How a Kenyan NGO has saved over 24,000 sea turtles from nets, poachers and plastic
WATAMU (Kenya), June 8 — A small charity on the Kenyan coast has become vital to the region's majestic turtle population, saving thousands from poachers, fishermen's nets and ever-worsening plastic pollution.
On the beach of the seaside town of Watamu, it takes four men to heave the huge Loggerhead sea turtle into the back of a car.
She has just been saved from a fishing tackle and will be taken to a nearby clinic to be checked for injuries, then weighed, tagged and released back into the sea.
A Kenyan NGO, Local Ocean Conservation (LOC), has been doing this work for almost three decades and has carried out some 24,000 rescues.
'Every time I release a turtle, it's a really great joy for me. My motivation gets stronger and stronger,' said Fikiri Kiponda, 47, who has been part of LOC's 20-odd staff for 16 years.
LOC began life in 1997 as a group of volunteers who hated seeing the creatures being eaten or dying in nets.
Turtles are still poached for their shells, meat and oil.
But through the charity's awareness campaigns in schools and villages, 'perceptions have significantly changed', said Kiponda.
LOC, which relies mostly on donations, compensates fishermen for bringing them injured turtles.
More than 1,000 fishermen participate in the scheme and mostly do so for the sake of conservation, the charity emphasises, since the reward does not offset the hours of lost labour.
Floating turtles
At the NGO's nearby clinic, health coordinator Lameck Maitha, 34, says turtles are often treated for broken bones and tumours caused by a disease called Fibropapillomatosis.
One current in-patient is Safari, a young Olive Ridley turtle around 15 years old — turtles can live beyond 100 — transported by plane from further up the coast.
She arrived in a dire state, barely alive and with a bone protruding from her flipper, which ultimately had to be amputated — likely the result of fighting to free herself from a fisherman's net.
Safari has been recovering well and the clinic hopes she can return to the sea.
Other frequent tasks include removing barnacles that embed themselves in shells and flippers, weakening their host.
But a growing danger is plastic pollution.
On the beach of the seaside town of Watamu, it takes four men to heave the huge Loggerhead sea turtle into the back of a car. — AFP pic
If a turtle eats plastic, it can create a blockage that in turn creates gas, making the turtle float and unable to dive.
In these cases, the clinic gives the turtle laxatives to clear out its system.
'We are seeing more and more floating turtles because the ocean has so much plastic,' said Maitha.
Survivors
LOC also works to protect 50 to 100 nesting sites, threatened by rising sea levels.
Turtles travel far and wide but always lay their eggs on the beach where they were born, and Watamu is one of the most popular spots.
Every three or four years, they produce hundreds of eggs, laid during multiple sessions over several months, that hatch after around 60 days.
The charity often relocates eggs that have been laid too close to the sea.
Marine biologist Joey Ngunu, LOC's technical manager, always calls the first to appear Kevin.
'And once Kevin comes out, the rest follow,' he said with a smile, describing the slow, clumsy procession to the water, preferably at night to avoid predators as much as possible.
Only one in a thousand reaches adulthood of 20-25 years.
'Living in the sea as a turtle must be crazy. You have to face so many dangers, fish and poachers, and now human pressure with plastic and commercial fishing,' he said.
'Turtles are definitely survivors.' — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
21 hours ago
- Malay Mail
How a Kenyan NGO has saved over 24,000 sea turtles from nets, poachers and plastic
WATAMU (Kenya), June 8 — A small charity on the Kenyan coast has become vital to the region's majestic turtle population, saving thousands from poachers, fishermen's nets and ever-worsening plastic pollution. On the beach of the seaside town of Watamu, it takes four men to heave the huge Loggerhead sea turtle into the back of a car. She has just been saved from a fishing tackle and will be taken to a nearby clinic to be checked for injuries, then weighed, tagged and released back into the sea. A Kenyan NGO, Local Ocean Conservation (LOC), has been doing this work for almost three decades and has carried out some 24,000 rescues. 'Every time I release a turtle, it's a really great joy for me. My motivation gets stronger and stronger,' said Fikiri Kiponda, 47, who has been part of LOC's 20-odd staff for 16 years. LOC began life in 1997 as a group of volunteers who hated seeing the creatures being eaten or dying in nets. Turtles are still poached for their shells, meat and oil. But through the charity's awareness campaigns in schools and villages, 'perceptions have significantly changed', said Kiponda. LOC, which relies mostly on donations, compensates fishermen for bringing them injured turtles. More than 1,000 fishermen participate in the scheme and mostly do so for the sake of conservation, the charity emphasises, since the reward does not offset the hours of lost labour. Floating turtles At the NGO's nearby clinic, health coordinator Lameck Maitha, 34, says turtles are often treated for broken bones and tumours caused by a disease called Fibropapillomatosis. One current in-patient is Safari, a young Olive Ridley turtle around 15 years old — turtles can live beyond 100 — transported by plane from further up the coast. She arrived in a dire state, barely alive and with a bone protruding from her flipper, which ultimately had to be amputated — likely the result of fighting to free herself from a fisherman's net. Safari has been recovering well and the clinic hopes she can return to the sea. Other frequent tasks include removing barnacles that embed themselves in shells and flippers, weakening their host. But a growing danger is plastic pollution. On the beach of the seaside town of Watamu, it takes four men to heave the huge Loggerhead sea turtle into the back of a car. — AFP pic If a turtle eats plastic, it can create a blockage that in turn creates gas, making the turtle float and unable to dive. In these cases, the clinic gives the turtle laxatives to clear out its system. 'We are seeing more and more floating turtles because the ocean has so much plastic,' said Maitha. Survivors LOC also works to protect 50 to 100 nesting sites, threatened by rising sea levels. Turtles travel far and wide but always lay their eggs on the beach where they were born, and Watamu is one of the most popular spots. Every three or four years, they produce hundreds of eggs, laid during multiple sessions over several months, that hatch after around 60 days. The charity often relocates eggs that have been laid too close to the sea. Marine biologist Joey Ngunu, LOC's technical manager, always calls the first to appear Kevin. 'And once Kevin comes out, the rest follow,' he said with a smile, describing the slow, clumsy procession to the water, preferably at night to avoid predators as much as possible. Only one in a thousand reaches adulthood of 20-25 years. 'Living in the sea as a turtle must be crazy. You have to face so many dangers, fish and poachers, and now human pressure with plastic and commercial fishing,' he said. 'Turtles are definitely survivors.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
3 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
In a hotter future, what comes after coral reefs die?
When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve. (AFP pic) PARIS : The fate of coral reefs has been written with a degree of certainty rare in climate science: at 1.5°C of global warming, most are expected to die. This is not a far-off scenario. Scientists predict that the rise of 1.5 Celsius will be reached within a decade and that beyond that point, many coral simply cannot survive. It is important to accept this and ask what next 'rather than trying to hold onto the past', said David Obura, chair of IPBES, the UN's expert scientific panel on biodiversity. 'I wish it were different,' Obura, a Kenyan reef scientist and founding director of CORDIO East Africa, a marine research organisation, told AFP. 'We need to be pragmatic about it and ask those questions, and face up to what the likely future will be.' And yet, it is a subject few marine scientists care to dwell on. 'We are having a hard time imagining that all coral reefs really could die off,' said Melanie McField, a Caribbean reef expert, who described a 'sort of pre-traumatic stress syndrome' among her colleagues. 'But it is likely in the two-degree world we are rapidly accelerating to,' McField, founding director of the Healthy Reefs for Healthy People Initiative, told AFP. When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve. At 1.5°C of warming relative to pre-industrial times, between 70-90% of coral reefs are expected to perish, according to the IPCC, the global authority on climate science. At 2°C, that number rises to 99%. Even with warming as it stands today – about 1.4°C – mass coral death is occurring, and many scientists believe the global collapse of tropical reefs may already be underway. What comes next Obura said it was not pessimistic to imagine a world without coral reefs, but an urgent question that scientists were 'only just starting to grapple with'. 'I see no reason to not be clear about where we are at this point in time,' Obura said. 'Let's be honest about that, and deal with the consequences.' Rather than disappear completely, coral reefs as they exist today will likely evolve into something very different, marine scientists on four continents told AFP. This would happen as slow-growing hard corals – the primary reef builders that underpin the ecosystem – die off, leaving behind white skeletons without living tissue. Gradually, these would be covered by algae and colonised by simpler organisms better able to withstand hotter oceans, like sponges, mussels, and weedy soft corals like sea fans. 'There will be less winners than there are losers,' said Tom Dallison, a marine scientist and strategic advisor to the International Coral Reef Initiative. These species would dominate this new underwater world. The dead coral beneath – weakened by ocean acidification, and buffeted by waves and storms – would erode over time into rubble. 'They will still exist, but they will just look very different. It is our responsibility to ensure the services they provide, and those that depend on them, are protected,' Dallison said. Dark horizon One quarter of all ocean species live among the world's corals. Smaller, sparser, less biodiverse reefs simply means fewer fish and other marine life. The collapse of reefs threatens in particular the estimated one billion people who rely on them for food, tourism income, and protection from coastal erosion and storms. But if protected and managed properly, these post-coral reefs could still be healthy, productive, attractive ecosystems that provide some economic benefit, said Obura. So far, the picture is fuzzy – research into this future has been very limited. Stretched resources have been prioritised for protecting coral and exploring novel ways to make reefs more climate resilient. But climate change is not the only thing threatening corals. Tackling pollution, harmful subsidies, overfishing and other drivers of coral demise would give 'the remaining places the best possible chance of making it through whatever eventual warming we have', Obura said. Conservation and restoration efforts were 'absolutely essential' but alone were like 'pushing a really heavy ball up a hill, and that hill is getting steeper', he added. Trying to save coral reefs 'is going to be extremely difficult' as long as we keep pouring carbon into the atmosphere, said Jean-Pierre Gattuso, an oceans expert from France's flagship scientific research institute, CNRS. But some coral had developed a level of thermal tolerance, he said, and research into restoring small reef areas with these resilient strains held promise. 'How do we work in this space when you have this sort of big dark event on the horizon? It's to make that dark event a little brighter,' said Dallison.
Free Malaysia Today
5 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rock stacking trend can be harmful to wildlife
Rock stacking can be harmful to animals, plants, and the soil in natural ecosystems. (Envato Elements pic) PARIS : If you're planning a hike in the mountains soon and feel the urge to pick up rocks, pile them up and post your creation on Instagram, think again. This trend, known as 'rock balancing,' 'cairns,' 'rock stacking' or 'stone stacking' may be all the rage on Instagram, but it can have very real consequences for the flora and fauna that populate mountain waterways. Back in 2020, Australian ecologist Nick Clemann, issued a warning about the dangers of such formations to a particular skink lizard in a report by Australian media outlet ABC News. In Australia and elsewhere in the world, rocks form the habitat of these small reptiles and other animal species. Moving them therefore means depriving them of their shelter, which can directly threaten their survival. In France, too, the practice is being called out. In 2022, the website of the Parc national des Calanques, a national park located on the Mediterranean coast in Southern France, published a press release sounding the alarm. A number of animal and plant species in this sublime natural setting – but heavily affected by overtourism – are suffering as a result of rock stacking, notably the Tarentola mauritanica, or common wall gecko, the European yellow-tailed scorpion and the Sabline de Provence, a plant endemic to the region. But that's not all: 'By removing stones along a pathway, the soil is left bare, leading to severe erosion until the bedrock is reached,' the news release explains. While the release states that its aim is to raise awareness rather than punish what appears to be a harmless act, it nevertheless points out that building cairns in the park can result in a fine of €135. National parks and mountain trails are not, of course, the only ecosystems affected. Picking up, moving, or stacking rocks or pebbles is punishable by a fine of €1,500 along the entire French coastline, as the government explains on its official website. Meanwhile, in the past month, the issue has been brought to the fore once more, with tourists and locals in the area of Lake Tekapo, New Zealand speaking out about the practice. While on this particular site, there is some disagreement about its direct impact on the ecosystem, the practice is being criticised for its disruption of the natural setting. Described as 'environmental vandalism' by one resident in a report by Radio New Zealand, it's yet another example of tensions surrounding sites of natural beauty and how they are being affected by social media-driven tourism. While it is obviously not forbidden to capture the breathtaking landscapes that you sometimes discover after hours of walking, there are practical and simple ways to enjoy the wonders of nature without harming it. National parks and other marked trails are generally subject to strict regulations, which are posted on signs in strategic locations for visitors. You should always read these carefully before setting off on a walk. Another golden rule to help you preserve the biodiversity of the place you're exploring is to 'leave nothing but footprints.' This advice applies to litter, building cairns, and even lovers who might be tempted to carve their initials into a tree or rock! The 'leave-no-trace' principle of outdoor exploration is also espoused by experts in the US, cited in a recent article, who have labelled the proliferation of cairns an aspect of 'visual pollution' in a natural landscape. Furthermore, cairns may have an important meaning in certain cultures whether as a traditional wayfinding approach or imbued with spiritual meaning, and thus stacking stones 'for fun' can potentially be seen as creating confusion or even offensive.
