
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill': Millions face stricter work rules - what changes are proposed under food aid program?
President Trump's bill proposes significant cuts to the US's largest food aid program — SNAP — impacting millions of people (Image credit: AP)
US President
Donald Trump
's recently introduced "Big Beautiful Bill" proposes significant cuts to federal spending on one of the largest food aid programs — the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for low-income groups.
The proposed changes to the food aid program would require states to cover more of the costs, make several million more recipients work to keep receiving benefits and could reduce the amount of food assistance provided in the future.
Earlier, the Republican-led House passed the much-debated legislation known as the "Big Beautiful Bill" to advance President Trump's policy agenda. He wants it finalized and sent to him by July 4,on the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.
What changes Are proposed in SNAP?
The federal food aid program, formerly known as food stamps, was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on October 1, 2008. It provides monthly payments for purchasing food to low-income residents who earn less than $1,632 per month for individuals or $3,380 for a household of four.
As of February, over 42 million people across the country were receiving SNAP benefits — roughly one out of every eight people in the US.
This is a decrease from the peak average of 47.6 million participants during the 2013 federal fiscal year.
Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly benefit of $353 per household.
According to the Congressional
Budget
Office (CBO), the legislation passed by the US House could reduce federal SNAP spending by about $295 billion over the next 10 years.
The bill would also eliminate SNAP benefits for around 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants who are legally in the US but are not citizens or permanent residents.
Currently, adults aged 18–54 who are able to work and have no dependents must work, volunteer or participate in job training for at least 80 hours a month to continue receiving SNAP benefits. If they fail to meet this requirement, they are limited to three months of benefits within a three-year period.
The new bill would extend these work requirements to people aged 55–64. It would also apply to some parents without children under the age of 7.
The CBO estimates that these changes could reduce SNAP participation by about 3.2 million people per month.
Currently, the federal government pays for all SNAP food benefits and shares the administrative costs with states. Under the proposed bill, states would have to cover 75% of administrative costs and begin paying a share of food benefits by 2028.
The House passed the bill by a narrow margin of just one vote (215–214). While Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats in the Senate, no Democrats supported the bill in the House, and they are unlikely to do so in the Senate.
Some Republican senators have also raised concerns about the bill, especially regarding potential cuts to food aid and medical coverage. They fear an increase in the federal deficit. To secure support, Senate leaders may need to revise parts of the bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump birthday parade: Birthday snub? Trump's military parade faces mass Republican no-show amid rising tensions
Most GOP Lawmakers Say No to the Parade Rand Paul Criticizes Parade's Style Personal Commitments Take Priority ADVERTISEMENT Some Republicans Will Still Attend FAQs ADVERTISEMENT As US President Donald Trump prepares to organise a grand military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army on June 14, which also coincided with his 79th birthday, many of his Republican allies in Congress have opted out and decided not to attend the event, as per a survey of 50 GOP lawmakers showed that just 7 of 50 Republican lawmakers said that they intended to attend Trump's parade, as per Daily Beast. Notable figures such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Majority Whip John Barrasso, and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, will not be attending, according to the READ: Iran Israel war: Netanyahu on the verge of attacking Tehran's nuke sites, Houthis warn U.S - latest news Kentucky junior senator Rand Paul shared that he was not a fan of 'goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' and added, 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that,' quoted Daily to the report, many lawmakers return to their families and districts on weekends instead of spending time in Washington. While many lawmakers said that they were not going to the event because they had prior commitments, reported Daily Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said that it is his anniversary this weekend, and 'I choose to be married,' as quoted in the Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Rick Scott of Florida and House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris have also planned to not attend the event, which is expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily some Republicans have shown enthusiasm to attend the event on the weekend like the Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, who said, 'Yes, of course, I'm going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army,' quoted Daily per the report, some members from the House will also make an appearance, Byron Donalds, Cory Mills, Elise Stefanik, Rich McCormick, John McGuire, and Lisa of 50 surveyed GOP lawmakers, only 7 confirmed they plan to expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily Beast report.


Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
US stocks tick lower as Middle East tensions rise
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT US stocks are drifting lower on Thursday as momentum wanes from their big rally that had brought them to the brink of their S&P 500 was 0.3% lower in early trading. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 246 points, or 0.6%, as of 9:35 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.3% was one of the main reasons for the Dow's struggles. It lost 5.5% after Air India said a London-bound flight crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport Thursday with 242 passengers and crew onboard. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a residential area near the airport five minutes after taking off. The cause of the crash wasn't immediately the bond market, Treasury yields eased following another encouraging update on inflation. Thursday's said inflation at the wholesale level wasn't as bad last month as economists expected, and it followed a report on Wednesday saying something similar about the inflation that U.S. consumers are Street took it as a signal that the Federal Reserve will have more leeway to cut interest rates later this year in order to give the economy a Federal Reserve has been hesitant to lower interest rates, and it's been on hold so far this year after cutting at the end of last year, because it's been waiting to see how much President Donald Trump's tariffs will hurt the economy and raise inflation. While lower rates can goose the economy by encouraging businesses and households to borrow, they can also accelerate yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.36% from 4.41% late Wednesday and from roughly 4.80% early this the inflation data, a separate report on jobless claims also helped to weigh on Treasury yields. It said slightly more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than economists expected, and the total number remained at the highest level in eight Wall Street, Oracle jumped 9.6% after the tech giant reported stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed across Europe and Asia amid mostly modest movements. Hong Kong's Hang Seng was an outlier, and it tumbled 1.4% to give back some of its strong recent gains. It's still up nearly 20% for the year so far.


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
UN nuclear watchdog board censures Iran, Tehran reacts with announcement of new enrichment site
The UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors on Thursday formally found that Iran isn't complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year. Iran reacted immediately, saying it will establish a new enrichment facility 'in a secure location' and that 'other measures are also being planned.' 'The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution,' the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said in a joint statement. US President Donald Trump previously warned that Israel or America could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed — and some American personnel and their families have begun leaving the region over the tensions, which come ahead of a new round of Iran-US talks Sunday in Oman. In Israel, the US Embassy ordered American government employees and their families to remain in the Tel Aviv area over security concerns. Nineteen countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency's board, which represents the agency's member nations, voted for the resolution, according to diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the outcome of the closed-doors vote. Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed it, 11 abstained and two did not vote. In the draft resolution seen by The Associated Press, the board of governors renews a call on Iran to provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces could provide further evidence that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons program until resolution was put forward by France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. Speaking to Iranian state television after the vote, the spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said that his agency immediately informed the IAEA of 'specific and effective' actions Tehran would take. 'One is the launch of a third secure site' for enrichment, spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said. He did not elaborate on the location, but the organization's chief Mohammad Eslami later described the site as 'already built, prepared, and located in a secure and invulnerable place.' Iran has two underground sites at Fordo and Natanz and has been building tunnels in the mountains near Natanz since suspected Israeli sabotage attacks targeted that facility. The other step would be replacing old centrifuges for advanced ones at Fordo. 'The implication of this is that our production of enriched materials will significantly increase,' Kamalvandi said. According to the draft resolution, 'Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran … constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement.' Under those obligations, which are part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is legally bound to declare all nuclear material and activities and allow IAEA inspectors to verify that none of it is being diverted from peaceful uses. The draft resolution also finds that the IAEA's 'inability … to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.' The draft resolution made a direct reference to the US-Iran talks, stressing its 'support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear program, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran's nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy.' A senior Western diplomat last week described the resolution as a 'serious step,' but added that Western nations are 'not closing the door to diplomacy on this issue.' However, if Iran fails to cooperate, an extraordinary IAEA board meeting will likely be held in the summer, during which another resolution could get passed that will refer the issue to the Security Council, the diplomat said on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the issue with the media. The three European nations have repeatedly threatened in the past to reinstate, or 'snapback,' sanctions that have been lifted under the original 2015 Iran nuclear deal if Iran does not provide 'technically credible' answers to the U.N. nuclear watchdog's questions. In a joint statement to the IAEA board of governors, the three European nations said that they would 'spare no efforts to work towards a diplomatic solution' but added that without a satisfying deal, they would 'consider triggering the snapback mechanism to address threats to international peace and security arising from Iran's nuclear program.' The authority to reestablish those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October, putting the West on a clock to exert pressure on Tehran over its program before losing that power. The resolution comes on heels of the IAEA's so-called 'comprehensive report' that was circulated among member states last weekend. In the report, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has 'been less than satisfactory' when it comes to uranium traces discovered by agency inspectors at several locations in Iran. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this, but in 2019, IAEA inspectors detected the presence of uranium traces there as well as at two other sites. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, who campaigned on reaching out to the West, struck a harder line after the IAEA vote. 'I don't know how to cooperate with the outside world to stop them from doing evil acts and let the people live independently in this country,' Pezeshkian said. 'We will continue down our own path; we will have enrichment.'