Bond-market panic is being overhyped by market 'tourists,' says Morgan Stanley strategist
Jim Caron said the investor concern implied by rising bond yields is overdone.
Yields on US Treasurys spiked this past week in response to President Donald Trump's tax bill.
The Morgan Stanley strategist said the fiscal deficit has long been a well-known issue.
The recent surge in US bond yields is overblown, said a chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley.
He's referring to yields on 10- and 30-year US Treasurys, which rose as high as 4.6% and 5.2%, respectively, this past week. The increases came after the decision by Moody's to downgrade its rating on US debt on May 16, and accelerated in the following week on concerns over the sweeping budget bill advancing through Congress.
While commentators have said fears about the swelling budget deficit are behind the week's bond-market jitters, Jim Caron, chief investment officer of the portfolio solutions group at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, told Business Insider he thinks the issue is being blown out of proportion.
He said markets were already aware that the national deficit is a problem, so Trump's " big beautiful bill" that passed in the House of Representatives on Thursday isn't really the issue.
Caron said he refers to those who believe Treasurys could lose their safe-haven status as "tourists in the market."
The GOP's sweeping budget bill aims to extend the 2017 tax cuts, slash Medicaid spending and supplemental nutrition assistance, and increase military spending. Estimates vary, but the bill could add as much as $4 trillion to the government's deficit over the next 10 years.
Caron doesn't necessarily think a widening deficit will erode the perception of Treasurys as ultra-safe investments.
"I wouldn't say that there's a straight line connection to some of the deficit and tax talk," he said. "And that's kind of what everybody's trying to conflate and put together."
"I think it would be refreshing to absolutely take a deeper look at that and just say, 'look, the fiscal situation is not new news,'" Caron said.
The IMF expects the US federal deficit to dip from 7.3% of GDP last year to 6.5% this year.
"The market is creating excess hysteria around it," Caron said of the deficit debate.
The Morgan Stanley strategist argued that rising bond yields are a global issue, and not just a US problem. Long-dated bonds in the UK, Germany, and Japan have soared this year on fears over those countries' fiscal outlooks.
"I always find it to be a very novice explanation when people say, 'oh, I think the US is losing its status and the dollar is going to lose its reserve status,'" Caron said. "If that were actually even 1% true, the markets would be selling off in a massive, massive way."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tax bill would add $2.4tn to US debt, says non-partisan analysis
Donald Trump's signature tax bill would blow a $2.4tn hole to America's national debt over the next decade, according to a congressional budget office analysis, which came as Elon Musk called for a new bill. The non-partisan budget office said on Wednesday that Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' would decrease federal revenues by $3.67tn while cutting spending by $1.25tn through 2034, as the national debt currently stands at $36tn. The analysis comes as the legislation faces criticism from within Republican ranks, threatening Trump's fragile Senate majority. The recent disapproval has been led by Musk, who denounced the measure as a 'disgusting abomination' on his X platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Then on Wednesday, he began to outline his suggested path forward. 'We need a new bill that doesn't grow the deficit,' he wrote on X. 'A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS,' he added. The House speaker, Mike Johnson, acknowledged tensions with Musk, telling reporters he had spoken with Trump about the criticism. 'He's not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said. The legislation extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts while making deep spending reductions, primarily through cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs, and passed the House by a single vote last month with no Democratic support. On Tuesday, the Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor-Greene admitted she had missed a section of the bill text that was meant to regulate AI over the next 10 years, something she says would have made her vote against it. The week prior, the Nebraska representative Mike Flood said he glossed over another part of the bill about federal judges enforcing contempt orders. The CBO analysis found the bill would leave 10.9 million more Americans without health insurance by 2034, including 1.4 million people 'without verified citizenship, nationality, or satisfactory immigration status' who would lose coverage under state-funded programs. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, dismissed the projections, claiming the budget office has become 'partisan and political'. She alleged CBO staff members have not contributed to Republican candidates since 2000 while many have donated to Democrats. Johnson had a similar take on the CBO, and defended the legislation, claiming it represents unprecedented spending cuts. 'No government in the history of mankind has ever cut $1.6tn in a piece of legislation,' he told reporters. Earlier in the week, he said 84% of its budget analysts were 'partisan Democrats' who donate to 'Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren'. The Senate is expected to consider modifying the legislation in coming weeks, with Republican leaders hoping to pass a final version by early July.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant Arkansans set to go into effect
Rep. Lee Johnson (left), R-Greenwood, an emergency medicine physician and the Joint Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee's House chair, asks Department of Human Services officials a question about presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. At right is Rep. Cameron Cooper, R-Romance. (Screenshot/Arkansas Legislature) Arkansas lawmakers reviewed two rules Wednesday in response to a new law aimed at improving the state's maternal health care landscape for low-income pregnant women. The Joint Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee spent nearly an hour discussing Arkansas' new policy of presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women, part of the Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies Act that will go into effect in August. Presumptive eligibility assumes 60 days of Medicaid eligibility and shortens the process of applying for coverage. The policy was among several recommendations to improve the state's maternal health care landscape that a task force convened by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued in September 2024. More than half of births in Arkansas are covered by Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance system for low-income Americans. A federal budget bill moving through Congress would make deep cuts to Medicaid spending, reducing the program by $625 billion over 10 years. U.S. House Republicans push through massive tax and spending bill slashing Medicaid Elizabeth Pitman, director of the Division of Medical Services for Arkansas Medicaid, said she anticipates the proposed cuts will affect the state's Medicaid expansion population but not pregnant women on Medicaid. Arkansas has among the nation's highest maternal mortality and infant mortality rates. Rep. Jack Ladyman, R-Jonesboro, said he found this frustrating and considered presumptive Medicaid eligibility 'a very good cornerstone' for improving these statistics. Ladyman and Rep. Lee Johnson, R-Greenwood, asked Pitman and other Department of Human Services officials how they plan to ensure that pregnant Arkansans statewide have the information and resources they need to opt into presumptive Medicaid eligibility if applicable. 'I want to support this rule, but I also want to be realistic in what we expect the outcome of this rule to be,' said Johnson, an emergency medicine physician and the joint committee's House chair. 'If we pass this eligibility category and nobody's applying for it any more often than they're currently applying for Medicaid, then it's not moving the needle.' Pitman said DHS can address Johnson's concerns about access to information in its focus groups with pregnant Arkansans. She also said the agency will work with community health workers, doulas and other local health care providers and community organizations to ensure the option of presumptive Medicaid eligibility is as widely known as possible. Committee outlines recommendations, actions taken to improve maternal health in Arkansas DHS learned during the three-year public health emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic that spreading information about public health resources via social media, digital billboards and doctor's offices successfully reaches the agency's target audience, state Medicaid Director Janet Mann said. In January, Arkansas received a 10-year, $17 million federal grant aimed at improving maternal health outcomes for Medicaid recipients. Applying for the grant was among the maternal health task force's recommendations last year. The grant includes payments to healthcare providers as incentives for improved data-sharing on maternal health outcomes, Pitman said. In response to more questions from Johnson, Pitman said DHS does not have data on whether pregnant Arkansans' first interactions with prenatal health care occur in primary care providers' offices or emergency rooms. Arkansas remains the only state that has taken no action to adopt the federal option of extending postpartum Medicaid coverage from 60 days to 12 months after birth, according to KFF. The maternal health task force did not recommend this policy, and a bill to create it failed in a Senate committee in April after Pitman and Mann expressed DHS' opposition to it. Arkansas Senate committee rejects 12-month postpartum Medicaid coverage The other rule the joint committee reviewed Wednesday was the 'unbundling' of billing rates for labor and delivery, a policy also put forth by the Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies Act. The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services authorized a 70% increase in Arkansas' maximum reimbursement rate for obstetrical care 'to include prenatal, delivery and postpartum care,' according to the rule. All of these services will be billed separately in all cases, Pitman said. CMS' approval of such a stark increase was 'very unusual,' but Arkansas' shortage of maternal health care providers in rural areas, closure of seven labor and delivery units since 2019 and high maternal and infant mortality rates led the agency to grant DHS' request without question, Pitman said. Higher reimbursement rates should 'improve Medicaid's data collection on utilization of prenatal and postpartum services,' the rule states. 'We're really hopeful that this will give us better data and insight into what is happening in the prenatal care space: when women are going [to the doctor], if it's the first, second or third trimester, who are they seeing and what are their diagnoses,' Pitman said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Big Beautiful Bill' Falters as Musk Ramps up Bid to ‘Kill' It
Elon Musk attends President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress in the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2025. Credit - Saul Loeb—AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump's sprawling tax-and-spending proposal—touted as the centerpiece of his second-term agenda—is facing intensifying resistance in the Senate, as fresh concerns about its impact on the deficit and a ramped-up campaign by Elon Musk to torpedo the entire package threaten to derail the legislation's fragile path to passage. At the center of the turmoil on Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is a sobering new assessment from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which reported Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next decade while stripping health coverage from nearly 11 million Americans, largely through deep Medicaid cuts and the imposition of new work requirements. That analysis sparked alarm among some Senate Republicans, several of whom are demanding substantial changes. 'I think Congress is sort of like a bad behaving teenager when it comes to spending,' Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of the Republicans threatening to vote against the bill, told TIME on Wednesday. 'If you had a teenager that you were giving $100 a week and they wasted all of it on gambling or on booze, would you give them $200?' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and other prominent Republicans tried to dismiss the CBO's projections by arguing its analysis was flawed or biased. But fiscal hawks in the Senate remained dug in, buoyed by former Trump advisor Elon Musk, who extended his all-out offensive against the bill. A day after using his vast social media reach to brand the bill a 'disgusting abomination,' he posted more than two dozen messages on X on Wednesday attacking the legislation, as well as urging his followers to call Congress and 'KILL the BILL.' Musk's ire appears especially focused on how the bill's expansion of the deficit would erase the cost-cutting he hoped to accomplish with the Department of Government Efficiency, which he led under the Trump Administration. He has also expressed concerns with provisions in the House-passed bill that would terminate clean energy tax credits and electric vehicle subsidies established under the Inflation Reduction Act. Tesla Energy, Musk's solar and battery company, has warned that ending those credits 'would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' The sharp reversal has blindsided some Republicans, who were counting on Musk's tacit support. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has spearheaded the bill's passage, tried to stem the fallout by reaching out to Musk directly. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson said Wednesday, though he added that Musk has not returned his call. Inside the Senate, Johnson's broader strategy—pushing through House priorities quickly and with minimal changes—is beginning to unravel. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota acknowledged that significant changes to the bill are now unavoidable. 'We'll make some modifications to it, strengthen and improve it,' Thune said Tuesday. 'But at the end of the day, the math is simple—51 in the Senate, 218 in the House. That's what we're working toward.' One potential modification Thune has expressed interest in is scaling back the $40,000 state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap in the House version of the bill, an increase from the current $10,000 cap that House Republicans from high-tax states secured as a concession. But not all Republicans agree with the additional spending: 'There really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue,' Thune told reporters as he departed a meeting with Trump and Senate Republicans on Wednesday evening, saying that they discussed ways to dial that money back. It's a move that could alienate House Republicans from New York and New Jersey, who say their support is contingent on the SALT provision. "Let's be clear — no SALT, no deal," New York Republican Mike Lawler said Wednesday in a post on X. Additionally, the bill's sweeping changes to Medicaid, such as imposing new work requirements, are a sticking point. Republican Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have raised red flags over a provision that would eliminate provider taxes—mechanisms that states use to fund Medicaid—which they argue could shutter rural hospitals. Hawley is also opposed to a so-called 'sick tax' in the bill, which would impose new charges on low-income patients for medical visits. Other Republican Senators, including Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, may also put up roadblocks over potential cuts to Medicaid. Trump has personally intervened, holding calls with Sens. Hawley, Paul, and Scott. But there is little evidence he has swayed skeptics. Paul, a libertarian-leaning lawmaker who has vocally pushed back on many Trump Administration policies, told TIME that he plans to vote against the bill over its provision to raise the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. 'Congress has been acting irresponsibly for decades,' he said. 'We spend $2 trillion more than to come in. They should have a very narrow leash. The only debt ceiling they get should be very, very narrow in time and very, very small in amount. And the more we vote on the debt ceiling, the better. I'd vote on it every three months.' Trump, meanwhile, renewed his calls on Wednesday for scrapping the debt ceiling altogether. The growing litany of disputes has created a daunting legislative gauntlet for Trump's signature bill. Senate committees are now beginning to draft their own version, starting with less controversial sections and leaving the most divisive elements—Medicaid, energy, taxes—for later. Should the Senate approve any amended version, it must still clear the House once again—no small task given the narrow margins and the emboldened dissent among House Republicans. The stakes are high not just for Trump, but for Republicans heading into a contentious midterm season. Failure to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts would translate into a tax increase for many Americans. Trump's legislation would also boost spending on defense and border security, while reducing spending on Medicaid and food stamps. Write to Nik Popli at
