logo
Turns Out, Sniffing Your Wine Isn't Just for Show

Turns Out, Sniffing Your Wine Isn't Just for Show

CNET6 days ago
Ordering wine can feel like a performance if you're not a seasoned sipper. There's the swirling, the sniffing, the obligatory nod after a tiny pour, and it's easy to assume it's all just for show or to see if you like the wine. But that initial sample isn't about taste at all. It's a quality check.
That first pour is your chance to make sure the wine hasn't gone bad. Sometimes, bottles can spoil-especially if they've been improperly stored or have a faulty cork-and the result is something called a "corked" wine. It might smell musty, like wet cardboard or mildew, and it definitely won't taste like what the winemaker intended. Giving your wine a quick sniff before you sip helps you catch any issues before the bottle gets fully poured, saving your palate and your night.
Because of that, you don't even need to sip the wine, but it's fine if you do. If you want to show you're a wine drinker in the know, though, simply give it a big swirling sniff, since a bad bottle is usually detectable by smell alone. But that flex is valuable only if you know how to sniff out a bad bottle.
An estimated 1% to 7% of bottles are corked -- we'll explain what that means below. Knowing what to look, taste and smell for is key when scrutinizing wine for problems. To get the full scoop on corked wine and how to tell a good bottle from a bad one, we turned to the experts. Here's everything to know.
What is corked wine?
"A corked wine is caused by a compound called trichloroanisole, or TCA, which contaminates the cork, bottle or wine itself during harvest, production or even shipping," said Vinnie Miliano, bar manager for the famed Waldorf Astoria Chicago.
Corked wine can come from a restaurant wine cellar or your own collection.
Cavan Images / Getty Images
TCA often exists as fungi in corks but can also present itself in pesticides, preservatives and cleaning products found in wineries. Barrels and cardboard boxes can also be sources of "contamination," even if high-quality control standards have been rigorously implemented.
"A corked wine isn't harmful to consume, but it certainly isn't pleasant to drink and will definitely detract from the experience," Miliano said.
Despite the temporary awkwardness and disruption of dinner service, it's OK to send something back that doesn't taste up to par. After all, if you're shelling out hard-earned cash to treat yourself and a loved one, you don't want the evening to go, well, sour.
We asked Miliano, as well as Courtney Cheney, the beverage operations manager for Ocean Prime, to explain how to tell if a wine is corked and the proper protocol of flagging the issue with a sommelier or server. (For more wine tips, read a sommelier's best tips for finding budget bottles and see how to properly store every type of open wine.)
How to tell if a wine is corked
Corked wine may smell like musty like wet cardboard or a damp basement.
Wine.com
There are typically two immediate indicators to detect if a wine has been corked: aroma and taste. "A corked wine will typically smell off, with scents of wet cardboard, mustiness, or like a damp basement," Miliano said. "If you taste it, you'll notice the taste can be muted or unpleasant, lacking the expected fruit and structure."
Cheney echoes these exact descriptions, adding that a corked wine will also taste "flat with a distinct astringency in severe cases that will also lack fruitiness."
And while one may believe that some tannin-heavy varietals are more prone to corking than others, TCA doesn't discriminate. "It is easier, however, to recognize cork taint in wines that are unoaked, due to more powerful aromatics that accompany oak aging," Cheney said. "It's [also] more likely to occur in wines with traditional corks."
Read more: We Asked a Wine Pro if Open Red Wine Lasts Longer in the Fridge
How to send back corked wine
Don't be shy about sending back a corked bottle of wine.
d3sign/Getty Images
Should you stumble across a corked bottle, a trained wine professional or bar manager will likely remedy the unfortunate circumstance. "The best approach is the simplest," Miliano said. "Politely inform your server or sommelier. There will be no offense taken, and most hospitality professionals are trained to handle the situation gracefully."
This may include tasting the wine themselves before replacing the bottle or glass. If you're not entirely sure, you can also rely on their expert palates for an explanation and/or final confirmation.
"I once had an entire case of wonderful Rioja completely corked," said Miliano, who also says that there is no need to "feel embarrassed or angry" in the moment. Quality verification is merely part of the process and an important step to determine if additional inventory is affected.
"You can also check the cork, which should be presented to you upon your server opening the bottle," added Cheney. "If it smells musty and dank, it is likely corked." Of course, if there is any type of pushback, escalate it higher to restaurant managers or owners after your meal. This can be done via email to avoid confrontation.
Read more: 7 Surprising Recipes You Can Add Wine To
Nothing to wine about
Any restaurant worth its salt will replace a corked bottle with a good one free of charge.
Media Whalestock/iStock/Getty Images
Cheney wrapped up the concept of wine corking best: "Cork taint is a naturally occurring fault in wines, so most restaurants will replace the bottle without further question or charge."
While an offensive sip may be unlucky, remember that it's probably the worst thing that will happen to you that day. Accept it, say something about it and move on. It's nobody's fault (not even the winemaker's), and you more than deserve a stress-free, delicious meal that's worth every dollar you spend.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Stick library" that caters to dogs a big hit at Fresh Pond in Massachusetts
"Stick library" that caters to dogs a big hit at Fresh Pond in Massachusetts

CBS News

time10 minutes ago

  • CBS News

"Stick library" that caters to dogs a big hit at Fresh Pond in Massachusetts

The idea of a neighborhood library isn't just for book lovers anymore. At Fresh Pond in Cambridge, Massachusetts, a "library" has popped up that caters to an entirely different kind of clientele, one with four legs and a love for sticks. Tucked along the Fresh Pond Reservation loop, the Dog Library has become an off-leash favorite among local dogs and their owners. The motto here is "Take a stick, leave a stick." "It's such a great Cambridge thing, a stick library for all the locals who come by, for adults and humans and dogs," said one dog walker. "I don't know who came up with it but it's a great idea." The concept is simple: a small, dedicated selection of hand-picked sticks, all ready for fetching. Built with a bit of humor and a whole lot of community spirit, the stick library is a hotspot for pups at the pond. "It's so great and it's a very sweet idea," said Liz, a Cambridge resident and regular visitor of Fresh Pond. Especially during the warmer months, the off-leash area is a favorite for dogs to cool off and explore the water. The addition of a fresh selection of sticks only adds to the excitement. And for dogs like Henry, a golden retriever with a nose for quality, the stick library is the highlight of his walk. "We're always looking for the right stick," said Henry's owner, Mark. Whether it's a quick fetch or a long stroll, the Dog Library at Fresh Pond is a playful reminder that sometimes the simplest ideas bring the most joy, especially when they involve wagging tails.

Kids Don't Want Screens—They Want Freedom
Kids Don't Want Screens—They Want Freedom

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kids Don't Want Screens—They Want Freedom

Kids love being on their phones and would rather do that than anything else. Right? New research finds that this is a myth. Children reported that what they really want to do is hang out with friends in real life—with no adults hovering and no screens. Kids go online because that's generally the only place they can meet up and have fun without constant adult supervision. Being glued to screens is their default, not their desire. In an August 4 Atlantic piece I cowrote with Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation (and my Let Grow cofounder), and Zach Rausch, director of the Tech and Society Research Lab at New York University, we discuss the survey we conducted with The Harris Poll. We asked 500 kids aged 8 to 12 to pick their favorite way to spend time with friends. The choices were: unstructured play, like pick-up basketball or exploring the neighborhood; adult-led activities, like ballet or soccer; and socializing online. The results surprised many people. It wasn't even close: kids want to meet up in person. No tutus, no trophies, no internet—and no adults! Basically, our kids want an old-fashioned, free-range childhood. But the survey also told us that this is almost an impossible dream, because kids are rarely allowed any free, unsupervised time. We found that: Most kids are not allowed to be without an adult in public spaces (streets, parks, playgrounds, stores). Most kids have rarely or never walked around without an adult. Fewer than half of the 8- and 9-year-olds have been to another aisle at the grocery store on their own. More than a quarter of the 8- and 9-year-olds—and 1 in 5 of the older kids—aren't even allowed to play in their own front yard alone. Our kids are growing up on lockdown. Their childhoods are strangely adult when it comes to tech, and infantilized when it comes to real life. The poll found that more 8- and 9-year-olds have talked to an artificial intelligence chatbot than have ever used a sharp knife. Perhaps unexpectedly, we don't blame parents for this. We blame the fears, social norms, and laws that have made micromanagement seem like a wise way to raise kids. But is it? Kids are more depressed than ever, according to the surgeon general. The same is true for parents. Today's childhood isn't working well for anyone. The saving grace for kids—and the thing driving adults crazy—is that one escape hatch beckons: the screen. Kids who have never been to a store on their own can conquer entire kingdoms online and connect with school friends and people in other countries alike. We nag at children to get off their devices, but why would they? We give them so few real-life alternatives. But if we would step back and let them step up and out, kids would be engaged with the world outside their door. Nearly three-quarters of the kids in the Harris survey agreed they "would spend less time online if there were more friends in my neighborhood to play with in person." Obviously, technology is attractive. But kids have a strong, almost evolutionary desire to play and roam—the way most of us adults did. Let Grow, the nonprofit I helm, is dedicated to making that kind of childhood easy, normal, and legal again. Our free programs for schools and parents encourage real-world independence and free play. And the Reasonable Childhood Independence laws we've helped pass in 11 states affirm the right of kids to play outside, walk to school, etc., without their parents being investigated for neglect. It's not fair to blame kids for being online when we don't let them go almost anywhere else. As we said in The Atlantic piece, "If parents want their kids to put down their phones, they need to start opening the front door." The post Kids Don't Want Screens—They Want Freedom appeared first on Solve the daily Crossword

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore
Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

After repeatedly ignoring basic rules with her newborn, one woman says her mother-in-law is no longer welcomed to babysitNEED TO KNOW A mom set clear rules for her newborn, but her mother-in-law had other ideas A simple request turned into a months-long power struggle Now, she's drawing a line, and not everyone in the family agreesA woman looks to the Reddit community for advice following a tense fallout with her mother-in-law over a series of ignored boundaries with her newborn daughter. In a heartfelt post titled 'AITA for not allowing my MIL to babysit anymore?' she shares the details of a situation that has left her feeling disrespected and unheard. 'From the moment my baby was born, I was very clear about the basic boundaries I had with the baby,' the new mom writes. Her requests were simple: no kissing, wash hands before touching the baby and ask before taking the baby from her arms. She describes how she and her husband were living with his mother shortly after their baby girl was born, hoping for some extra support. But instead of feeling supported, she says, her boundaries were crossed 'within the first week after the baby was born.' Despite clearly explaining her expectations, she says her mother-in-law refused to listen. 'She responded with 'I'm the grandma and grandmas can do what they want,' ' the mom reveals, adding that this attitude only continued. She notes that she and her husband both spoke to his mother multiple times, attempting to reinforce the importance of their rules. But instead of improving, the situation escalated as her MIL 'completely disregarded our rules and continued to [ignore] them.' In addition to boundary violations, she says her mother-in-law started referring to the baby in a way that made her deeply uncomfortable. 'She also began to call our child 'her child,' ' she writes, explaining that her MIL would reach for the baby, saying, 'Give me my child.' These moments were not taken lightly by the new mom, who says the behavior 'made me very uncomfortable.' She also shares that each time she and her husband addressed the issue, it 'would continue to become defensive and start big arguments.' Feeling overwhelmed and increasingly isolated, the couple decided to make a major change. 'After our baby turned 2 months old, we moved out of state due to my husband's military assignment,' she explains. But the space didn't end the tension. Soon after the move, her MIL began making plans to visit and babysit, which led to the mom putting her foot down. 'I've told her and my husband that I don't feel comfortable with her babysitting anymore,' she says. Her reasoning was clear: 'Until she can respect the rules and boundaries I've had in place and until she can respect me as a mother, I no longer want her in my home.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Reddit post ends with a direct question to the community: 'So, AITA for saying these things?' And the comments come pouring in with strong support for her stance. One commenter writes, 'This is just a sign of much worse to come,' warning her not to let her mother-in-law take away precious memories from this time in her life. 'Don't let her rob you of what's supposed to be happy times that you'll never get back.' Another user echoes the sentiment and applauds her strength in taking a stand. 'Not overreacting,' they say. 'I think it's good you are setting these boundaries now.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store