
The Party's Interests Come First by Joseph Torigian: The paranoid and intensely emotional political culture behind China's Xi Jinping
Author
:
Joseph Torigian
ISBN-13
:
978-1503634756
Publisher
:
Stanford University Press
Guideline Price
:
£41
When
Xi Jinping
took over the leadership of the
Communist Party
in 2012, his reputation outside
China
was that of a technocrat who was seen as unlikely to change the country's broad policy direction. Most western observers expected him to pursue the economic reform agenda that had prevailed since the 1980s and adhere to the collective leadership norms established after the death of
Mao Zedong
.
Chinese political insiders knew about Xi's preoccupation with fighting corruption and his focus on securing the party's grip on power. But many found reassurance in the fact that the new leader was the son of Xi Zhongxun, a communist revolutionary and a senior political figure who embraced economic and political reform.
It was not just the father's record as a guerrilla fighter during the war against Japan and the Chinese civil war or as a high-ranking official that elevated him in the esteem of party comrades. It was also his personal conduct towards others during the party's vicious power struggles and purges, some of which he found himself on the wrong side of.
'He established a reputation as the very best kind of individual that the party could produce. According to that narrative, shared widely among Chinese elites, Xi was a righteous individual who was almost uniquely practical, open-minded, and merciful,' Joseph Torigian writes in his magisterial biography of Xi Zhongsun, The Party's Interests Come First.
READ MORE
The book's title comes from an inscription written by Mao for Xi Zhongxun in January 1943 and devotion to the party is the red thread that runs through the lives of both father and son. A member of the Communist Youth League at 13, Xi Zhongxun was imprisoned at 15 for the attempted assassination of a teacher on the party's orders.
He played an important part in the rise of the party in northwest China in the early 1930s and fought in the communist stronghold of Yan'an during the war against Japan and the civil war with Chiang Kai-shek's nationalists. After the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, he held a number of high offices, including vice-premier and minister for propaganda.
He was persecuted by the party five times and purged for 15 years in 1962, during which time he was in political exile or under house arrest. During the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1976 he and his family were targeted and those years saw his daughter take her own life and Xi Jinping sent down to the countryside as a teenager to work in the fields.
Rehabilitated by Deng Xiaoping after Mao's death, Xi Zhongxun became an enthusiastic champion of economic reform and cultivated connections with intellectuals, ethnic and religious minorities and overseas Chinese. Initially sympathetic towards the student demonstrators in 1989, he fell into line behind the deadly crackdown that saw soldiers open fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square.
[
'Dominance, dependency and blackmail': EU and China talks overshadowed by deep divisions
Opens in new window
]
The puzzle at the centre of Xi Zhongxun's life, and of Torigian's book, is why he remained so loyal to a party that betrayed him so many times and caused such suffering to himself and his family. Torigian uses memoirs, letters, interviews and archival sources inside and outside China to explore the details of his subject's life but it is the biographer's radical empathy and subtlety of mind that illuminates it.
The party was the source of meaning in Xi Zhongxun's life and the suffering it caused him bound him more closely to it so that it was a source of pride that he endured so much and remained so loyal. Xi Jinping also endured great hardship during the Cultural Revolution but appears to have inherited his father's unwavering devotion to the party.
[
How China uses soft power to exert influence in Ireland
Opens in new window
]
Many readers will come to this book looking for insights into the character and thinking of Xi Jinping and how he was influenced by his father. And his father's story and that of his own upbringing do reveal much about the forces that shaped China's most powerful leader since Mao.
But Torigian's signal achievement is in the way he takes the reader into the world of the Chinese Communist Party in the 20th century and the interior life of its elite figures. That paranoid and intensely emotional political culture had a profound influence on Xi Jinping and its consequences are playing out in China today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Intel shares rise on report of possible US government stake
Intel shares rose nearly 4% today on hopes of more financial aid for the turnaround of the struggling chipmaker after a report that the US government may buy a stake. The Bloomberg News report followed a meeting between CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Donald Trump on Monday after Trump demanded the new Intel chief's resignation over his "highly conflicted" ties to Chinese firms. President Trump, who called the meeting "very interesting," has taken an unprecedented approach to corporate interventions, including a deal that would make the Department of Defense the largest shareholder in rare-earth producer MP Materials. In the latest move, the Trump administration is considering using funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act, signed into law by his predecessor Joe Biden, to take a stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reported today, citing people familiar with the discussions. Intel last year secured nearly $8 billion in subsidies, the largest outlay under the act, to build new factories in Ohio and other states as former CEO Pat Gelsinger bet on them to restore the company's manufacturing edge. Mr Tan, however, pared back such ambitions, slowing construction in Ohio. He plans to build factories based on demand for the services, which analysts have said could put him at odds with Trump's push to shore up American manufacturing. Intel and the White House did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Federal backing could give Intel more time to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts said, but it still faces a weak product roadmap and trouble attracting customers for new factories. It could be a "game-changer", said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. But he warned "government support might help shore up confidence, but it doesn't fix the underlying competitiveness gap in advanced nodes." Intel lost its competitive edge years ago to Taiwan's TSMC. It has virtually no presence in the booming AI chips market dominated by Nvidia and is losing market share in PCs and datacenters to AMD. Its latest 18A manufacturing process is facing quality issues, Reuters has reported, as only a small share of chips produced are good enough for customers, while it remains partly dependent on TSMC to make Intel in-house designed chips. "Intel also needs capability; can the US government do anything to help here?" Bernstein analysts said. "Without a solid process roadmap the entire exercise would be economically equivalent to simply setting tens of billions of dollars on fire."


Irish Examiner
17 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump weighs taking stake in Intel
The Trump administration is in talks with Intel to have the US government potentially take a stake in the struggling chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the plan. Such a move would mark another intervention by US President Donald Trump in industries seen as vital to national security. Trump has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths - for instance, a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare-earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Intel declined to comment on the report but said it was deeply committed to supporting Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration." Intel's shares surged over 7% in regular trading and then another 2.6% after the bell. The discussions follow a meeting this week between Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. That meeting came days after Trump publicly demanded that Tan resign over his investments in Chinese tech companies, some linked to the Chinese military. Details of the stake and price are still being discussed, Bloomberg said. Ryuta Makino, an analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, said it was likely that the US government would take a stake in Intel because Trump wants the chipmaker to expand domestic manufacturing and to create more jobs. Intel warned last month that it may have to get out of the chip manufacturing business if it does not land external customers to make chips in its factories. It planned to slow construction work on new factories in Ohio. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to undo years of missteps that left Intel struggling to make inroads in the booming AI chip industry dominated by Nvidia, while investment-heavy contract manufacturing ambitions led to heavy losses. "I think any deal that involves the US, as well as third-party investors (PE) likely has to come with tariffs that strongly encourage customers like Nvidia, AMD, Apple to use Intel Foundry," said Ben Bajarin, CEO of market analysis firm Creative Strategies. It is not unusual for the US government to take a stake in a company, but those have usually needed financial help. Though Intel's stock market value has tumbled in recent years and it has lost its industry leadership, its revenue remains stable at over $50bn (€43.3bn) a year, and it was not clear to some investors that the chipmaker needs such direct government assistance. Reuters


RTÉ News
18 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump weighs taking stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports
The Trump administration is in talks with Intel to have the US government potentially take a stake in the struggling chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported today, citing people familiar with the plan. Such a move would mark another intervention by US President Donald Trump in industries seen as vital to national security. Trump has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths - for instance, a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare-earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Intel declined to comment on the report but said it was deeply committed to supporting Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration." Intel's shares surged over 7% in regular trading and then another 2.6% after the bell on Wall Street last night. The discussions follow a meeting this week between Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. That meeting came days after Trump publicly demanded that Tan resign over his investments in Chinese tech companies, some linked to the Chinese military. Details of the stake and price are still being discussed, Bloomberg said. Ryuta Makino, an analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, said it was likely that the US government would take a stake in Intel because Trump wants the chipmaker to expand domestic manufacturing and to create more jobs. Intel warned last month that it may have to get out of the chip manufacturing business if it does not land external customers to make chips in its factories. It planned to slow construction work on new factories in Ohio. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to undo years of missteps that left Intel struggling to make inroads in the booming AI chip industry dominated by Nvidia, while investment-heavy contract manufacturing ambitions led to heavy losses. "I think any deal that involves the US, as well as third-party investors (PE) likely has to come with tariffs that strongly encourage customers like Nvidia, AMD, Apple to use Intel Foundry," said Ben Bajarin, CEO of market analysis firm Creative Strategies. It is not unusual for the US government to take a stake in a company, but those have usually needed financial help. Though Intel's stock market value has tumbled in recent years and it has lost its industry leadership, its revenue remains stable at over $50 billion a year, and it was not clear to some investors that the chipmaker needs such direct government assistance.