logo
Martin Lewis: Anyone with children born 1978-2010 may be owed thousands by HMRC

Martin Lewis: Anyone with children born 1978-2010 may be owed thousands by HMRC

Martin Lewis has sounded the alarm for anyone who had children between 1978 and 2010, as they "may be owed thousands" by HMRC. The Money Saving Expert has revealed that a significant number of individuals could be in line for a substantial payout from HMRC due to a "State Pension error".
Those who took career breaks from 1978 to 2010 to care for children or someone with a long-term disability might be entitled to a refund because of Government underpayments.
The issue arises from potential gaps in National Insurance contributions, which could lead to a reduced State Pension if you were eligible for 'Home Responsibilities Protection' but did not receive it.
In a recent post on X, Mr Lewis highlighted: "State Pension error! Did you take time off work (1978 to 2010) to look after children or someone with long term disability? You could be owed £10,000s", reports the Manchester Evening News.
"In brief: 100,000s wrongly have Nat Insurance gaps that reduce your State Pension as they should've got 'Home Responsibilities Protection'. The Govt was contacting people, but isn't any longer. Thus the onus is on YOU to proactively check."
He went on to explain one case where a woman received an incredible £31,000 back from HMRC.
The money-saving guru added: "Cilla emailed us, 'I've just received 15yrs' back pay from HMRC of £31,674 for underpayment of my pension.'"
It comes after recent figures revealed there is more than £800 million owed by the government in State Pension underpayments.
The figures come after the DWP announced in 2021 that they would be checking hundreds of thousands of pension records to see if people have been underpaid.
One of the State Pension correction exercises it is looking into is the missing historic periods of HRP. Between January 8 and September 30, 2024, the exercise identified 5,344 underpayments, with total arrears of around £42 million.
Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, who has been exposing State Pension errors, said the amounts paid out under the current HRP exercise are expected to rise sharply as it gathers momentum.
A previous HRP correction exercise over a decade ago led to State Pension arrears payments of £83 million.
Sir Steve, who is now a partner at consultants LCP (Lane Clark and Peacock), said: "The vast majority of those who lost were women, some of whom were underpaid for decades or even went to their grave never paid the right State Pension.
"The remaining corrections need to be handled as a matter of urgency. This should never be allowed to happen again."
Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, said: "This is one of the biggest benefit scandals of modern times. DWP miscalculations have left thousands of pensioners – mainly women – short on their State Pension payments.
"It is absolutely critical all those affected by this scandal receive the money they are owed as quickly and efficiently as possible."
A DWP spokesperson said: "Our priority is ensuring pensioners receive the dignity and security they deserve in retirement and that State Pension underpayment rates remain as low as possible.
"We have now completed the vast majority of cases in the exercise as planned with a small number of outstanding cases due to further documentation needed from the customer."
The DWP recently said that it is expecting to resolve all remaining State Pension underpayment cases by the end of March 2027.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HMRC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300
HMRC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300

Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

HMRC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300

The tax authority said it will continue in its efforts to raise awareness of the issue HMRC has spoken out about its campaign to contact people who could be owed thousands of pounds in state pension payments. The group has been writing to people who may have been underpaid due to missing Home Responsibilities Protection from their National Insurance record. ‌ The average arrears payment was £8,377, as of March 2025. Consumer advocate Martin Lewis, founder of Money Saving Expert, recently urged people to check if they were owed cash because of the issue, particularly as HMRC has now stopped writing to people who may be affected. ‌ HMRC was asked for an update on its work to contact those who may have been affected. ‌ A government spokesperson said: "We're determined to help people who've been left out of pocket due to historical errors which are no fault of their own. "That's why we wrote to more than 370,000 people potentially affected, and launched an online tool to help people check if they can claim. "We ran an extensive campaign to raise awareness of the issue and will continue regular communications to get people to check their National Insurance record." ‌ What was the Home Responsibilities Protection scheme? Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) was a scheme that ran from 1978 to 2010. It was designed to make sure your National Insurance (NI) contributions were added to your record, which helps build up your state pension entitlement, in cases where a person was out of working caring for a child or for a sick or disabled person. In some cases, HRP was missing from people's records, meaning their NI contributions and subsequent state pension payments were lower than they should have been. This issue mostly affects women who took time out of work to raise their children, but anyone who otherwise cared for a person during this period could be affected. ‌ If you think you were missing HRP, you can apply for it to be added to your record on the Government website. HMRC was also asked to explain what happens when HRP is added to someone's NI record. The group said: "If someone has a period of HRP added as a result of an application, first HMRC will determine the number of years of National Insurance that should be added to their record. " DWP will then apply this to the individual's state pension eligibility and determine what impact (if any) it will have on their state pension payments." If you apply for HRP and you disagree with the decision and how it affects your state pension, if the dispute relates to the number of years on your record, you should contact HMRC. If the issue relates to your state pension entitlement, you should contact DWP.

Readers' Letters: Wind farm could mean loss of Scottish bird species
Readers' Letters: Wind farm could mean loss of Scottish bird species

Scotsman

time10 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: Wind farm could mean loss of Scottish bird species

Scottish Government backing for a massive windfarm off North Berwick didn't have a single correspondent on side Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It's an amazing experience to go on a boat trip to see the puffins and world-famous colony of gannets on Bass Rock. The Scottish Government has approved the Berwick Bank offshore wind farm, one of the largest wind farms in the world, which they acknowledge will affect the birds. It is off the coast of the seabirds colonies of St Abb's Head, too. The developer predicts 31,000 collisions during its 30-year life span. I do not think it is possible to predict the behaviour of birds with such accuracy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When we moved to our cottage in 1992 we would have skeins of pink-footed geese over our cottage in spring and autumn. Gladhouse Reservoir was made a Ramsar site because of the numbers there. My parents marvelled at the sight when they visited In 1999. In 2002 Bowbeat wind farm was built in the Moorfoot Hills on the flight path and we have not seen skeins from that direction for many years, and the Gladhouse numbers are now low – so much so that the RSPB could not put in an objection to the 18-turbine, 180m high Torfichen windfarm, near Gladhouse, on pink foot grounds but had to rely on other species. A view of the proposed wind farm site from St Abb's Head (Picture: National Trust for Scotland / Rachel Bonnici) How can we justify such a large experiment when Scotland is world famous for these species and we already have enough wind power for our own needs? Celia Hobbs, Penicuik, Midlothian Shot in foot? The decision in principle by the Scottish Government to grant planning permission for a completely unnecessary massive offshore wind farm (Berwick Bank) to be constructed in an environmentally sensitive location frankly beggars belief, especially given the scale of the well-judged opposition, which has simply been ignored. The irony is that Holyrood is currently contemplating the introduction of an Ecocide Bill, at the very time that the Scottish Government is complicit in ecocide committed by renewable energy companies on an ever-expanding scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We note that 'SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds to be approved by ministers", but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. What will their proposed 'mitigation' provide? It is to be hoped that it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic terns, hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for a deliberate act of ecocide that should never have been granted permission The Scottish Government may well have shot themselves in the foot. Even people who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant in the name of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson, Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor, East Renfrewshire Strange silence There is a deafening silence from Holyrood over the unit cost of electricity from Berwick Bank. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are non-stop claims that the output is the cheapest electricity generation system in the UK, but what the SNP Energy Secretary refuses to admit is that the party have taken out three 'insurance policies' to keep the lights on in Scotland as wind output is both unreliable and inefficient. The first 'policy' is the myriad battery units required to ensure grid stability during short lulls in wind speed (over a period of minutes). The second is the output from pump store plant to cover a lack of wind over a time period of about six hours. The last is the proposed 25GW of hydrogen-fuelled gas turbines to cover for dunkelflaute weather conditions. Why, then, do our 129 MSPs refuse to inform the people of Scotland of the unit cost of wind output that includes the capital repayment and operational running costs of the three projects? Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Botched Whatever one thinks of the Berwick Bank wind farm project, we can only hope the rights auction is open so as to maximise revenue. A few years ago the SNP horribly botched the ScotWind auction, losing the public coffers a whopping £15 billion, the equivalent of more than £3,000 per adult in Scotland! George Morton, Rosyth, Fife Not so bonny Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Our beautiful country used to be called 'Bonny Scotland'. Nowadays, it would be more apt to call it 'Pylon-ny Scotland'. Please, please rid us of these horrible eyesores. John MacKay, Cumbernauld, Dunbartonshire Legal focus Veteran nurse Sandie Peggie, who was suspended by NHS Fife for objecting to the presence of a male-born, female-identifying doctor in a female changing room while she was undressing, has enjoyed a groundswell of public support. However, NHS Fife's lawyer, Jane Russell KC, produced two witnesses, both former colleagues and friends. Their evidence mainly focused on Ms Peggie's presumed character based on some politically incorrect banter at some point in the past. Ms Peggie actually didn't deny this and admits it was in bad taste. Arguably Ms Russell's detailed questions about Sandie Peggie's menstrual flow and who is paying for her case weren't exactly tasteful either. Yet nothing of this should deflect from the matter at hand. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What the judges will have to decide is not whether Ms Peggie 'deserved' to be suspended due to her supposedly flawed character. They will decide whether NHS Fife acted fairly and lawfully when suspending a nurse for insisting on her sex-based rights, no more, no less. Their conclusion will ultimately guide public perception of the case. Regina Erich, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Terrible talk I'd just like to say well done Anas Sarwar for saying what every decent person in Scotland is thinking. The alleged racist language of Sandy Peggie is horrific and highly offensive. Politicians Joanna Cherry and Murdo Fraser, who have both spoken in support of Ms Peggie since these allegations were made public, should hang their heads in shame for failing to speak out against these racist statements and offensive jokes. Alexander Lunn, Edinburgh Oust the SNP So, it seems that as a result of Donald Trump's visit to Scotland, First Minister John Swinney has decided he has an 'updated strategy' for achieving Scottish independence. More fool him! He has conveniently forgotten that the UK Supreme Court's ruling was quite clear in that 'there can only be another referendum on such a matter if the UK Government agrees! Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As is obvious to most folks, except for diehard SNP followers, Mr Swinney is deluded in his quest for an independent Scotland. If the efforts of Alex Salmond, and his prodigy Nicola Sturgeon, failed to convince the people of Scotland that independence would be to their advantage, then John Swinney is on a hiding to nothing campaign in respect of Scottish independence. The Holyrood elections in May 2026 will hopefully see off the SNP for a very long period. Let us hope that whatever alliance of political parties is needed to achieve this objective, we will see radical changes put into effect at Holyrood, and at local council levels. Fellow Scots, let us all be fully supportive of whatever alliance of political parties is needed to oust the SNP. Unless radical changes are put into effect at Holyrood, then the only answer to Scotland's political dilemma is to return all political powers to Westminster. Hopefully that will not be our only option! Robert IG Scott, Northfield, Ceres, Fife Good call I congratulate Foysol Choudhury for his article in The Scotsman, 'Staying silent over Gaza risks complicity in war crimes, even in Scotland' (Perspective, 1 August). He confirms 'the right of every person to live free from fear, violence and oppression and there must be immediate international action to stop the violence, protect civilians, and hold those responsible to account'. It's rare for a Labour MSP to call out and criticise Hamas. Lewis Finnie, Edinburgh An apology Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a beleaguered American citizen, I first want to apologise to the Scots for inflicting Donald Trump upon you, and the world. Secondly, my profound thanks and blessings on your heads for your protests, marches, signs, etc displayed during his visit. You cannot imagine how reassuring it was to know that we are not alone, that good people in Scotland also agree and support us, even when we sometimes feel our voices are lost in the wind. C Root, Flagstaff, Arizona Historic pun According to the US President, Nicola Sturgeon was a terrible First Minister (your report, 31 July). Can this be the latest 'Blast of the Trump against the Monstruous Regiment of Women'? Peter Freshwater, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

HRMC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300
HRMC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300

Daily Mirror

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

HRMC update on letters going out over state pension back payments worth £8,300

The tax authority said it will continue in its efforts to raise awareness of the issue HMRC has spoken out about its campaign to contact people who could be owed thousands of pounds in state pension payments. The group has been writing to people who may have been underpaid due to missing Home Responsibilities Protection from their National Insurance record. ‌ The average arrears payment was £8,377, as of March 2025. Consumer advocate Martin Lewis, founder of Money Saving Expert, recently urged people to check if they were owed cash because of the issue, particularly as HMRC has now stopped writing to people who may be affected. ‌ HMRC was asked for an update on its work to contact those who may have been affected. ‌ A government spokesperson said: "We're determined to help people who've been left out of pocket due to historical errors which are no fault of their own. "That's why we wrote to more than 370,000 people potentially affected, and launched an online tool to help people check if they can claim. "We ran an extensive campaign to raise awareness of the issue and will continue regular communications to get people to check their National Insurance record." ‌ What was the Home Responsibilities Protection scheme? Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) was a scheme that ran from 1978 to 2010. It was designed to make sure your National Insurance (NI) contributions were added to your record, which helps build up your state pension entitlement, in cases where a person was out of working caring for a child or for a sick or disabled person. In some cases, HRP was missing from people's records, meaning their NI contributions and subsequent state pension payments were lower than they should have been. This issue mostly affects women who took time out of work to raise their children, but anyone who otherwise cared for a person during this period could be affected. ‌ If you think you were missing HRP, you can apply for it to be added to your record on the Government website. HMRC was also asked to explain what happens when HRP is added to someone's NI record. The group said: "If someone has a period of HRP added as a result of an application, first HMRC will determine the number of years of National Insurance that should be added to their record. " DWP will then apply this to the individual's state pension eligibility and determine what impact (if any) it will have on their state pension payments." If you apply for HRP and you disagree with the decision and how it affects your state pension, if the dispute relates to the number of years on your record, you should contact HMRC. If the issue relates to your state pension entitlement, you should contact DWP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store