
Why Americans love milk, explained in 8 charts
The past few years have violated many of my assumptions about human progress. Twenty-year-olds are going MAGA. More and more Americans say that women should return to their 'traditional' roles in society. For some reason, we have decided to gamble with bringing back once-eradicated deadly diseases.
And now, add to the list: Cow's milk is back. Sort of.
Last year, US dairy producers sold about 0.8 percent more milk than in 2023, according to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics, the first year-over-year increase since 2009, when milk prices were historically low. That may not sound like much, but it's a big deal for the dairy industry, which has seen a sustained drop in both per capita and total US milk consumption over the last few decades. Raw milk, which has not been pasteurized to kill pathogens, has seen double-digit growth, a concerning trend given its potential to spread life-threatening infections, though it still makes up a very small share of overall milk sales.
Meanwhile, non-dairy milks — the kind made from soybeans, oats, almonds, and other plants — have stumbled, declining by about 5 percent in both dollar and unit sales over approximately the last year, according to data shared with Vox by NielsenIQ and data reported elsewhere from the market research firm Circana.
A small uptick in cow's milk intake is, obviously, not tantamount to the calamities that have been unleashed over the last six weeks in American politics. But it does likely sprout, at least in part, from the same vibe shift that's given us butter-churning, homestead-tending tradwives, an unscientific turn against plant-based foods, and a movement to destroy public trust in vaccines.
After achieving ubiquity in the 2010s and early 2020s, plant-based milks may have lost their cool, nonconformist quality — much like how, after more than a decade of liberal cultural supremacy, embracing authoritarian revanchism now feels like countercultural rebellion.
It's too early to tell whether the growth in milk sales is a temporary blip or a genuine turning point; Dotsie Bausch, executive director of Switch4Good, a group that advocates for moving away from dairy consumption, told me she's optimistic it's the former. And all this comes amid another important shift: America's top coffee chains, including Starbucks, Dunkin', Dutch Bros, Tim Hortons, and Scooter's — very large buyers of milk — have all in recent months dropped their extra charges for adding plant-based milks to drinks, a change that animal rights groups, led by Switch4Good, had demanded for years.
That change makes it anywhere from 50 cents to $2 less expensive to choose plant milks over cow's milk, and will likely nudge some customers to choose more planet-friendly plant-based options. Still, while economic incentives do matter for milk consumption, as we're increasingly seeing, they're not the whole story.
Processing Meat
A newsletter analyzing how the meat and dairy industries impact everything around us. Email (required)
Sign Up
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Why dairy milk is becoming more popular
If you really think about it, it's weird that we drink dairy milk — the milk that cows, like all mammals, make for their babies.
There's no compelling reason to think humans need to drink milk after infancy, much less the milk of another species. Nevertheless, thanks to many years of 'pseudo-scientific theories that exalted drinking-milk to permanent and unquestioned superfood status,' as culinary historian Anne Mendelson put it in her book Spoiled: The Myth of Milk as Superfood, cow's milk consumption became practically compulsory in the US, peaking in 1945 at 45 gallons per person, or about two cups per day. And that's only counting straight cow's milk, not other dairy products made from it like cheese, butter, or ice cream, which added a lot more — ice cream consumption peaked in 1946, at 23 pounds per person.
After World War II, fluid milk intake plummeted, falling to less than half a cup per person per day on average in 2019. It's important to keep these trends in perspective, however: More than 90 percent of US households still buy cow's milk, while less than half buy plant-based milk; plant milk sales are still way lower than sales of cow's milk. And even as cow's milk in fluid form became less popular, overall dairy intake in the US has only increased since the 1970s, driven by growing consumption of cheese, butter, and yogurt.
So why might drinking cow's milk be coming back? The most persuasive hypotheses boil down to three things: price, perception, and protein.
The first one is pretty obvious: Consumers are angry about inflation, struggling with high grocery bills, and switching to lower-cost options. Conventional dairy milk — the kind that makes up more than 90 percent of the cow's milk market and comes in clear, hard-plastic jugs with brightly colored caps — is generally cheaper than any plant-based milk you can get. The cheap soy milk I buy is still more than twice the cost by volume of the cheapest cow's milk at my grocery store.
If you know anything about how resource-intensive cow's milk is to produce, its low cost might seem counterintuitive. Part of that is because the costs are externalized elsewhere: Cows have been bred to produce immense volumes of milk over the last century, which has brought down the cost while taking a heavy toll on their welfare. Most milk today comes from mega dairies, which benefit from economies of scale by confining thousands or even tens of thousands of cows in one place, but these operations are known for spreading pollution and foul odors to nearby communities.
Dairy is also much higher in greenhouse emissions than plant-based foods with comparable nutrition, and much more water-intensive, contributing to water scarcity in arid Western states like California, the nation's top dairy producer. But the dairy industry, as well as those that grow crops to feed cows, gets to use all that water at low cost, a classic 'tragedy of the commons,' UC Davis agricultural economist Richard Sexton told me.
Soy milk, while far less resource-intensive than dairy, has higher manufacturing costs, and hasn't benefited from the decades of US government-subsidized R&D that have lowered the cost of cow's milk, nor from the dairy industry's scale efficiencies. The cost of the soy used to make soy milk is also shaped by competition with other, much larger, uses of soybeans, Sexton said. Most soy grown in the US is fed to farmed animals, while another chunk is used to make subsidized biofuels.
Why soy milk rules
Soy milk, which has been consumed in East Asia for centuries, is almost too good to be true — but at just 1 percent of the US milk market, it doesn't get enough credit. It's packed with protein and (assuming you get a fortified variety) essential nutrients, low in saturated fat, and much lower in sugar than milk.
The federal government's Dietary Guidelines for Americans recognize fortified soy milk as an appropriate substitute for cow's milk. I think it's an even better choice, kinder to both the planet and to cows. If you haven't had it before, soy milk might taste different from what you're used to, but it has a satisfying, full-bodied texture and nutty flavor. And don't worry about whatever you may have heard about the supposed dangers of soy — it's been debunked. It's literally a bean, and we can all use more of that in our diets.
But look closer at the data, and the price explanation for dairy milk's rebound becomes a lot more complicated. Organic milk sales grew by 7 percent by volume from 2023 to 2024 — about 19 times faster than conventional milk did over the same period. And organic cow's milk is significantly pricier than conventional; often, it's more expensive than plant-based milks. Lactose-free milk, which is also costlier than regular milk, saw huge gains, too, with many new buyers switching from less-expensive plant-based milks.
One factor might simply be taste and feel, Chris Costagli, vice president for food insights at NielsenIQ, told me. Consumers seem to be trying to incorporate more fats in their diets: Rich, full-bodied whole milk, which has been rising in popularity as low-fat milks decline, may be gaining appeal compared to almond milk, the most popular plant milk, which is runny and low in calories.
And then there's the hazier but crucial element of consumer perceptions — in other words, vibes.
Americans are increasingly skeptical of so-called ultra-processed foods, an ill-defined, unrigorous concept that I covered back in December. Most plant-based milks fall into that category, putting them on the wrong side of today's culture war, which has swung toward the regressive and anti-modern.
Consumers find the ingredient lists of cow's milk — which is often just 'milk' and added vitamins — simpler and easier to understand than those of plant milks, Costagli said, and they also might feel that they're getting a better value. 'The first ingredient on dairy milk is milk. The first ingredient on plant-based is water,' he said. That's true — but cow's milk is also overwhelmingly comprised of water. A more detailed ingredient list might look like this: Water, milk fat, casein, whey, lactose, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, estrogen, progesterone, Insulin-like Growth Factor 1. Novel foods suffer from the perception of being 'unnatural' and mechanized regardless of their actual health impacts.
I'm reminded of what 20th-century philosopher Walter Benjamin wrote in his essay 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,' arguing that in an era of mass production, objects lose their 'aura,' or uniqueness and authenticity. Cow's milk, particularly the kind that's marketed as unadulterated and close to the source, like organic, appeals to a sense of lost aura by promising to reconnect consumers with something ancient and primal — a living, breathing animal, the very opposite of a machine.
But this fatally misunderstands the nature of modern dairy farming, which one could reasonably define as the process of turning an animal into a milk-making machine. Organic dairy does have some standards that are better for animal welfare, including a requirement for cows to have access to pasture for at least 120 days per year, although organic dairy has been gamed and industrialized to such an extent that it often resembles conventional mega dairies.
More fundamentally, though, there's no guarantee that organic dairy cows are treated humanely because both organic farms and conventional mega dairies rely on the same business model: Putting cows through repeated, taxing cycles of insemination, pregnancy, and lactation, separating them from their calves so that humans can take their milk, and then sending them to slaughter at a young age when their health and productivity decline. Organic dairy is not meaningfully better for the environment, either.
Got soy milk?
There's one more factor we need to consider to understand what's happening in the cow's milk market: America's obsession with protein. Most types of plant milk, including oat, almond, and coconut, are significantly lower in protein than cow's milk. That might explain why sales of soy milk — which is higher in protein as a share of calories than either whole, reduced fat, or low-fat cow's milk — have remained stable, while low-protein almond milk has seen the steepest declines.
Some companies have even introduced 'ultra-filtered' cow's milk that's higher in protein than regular milk. The Coca-Cola-owned milk brand Fairlife, which has seen massive growth in recent years thanks to the popularity of its high-protein products, was recently the subject of an undercover investigation by the animal advocacy group Animal Rescue Mission. The group found appalling animal abuse at two Fairlife supplier farms in Arizona, including cows and calves being beaten, dragged, chained, and shot. A 2019 investigation found similar abuse at another Fairlife supplier, and Coca-Cola in 2022 settled lawsuits alleging that it falsely advertised Fairlife milk as coming from humanely raised cows.
'The mistreatment of animals depicted in the recent videos is unacceptable. Effective immediately, our supplier, United Dairymen of Arizona (UDA), has suspended delivery of milk from these facilities to all UDA customers,' Fairlife told Vox in a statement. 'We have zero tolerance for animal abuse. Although we operate as milk processors and do not own farms or cows, we mandate that all our milk suppliers adhere to stringent animal welfare standards, and we expect nothing less.'
So what kind of milk should people drink if they care about nutrition and animal welfare? The perfect milk for most people is made of soybeans.
Soy milk is not just high-protein, but also lower in saturated fat than any type of cow's milk except skim, much lower in sugar (make sure you get an unsweetened variety), and even has fiber, which, unlike protein, Americans are actually deficient in. If you get a fortified variety, like the leading soy milk brand Silk, you also get calcium, vitamin D, and other essential nutrients.
If you're accustomed to cow's milk, soy might just taste different. Myths about adverse health effects from soy have been debunked; unless you have an allergy, there's no reason to be afraid of it. To the contrary, soy is simply a bean, and one of the best sources of protein out there.
Soy milk is also unequivocally better for the environment than dairy, isn't made with animal abuse, and as a plus, won't help start the next pandemic. The US federal dietary guidelines recognize fortified soy milk as an appropriate substitute for cow's milk.
Despite this, it is, strangely, the official policy of the US government to promote cow's milk consumption and protect it from changing consumer preferences — an outdated vestige of 20th-century agricultural policy that punishes plant-based foods at a time when we most need them.
Seen in this light, the perceived resurgence of cow's milk may really just be one more example of the re-entrenchment of the status quo. Although it's seeing a bit of a renaissance, cow's milk has never not been mainstream. The truest form of cultural rebellion has always been to simply avoid it.
And please, whatever you do, don't drink raw milk.
This story originally appeared in the Processing Meat newsletter. Sign up here!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
16 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Mark Cuban says the US has got to keep investing in research if it wants to have a chance of beating China at AI
"Shark Tank" star Mark Cuban says the US can beat China at AI if it continues "investing in research of all kinds as a country." "The IP we create domestically is what the frontier models can buy or invest in to define their differentiation and advance forward," Cuban wrote on X in response to a post by David Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto czar, on the state of the AI race. When asked about his X post, Cuban told Business Insider that American research is "important, not just because of the outcome of the research itself, but its value to American frontier AI models" like ChatGPT and Gemini. Cuban said that any unique intellectual property produced can be "licensed to the models, for a fee, to be included in their training." This would not only offset research costs but also make the models more valuable, he added. "The quality and depth of the research we do in this country can help us stay ahead of China and other countries in the AI race," Cuban told Business Insider. "We need our Ph.D.s, our scientists, our experts, to stay here and contribute to society, and their IP to make American AI models the global leaders," he added. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump's administration has been culling research grants for universities and research institutions like the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Researchers and scientists told Business Insider's Ayelet Sheffey in April that the cuts could stifle innovation and result in brain drain. "It absolutely endangers the United States' position as the global leader in medical research. And for that, we will pay," Peter Lurie, a recipient of an NIH grant terminated in March, told Sheffey. Staying ahead in the AI race has been a primary focus for the Trump administration, which unveiled its " AI Action Plan" last month. The 28-page plan calls for a light-touch approach to AI regulation compared to Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden. In January, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek shocked the world with its high-performing but relatively cheap AI models. Trump said he viewed DeepSeek's accomplishment "as a positive, as an asset" for America. "The release of DeepSeek, AI from a Chinese company, should be a wake-up call for our industries that we need to be laser-focused on competing to win," Trump told GOP lawmakers in January.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
US military preparing to surge National Guard troops to Washington DC to fight local crime and youth violence: report
The US military is preparing to activate hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, DC as a part of President Trump's sweeping federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital, according to authorities. Trump has yet to make a final decision about the activation of federal troops, but the National Guard is currently readying to deploy them, two US officials with knowledge of the operation confirmed to Reuters. 3 The US military is preparing to activate hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, DC as a part of President Trump's sweeping federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images The preparation comes as 120 FBI agents from across the country have already begun patrolling DC streets overnight and backing up area cops at carjacking hot spots, despite many lacking local patrol work training, The Washington Post reported. 'Be prepared! There will be no 'MR. NICE GUY.' We want our Capital BACK,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social Sunday ahead of a planned White House press conference Monday morning about the city's cleanliness and general condition. The possible order follows Trump's 'Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful' executive order signed on March 28, which established a task force dedicated to fighting crime and reducing illegal immigration in the city. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong,' Trump wrote in the social media post — comparing the action to his illegal immigration crackdown at the border. 'The Mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, is a good person who has tried, but she has been given many chances, and the Crime Numbers get worse, and the City only gets dirtier and less attractive,' Trump said in a different post Sunday. 3 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong,' Trump wrote in the social media post. YURI GRIPAS/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock Bowser has since fought back on Trump's characterization of the city. 'If the priority is to show force in an American city, we know he can do that here,' Bowser said on MSNBC Sunday morning. 'But it won't be because there's a spike in crime.' Violent crime is down 26% compared with this time in 2024, according to DC police data, and there have been roughly 20% fewer juvenile arrests this year, the Washington Post reported. However, the White House isn't backing down — noting that the city's 'been plagued by petty and violent crime for far too long,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.. US Park Police arrested more than half a dozen perps in the capital on charges including possession of stolen firearms and illicit drugs as part of a federal crackdown launched by the Trump administration Thursday to clean up the nation's capital. Eight culprits were arrested in the surge and two handguns were confiscated from offenders with prior felony convictions, Park Police Fraternal Order of Police chairman Kenneth Spencer told The Post Friday. At least 30 'fraudulent oxycodone pills' — which appeared to be fentanyl — were also seized, along with 210 grams of crack cocaine, 600 grams of marijuana, 64 grams of hashish oil and cash with a total value of $3,600, Spencer added. 3 The show of force was in part sparked by the assault of a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer who was beaten and bloodied by a mob of 10 minors last Sunday. Truth Social/@realDonaldTrump The show of force was in part sparked by the beating of a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer who was beaten and bloodied by a mob of 10 minors last Sunday as he thwarted a carjacking attempt in the nation's capital, according to DC police. Edward Coristine, whose LinkedIn handle earned him the nickname 'Big Balls' at DOGE, was with a woman near downtown DC when he saw the group of juveniles approach their car and 'make a comment about taking the vehicle. Trump and Coristine's former boss Elon Musk shared a photograph of the aftermath of the assault on Coristine early Tuesday afternoon, showing the former DOGE staffer sitting on the ground, bloodied and with his ripped shirt barely hanging on his body. Critics and residents have fired back at Trump's sweeping crackdown and removal of the homeless as inhumane. 'That money could be better spent getting folks housing and support,' Jesse Rabinowitz, campaign and communications director at the National Homelessness Law Center, told the Washington Post. It is not yet clear what exactly federal troops would do, but they could be deployed to protect federal agents or even carry out administrative tasks to free up law enforcement, officials said. With Post wires.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Reckless Assault on Remembrance
Americans will encounter the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 2026 through four distinct but intertwined forms of remembrance: commemoration, celebration, memory, and history. The four perspectives constantly shift and interconnect, often in surprising ways. Celebration recalls the highest ideals and greatest accomplishments of the nation's story, finding patriotism in common purpose and high ideals. It offers the appeal of parades and fireworks, festivals, and flags. Commemoration, on the other hand, is often solemn, asking for acknowledgment of what has been lost as well as gained, of sacrifice and theft, of forgetfulness and neglect. Memory, for its part, reflects on the ways personal lives interweave with the public events of the past, finding joy and sadness, pride and anger in family, place, and faith. History is dispassionate, built on careful investigation and documentation, on open-mindedness and skepticism. The four kinds of remembrance evoke conflicting emotions. Celebrants can find the sober tones of commemoration out of place, while displays of patriotic celebration can seem hollow and hypocritical to those who seek commemoration. People who identify with valued ancestors can find the clinical analysis of history an affront, while those who value documented history can find in memory a form of wishful thinking. Despite the intrinsic and unavoidable tensions among these different forms of remembering, Americans need each form of engagement with the past. No single approach can provide an understanding of the national past that is both affirming and honest. A vast and diverse democratic nation, with a history of both centuries of enslavement and triumph over global dictators, both the dispossession of a continent and bold struggles for rights by the oppressed, is held together by ideals that must transcend personal identity and yet make personal connection. A democracy must seek both cohesion and truth in its past. That is no simple task. We must expect, and even welcome, a perpetual debate over last half-century has seen the United States navigating this complicated landscape of memory in fraught ways. Scenes of conflict come to mind: football players kneeling during the national anthem, rioters invading the Capitol under flags of professed patriotism, Confederate names removed (and then restored) from military bases, protests in all 50 states in opposition to a president denounced as a would-be king. These scenes of conflict play out within, and often in reaction to, a far more expansive past than the nation has ever before possessed. A fuller American history has emerged over the last six decades in the nation's classrooms, museums, historic sites, and public programs. History museums, historic houses, and historical societies account for about half of all the nation's 35,000 museums in communities across the country. Those sites of memory range from a reconstructed cabin of Davy Crockett's childhood to the Vanderbilt family's Biltmore Estate, from Mark Twain's elegant home to the Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia, from the cabins of the enslaved to the ruins left by ancient nations in the Southwest, from the grand First Americans Museum in Oklahoma City to the gritty Tenement Museum in New York. Small museums present artifacts and stories in a cacophony of vernacular history meaningful to local people, while the Smithsonian Institution displays the vast collections of the nation in professionally orchestrated exhibits. Museums, archives, and libraries of all sizes eagerly share their treasures online for distant visitors. Volunteers do much of the work of preserving and sharing this American past. These citizens repair houses and restore cemeteries that would otherwise be lost to time. Unpaid docents give their time and knowledge to help create intimate and informed visitors' experiences even in Washington's greatest museums. Amateur genealogists share their discoveries with others and welcome discoveries in return. Devotees of classic cars and classic rock music sustain vibrant online and real-world communities, weaving their passions together and into the fabric of history. Veterans' groups recall lost comrades and long-ago victories that helped democracy live. Documented history merges with local memory on historical signs that enliven roads, streets, and parks. The Historical Marker Database records nearly 240,000 markers in places across the United States, the number growing by hundreds every month. The markers embrace an ever-broader and deeper understanding, telling stories long forgotten that deserve to be remembered wherever people might pause. School groups work with historical societies and historians, with state governments and private donors, to connect the landscape with these reminders of the past. The fuller American past would not flourish without Americans who take on the responsibilities of the past as careers. The historians of the National Park Service daily work at the boundaries of celebration and commemoration, on the borders of history and memory. They know that their devotion and years of continual education will not be repaid with high salaries and will sometimes be disrupted or even ended for political purposes. Across the nation at our historical parks, sites, battlefields, and more, interpreters from the NPS explain the complexities of American history to visitors of all political persuasions, without favor or evasion. Park historians work at the birthplace of 'The Star-Spangled Banner' and the Japanese internment camps in California. They interpret ancient archaeological sites and the three locations of the 9/11 attacks. Their work is inspiring and essential. Much of the work that sustains remembrance takes place out of public sight. The National Endowment for the Humanities, founded by Congress in 1965, has sponsored nearly 70,000 projects in every state of the union. The endowment has supported major efforts of national and enduring impact, such as the papers of the Founders and the films of Ken Burns, but much of the funding from the NEH consists of small grants distributed, after rigorous nonpartisan review, through state humanities councils to local museums, schools, nonprofits, and writers. Those funds promote folklore and film, exhibits and enactments, documentary collections and innovative research. All 56 state councils, in red states and blue, have provided their communities with lectures, conferences, and exhibits through support from the NEH. The most important caretakers of American remembrance are the hundreds of thousands of social studies teachers in every community in the nation. Every day, these teachers shoulder great responsibilities as the allies of young people. They explain matters of moral and political complexity to children struggling to comprehend who they are and where they fit in the American story. It is in the nation's classrooms that children come to understand ideals, memories, and historical truths larger than themselves. Networks of cooperation and collaboration unite the teachers of social studies and history, who come together by the thousands at conferences, workshops, and online gatherings to bolster their own intellectual lives and share strategies successful in their own classrooms. Networks of nonprofits help teachers by providing resources to enrich their teaching. Among the most successful has been National History Day, a nonpartisan entity that has for 50 years encouraged students and teachers to study the past 'to inform the present and shape the future.' Students from sixth to twelfth grade integrate historical context, multiple perspectives, historical accuracy, historical significance, and historical argument. The projects start in schools, 'public, private, parochial, charter, or homeschool,' and are improved through revision and additional research. The winning projects compete among 3,000 students, exploring every aspect of American history. National History Day has united teachers and students nationwide in memorable shared efforts to explore the national a result of these and related efforts, more Americans today experience U.S. history in more ways than any generation before. A broader range of people appear as shapers of the nation's story and are represented in more ways. The result has not been a dilution or weakening of patriotism but its strengthening. We are living in what could be, and should be, embraced as a time of unprecedented national self-discovery. Instead, the hard-won gains of the last half-century are now under concentrated attack. With a political agenda framed as a recovery of a lost mythical history, the Trump administration, its political allies in the states, and its promoters in the media relentlessly attack any form of remembrance that does not align with their vision of the nation's past. They have commandeered institutions traditionally held above partisan favor and charged with preserving the nation's most cherished memories: the Library of Congress, the National Archives, and the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery. They have issued edicts to the National Park Service to post signs with QR codes inviting visitors to report anything that 'inappropriately disparages Americans past or living' and does not celebrate 'the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people.' The current regime has launched a systematic effort to make each form of remembrance into what they declare it should be. Its forms of celebration militarize patriotism. Its commemoration devolves into a garden of heroic statues. Its memory intentionally forgets Pride Month. Its history curricula portray American history as a zero-sum game in which the representation of more people must diminish the significance of others, in which frank acknowledgment of wrong destroys young people's love for their nation. The regime narrows history under the guise of rigor and merit, often with disdain for teachers' insights. The assaults on remembrance have weakened the nation's capacity for meaningful engagement with its history as the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence approaches. Just as Americans have begun to explore a shared past far richer and more widely presented than any previous generation has known, remembrance has been damaged with a recklessness few imagined possible. While the great American traditions of volunteerism, local mobilization, and selfless devotion to the public good will sustain remembrance as best they can, institutions of remembrance must be rebuilt on firm and enduring foundations. That will require renewed federal support for national institutions, state-level reform of educational governance to empower teachers and students, and dedication to history and memory that local organizations can best sustain. Philanthropic and civic organizations must step up to promote a fuller remembrance of the nation's past. Future Americans will remember these years as a critical test of whether the nation allowed itself to forget its highest ideals. As we enjoy ceremonies in 2026, we might also recall that celebration without commemoration is vanity, that flattering memory without truthful history is self-delusion. The Declaration of Independence reckoned with wrongs of the past to open the new nation to ideals of equality. We honor that document when we extend and expand its principles, when we remember all the people who have made our country.