'On a flight to Sweden': Israel deports Greta Thunberg after intercepting Gaza-bound ship she was on; shares pic
Activist
was deported from Israel on Tuesday, a day after Israeli naval forces intercepted a Gaza-bound aid ship she was aboard. The Swedish environmentalist was put on a flight to France, from where she would continue to Sweden, according to Israel's foreign ministry, which posted a photo of the normally flight-averse activist on the plane.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Thunberg was among 12 passengers on the Madleen, a vessel carrying humanitarian supplies that was seized about 200 kilometers off Gaza's coast. While three other activists agreed to immediate deportation, eight others contested the order and were detained pending a court hearing.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organized the journey, and rights groups including Adalah and Amnesty International condemned Israel's actions as a violation of international law, as the vessel was in international waters.
Israel rejected these claims, maintaining its right to enforce what it calls a lawful naval blockade of Gaza.
Israel dismissed the mission as a "selfie yacht" publicity stunt, noting the "meager" aid aboard amounted to less than a truckload of supplies. The cargo, including rice and baby formula, will be transferred to Gaza through "real humanitarian channels," the foreign ministry stated.
Former US President Donald Trump weighed in on the incident, mocking Thunberg: "I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg.
She's a young, angry person... I think she has to go to an anger management class."
The naval blockade has been in place since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The current conflict, which began with Hamas's October 7 attack that killed over 1,200 Israelis, has resulted in more than 54,000 Palestinian deaths and a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, according to local health officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chicago riots: Videos show violent clashes, Trump effigy set ablaze
Thousands of demonstrators flooded Chicago's downtown Loop on Tuesday to protest rapid ICE raids across the country and the Trump administration's immigration crackdowns. What began as a large, vocal march quickly turned chaotic, with videos showing a Trump effigy raised in Daley Plaza, clashes with police, and a car speeding through a crowd. ALSO READ| How much do ICE agents make? Know average annual salary as Los Angeles protests ramp up 1. The protest kicked off at Federal Plaza around 5 PM, with drums pounding and chants of 'Revolution!' echoing through the crowd. Protesters waved Mexican and Palestinian flags, held signs reading 'ICE Out of Chicago' and 'One mustache away from fascism.' 2. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators joined the protest, chanting 'From Palestine to Mexico, these border walls have got to go.' 3. Around 6:19 p.m., chaos broke out when a maroon sedan sped through the crowd near Monroe Street and Wabash Avenue. A Chicago officer tried to strike the vehicle with a baton. Witness Dr. Howard Ehrman told CBS News, 'It was a miracle that nobody got hit… Instead of trying to block the car, [police] were trying to block the demonstrators.' 4. A woman in a yellow tank top, seen earlier spray-painting during the protest, was later spotted behind the wheel of the car, which only stopped after breaking down on State Street. 5. Tensions escalated at State and Monroe as protesters clashed with officers. Videos captured officers making arrests and protesters resisting. One demonstrator was seen being taken away wrapped in a flag. 6. At Daley Plaza around 7:45 p.m., demonstrators raised an effigy of Donald Trump and stood atop the iconic Picasso sculpture in symbolic defiance. 8. Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) suspended bus service across much of downtown, halting routes between North Avenue and Roosevelt Road due to the unrest. 'L' trains continued operating. 9. While several people were arrested, police said there were no major injuries. Some squad cars were tagged with anti-police graffiti. ALSO READ| What is Insurrection Act? 1807 law Donald Trump could invoke in Los Angeles amid anti-ICE riots 10. 'That's not my country, and I'm here to fight for my country,' said one woman from the podium, per CBS News. 'The injustice that's being done and being upheld by the White House is unfair, and we're here to practice our right to protest,' another added.
The Print
13 minutes ago
- The Print
Israel's biggest fight is against propaganda. Fact-checking is a duty
But there was one problem: The story was fake. On 1 June 2025, some top international media outlets rushed to publish alarming headlines along the lines of: 'Israeli forces open fire at Gaza aid site, kill at least 31 Palestinians.' Without any delay, news platforms picked the story almost verbatim, amplifying the claim that Israeli troops had opened fire on innocent civilians waiting for humanitarian aid, resulting in a tragic loss of life. The narrative was emotionally charged, complete with harrowing images and heart-wrenching testimonies by, of course, 'Palestinian health officials'—exactly the kind of material that garners viral traction in the digital age. In an age where headlines travel faster than facts and the world is interconnected, it has become alarmingly easy for falsehoods to masquerade as truth—particularly when they serve the interests of hostile actors. Since 7 October 2023, Israel has been dealing with a flood of misinformation and disinformation on a daily basis. And this week was on a whole other scale. Subsequent investigations by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the US and Israeli-backed aid initiative that runs the site, revealed that the events were manipulated and misrepresented. Yes, there was chaos. Yes, there were casualties. But they were all the result of what the media labelled as 'some masked gunmen' (that is actually Hamas). Yes, Hamas terrorists were firing at their own civilians, preventing them from getting aid packages and sabotaging the well-organised US-Israeli-backed humanitarian efforts. It was a deliberate orchestration of panic by Hamas, a terrorist organisation known for its expertise in exploiting civilian suffering for global sympathy. Israeli forces were not the aggressors but had, in fact, coordinated with international bodies to ensure safe and orderly aid distribution. This was not just a tragic misunderstanding – it was a strategic lie. Fact-checking is a duty What's even more concerning is how quickly and uncritically the falsehood was adopted by media outlets near and far. When the inaccuracy was pointed out, some media outlets corrected their reports—but by then, the damage was done. The false narrative had already spread like wildfires, shaping public perception and fueling it with Hamas propaganda. Yet another victory for Hamas in spreading their lies. With such a robust and diverse media landscape, stories sometimes bypass the rigorous filters of verification and balance. In the rush to be first, too often we forget to be right. In a region as volatile as West Asia, misinformation doesn't just distort perception—it can cost lives, incite violence, and derail peace efforts. Hamas and similar groups are well aware of this dynamic. They do not merely fight with rockets—they fight with rumours (sounds familiar? India recently experienced something very similar from a neighbour). They weaponise emotion and imagery, knowing that the court of global opinion is as critical as any battlefield. Their goal is not just to resist Israel militarily, but to isolate it diplomatically and vilify it morally. In this war of narratives, every unverified headline that echoes their propaganda is a victory for extremism. Israel remains committed to the safety of all civilians—Israeli and Palestinian alike. Every aid shipment into Gaza, every ceasefire proposal, and every diplomatic negotiation is a testament to that commitment. But Israel's efforts are undermined when lies are allowed to overshadow facts. We must all uphold the standards of our profession: Fact-checking is not a luxury; it is a duty. Let us not allow those who thrive in confusion—dictate the narrative. In this age of information warfare, truth is our strongest ally. Let us protect it together. Guy Nir is Spokesperson at Embassy of Israel in India. Views are personal.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill': Millions face stricter work rules - what changes are proposed under food aid program?
President Trump's bill proposes significant cuts to the US's largest food aid program — SNAP — impacting millions of people (Image credit: AP) US President Donald Trump 's recently introduced "Big Beautiful Bill" proposes significant cuts to federal spending on one of the largest food aid programs — the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for low-income groups. The proposed changes to the food aid program would require states to cover more of the costs, make several million more recipients work to keep receiving benefits and could reduce the amount of food assistance provided in the future. Earlier, the Republican-led House passed the much-debated legislation known as the "Big Beautiful Bill" to advance President Trump's policy agenda. He wants it finalized and sent to him by July 4,on the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. What changes Are proposed in SNAP? The federal food aid program, formerly known as food stamps, was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on October 1, 2008. It provides monthly payments for purchasing food to low-income residents who earn less than $1,632 per month for individuals or $3,380 for a household of four. As of February, over 42 million people across the country were receiving SNAP benefits — roughly one out of every eight people in the US. This is a decrease from the peak average of 47.6 million participants during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly benefit of $353 per household. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the legislation passed by the US House could reduce federal SNAP spending by about $295 billion over the next 10 years. The bill would also eliminate SNAP benefits for around 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants who are legally in the US but are not citizens or permanent residents. Currently, adults aged 18–54 who are able to work and have no dependents must work, volunteer or participate in job training for at least 80 hours a month to continue receiving SNAP benefits. If they fail to meet this requirement, they are limited to three months of benefits within a three-year period. The new bill would extend these work requirements to people aged 55–64. It would also apply to some parents without children under the age of 7. The CBO estimates that these changes could reduce SNAP participation by about 3.2 million people per month. Currently, the federal government pays for all SNAP food benefits and shares the administrative costs with states. Under the proposed bill, states would have to cover 75% of administrative costs and begin paying a share of food benefits by 2028. The House passed the bill by a narrow margin of just one vote (215–214). While Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats in the Senate, no Democrats supported the bill in the House, and they are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have also raised concerns about the bill, especially regarding potential cuts to food aid and medical coverage. They fear an increase in the federal deficit. To secure support, Senate leaders may need to revise parts of the bill.
