Social Security wants to make a change that would cause 3.4 million more people to have to visit its field offices
According to a regulatory filing, the SSA aims to expand the use of multi-step verification to generate a personal identification number (PIN) in order for beneficiaries to make changes to their address, check the status of claims, request benefit-verification letters or ask for tax forms by phone. If a beneficiary can't handle the PIN process, they would be required to make the changes online or at a field office.
Social Security wants to make a change that would cause 3.4 million more people to have to visit its field offices
Josh Hawley's $600 rebates bill shows why Republicans win
Why is Meta's stock soaring after earnings? It's about far more than the numbers.
UPDATE: Social Security now says online-authentication rules will be encouraged — but 'entirely optional'
By the SSA's own estimate in the filing, that would mean 3.4 million more visits to field offices each year. The change is slated to take effect on Aug. 18 if approved by the Trump administration's Office of Management and Budget, according to the regulatory filing.
'This will create a significant new burden, particularly for those who live in rural areas or have transportation or mobility difficulties,' Kathleen Romig, the director of Social Security and disability policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), wrote in blog post. 'The Trump administration is rushing these changes with almost no public notice or feedback.'
The number of additional beneficiaries going to field offices comes on top of the 1.9 million people required to travel to field offices to change their direct-deposit banking information.
Read: A Social Security office visit in the 'DOGE' era finds fearful, uneasy visitors wondering if the place is staying open
A recent CBPP study found that nearly a quarter of older adults live more than an hour's drive round-trip from their nearest field office. AARP said that some beneficiaries in Alaska would need to travel by plane to reach their nearest SSA office.
The SSA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In making the request to expand the PIN process, the SSA cited fraud as the reason for the multi-step verification process. It did not provide any numbers of cases of fraud in the regulatory filing.
'AARP supports efforts to strengthen fraud prevention and identity verification. However, we are concerned that SSA's new Security Authentication PIN (SAP) process, particularly its expansion to additional telephone services, could create new barriers for older adults who rely on telephone access to manage their Social Security benefits,' Nancy LeaMond, AARP's executive vice president and chief advocacy officer, said in a statement.
The SSA, in its request, said beneficiaries could make the changes online, but that would present other challenges, AARP said.
'Our experience shows that the option to verify identity online will be a challenge for the one in four older adults who report never going online. Creating an online 'My Social Security' account can be a complicated process for people who are uncomfortable with online systems or do not have reliable internet access,' LeaMond said.
The potential change comes as the SSA has cut 7,000 jobs, or 12% of its workforce, closed regional offices and suffered website outages and AI phone glitches.
If such a policy change was implemented, it would flood field offices at a time when the agency has reassigned about 1,000 field-office employees to answer SSA's national 800 number, according to media reports.
Catch up: Social Security's new commissioner, rule reversals and cost cuts: Here's everything that's happening at the agency
Comcast could see its heaviest internet-subscriber losses ever. Then what?
Why the man behind 'The Hater's Guide to the AI Bubble' thinks Wall Street's hottest trade will go bust
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
a minute ago
- CNET
We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart
It's back-to-school season and for many, this is a great time to reset and refocus on academic and personal goals. If you're into fitness and want to keep better track of your step count, then you know that Apple and Samsung dominate the smartwatch sector. Though these tech companies make great wearable pieces, Garmin is also behind some pretty neat smartwatches. Right now we've spotted the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch for just $264 at Walmart, which saves you a massive $136. If you prefer Amazon, you an score the same watch for $264 with Amazon Prime. Though there's no set deadline for either of these deals, we suggest acting fast if you're interested. The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch has a 45mm case and its watch band adjusts from 5.3 inches to up to 9.1 inches. The watch features multiple apps that track your step count, VO2 max and other sports activities so you can get an accurate picture of your progress. The Garmin Instinct 2 smartwatch includes a 3-axis compass and navigation programs, such as GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, which offer advanced readings that let you confidently trek in challenging environments. You can also sync this watch with a compatible smartphone and get notifications. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. The Garmin Instinct 2 is renowned for its solar charging capacity and long battery life of up to 54 hours. Keep in mind that you need a clear sky for at least 3 hours for a solar charge, but this is still a great watch for days-long hiking or outdoor adventures. Its power manager helps you track battery life, and your purchase includes a charging cable for when solar charging is unavailable. Looking for more wearable tech but not sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best smartwatch so you can find one that works for you. Why this deal matters The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch offers a battery life of 54 hours, solar charging capacity and loads of apps that will help you track your fitness statistics. It's a massive $136 off at Walmart for a limited time and makes a great alternative to Apple or Samsung smartwatches if you've been looking for one. Now is also a great time to save on this smartwatch and potentially avoid price hikes due to tariffs.
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
Office Hellscapes And AI Process Mapping
Why are human workplaces so disorganized? In some ways, it's a question people have been asking themselves ever since the first cubicle dwellers rose up from the primordial swamp - whenever that was. We know that larger systems tend to be disordered, especially if they're administrated by humans. Just go read Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, and it might remind you of the modern office – people and products and materials strewn about a gigantic footprint, with very little centralized control. You get the same kind of idea reading the most recent piece by Ethan Mollick on the site where he posts his essays, One Useful Thing. I always follow his posts, interested in his emerging take on the technologies that are so new to all of us. Mollick has MIT ties, and an excellent track record looking at the AI revolution from a fresh perspective. The Office Dilemma Human wothis most recent piece, he talks about process mapping and how AI can help people to sort through the disorganization of a business. Think of a company with 100 or more employees, and probably a dozen locations. The first thing you tend to find is that sense of disorder. Mollick talks about a 'Garbage Can' principle, which posits that most businesses are a collection of disparate processes thrown into a large, disorganized bin. To me, you could use the analogy of what programmers used to call 'DLL hell' in the earlier days of the Internet. DLLs are digital libraries. Their application was often chaotic and disordered. There were dependencies that would flummox even the most seasoned engineers, because things were complicated and chaotic. That's what a large company is often like. Everyone for Themselves Mollick also pointed to some numbers that I've seen in various studies, and presented at conferences where we've talked about AI over the past year. His number was 43% – the number of employees who are using AI in the workplace. But as Mollick points out, and as I've heard before, most of them are using AI in personal ways. The use of the tools is not ordered across an organization – it's piecemeal. It's people using an AI tool like you would use a hammer, or a saw, or a drill, or a lathe --- largely in an unsupervised way. However, in general, it seems AI is largely catching on, especially when it comes to product development. You have resources like this one from the Texas Workforce Commission, referencing thousands of AI jobs. So even if there's not much centralized AI in the boardroom, there is abundant AI in business processes. It's just that those processes may or may not be unified. The Bitter Lesson Then Mollick references something called the 'Bitter lesson' that's attributed to Robert Sutton in 2019. It's the idea that AI will prove to be cognitively superior to humans without a lot of poking and prodding – but given enough time and compute, the system will find its own way to solve problems. That phrase, problem solving, is what people have been saying is the unique province of humans. It's the idea that AI can do the data-crunching, but people are still doing the creative problem-solving. Well, that bastion of human ingenuity doesn't seem that safe anymore. Mollick references the early days of chess machine evolution, where eventually Deep Blue beat Kasparov. He notes that there are two ways to go about this – you can program in innumerable chess rules, and have the system sort through them and apply them, or you can just show the system thousands of chess games, and it will make those connections on its own. Back to Machine Learning Principles Reading through this, I was reminded of the early days of machine learning, where people talked a good bit about supervised versus unsupervised learning. We often used the analogy of fruit in a digital software program enhanced with machine learning properties. Supervised learning would be labeling each fruit with its own tag – banana – apple - or grapes. The program would then learn to correlate between its training data and new real-world data. That comparison would be its main method. And that comparison isn't hugely cognitive. It follows the tradition of deterministic programming. The unsupervised version would be simply to tell the program that bananas are yellow and long, that grapes are purple or green and have clusters, and the apples are red or green and round. Then the system goes out, looks at the pictures and applies that logic. The interesting thing here is taking that analogy to the bitter lesson. Is AI more powerful if it simply analyzes reams of training data without applied logic? Or is it more powerful if it can actually distinguish between various kinds of outcomes based on requested logical processes? Which came first: the chicken or the egg? The theory of the bitter lesson seems to be that the system can actually do better through supervised learning. But that supervision doesn't necessarily have to be human oversight. The machine gets a practically infinite set of training data, and makes all of its own conclusions. That's contrasted to an approach where people tell the machine what to do, and it learns based on those suggestions. Back in the era of supervised versus unsupervised learning, the unsupervised learning seemed more powerful. It seemed more resource-intensive. But AI might finally show us up just by doing things in a more efficient way – if I can use one more analogy, it's the traditional idea of the Laplace demon, an invention of the physicist Pierre-Simon Laplace who suggested that if you know enough data points, you can predict the future. In other words, brute force programming is king. We learned a lot of this in the big data age, before we learned to use LLMs, and now we're seeing the big data age on steroids. In Conclusion I also found a very interesting take at the end of Mollick's essay where he talks about businesses going down one or the other avenue of progress. Sure enough, he suggested that these companies are playing chess with each other – that one of these chess teams consists of companies using AI to be logical, and that another chess team consists of businesses using it for brute force programming and classification. If all of this is a little hard to follow, it's because we're pretty securely in the realm of AI philosophy here. It makes you think about not just whether AI is going to win out over human workers, but how it's going to do it. I forgot to mention the exponential graph that Mollick includes showing that we're closer to AGI then most people would imagine. Let's look back at the end of this year and see how this plays out.
CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Several former Justice Department attorneys seek elected office — some to fight policies enacted by Trump
Ryan Crosswell's campaign for a U.S. House seat features the hallmarks of many traditional political operations. His website shows him in shirtsleeves talking about his military service and growing up in a coal town. His campaign video features images of the nearby Pennsylvania community of Pottsville, festooned in red, white and blue bunting. His campaign advisers circulate copies of a political advocacy group's endorsement. Crosswell talks about knocking on doors and meeting voters, one of whom Crosswell said is "struggling and may need to sell her house." But, unlike many congressional candidates, Crosswell has no campaign experience and has never worked in politics. He's one of several former Justice Department attorneys and officials seeking public office after resigning from an agency they say has been contaminated by politics. Among the wave of resignations and firings of Justice Department prosecutors, administrators and career staffers who have resigned or been fired in the first six months of President Trump's second term, some want to resume public service, and now they're exploring different avenues to achieve that. Crosswell, a longtime federal prosecutor, resigned from the Justice Department on Feb. 17, in protest of the controversial department decision to drop the criminal corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams and a purge of the agency's public integrity division. He has criticized the Justice Department's reductions in its anti-corruption offices. "What the administration has done is removed one of the most important guardrails against corruption within the government at all levels: state, local and federal," Croswell told CBS News. "We're now moving into an area where prosecutions would be determined by political loyalty," he said. Crosswell's race is also uniquely important. He's running for the Democratic nomination in one of the most competitive and high-impact House races in the country, Pennsylvania's 7th District, which flipped from Democratic to Republican in 2024. Crosswell has already raised more than $300,000 since announcing his candidacy in June, while the incumbent Republican, Rep. Ryan MacKenzie, has raised over $1.4 million this year. It's a big change for a longtime career prosecutor, who just months ago was credited by the Justice Department with helping secure the conviction of a former New Mexico state political candidate who'd gone on a shooting spree that targeted the homes of four elected officials. Croswell, a Marine reservist, is leaning into his biography during his campaign. He told CBS News, "If you're a Marine and you're a former prosecutor, you are protecting people." Some of his former colleagues are also seeking elected office, and like Crosswell, none have elected experience or a political background, but all of them are openly criticizing recent changes in the Justice Department and talking about why they chose to exit their careers as career prosecutors. Erika Evans quit her Justice Department position in March, leaving what she said was her dream job. She's now seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of city attorney in Seattle. Speaking with CBS News by phone between campaign stops in Seattle, Evans said, "The polls are in our favor, and we're feeling good about that." She's the granddaughter of civil rights figure Lee Evans, who was among the 1968 Olympics track stars who raised a fist in the air during a medal presentation. Evans told CBS News the Trump administration's dismantling of the Justice Department's Civil Rights division was among her motivations for leaving. "We received emails requiring that we report any colleagues doing diversity work in the office. We had 10 to 14 days to report them or we would get in trouble ourselves," Evans said. "That was pretty disgusting." She said she didn't feel safe at the agency, in part because she was the co-chair of a diversity effort. In a campaign video, Evans pledged to challenge Mr. Trump: "With your vote, I'll take on Trump and demand the community safety we deserve." And her campaign materials also promote Evans' work on civil rights issues. "I have only worked in public service my entire career. That's the reason why I became a lawyer — to represent and serve my community," Evans said. "When I realized that that was not going to be possible any longer with the values that the Trump administration was having for the department, I knew I needed to shift." She said her public criticism of the recent changes in the Justice Department is resonating with voters. "We've spoken with thousands of voters and we have been knocking on thousands of doors," she said. "It's been really comforting to hear from our voters who say 'You are so brave to step out and speak out against this.'" The Seattle primaries are Tuesday. If Evans wins enough votes, she'd proceed to a general election in November. Hetal Doshi rose through the ranks of the Justice Department over more than a decade of service, including as deputy assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division. She left in January, when Mr. Trump was sworn in, and is now seeking her first elected office as a candidate in next year's election for Colorado attorney general. Doshi told CBS News the recent changes at the agency "really weighed on my heart and on my mind." "State attorneys general are more important than ever before, in filling an enforcement vacuum," she said. "That's why I made the decision to run for office." "I faced a lot of complicated feelings about my exit," Doshi said, "and that complexity was coming from the fact that I loved what I did on behalf of the American people so much." Despite her lack of campaign experience, Doshi touted robust early fundraising and a statewide campaign infrastructure as she pursues the Democratic nomination for the post. Doshi's campaign materials, including an introductory video, emphasize she's a first-generation American from a working-class family. Her campaign website includes a video in which Doshi takes aim at Mr. Trump, saying, "The rule of law is under attack by Donald Trump and politicians who have abandoned patriotism." The video includes images of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Trump surrogate Jeanine Pirro, who was just confirmed as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. "It's hard to watch the dismantling of the norms and traditions of the Department of Justice," Doshi said in a phone interview with CBS News. The Justice Department declined a request to comment on Doshi, Crosswell or Evans and their criticism of recent agency changes. Doshi's campaign lists several of her Justice Department accomplishments and promotes her record. Her campaign materials highlight her federal case work in challenging an airline merger, big tech mergers, concert ticket pricing and a case she said would have impacted grocery prices. "I feel much more comfortable in a courtroom than any other place," Doshi admitted, but she says campaigning is a form of public advocacy that mirrors her work as a government attorney. "It's normally pretty rare for career DOJ attorneys to run for office. They actively steer clear of partisanship at the department," said Stacey Young, a former Justice Department attorney who leads the Justice Connection, a networking organization to help former Justice Department employees who have resigned or been fired. "It makes perfect sense that for some, serving through elected office, outside the president's chain of command, is a viable alternative," Young added. Victor Salgado said he decided on Election night last year he'd prepare to leave his job as an attorney in the Public Integrity division of the Justice Department. He soon began pursuing the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor of Virginia. His campaign and his effort won just about 5% of the vote in the June was not enough to advance to the November general election,but he still did better than he had expected. Salgado told CBS News he decided to leave before the expected shakeup inside the Justice Department. "I was just reading tea leaves on the type of people that had been close to Mr. Trump, and the people who would eventually come to run the Department of Justice," he said. "I handicapped it at 90% that within the near future of January 20, the Public Integrity section will be dismantled." There were a series of ousters in the agency's public integrity section within the first two months of the Trump administration. Salgado enjoyed a storied career at the Justice Department, including an agency award for his work on a major cryptocurrency investigation, which led to a CEO's guilty plea in 2023. The department also credited Salgado with "substantial contributions" to the successful prosecution of former Rep. George Santos, a New York Republican who was expelled from Congress, pleaded guilty to fraud and began serving a prison sentence last month. Salgado said he emphasized his Justice Department work during his brief campaign, and as he met with voters and made campaign stops, he referenced the controversies involving the Trump's administration's use of law enforcement in immigration enforcement. He said the role of political candidate is challenging for career prosecutors. "We are not partisan, especially as corruption prosecutors," he said. "Of course, we have political opinions, but all of those get checked at the door." Crosswell's race could become one of the most expensive and highest profile in the nation. He moved back to Pennsylvania, where he grew up, just about 45 minutes outside of Allentown. In a sign he's cemented his position as a frontline Democratic political candidate, Crosswell is receiving strong criticism from the National Republican Congressional Committee. "Carpetbagging Ryan Crosswell parachuted into the Lehigh Valley after working in Biden's corrupt DOJ. Pennsylvanians took out the trash last November when they elected Rep. Ryan Mackenzie and President Trump, and they're not looking back," an NRCC spokeswoman said in a statement.
