Marcos hopes China will give PH notice on rocket launches
Speaking to the Philippine media delegation in India, Marcos said the Philippines could recover debris from the sea and return it to China if given prior notice.
He added that Beijing did not commit any violations in connection with its recent rocket launch near Palawan, and recalled telling Chinese President Xi Jinping that the Philippines has no interest in China's rockets.
The statement comes after concerns were raised over the launch of China's Long March-12 rocket, which was seen over Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, last Monday. Residents reported hearing explosions and feeling the ground shake as a fiery object crossed the sky.
According to Chinese state media, the Long March-12 rocket successfully placed a group of internet satellites into orbit after launching Monday night from a commercial spacecraft site in Hainan province.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
11 hours ago
- Arabian Post
China urges Israel to halt Gaza control plans
Tensions over the future of Gaza escalated this week as China strongly condemned Israel's proposals to expand control over the region. The Chinese government has called on Israel to abandon its plans, asserting that Gaza is an integral part of Palestinian territory. This intervention comes amid increasing international scrutiny over the situation in Gaza, with many nations expressing concern about the potential implications of further Israeli expansion. Beijing's position on the Gaza Strip is rooted in its longstanding support for Palestinian sovereignty. The Chinese government has consistently opposed any actions that it views as undermining Palestinian claims to the region. This latest diplomatic stance reflects China's ongoing engagement in Middle Eastern politics, where it aims to strengthen its influence as a key player in regional security and diplomacy. The statement from China marked a significant moment in the broader international discourse surrounding Gaza. In response to Israel's plans, Beijing emphasised that any actions that alter Gaza's status would be unacceptable. It reiterated its support for the Palestinian people, underscoring the belief that their rights to self-determination must be respected. While China's calls are unlikely to directly alter Israeli policy, they reflect the growing international division over how the situation in Gaza should be addressed. ADVERTISEMENT Israeli officials, for their part, have maintained that any actions taken in Gaza are in response to security concerns. Israel has long cited the need to safeguard its borders from militant groups operating within the territory. These concerns were amplified by the ongoing conflict and rocket attacks originating from Gaza, which Israel attributes to Hamas and other factions within the region. However, these justifications have been met with widespread condemnation from various global actors who argue that Israel's military actions are disproportionately harming civilians and exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. China's intervention highlights its increasing diplomatic role in the Middle East. Over the past decade, Beijing has sought to present itself as a neutral force in the region, often positioning itself as a mediator in long-standing conflicts. Its ties with both Israel and the Palestinian Authority allow it to offer unique perspectives that might appeal to multiple sides of the dispute. This balancing act has granted China a significant degree of credibility in its calls for peace and stability in the region. The broader context of China's involvement in Middle Eastern affairs is also a key consideration. As part of its Belt and Road Initiative, China has sought to expand its economic and political presence in the region. With growing investments and partnerships in various Middle Eastern countries, China is increasingly viewed as a counterbalance to the influence of traditional Western powers. The dynamics of this shift are still evolving, but Beijing's vocal stance on Gaza illustrates its determination to assert itself in international diplomacy on critical issues. The Israeli government has yet to officially respond to China's remarks. However, analysts suggest that while Israel is unlikely to alter its strategy due to external pressure, the diplomatic fallout could have implications for Israel's international relations. As Israel faces increasing international pressure over its policies in Gaza, the country's position on its ongoing military operations remains a source of significant debate. Meanwhile, the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, with reports of civilian casualties and widespread displacement. The United Nations and various humanitarian organisations have called for an immediate cessation of hostilities to allow for much-needed aid to reach those affected. Despite these calls, the conflict shows little sign of abating, with both sides remaining entrenched in their positions.
Filipino Times
13 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Marcos to Convene ‘Conclave' to Craft Online Gambling Policy
President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. said Friday that the government will gather all concerned sectors in a 'conclave' to formulate a comprehensive policy on online gambling, focusing on its socio-economic impact. Speaking at a 'Kapihan with the Media' event in Bengaluru, India, Marcos said the discussions will include the Church, educators, parents, police, and addiction experts. He emphasized that the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines has been vocal on the matter and should be heard. Marcos stressed that an outright ban may not be the best solution, noting how illegal operations continued even after e-sabong was prohibited. He added that the conclave's goal is to find a more measured and effective approach rather than simply outlawing online gambling.
Filipino Times
15 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Marcos: SC Ruling on Sara Impeachment Didn't Settle Accountability Issue
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. reiterated that the Supreme Court's decision voiding the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte did not address her accountability as a public official. Speaking to reporters during his state visit to India, Marcos emphasized that the high court's ruling focused solely on procedural issues and not on whether wrongdoing occurred. The Supreme Court, in its July 25 decision, ruled in favor of petitions questioning the constitutionality of the articles of impeachment, citing violations of the one-year ban on multiple complaints and due process concerns. Marcos clarified that the Court neither cleared nor condemned Duterte, but found that the process was mishandled. This was Marcos' first public comment on the unanimous ruling, which nullified the House-approved impeachment complaint transmitted to the Senate. He stressed that as an impeachable official himself, he has no role in impeachment proceedings, which are the responsibility of the Court, the Senate, and the House. The Senate has since voted to archive the impeachment case rather than dismiss it outright, allowing space for pending motions for reconsideration before the Supreme Court. Several petitioners, including the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, have filed appeals urging the Court to reverse its decision, arguing that it creates procedural obstacles that weaken accountability for high officials. Legal experts are divided on whether the articles of impeachment can be revived if the Supreme Court reverses itself. Some see the archiving as a safeguard, while others note that the ruling's procedural findings may still block further action. For now, the impeachment case is effectively suspended unless the Court grants the appeals.
