$36m blow to super fund-backed ISPT could hit Aussie retirements
Property funds management firm ISPT, who invest in properties nationwide on behalf of a swath of super funds that covers about 50 per cent of all Australian workers, have sold a 206 Bourke St property in an $80.1m deal that is one of the biggest CBD transactions this year.
But it's far less than the $116.28m they paid for the property in the heart of Chinatown in 2015, according to CoreLogic records.
The six-storey complex currently hosts Michelin-starred dumpling restaurant Tim Ho Wan, JB Hi-Fi, Holmesglen Institute, and Victoria Police.
The property sold to a Melbourne-based investor with historic links to China, and half of the other groups that contested the sale were backed by Asia-based capital.
Independent commercial property specialist Mark Wizel said the sale was outstanding in the current climate, but noted that additional taxes on foreign investors would have wiped millions from what they would have bid for the site.
The founder of Mark Wizel Property Group estimated that if not for the additional costs for internationals, the property would have sold for more than $95m — with such bidders likely to have factored in a $1.5m hit to annual revenues for the property to cover those taxes.
'And there is little doubt that the Melbourne CBD has undergone major repricing post Covid, due to the nature of our lockdowns, an ongoing work from home trend and the CBD going through a big transition from the traditional Monday to Friday, nine to five, hub, to a more vibrant destination Thursday to Sunday evenings,' Mr Wizel said.
'But the Melbourne CBD is now opening itself up from a commercial property pricing point of view to being at an extremely smart counter-cyclical time in the market for buyers to secure core assets in core locations at heavily discounted prices.'
Historically, the property was home to Melbourne's old Village Cinemas centre, and prior to ISPT, Singaporean real estate group Hiap Hoe paid $105m for it in 2013.
JLL's Stuart Taylor, Josh Rutman and MingXuan Li, as well as Cushman and Wakefield agents Oliver Hay, Leon Ma, and Daniel Wolman handled the most recent sale, which was touted as an indication of the depth of international and particularly Asia-based demand for Melbourne properties.
About half of the offers made for the property with a 3157sq m landholding and 11,845sq m of floorspace, were backed by Asian capital, with Mr Ma indicating that the buyer while based in Melbourne today, had relocated from China a number of years ago.
The agent added that of the $700m in commercial property the team have sold since January, 50 per cent of sales had been linked to Asia-based capital'.
'But land tax will definitely play a critical role in this space, because it has gone up quite significantly — and that's not helping to get investors back,' Mr Ma said.
'So the government does need to do something.'
Mr Hay said there were other positive signs for the CBD, including its relative affordability.
'If you look at foot traffic, that is up beyond where the numbers were pre Covid, and assets like this are starting to rebound reasonably strongly,' he said.
'And the population fundamentals are very strong.'
The completion of the nearby Town Hall train station is also likely to have an impact on boosting foot traffic further.
JLL's Josh Rutman said while not commenting directly on the 206 Bourke St sale, said the CBD had suffered as a result of uncertainty around government taxation and policies in the property sector — but also as a result of poor clarity on bringing government workers back into the office instead of working from home.
'But it has been heartening to see investors starting to bid on well located properties that present a great deal of potential, and on a historical basis, they are buying in at a very attractive time,' Mr Rutman said.
Property Council of Australia Victorian executive director Cath Evans said it was good to see Melbourne's CBD attracting investment, a sign of confidence in its long-term future.
'At the same time, further investment can and should be unlocked through innovative planning solutions and much needed tax relief that levels up Melbourne with other major cities in Australia and throughout the Asia-Pacific region,' Ms Evans said.
ISPT remains one of Victoria's bigger property owners, with stakes in a further 10 CBD sites, including the Midtown arcade, The Strand arcade and Melbourne's GPO in the vicinity of their recent sale.
Their website indicates they own about 44 properties around the state, and have a total of 139 properties and $20.5bn under management.
The property at 206 Bourke St was understood to be a part of its $16.6bn Core Fund, which aims to help super industry groups maintain growth in the long term.
Money made in the sale is likely to be put back into the fund in a bid to deliver future gains.
The government is also facing calls to alter taxation on international investors to help boost housing supply, with groups including the Housing Industry Association noting additional costs were a major deterrent to bringing in more funding to build homes across Melbourne — especially apartments in the CBD.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds
In a reminder of how broken housing affordability and access is, new analysis highlights a major mismatch between the size of Australian homes and the number of people living in them. While the vast bulk of Australian housing is built for larger families, property research firm Cotality has found more than 60 per cent of households are made up of just one or two people. It reveals a misalignment between "who lives in our homes and the kinds of homes we're building", Cotality's head of head of Australian research Eliza Owen said in the report. "Of the lone-person households in Australia, the data suggests around 40 per cent are aged 65 and over," Ms Owen said. "The highest share of households is two people, but the highest share of housing has three bedrooms. "While there's nothing wrong with more bedrooms than people in a dwelling, there could be some inefficiencies in the way housing is being allocated," Ms Owen said. "After all, a 'traditional' family of four may have more need for a three-bedroom dwelling than a household of two people." The report cited data from the 2021 Census, which showed there were more two-person family households in three-bedroom dwellings (about 1.3 million), than three or four-person family households (about 1.1 million). Ms Owen has suggested a way to fix the "efficiency question", which she knows is not politically appealing — send a price signal. "Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than you need, and cheaper to live in smaller housing," she wrote in her research note. She said that logic often leads to calls for tax reform including abolishing stamp duty to cheaper to move between housing, replacing it with a broad-based land tax (which raises costs the more land you own). "These options are both politically difficult as it would involve moving from a tax that applies to a small amount of voters each year who purchase property to one that will tax two thirds of voters (property owners)," she noted. Independent housing researcher Cameron Kusher, speaking to The Business in July, argued high transaction costs, namely stamp duty, discourage moving to a "better sized property" and can lead to people purchasing larger homes than they need to begin with. "People just feel like if I can get a better and bigger home sooner, that's a better outcome," he said. "If we look at what is being built, it's usually very large houses, four or five bedrooms, taking up most of the land on these new housing sites," Mr Kusher said. "A lot of it comes down to how much a piece of a property, [and] how much the land and the house, costs. "I think a lot of people are building bigger homes, thinking 'I'll spend a little bit more up-front and my family will grow into this home'. "It might just be a couple grandkids, or they're planning to have a couple of kids." He noted the effects of rapidly increasing property prices, which can leave people priced out of re-entering the market, and the fact that larger properties can be more likely to appreciate in value at a faster pace. Cotality's Ms Owen said other policy options to encourage people to move into appropriately sized homes could include reforming pension asset tests to include the value of the family home. "Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in our larger cities, that can accommodate smaller households. "But shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these new homes." The government has accepted it is not on track to meet the target to build 1.2 million homes in five years, but Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the ambition, despite Treasury advice it would not be met. In another recent note, Ms Owen questioned the focus of state and federal governments on speeding up building approvals to boost housing supply, warning that the construction industry simply cannot keep pace. "With completion times already above average and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements," she said. Cameron Kusher argued past experience could be a guide on how to approach today's housing problems and ease the construction crunch. "Maybe we need to go back to how things were 30 or 40 years ago, where you have smaller homes and you make them easy to renovate," he told The Business. "Over time, people can actually add bedrooms, bathrooms, car parks, verandahs and all these sorts of things to add value to the home.
ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply
Rules holding back superannuation funds from investing potential billions of dollars into housing and renewables projects could face a shake up, after broad agreement at Canberra's productivity roundtable that there is a need for change. Super funds are required to meet a "performance benchmark", under laws designed to ensure funds are performing and maintaining the retirement savings of their members. But critics have said the rules around those benchmarks discourage investment in some assets, including a rule that requires stamp duty to be disclosed as a fee in a way that they say discourages housing investment. The government flagged it was seeking to rewrite the benchmark after a 2023 review similarly found it could unintentionally be discouraging investment in some assets. Rebecca Mikula-Wright, who heads the Investor Group on Climate Change, said there had been broad agreement at this week's summit that changing those rules could accelerate housing and renewables investment. "The Your Future Your Super performance benchmark was discussed a lot in the session I was in yesterday, and really around how that is constraining the ability of super funds to invest in higher risk projects they really want to invest into," Ms Mikula-Wright told the ABC. 'The treasurer did indicate he is likely to revisit those reforms." After a day of talks focused on finding agreement on one of the thorniest issues impacting housing and the environment — Australia's "broken" environmental approvals process — Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed his pleasure at the "real prospect of a useful consensus" emerging on some of the country's key economic challenges. "Day two of the reform roundtable was really dominated by how we can boost housing supply, how we can responsibly reduce and improve regulation and speed up approvals," Mr Chalmers said. "I'm really encouraged by the consensus in the room for economic reform in these areas, and we're enthusiastic about some of the policies that participants put on the table." Ms Mikula-Wright said there had also been good support for a Productivity Commission recommendation to establish a "strike team" that could land faster approvals for key infrastructure projects, particularly around renewables. "We're competing with markets that are getting projects up faster and cheaper, so we have to do the same. Then we can attract more capital and get those projects rolling out," she said. After warnings from Housing Minister Clare O'Neil that red tape was dragging down housing approvals — and leaked Treasury documents indicating the government was considering a pause on the National Construction Code — attendees also agreed such a move should take place. The National Construction Code lays out minimum requirements for buildings on everything from fire exits and accessibility to insulation and capacity for electric vehicle chargers. But while changes to safety standards could continue, attendees discussed possible pauses on "non-essential" rules of the construction code, such as new requirements to lift energy efficiency standards. New South Wales Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said a pause on the code was needed, though the finer details were being worked through. "The pause is something that is where the conversation was concentrated on. In terms of how long it needs to be paused, who would do the review, what's the terms of reference, that work can be pursued," he said, "I think we will have a few more conversations at the roundtable and beyond to sort out those levels of detail." The ABC understands the government hopes to move fast on a pause, and not have discussions drag out for several months. After two successive terms of government failing to find a path through the thicket of reform on Australia's Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, attendees of today's roundtable were cautiously welcoming what appeared to be some progress. The complicated laws govern the environmental approval process for major projects, such as energy and mining projects, as well as housing and other developments where they potentially impact threatened species or significant cultural sites. But a major review of those decades-old laws published in 2020 concluded that they were no longer working for business or the environment — a view that today's roundtable attendees were agreed on. However, attempts under former environment minister Tanya Plibersek to update the laws were abandoned before the federal election — with a key sticking point being a plan to introduce a federal watchdog that could independently monitor EPBC approvals. Mining and other business groups did not support that proposed Environmental Protection Agency. But after extended talks today, they left saying they would be prepared to support an EPA, with a caveat that the final say would rest with the environment minister. There are still devils in the detail, including a desire from environment groups to see the EPA also given final approval powers on projects. But it marks the first significant advancement in EPBC discussions since they stalled last term. Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive, Kelly O'Shanassy, said there was agreement in the room that an EPA was needed but there remained different views on how it should operate. "There is a lot of support for efficient decision making, transparent decision making, accountability — that is not the current process," Ms O'Shanassy said. "You need to have an independent regulator that is held to account for the speed of its decisions and the quality of its decisions." Business Council of Australia chief executive, Bran Black, said a federal EPA should effectively be set-up in the same way as existing state-based authorities. "We take the view that it's really important to have a separation between the entity that is ultimately responsible for compliance and the entity that's ultimately responsible for approvals," Mr Black said. "In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to go down the path of creating multiple bodies at all [but] the government has committed to a new EPA. It's made it very clear, that's a point that it's taken to two elections now." "The question then is: what does this EPA do?" Environment Minister Murray Watt said, however, there was strong support around the table for "stronger" environmental protections and "faster and simpler" project approvals, through a more transparent process for businesses. "These are objectives our government supports, but we will ultimately need support across the parliament for reform. It was therefore very useful for the shadow treasurer, as a roundtable participant, to hear the depth of support for change," Senator Watt said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the Coalition was willing to work constructively with the government to see reforms to the environment laws passed.
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
The businesses abandoning America over US tariffs
Australian businesses are halting exports to the US, as the Trump administration closes a tax loophole for low-cost goods entering America on August 29.
