UK watchdog says police must not be caught off-guard again after violent summer riots
LONDON, May 7 (Reuters) - Nationwide rioting that shook Britain last summer was not coordinated by specific groups, but police must do more to counter false narratives online to avoid similar events in future, England's police watchdog said on Wednesday.
Racist unrest involving far-right supporters erupted at anti-immigration protests across Britain last summer after false information circulated online that a British teenager who killed three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event was an Islamist migrant.
Axel Rudakubana, 18, admitted killing the girls and stabbing 10 others last July in the northern English town of Southport. He was sentenced to at least 52 years behind bars in January.
In a report, His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services said those who took part in the riots were mostly "disaffected individuals, influencers or groups that incited people to act violently", rather than criminal factions or extremists.
"It was mainly unrelated to their ideology or political views," the inspectorate said in the report. "The causes of the disorder were complex, but the overwhelming speed and volume of online content further fuelled its spread."
HMICFRS said the police had not kept pace with the fast-developing nature of online communications, and that such events required forces to counter false narratives online and be innovative in their approach.
"Policing cannot be passive when public safety is at risk," HMICFRS said.
HMICFRS also found the police did not sufficiently prioritise intelligence on disorder and that lessons had not been learned from previous outbreaks. Chief Inspector Andy Cooke said the police "should not be caught off-guard again".
The National Police Chiefs Council welcomed the report but said it failed to accurately assess the forces' role in countering harmful online content.
"It overlooks the reality that law enforcement cannot and should not regulate social media, placing unrealistic expectations on policing while ignoring the critical responsibility of platform providers and regulators," the NPCC said.
"Without robust detection, moderation, and removal of false narratives, misinformation will continue to fuel unrest unchecked," the NPCC added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top
There was not much headroom, fiscal or otherwise, as the Tory leader spoke on the economy in the cramped basement of a City hotel. The ceiling was low but Kemi Badenoch's hopes were high as she addressed a conference of bankers who seemed under-enthused by the Chancellor's spending review. Tax Freedom Day, the point of the year when we stop working for the Exchequer, had just dawned, six days later than last year, and there was little sign of relief. The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that Rachel Reeves was a 'gnat's whisker' away from having to hike taxes and most gnats are asking for the No 1 clippers these days. Add the grim news of GDP falling by 0.3 per cent in April, and the Chancellor's breakfast media round had been like someone trying to sing Good Vibrations to the tune of Beethoven's Funeral March. Speaking from a hospital surrounded by diagnostic equipment (all wisely unplugged to avoid images of flatlining) Reeves insisted she is 'determined' to deliver growth and that GDP is 'volatile'. This is the same Reeves who demanded an emergency Budget in 2022, when GDP fell by 0.1 per cent on the Tory watch. It was not a bad time, therefore, for a Conservative to remind those in the City who their friends are. Badenoch had come to play FTSE with financiers, but she began with a nostra culpa. She admitted the Tories had left a ropey economy – blame Covid, blame Putin, blame the Treasury, don't blame me – 'but it was not this bad'. Productivity, she added, was 'stuck in first gear' and London was experiencing the greatest exodus of wealth of any city save Moscow. She pronounced it the American way to rhyme with cow. Labour don't 'get' business because hardly any of them have a background in it, she added, which may be true but only one of the Beach Boys knew how to surf. Reform, she contended, was running a scam. 'No one is making the argument for business any more except me and my party,' she said. 'Business is a good, in and of itself, and it pays for everything.' Especially, she hoped, at that night's Tory donors' summer party. Their tummies suitably tickled, Badenoch then returned to bashing the Government, saying that borrowing is so high there is a 'significant risk of a death spiral' and that Labour is pessimistically pursuing a path of managed decline, exacerbated by a compliance culture that strangles innovation. So far so punchy, but what would she do better? Badenoch's shirt cuffs were unbuttoned but she had little up her sleeves. Her opposition to VAT on school fees was reprised and she promised to 'reverse changes to APR and BPR' (agricultural and business property relief), thus giving CPR to the economy. Beyond that, she had nothing. It is, to be fair, early in the parliament for policy. What she most wants now are allies ('Quite frankly, we need an army.') 'I'm on your side,' she told them, 'but I need you to be on mine too. You can't sit back and hope that someone else is coming along to fix this. You need to speak up. Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. You need to get on the pitch too.' Building to her conclusion with a plea for ideas, Captain Kemi hit a poetic, if metrically flawed, note. 'Back us, put your name to the cause,' she said, 'for we're not going to turn the country around with quiet applause.' She then left the stage to quiet applause. The pin-striped army liked her tone, but they are not quite ready to follow her over the top.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
RIOTS AND REBELS by Nick Rennison: Why the English LOVE revolting
RIOTS AND REBELS by Nick Rennison (Oldcastle Books £16.99, 210pp) Throughout history, angry men and women have taken to the streets to express their displeasure about everything from theatre tickets (too expensive) to prayer books (no longer in Latin) by way of brothels (shouldn't be allowed). That's not forgetting the wonderfully named Plug Plot riots (1842), the Brown Dog riots (1907) and the Rebecca riots (1839-43). In this highly accessible book, Nick Rennison walks us through the history of popular protest from the 14th century to the present day. In the process some common themes emerge. Not only do protesters usually not get the thing they are campaigning for – a longer lunchbreak, the abolition of the monarchy, cheaper potatoes – they also have a high chance of ending up mangled or dead. One of the earliest examples of how things can escalate was Kett's Rebellion of 1549, which was fought by East Anglian peasants against the local gentry who were enclosing their common land. During a tense stand-off, a boy dropped his trousers and mooned at the soldiers, whereupon he was despatched with a single bullet. In one way the lad was lucky. The punishments meted out to rebels and rioters were generally designed to inflict the maximum pain. Nor was rank any protection. In 1660, Major-General Thomas Harrison was hung, drawn and quartered for his part in the execution of Charles I 11 years earlier. The grisly procedure involved Harrison being hanged almost to the point of death, before being castrated and then having his bowels cut out of his body and paraded in front of him. Only at the beheading stage did the torture end. After death, Harrison's body was cut into quarters and displayed to the crowd as a warning about what awaited anyone tempted to commit high treason. Incredibly, the old soldier seems to have borne his fate with equanimity. According to the diarist Samuel Pepys who witnessed the horrible spectacle, the condemned prisoner looked 'as cheerful as any man could in that condition'. A HUNDRED and fifty years later, the appetite for revenge showed little sign of abating. During the anti-Catholic Gordon riots of 1780, thousands of citizens were brought to boiling point by a wild rumour that hordes of Jesuit priests were hiding in tunnels beneath London, awaiting instructions from the Pope to blow up the banks of the Thames and flood the city. Taking to the streets, the protesters set buildings on fire, pelted bishops with filth and even roughed up the Lord Chief Justice. In the confusion, hundreds of citizens were trampled underfoot, while others were later condemned to death for public disorder. (As an extra bit of unfairness, the hotheaded leader of the riots, Lord George Gordon, was acquitted of any wrongdoing.) Just because the forces of law and order usually won in the long run, it didn't mean that there weren't some close calls along the way. Rennison reveals that even rocksteady Victorian England teetered on the edge of full-scale insurrection. In 1842, men disguised as women and calling themselves 'Rebecca's Daughters' roamed South Wales smashing tollgates in protest at the way that poor farming communities were forced to pay to use local roads. That same year, the Chartists gathered in their thousands to demand a radical overhaul of the status quo, including giving the vote to every man in England. A political revolution, in other words. In the circumstances you can see why Queen Adelaide, Victoria's aunt, was convinced that England would go the way of France, and that 'her fate is to be that of Marie Antoinette'. She wasn't the only person to misread the situation. In 1855, Karl Marx witnessed a riot in Hyde Park held in protest at the proposed ban on Sunday trading. He declared excitedly he was not 'exaggerating in saying that the English Revolution began yesterday in Hyde Park'. He was, of course, exaggerating. Throughout this engaging book, Rennison keeps a sharp eye out for themes and patterns that repeat across the centuries. For instance, the riots against Margaret Thatcher's poll tax in 1990 centred on the unfairness of everyone paying the same, regardless of income. Six hundred years earlier a similar grievance ignited the Peasants' Revolt when King Richard II imposed a levy of one shilling on poor and rich alike. Perhaps the most obvious hangover from the past, though, concerns the Just Stop Oil protesters who glued themselves to Constable's Hay Wain in 2022. The choice of painting was no accident. John Constable's 200-yearold masterpiece shows a rural landscape in his native Suffolk in which a hay wagon is being pulled through a tranquil millpond. By targeting this image, the protesters made the point that climate change and fossil fuels threaten to destroy this natural idyll. Indeed, before gluing themselves to the frame, the Just Stop Oilers attached their own version of The Hay Wain, depicting an 'apocalyptic vision of the future' complete with a broken washing machine in the hay cart. This incident achieved maximum publicity around the world, which was exactly what had been intended. Still, it was hardly original. Riots and Rebels is available now from the Mail Bookshop OVER a hundred years earlier, the suffragette Mary Richardson had chosen another National Gallery treasure to deface. In 1914, she slashed the priceless Rokeby Venus with a meat cleaver. In Velazquez's 17th-century masterpiece, a luscious nude female figure reclines languorously on a chaise longue while admiring her reflection in a mirror held by Cupid. Richardson and her suffragette colleagues saw The Rokeby Venus as a symbol of the objectification and subjugation of women. Specifically, Richardson wanted to draw attention to the way that suffragette hunger-strikers, of whom she had been one, were systematically brutalised by prison doctors. During force-feeding sessions, a tube was shoved down the women's gullet and into their stomach, resulting in physical and mental trauma that could last a lifetime. How different from Velazquez's Venus, whose naked body was the object of veneration – and titillation – for the men who poured into the National Gallery to gawp at her sensuous curves and gleaming skin. Apart from anything else, the goddess of love seemed entirely unconcerned with bothering her pretty head as to whether or not she had the vote.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
So what's there to high-five about now, Ms Reeves? Critics blast Chancellor's tax and spend plans - as it emerges the economy SHRANK by 0.03 per cent
Rachel Reeves ' plan to renew the British economy was left in tatters yesterday after figures revealed it was slamming into reverse. The Office for National Statistics said gross domestic product shrank by 0.3 per cent in April – the worst monthly performance for a year and a half. It came less than 24 hours after the Chancellor declared that only Labour could fix Britain as she set out the Government's spending plans. Yesterday she admitted that the latest numbers were 'clearly disappointing'. Yet much of the blame for the slump was laid squarely at her own door – with firms pointing to the impact of Ms Reeves' £25billion raid on employer national insurance. Donald Trump 's tariff wars and the end of a stamp duty holiday also took their toll. It added to the growing sense of disenchantment with Labour's handling of the economy as firms also face higher business rates and a raft of new workers' rights. The figures will knock the wind out of the Chancellor's sails after the UK had appeared to enjoy a much brighter start to the year, with GDP growing by 0.7 per cent in the first quarter – the fastest pace among the G7 group of advanced economies. Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said: 'It's bad news that growth has fallen but when you introduce a £25billion jobs tax, hike business rates, drive investors overseas and spawn hundreds of pages of red tape, lower growth is precisely what you get. 'You can't tax and spend your way to growth. The quicker this socialist Government wakes up to that, the better.' Separate figures today from the Recruitment and Employment Confederation showed the number of those seeking jobs has seen the biggest increase in four and a half years, as redundancies surge and work opportunities shrink. And evidence mounted that entrepreneurs are becoming fed up with Labour's anti-business policies, as a survey from accountancy firm S&W showed 39 per cent were considering moving their companies abroad because a lack of support. It came as Tesco, Britain's biggest supermarket, said costs being piled on to it by the Government were resulting in higher prices for consumers. 'There are definitely continued inflationary pressures on the market,' said chief executive Ken Murphy. 'I think you've got to look at things like the impact of all the new taxation and regulatory costs on the industry.' The downturn in April was the worst since October 2023 and bigger than the 0.1 per cent contraction expected by economists. The figures covered a period when President Trump introduced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs that caused a wave of market turbulence and upended decades of global trading arrangements. They showed a £2billion slump in UK goods exports to the US, the biggest fall on records going back to 1997. There was also a big drop in output from the car industry – one of the sectors worst affected by tariffs. And the end of the stamp duty holiday took its toll as a surge in market activity at the start of the year, as buyers rushed to beat the deadline, screeched to a halt. The deteriorating picture will only add to fears that the Chancellor will raise taxes again this autumn. It follows figures earlier this week showing the economy has lost more than a quarter of a million jobs since her last Budget. Suren Thiru, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, said: 'These figures suggest that the UK's economic fortunes took a notable nosedive in 'Awful April'. 'April's decline is probably the start of a more sobering period for the UK economy with the damage from spiralling costs and intensifying global uncertainty set to slow growth sharply this quarter. Weaker growth makes generating the revenue Government needs to support its sizable spending plans more difficult, increasing the chances of further tax rises in the autumn Budget.'
