Changes are coming for your mail: Postal service faces challenges − digital and DOGE
As a teenager, Ellen Dare Burling had an unusual summer job: Jumping off a moving ferryboat onto wooden piers, her arms filled with letters and packages destined for summer residents in their southern Wisconsin lake houses.
She'd drop off the load, grab the outgoing mail and packages, race back along the pier and leap back aboard. The boat didn't stop moving, and neither did she, unless she fell in the water.
Today, Burling, 61, is the general manager of the Lake Geneva Cruise Line and the tradition of the "mail jumpers" continues more than 100 years after the U.S. Postal Service first contracted with the company to deliver to homes without road access.
"There are still people who are on their pier every day to get their mail," said Burling. "It's 100% done because of the tradition. It was more of a necessity in the old days, but now it's people who want to keep up the tradition."
The emotional connection those Lake Geneva residents feel for their mail deliveries highlights the challenge in bringing changes to the U.S. Postal Service, which faces competing priorities to deliver to 165 million addresses six times a week while not losing money.
Last year it lost $9.5 billion.
Older than the United States itself, the postal service faces significant challenges as Americans send fewer letters, Christmas cards and wedding invitations. Now, President Donald Trump's federal cost-cutting efforts, led by billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, are targeting how to stop the service from losing money.
But change comes hard to an institution that counted Benjamin Franklin as the first postmaster general and uses an army of 635,000 union workers and contractors, a fleet of specialized trucks, boats, float planes and even mules to help deliver about 300 pieces of mail daily.
While news that Musk's DOGE team will be scouring the service for savings sparked recent protests and drew headlines, a reorganization was already well underway with a longstanding transformation called "Delivering for America."
Those changes include cutting 10,000 jobs through early retirements, a new fleet of electric delivery trucks to replace existing trucks that keep breaking down, and slowing delivery for many rural customers. More than 75% of the postal service's budget goes to paying its roughly 635,000 workers, and those 10,000 job cuts reflect only a 1.5% staffing reduction.
Some critics want to see even bigger changes, from closing post offices to merging the service with the Commerce Department, or even wholesale privatization like other countries have done.
Although the postal service is technically an independent agency, Congress maintains close control, and retired New York University Prof. Steve Hutkins, a longtime postal service champion, said he's skeptical DOGE will be able to make significant inroads. "I don't know what Musk can do to make those things happen because of the legal barriers to making to them happen," he said. "If Musk wants to go there, good luck."
Created by the Continental Congress in 1775, the post office helped foster a sense of national identity, creating post offices and helping maintain important road connections.
The Civil War also sparked rapid growth in the service, which struggled to deliver mail from deployed Union soldiers to their families back home, prompting officials to implement a national rural delivery system that later expanded to deliver parcels and freight.
For many years, the service even delivered newspapers for free on the grounds that a well-informed citizenry was key to success, the official postal service history says.
"The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people," Congress said in creating the modern USPS. "It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities."
But as the Internet grew in popularity, Americans sent fewer and fewer letters. In 2021, CBS News reported that 37% of Americans hadn't sent a letter in at least five years, and 15% of Americans had never sent a personal letter. While the service has raised prices to help compensate for the drop in first-class volume, it hasn't been enough.
Last year, the service handled more than 116 billion pieces of mail, with most of that being presorted mailers, solicitations or other items that many people would consider "junk" mail. Overall mail volumes have been dropping since 2006, according to the postal service, but each year there are more and more addresses to deliver that to.
Private companies like FedEx and UPS are outcompeting the postal service for some parcel deliveries, in part because it's a lot easier for them to charge higher prices for harder deliveries in rural area ‒ or to simply not deliver.
In contrast, the USPS is required to deliver to virtually every address in the country, regardless of how much it costs. That's why it still uses mules or horses to deliver to Supai, Arizona, a remote Havasupai tribal village in the Grand Canyon of Arizona, or float planes to serve fishing villages off the Alaska coast.
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy stepped down Monday amidst growing protests from postal workers and supporters about proposed changes and service reductions. Appointed during the first Trump presidency, DeJoy had grown frustrated that his efforts to transform the service were being stalled by Congress. He had been planning to retire at the end of his five-year term but instead stepped down shortly after inking a deal with DOGE.
"The simplest and most obvious ideas and solutions receive illogical and irrational scrutiny from those that have no responsibility for ensuring the financial viability of the Postal Service," DeJoy wrote in a Feb. 17 letter to the USPS governing board.
Although it's supposed to be an independent agency, the service is subject to Congressional mandates and whims, including down to whether a specific neighborhood will get door-to-door delivery or a centralized "cluster" box. Members of Congress of both parties push back fervently whenever the service proposes to close a local post office.
"In any other organization the disruptive accomplishments we have made to date would have created an easier path forward versus the Herculean one we still face today," DeJoy wrote. "This situation reflects how tragic our condition was when we started this journey, the negative consequences the past four years of a pandemic and historic inflation, the resistance we face to our initiatives for change, and to a certain extent, our failures in execution on what is otherwise a very solid business plan."
Unionized postal workers oppose many of the changes DeJoy had been pushing, and staged nationwide protests earlier this month after heading that Musk's DOGE would be helping cut costs further.
In a statement, APWU President Mark Dimondstein urged the service's Board of Governors to quickly replace DeJoy with someone committed to keeping the USPS accountable to the public. Union workers have argued that mail delivery is a vital public service that shouldn't necessarily turn a profit.
"...any attack on the Postal Service is part of the ongoing oligarchs' coup against the vital public services our members and other public servants provide the country. We know that privatized postal services will lead to higher postage prices, and lower service quality to the public," Dimondstein said. "No matter who leads the USPS, it is – and must remain – the People's Postal Service."
Hutkins, the retired NYT professor, runs a longstanding "Save the Post Office" website where he chronicled efforts by DeJoy and others to trim costs. Hutkins more than a decade ago got involved with efforts to keep his local post office open, and has emerged as one of the service's staunchest defenders.
He's skeptical any significant changes are coming quickly. Unlike the executive branch, the postal service isn't directly under Trump's control. That means elected lawmakers will have to explicitly change laws governing service rules about delivery frequency and pricing, he said.
"For any of this to happen, which requires Congress, I don't see the votes to do something major," Hutkins said. "I'm a little skeptical about anything radical happening."
In Wisconsin, Burling and other Lake Geneva Cruise Line workers are gearing up for another summer season of delivering the mail via boat.
Burling's kids also served as mail runners, and she feels a close emotional connection to the service, even if it's not quite as critical as it once was.
"Because it has been such a long tradition, it's something people are attached to and really, really value," she said. "I felt guilty for years when I stopped sending out my bills with a check in the mail, and started paying online."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Postal service faces major changes as DOGE works across government
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
15 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Online Tax Firm MyExpatTaxes Alerts Expats: Final Chance to Claim 2021 Stimulus Payments
Vienna, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MyExpatTaxes, a leading US expat tax company known for its support of U.S. citizens living overseas, is highlighting an important upcoming deadline for American expatriates. By June 16th, expats must act to claim the 2021 stimulus payments. This deadline represents the final opportunity for expats who haven't already to benefit from COVID-19 economic stimulus payments, which can total thousands of . MyExpatTaxes is urging individuals not to miss out on this opportunity. As the U.S. is one of just two countries that taxes based on citizenship rather than residence, Americans living abroad have to report their worldwide income by filing a U.S. tax return every year. Many Americans expats are unaware of this requirement to file from overseas though, so get behind in their filing. The IRS has an amnesty program for these expats though called the Offshire Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. This process offers a chance for overseas Americans who have unintentionally failed to meet their filing obligations to catch up on their U.S. tax filing without facing penalties. It requires submitting the last three years of tax returns and, where applicable, up to six years of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Reports (FBARs). The procedure can seem complex, but with MyExpatTaxes offering either self-service or guided assistance, expats can find a sense of relief with easy access to tools like a US expat tax calculator and a stimulus check calculator found on their website. Nathalie Goldstein, CEO of MyExpatTaxes, underscores the significance of acting before the June 16th deadline for non-compliance overseas Americans, saying, 'The June 16th 2025 deadline is the last opportunity for American expatriates who may not have been aware that they have to file U.S. taxes from abroad to claim teh COVID-19 stimulus payments. It's also a valuable opportunity to get tax compliant without facing penalties. Our goal is to provide them with the guidance they need to make the most of these benefits.' Her words reflect the broader mission of MyExpatTaxes – supporting American expats in navigating what can often be a daunting process filing from overseas (often as well as filing taxes in the country where they reside). The 2021 expanded Child Tax Credit is also available for American families living abroad. This credit offers a substantial benefit of up to $3,600 per child, refundable for qualifying families. Timely filing is critical to claim this credit, ensuring families don't inadvertently miss out. To aid in this, expats can access comprehensive guidance and information on the Streamlined Procedures through MyExpatTaxes' dedicated page: Adding to the firm's efforts, Goldstein remarks, 'The potential gains for catching up and filing for 2021 for expats who qualify for the stimulus payments are typically far outweigh the costs of becoming compliant. Our platform is designed to simplify the tax filing process for U.S. citizens abroad, offering practical solutions and expert support. With the deadline imminent to claim these valuable payments, we're dedicated to helping expatriates claim what they are rightfully owed.' This statement emphasizes MyExpatTaxes' commitment to easing the stress associated with U.S. tax filing for expats. To further assist expats, the company has developed easy-to-use resources such as tax guides, quick start checklists, and webinars available on their website. These resources provide education and support, aimed at simplifying and demystifying the intricacies of international tax reporting for Americans living abroad. User testimonials and official reviews highlight the effectiveness and reliability of MyExpatTaxes' services, reinforcing their reputation as a helpful aid for expats. As the June 16th deadline approaches, expats need to be vigilant. Missing this date means losing out on the chance to claim the stimulus payments for good. Through proactive action and using MyExpatTaxes' offerings, expatriates can not only ensure compliance but also capitalize on available benefits. MyExpatTaxes remains committed to guiding expatriates through these important periods, helping them understand and fulfill their tax responsibilities while maximizing their eligible claims. For those seeking to learn more or benefit from these services, they can learn more through the platform's site: The resources provided are not just about fulfilling obligations – they also empower expats to take control of their financial responsibilities with confidence. ### For more information about MyExpatTaxes, contact the company here: MyExpatTaxesMackenzie Passegger [email protected]

USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Most job switchers are making a change in career: Top 5 fields they're leaving.
Most job switchers are making a change in career: Top 5 fields they're leaving. Show Caption Hide Caption Bolster these work skills amid the AI boom With new college graduates entering the workforce, these are key skills employers will look for amid the AI boom. Nowadays, when Americans switch jobs, they're not just making changes around the edges. Sixty-four percent of workers who switched jobs from 2022 to 2024 also changed careers, according to an Indeed study of 35 million profiles on the leading job site. Among the fields workers left at the highest rates: hospitality, and arts and entertainment. Those fostering the most loyalty: nursing and software development, Experts largely attribute the trend to shifts that took root during the COVID-19 pandemic, which triggered 22 million layoffs as well as new perspectives about work. On a practical level, the health crisis spawned unprecedented labor shortages that allowed workers to hop among jobs for better pay, benefits and less tangible rewards. 'People could really change jobs if they wanted to,' said Allison Shrivastava, an economist with the Indeed Hiring Lab, the job site's research arm. As a result, she said, 'There was a lot more opportunity for people to change careers.' How did COVID-19 affect the workforce? COVID-19 also sparked deeper transformations. During the crisis, many workers burned out as they toiled long hours to fill in for idled colleagues or grew more aware of life's fragility. That spurred a desire among many Americans for better work-life balance, remote or hybrid work set-ups and greater job fulfilment. 'People really started wanting to align their careers with their personal visions and values,' said Toni Frana, a career expert with FlexJobs, a job search site specializing in remote and hybrid jobs and roles with flexible hours. While the job-hopping frenzy known as the Great Resignation has faded along with the pandemic, the fresh attitudes about career fulfilment and work-life balance seem to have endured. According to a FlexJobs survey for USA TODAY in February, 24% of Americans said they tried to change occupations the previous year, 6% did so and another 39% said they're looking to make a switch this year. That's nearly 70% of workers changing careers, according to the online survey of 2,293 respondents, conducted by SurveyMonkey. What are the reasons for career change? The top reason: to work remotely, cited by 67% of respondents, followed by better work-life balance (52%), more meaningful or fulfilling career (48%) and higher pay (48%), the FlexJobs poll revealed. Neither Indeed nor FlexJobs has previous data on the share of career switchers years ago. But Labor Department figures suggest the practice was less common. In January 2024, workers had been with their current employer a median of 3.9 years, down from 4.1 years in January 2022 and the shortest median tenure since January 2002. Generally, the fewest workers switch from and to occupations that require formal credentials, licenses, training and specialized skills, according to Indeed. And there's more turnover in fields with lower entry barriers and, typically, lower salaries. Here are the top five occupations Americans left from 2022 to 2024, according to the Indeed survey: Hospitality and tourism Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 91%. Key reason: There's not much upward mobility in the field, Indeed's Shrivastava said. Do you work for a great organization? Nominate it as one of America's Top Workplaces. And many workers are in lower-wage positions that have long hours and unpredictable schedules, according to Payactiv, a financial services company. Arts and Entertainment Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 86% Key reason: Jobs such as actors and authors are appealing but the chances of success are low. 'A lot of people may try their hand at it' but then leave for more stable occupations, Shrivastava said. Child care Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 86% Key reason: The field can be rewarding. But, 'It's a lot of work for not a lot of pay,' Shrivastava said. During the pandemic, the sector laid off or furloughed 373,000 employees, or 36% of its workforce. Logistics support Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 86% Key reason: Supply chain troubles during the pandemic led many logistics workers to quit for better pay and less stress, according to Intelligent Audit, a logistics company. Personal care and home health Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 86% Key reason: While the job can be rewarding, many people leave because of low pay, long hours and inconsistent schedules, according to CareVoyant, which makes software for the industry. Here are the bottom five fields workers left from 2022 to 2024: Nursing Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 28% Key reason: There's lots of demand for nurses, wages have risen and few nurses leave once they've invested the time and money to earn nursing degrees, Shrivastava said. Software development Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 37% Key reason: Software developers have relatively high salaries and job satisfaction levels, Shrivastava said. It's also a low-stress job with good work-life balance, according to U.S. News rankings. Dental Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 38% Key reason: The pay is good, the investment in schooling is significant and skills aren't transferable to other occupations, Shrivastava said. Therapy Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 51% Key reason: Occupational therapists and speech pathologists earn a comfortable living and have high job satisfaction levels, Shrivastava said. Accounting Share of workers leaving in the two-year period: 52% Key reason: Accountants have specialized skills, stable work environments and good work-life balance, Shrivastava said.

Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Uncle Elon's final report card
All good buddy comedies come to an end. For President Donald Trump and first friend "Uncle Elon" Musk, theirs wrapped up with the same explosive fanfare upon which it started. But now their shared enthusiasm for cutting government waste has morphed into animosity for each other so deep and personal that it's become a textbook case study in management gone wrong. In November, just after Trump's reelection, I asked management experts if Musk could mimic his track record of juicing everything he could out of his lean companies to make the government run more efficiently. They were reluctant to doubt Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, but just as reluctant to think his efficiency tactics at Tesla and X meant he could single-handedly transform the government. I checked back in with some of them in March, six weeks into DOGE's chaotic tenure, after it dismantled USAID and axed tens of thousands of federal workers. They described his management as "clumsy," "wrongheaded," and full of "political recklessness." Now, the breakup of the bromance between two of the world's biggest, boldest personalities is surprising only in that it took so long to unfold and, once it did, moved with the speed that only two social media savvy, chronically online posters could propel. (Musk posted on X more than a dozen times lambasting Trump and his " Big Beautiful Bill" late last week, since deleting some of the most disparaging claims, and Trump suggested Musk might be suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome.") If DOGE is a cautionary tale in how not to manage, it's one from the furthest extreme, marked by a clash between the egos of two of the world's most powerful men that made politics extremely personal. Still there are business lessons to be gleaned even for those of us who run fewer than six companies and have fewer than 220 million social media followers. DOGE has proved "unsuccessful" up to this point, and is so far a "failed venture" for Musk and for the government, says Subodha Kumar, a professor at Temple University's Fox School of Business. It brought "disruption, a lot of delays, a lot of mistrust, and a lot of good people have left the organization," he says. "This kind of damage takes a long time to repair." To date, DOGE has claimed it found $180 billion in savings (Musk in May called DOGE "effective," but "not as effective as I'd like," as the original goal was to save $2 trillion). An analysis in April from nonpartisan research group Partnership for Public Service found that the department's actions could cost as much as $135 billion, an estimate of the costs of the firings, re-hirings, and lost productivity. Meanwhile, the four months Musk spent working taking a chainsaw to the federal government are wrapping up doused in drama that has spilled over to his other companies. After his 130-day post as a special government employee ends, Musk is pointing the blame for government waste back on Trump, skewering the spending bill for being too big and ugly, and endorsing a call to impeach Trump and replace him with Vice President JD Vance (that post has since been deleted). The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor The escalating tension is just the beginning of a fight that could get worse for Musk, and likely has little benefit for Trump, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor who has studied Trump for decades and advised presidents, tells me in an email. DOGE, he notes, overpromised savings and may actually cost US taxpayers more when it comes to rehiring costs, repairing systems, and weakened cybersecurity. As WIRED reported last week, DOGE is hiring, and even has reached out to technologists who formerly worked for the government. Musk's involvement with the DOGE proved tumultuous for his businesses from the start. His personal wealth ballooned by some $200 billion in 2024, surpassing $400 billion after Election Day. Once he got to work in the White House, his absenteeism from his companies — paired with a growing distaste for DOGE's actions among the electorate and protests targeting Tesla — led his net worth to drop alongside Tesla's market cap. Last Thursday, Musk's open beef with Trump further hampered his wealth, leading the Tesla CEO to lose $34 billion personally in a single day. Tesla stock, which has taken a beating as people turn on the company to protest Musk's government work, took its biggest tumble since March, closing 14% lower and wiping out $152 billion from the company's market cap. Musk is still the richest person in the world. For Musk, there's damage to the Tesla brand in need of repair. His next step could be "to portray himself as a purist who came in to offer his technical help and didn't realize how deep the corruption runs," says Michael Morris, a professor at Columbia Business School. "Musk could potentially portray himself as a wayward son of the tech industry." This might only work if the Trump administration continues to stumble, and if Musk also sees more success, like winning big with his robotaxi push. As Taylor Lorenz reported in User Mag Friday, some high-profile Democrats are already signaling that they would welcome Musk back into the fold. Trump over the weekend told NBC News Musk would face "serious consequences" if he donated to Democratic candidates (he did not specify what they would be). It's yet to be seen where Musk will find his next political alliances: On Friday, he ran a poll on X asking if a third political party should emerge to include the 80% of Americans in the middle of Republicans and Democrats, as he sees it. The president has threatened to go after Musk's government contracts — which total in tens of billions of dollars for SpaceX and Tesla. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump himself bought a Tesla just three months ago, and is now considering selling it. (Best of luck to him, the cars' resale values have tanked). As Trump and Musk part ways, it's clear that Musk's brazen, fully autonomous leadership style didn't work in the government world, as it eschewed transparency and collaboration in favor of a top-down approach. "The one-size-fits-all policy does not work everywhere," says Kumar. "You have to understand the culture of the organization and you have to work from inside rather than from outside." Back in November, experts told me it wasn't clear what authority Musk would actually wield in the newly-created position to implement massive spending cuts. Trying to employ tech-world leadership tactics from the White House created a rivalry between Musk and Trump for power and control, undercutting the alliance between the two and leaving DOGE far short of its savings goals. "The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss — with surging parallel drives for grandiosity," Sonnenfeld says. "Musk's tragic mistake was that he forgot his role — as a staffer and advisor to Trump, not the primary character he foolishly believed himself to be, and even now, continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability."