value is recognised by the government? — Tom Dolphin🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ (@thomasdolphin) July 21, 2025 Elsewhere, the BMA has also issued strike guidance for consultants regarding the extra pay they can seek for covering work that is not in their contracts. The BMA 'rate card' says consultants can ask for £188 per hour on weekdays from 7am-7pm and £250 an hour from 7pm to 11pm. At weekends, the pay claim can rise to £250 per hour from 7am to 11am and £313 per hour for overnight work from 11pm to 7am. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, were awarded an average 5.4% pay increase this financial year, following a 22% rise over the previous two years. However, the BMA says real-terms pay has still fallen by around 20% since 2008, and is pushing for full 'pay restoration'. Resident doctors are qualified doctors in clinical training. They have completed a medical degree and can have up to nine years of working experience as a hospital doctor, depending on their specialty, or up to five years of working and gaining experience to become a GP.

Paul Gascoigne returns home following health scare
Paul Gascoigne returns home following health scare

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Paul Gascoigne returns home following health scare

Former England international Paul Gascoigne is recovering at his home after being discharged from hospital. The 58-year-old was admitted to intensive care on Friday, found semi-conscious by a friend. His management company confirmed his release, stating he is now working his way back to health at home in Poole, Dorset. A statement from the MNT Agency read: 'Paul voluntarily went into A&E on Friday after struggling with a throat condition (not by ambulance) he has had for a while. He is already back home and doing well.' Gascoigne, who won 57 caps for his country, was discovered by Steve Foster, who works as his driver and personal assistant, and taken to hospital. He was treated by intensive care staff and later moved to an acute medical unit, where his condition was said to be stable, and he has since been released. Steve Foster, who drove the 58-year-old to hospital after finding him in a semi-conscious state at his home in Poole, Dorset, told the Sun: 'Paul is in hospital, which is the best possible place for him to be right now.' The paper said Gascoigne was admitted to an intensive care ward, but later moved to an acute medical unit. Mr Foster, who is also Gascoigne's driver and personal assistant, told the newspaper the former midfielder would 'like to thank everyone for the support he's received so far from so many old friends who wish him well and want to see him back to his best.' Gateshead-born Gascoigne found fame as one of his generation's most gifted football talents, making his name at Newcastle before spells with Tottenham, Lazio, Rangers, Middlesbrough and Everton. However, life away from the pitch has at times proved challenging and his struggles with alcohol addiction and depression have been well-documented.

Post-Cerclage Cervical Length as Predictor of Preterm Birth
Post-Cerclage Cervical Length as Predictor of Preterm Birth

Medscape

time19 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Post-Cerclage Cervical Length as Predictor of Preterm Birth

TOPLINE: Post-cerclage cervical length (CL) was a significant predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB; < 34 weeks of gestation) in women who underwent cervical cerclage, predominantly outperforming pre-cerclage CL. METHODOLOGY: Researchers in the UK conducted a retrospective cohort study at four preterm birth prevention clinics between January 2008 and March 2021 to assess the predictive value of CL measurements, both before and after cervical cerclage, for sPTB (< 34 weeks of gestation). They included 331 women who underwent cervical cerclage and had both pre- and post-cerclage CL measured per the standardised protocol using transvaginal ultrasound as recommended by the Cervical Length Education and Review program. The primary outcome was sPTB (< 34 weeks of gestation), assessed using multivariable logistic regression modelling (adjusting for pre- and post-cerclage CL, gestational age at cerclage, and direction of the CL change) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. TAKEAWAY: Both pre-cerclage CL (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.635; 95% CI, 0.559-0.712) and post-cerclage CL (AUC, 0.677; 95% CI, 0.604-0.751) were predictors of sPTB. Adjusted models incorporating gestational age at cerclage demonstrated that both pre-cerclage CL (odds ratio [OR], 0.964; P = .018) and post-cerclage CL (OR, 0.940; P < .001) were significant predictors of sPTB. In a comparative model analysis, the effect of post-cerclage CL on sPTB was greater than that of pre-cerclage CL (OR, 0.943; P < .001 vs OR, 0.974; P = .058). Overall, sPTB was reported in 11.9% of women with history-indicated cerclage vs 24.3% of those with ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 36.8% of those with emergency cerclage (P = .003). IN PRACTICE: "Clinicians performing cervical cerclage should aim to maximize total CL when inserting cerclage and continue to monitor CL after cerclage insertion," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by K. E. Mountain and S. Ng, March of Dimes Prematurity Research Centre at The Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, England. It was published online on July 09, 2025, in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. LIMITATIONS: This study included only women who underwent cervical cerclage, limiting the use of pre-cerclage CL thresholds for decision-making guidance. Metrics related to the cerclage position within the cervical canal were not assessed. Additionally, the intervals between pre- and post-cerclage scans and cervical cerclage were not standardised. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, and Tommy's Charity, London, UK. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store