logo
Health officials warn of Hepatitis A exposure at historic Provincetown restaurant

Health officials warn of Hepatitis A exposure at historic Provincetown restaurant

Boston Globe25-05-2025

Provincetown officials said in a
Advertisement
Reached by phone, a restaurant employee declined to comment on Saturday evening. The restaurant did not immediately return an emailed request for comment.
Hepatitis A
can be spread via close person-to-person contact or through contaminated food and drink, according to state health officials. Vaccines and the medication
Early symptoms of hepatitis A can include fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and jaundice, officials said. Mild cases may last two weeks, with more severe cases lasting six weeks or longer.
Childhood vaccination against hepatitis A has been recommended for children since 1991. That means individuals under 34 may be safe from infection, although state officials said that exposed diners should confirm their vaccination status with their doctors.
Advertisement
The Red Inn, originally built in 1805, has served as a hotel since 1915, according to its
Camilo Fonseca can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater
Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater

Credit - Getty Images Measles cases in the U.S. have been rare in recent decades, thanks to a strong childhood vaccination program. But a few cases inevitably pop up each year as travelers bring the virus in from other countries and infect unvaccinated people, primarily children. Those cases are no longer blips. Now that the measles vaccination rate is dropping precipitously across the U.S.—due in part to anti-vaccine sentiments—cases are rising. So far in 2025, 14 outbreaks have been reported in 33 states, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (By comparison, in 2024, there were just 16 outbreaks reported during the entire year.) Scientists may now have a new way to catch cases. For the first time, researchers have posted national information on where the measles virus is showing up in wastewater. Wastewater surveillance is a useful public-health tool because it provides an objective glimpse into where a given virus is causing infections—often before traditional testing methods. For viruses like measles, which infected people shed in urine, feces, or saliva, it can provide a critical heads-up for health officials. 'It gives us a finger-to-the-wind weather map of what is happening with infectious diseases,' says Dr. Marlene Wolf, assistant professor at Emory and principal investigator and co-program director of WastewaterSCAN, an academic and commercial group that includes researchers from Stanford University, Emory University, and Verily (which is Alphabet Inc.'s research organization). Here's what wastewater is revealing about measles in the U.S. WastewaterSCAN began testing sewage in the U.S. for the COVID-19 virus in 2020 and has since added other disease-causing microbes including influenza, RSV, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), norovirus, enterovirus, mpox, Candida auris, and hepatitis A. This spring, the scientists began developing a test for picking up signs of the active or "wild type" measles virus that is causing outbreaks in the U.S. The test uses samples from nearly 150 sewage sites across the country and can pick up signs of measles within 48 hours. Read More: What to Know About the New COVID-19 Variant NB.1.8.1 So far, they have detected it in three sites: one day in Hollywood, Md.; four days toward the end of May in Sacramento; and twice in mid-May in Stamford, Conn. WastewaterSCAN is only one such wastewater surveillance network in the country, though it's the first to test for measles on a national level. The CDC launched its National Wastewater Surveillance System in 2020 and includes more than 1,400 sites that cover 150 million Americans. Some state health departments—including in Texas, where the current measles outbreaks began—also test wastewater samples. WastewaterSCAN collaborates with the CDC, but the CDC does not yet test for measles in wastewater. Doctors who see patients with measles must report the case to the CDC so the agency can track it and respond to any outbreaks. But it takes time for people to develop symptoms, seek medical care, get tested, and then have their case reported if the test is positive. In addition, the first symptoms of measles are common ones like fever, runny nose, and cough—before the telltale rash appears. Plus, not everyone may get sick enough to know they have measles, so their cases may go unreported. Still others may get sick but not have access to health care and therefore never seek medical help. Read More: Measles Vaccination Rates Are Plummeting Across the U.S. Wastewater monitoring bypasses those hurdles and can theoretically catch evidence of the virus much earlier. That could be especially helpful with a highly contagious disease like measles, in which one infected person can quickly spread the virus to as many as 18 others. 'This is anonymous testing that combines everyone in a community,' says Wolfe. 'And for measles, it's likely that shedding [of the virus] into wastewater is happening before people necessarily recognize what they have.' This type of tracking for measles is too new to know yet whether it can detect cases in a region before people start testing positive, Wolfe says. But wastewater surveillance was able to pick up signs of the COVID-19 virus days or sometimes even weeks before cases began appearing in hospitals and testing labs. Over time, as more data are collected on measles, health experts can begin to look for trends and patterns, such as increases in the number of positive samples. That could help public-health departments focus resources like vaccines in areas where infections are spreading. If the number of positive samples start to decline, that information could also give them a heads up when infections are under control. Getting vaccinated is the best way to protect yourself against measles infection, and the immunization provides close to lifelong immunity. Making sure that anyone who is eligible is up to date on their measles vaccines can help them avoid infection. Contact us at letters@

Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater
Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater

Time​ Magazine

time12 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Measles Is Now Showing Up in Wastewater

Measles cases in the U.S. have been rare in recent decades, thanks to a strong childhood vaccination program. But a few cases inevitably pop up each year as travelers bring the virus in from other countries and infect unvaccinated people, primarily children. Those cases are no longer blips. Now that the measles vaccination rate is dropping precipitously across the U.S.—due in part to anti-vaccine sentiments—cases are rising. So far in 2025, 14 outbreaks have been reported in 33 states, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (By comparison, in 2024, there were just 16 outbreaks reported during the entire year.) Scientists may now have a new way to catch cases. For the first time, researchers have posted national information on where the measles virus is showing up in wastewater. Wastewater surveillance is a useful public-health tool because it provides an objective glimpse into where a given virus is causing infections—often before traditional testing methods. For viruses like measles, which infected people shed in urine, feces, or saliva, it can provide a critical heads-up for health officials. 'It gives us a finger-to-the-wind weather map of what is happening with infectious diseases,' says Dr. Marlene Wolf, assistant professor at Emory and principal investigator and co-program director of WastewaterSCAN, an academic and commercial group that includes researchers from Stanford University, Emory University, and Verily (which is Alphabet Inc.'s research organization). Here's what wastewater is revealing about measles in the U.S. Adding measles to the menu of wastewater tests WastewaterSCAN began testing sewage in the U.S. for the COVID-19 virus in 2020 and has since added other disease-causing microbes including influenza, RSV, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), norovirus, enterovirus, mpox, Candida auris, and hepatitis A. This spring, the scientists began developing a test for picking up signs of the active or "wild type" measles virus that is causing outbreaks in the U.S. The test uses samples from nearly 150 sewage sites across the country and can pick up signs of measles within 48 hours. So far, they have detected it in three sites: one day in Hollywood, Md.; four days toward the end of May in Sacramento; and twice in mid-May in Stamford, Conn. WastewaterSCAN is only one such wastewater surveillance network in the country, though it's the first to test for measles on a national level. The CDC launched its National Wastewater Surveillance System in 2020 and includes more than 1,400 sites that cover 150 million Americans. Some state health departments—including in Texas, where the current measles outbreaks began—also test wastewater samples. WastewaterSCAN collaborates with the CDC, but the CDC does not yet test for measles in wastewater. Why wastewater monitoring may be especially useful for measles Doctors who see patients with measles must report the case to the CDC so the agency can track it and respond to any outbreaks. But it takes time for people to develop symptoms, seek medical care, get tested, and then have their case reported if the test is positive. In addition, the first symptoms of measles are common ones like fever, runny nose, and cough—before the telltale rash appears. Plus, not everyone may get sick enough to know they have measles, so their cases may go unreported. Still others may get sick but not have access to health care and therefore never seek medical help. Wastewater monitoring bypasses those hurdles and can theoretically catch evidence of the virus much earlier. That could be especially helpful with a highly contagious disease like measles, in which one infected person can quickly spread the virus to as many as 18 others. 'This is anonymous testing that combines everyone in a community,' says Wolfe. 'And for measles, it's likely that shedding [of the virus] into wastewater is happening before people necessarily recognize what they have.' How wastewater data can help health officials This type of tracking for measles is too new to know yet whether it can detect cases in a region before people start testing positive, Wolfe says. But wastewater surveillance was able to pick up signs of the COVID-19 virus days or sometimes even weeks before cases began appearing in hospitals and testing labs. Over time, as more data are collected on measles, health experts can begin to look for trends and patterns, such as increases in the number of positive samples. That could help public-health departments focus resources like vaccines in areas where infections are spreading. If the number of positive samples start to decline, that information could also give them a heads up when infections are under control. What to do if cases are detected near you Getting vaccinated is the best way to protect yourself against measles infection, and the immunization provides close to lifelong immunity. Making sure that anyone who is eligible is up to date on their measles vaccines can help them avoid infection.

Juice Cleanses Likely Good for Nothing, Bad for Much
Juice Cleanses Likely Good for Nothing, Bad for Much

Medscape

time7 days ago

  • Medscape

Juice Cleanses Likely Good for Nothing, Bad for Much

'It's a great way to get those fruits and vegetables into my diet, especially since I can't be bothered peeling or preparing them…' 'I lost weight and felt lighter…' 'I'm helping my body detox, and that's a good feeling.' Social media is rife with statements like the above about juice cleanses. It's a favorite topic as well as something patients often ask about. The perception is that by doing a juice cleanse, they're doing something healthy for themselves — yet experts agree that in most cases, they're not. But if they're having a conversation or asking about it, it offers an opportunity to provide evidence-based guidance. American Gastroenterological Association Spokesperson Fazia Mir, MD, clinical assistant professor at the University of New Mexico and a gastroenterologist with Presbyterian Healthcare Services, both in Albuquerque, New Mexico, said some of her patients ask about juice cleanses because they're interested in doing a liver detox or helping their gut inflammation. 'I tell them that, in fact, it does the opposite,' she told Medscape Medical News . 'The majority of juice cleanses impact gut health negatively. They can cause bowel habit irregularity and even precipitate inflammatory bowel disease, as the gut microbiota is disrupted due to the lack of fiber in these cleanses. And we see patients all the time whose irritable bowel syndrome worsens after they've embarked on a juice cleanse.' What the Evidence Says There's little evidence to support the use of juice cleanses for eliminating toxins from the body, according to the US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Furthermore, some juices used in 'detoxes' and 'cleanses' haven't been pasteurized or treated in other ways to kill harmful bacteria, meaning they can expose individuals to toxigenic E coli, Salmonella , hepatitis A, and Cryptosporidium . In addition, some juices are made from foods high in oxalate, such as leafy green vegetables and beets. Individuals susceptible to kidney stone formation should limit their consumption of high-oxalate foods, which can present a health threat. In fact, a case report published several years ago documented acute oxalate nephropathy caused by a 'green smoothie cleanse' prepared from juicing oxalate-rich green leafy vegetables and fruits. 'Reality Check' Two recent studies highlight the negative impact of juice cleanses. In a small randomized, three-arm intervention study with 14 healthy participants published online in Nutrients , 'a 3-day exclusive juice cleanse (800-900 kcal/d) led to shifts in the oral and gut microbiome, with increases in taxa linked to inflammation, gut permeability, and even cognitive decline after juice consumption,' said principal author Melinda Ring, MD, executive director, Osher Center for Integrative Health at Northwestern University in Chicago. Participants followed one of three diets — juice only, juice plus food, or plant-based food — for 3 days. Microbiota samples (stool, saliva, and inner cheek swabs) were collected at baseline, after a pre-intervention elimination diet, immediately after the juice intervention, and 14 days after the intervention. Gene sequencing was used to analyze microbiota taxonomic composition. The juice-only group showed the most significant increase in bacteria associated with inflammation and gut permeability, as well as associated changes in the saliva and cheek microbiota — particularly in the relative abundances of proinflammatory bacterial families. These changes are potentially due to the high sugar and low fiber intake of the juice-related products, the authors suggested. Ring said the study 'offers a reality check' on juice cleanses. 'Whether a cleanse is 'healthy' depends on the individual and the intent behind it,' she told Medscape Medical News . 'A short, structured cleanse, ideally lasting no more than 1-3 days, can be safe for many people if it focuses on polyphenol-rich, low-sugar vegetables rather than fruit, retains some fiber (as in blended rather than pressed juices), and avoids extreme calorie restriction.' Pediatricians should also be aware that a high-sugar, low-fiber diet may promote the growth of pro-inflammatory taxa, first author Maria Luisa Savo Sardaro, PhD, a professor of food microbiology at San Raffaele University in Rome, Italy, told Medscape Medical News . 'Families often rely on juice boxes in lunch packs, believing they're a healthy substitute for whole fruit, and school cafeterias frequently offer sugary drinks throughout the day,' she said. 'Together, these habits may contribute to an early life increase of inflammation in children.' Change Dietary Guidelines? Although it did not address juice cleanses per se, a new review published online in Nutrition Bulletin specifically compared evidence on whole fruit and 100% fruit juice with regard to nutrient composition, impact on hunger and satiety, and association with chronic health conditions. Lead author Hemangi Mavadiya, a PhD candidate at the Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, said that, like the Nutrients study, the review of 83 studies found juicing does indeed remove much of the dietary fiber that has beneficial effects on the gut. In addition, processing and/or storing 100% fruit juice reduces vitamins and other antioxidant contents and transforms intrinsic sugars in the whole fruit into free sugars, which have little nutritional benefit. Furthermore, fruit consumed in solid form provides greater satiety due to delayed gastric emptying and related physiological reactions, and 'the synergistic effects of polyphenols and fiber in whole fruit benefit the gut microbiome by acting as prebiotics and producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce inflammation,' the authors wrote. The review also showed that consuming high amounts of fruit juice is associated with increased risks for certain types of cancer, while results were mixed for type 2 diabetes and hypertension. As a result of their findings, the authors recommended that the next version of the next set of Dietary Guidelines for Americans, coming out at the end of 2025, be updated to better reflect the amount of whole fruit and 100% fruit juice adults and children should consume. Current guidelines recommend that at least half of the daily recommended fruit intake of two cups a day should come from whole fruits, potentially allowing the other half to be fulfilled by 100% fruit juice. Tips for Patients What are clinicians telling their patients regarding juice cleanses? 'When used as a bridge to more sustainable, whole-food, high-fiber eating habits, a brief cleanse might serve as a motivational tool,' Ring said. 'However, clinicians should counsel patients that detoxification is a natural, ongoing function of the liver and kidneys, not something that requires commercial juice products.' Patients should also be told that juice cleanses may temporarily disrupt the body's microbial balance, likely due to their high sugar and low fiber content and may not support long-term gut health. 'Cleanses may offer a psychological 'reset,' but without adequate fiber and protein, they could undermine microbial diversity and resilience, especially if repeated or prolonged.' Patients who love juicing can consider blending instead, to keep the fiber intact, or pairing juices with whole foods to balance the impact on the microbiome, she suggested. Mavadiya advises patients read food labels, which can help distinguish between fruit juice and fruit drinks, since the latter 'is loaded with added sugars,' and it's easy to confuse the two. 'Ultimately, the healthiest path forward is not a periodic cleanse, but a consistent, nutrient-dense, fiber-rich diet that supports gut and systemic health over the long term,' Ring concluded. Furthermore, clinicians should assess for underlying conditions such as diabetes, eating disorders, or frailty, which may make juice cleanses inadvisable. No conflicts of interest were declared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store