Mantashe pulls back on BEE proposals for mining exploration
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has changed clauses in the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) that would have imposed BEE requirements on previously exempt exploration companies and projects in the mining space.
The BEE requirements on the high-risk exploration arm of the mining sector provoked backlash from the mining industry, and Mantashe made comments last month that suggested he was not aware that the draft Bill contained such provisions — but if it did, he would correct them.
'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe said in late May during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA.
Earlier this week, Mantashe issued an erratum notice to correct the draft and remove the BEE requirements for exploration and prospecting.
'The granting of such rights will further the objects referred to in section 2(d) and comply with the broad-based socio-economic empowerment prescribed elements,' was in the original wording regarding prospecting, but that has now been removed.
South Africa's share of global exploration spend has collapsed from around 5% two decades ago to less than 1% in the face of a range of challenges, including massive applications backlogs that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources hopes to address soon with a new mining cadastre.
Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front.
'The Minerals Council South Africa notes the gazetting of … corrections to the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill,' said the council, the main mining industry body, in a terse statement.
'The Minerals Council continues to review the Bill amending the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and we will submit our perspectives within the scheduled timeline of 13 August 2025.'
Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goalposts at a time when investors are crying for certainty in a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy.
One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate, which the industry has already won in court.
'Once empowered, always empowered' means that once a company meets a threshold for black ownership, it does not have to keep topping up endlessly if black shareholders sell their stakes.
'The Bill in its current form does not encourage or sustain the growth and investment that the mining industry needs to realise its full potential to create employment, stimulate the economy and fulfil its social mandate,' said the Minerals Council. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell — the strange and ancient enmity between the mining industry and the ministry
When something happens that involves private companies and the government, I'm always interested in what went on behind the scenes. Who was doing what, how did the real negotiation happen and were their drinks hot or cold at the time? Once, many years ago, I happened to find myself in a rather well-appointed lodge somewhere in Mpumalanga. Someone pointed to a particular point at the bar and suggested, almost in hushed tones, that that was where a particular breakthrough happened between the government and the mining industry way back when. I'm not sure, but I suspect the drinks involved had more ice than froth. A lot has happened since then. And I'm sure you remember, as I do, how strange and strained relations between the government and business have been over the years. For a long time, I would go to press conference after press conference, and just get the sense that business was too scared to speak up. In early 2011, fewer than two years after this publication started, a younger and less-thoughtful version of myself even published what I rather grandly called 'A capitalist's letter to Bobby Godsell'. Basically, I felt that business clearly believed it did not have to be a part of the national debate. And since the national debate was changing, I felt it needed to raise its voice. But business is diverse. And a year later, the Black Business Council, under Sandile Zungu at the time, was lobbying the ANC for the creation of a Ministry of Small Business Development. They got their wish. Even if Zungu recently admitted that its performance has been a disappointment. Perhaps the worst point in the relationship between business and government was towards the end of the Jacob Zuma period. According to legend, there was a meeting at some point in 2017 during which business organisations really laid into Zuma – while he had to watch them do it. I have no idea what really happened, and I obviously wasn't in the room. But it does seem that business has lost its innocence. It realised it had to get into the battle, into the court of public opinion. Now, of course, the relationship between business and the government has never been better. We see all sorts of meetings and gatherings and launches. Which is why it's so strange that the ancient enmity between the mining industry and the Mineral Resources Ministry still flares up. Yesterday (Monday, 18 August), the Minerals Council confirmed that it wanted to talk to the Mineral Resources Minister about the new proposals to change the Mineral Resources Development Bill. The council's first reaction had been a lot angrier. And considering that some of the suggestions in this draft bill were clearly ludicrous, it was easy to see why. Even the minister, Gwede Mantashe, realised the idea of forcing companies to have a BEE partner just to qualify for a prospecting right (when there is no guarantee of any money coming to anyone at the end of it) was madness. He withdrew that proposal days after first publishing it. I can understand some of this. It makes sense to me that mining would always be quite difficult politically. This industry, and the economy it created, was possibly second only to the theft of land during the colonial era in creating the racialised inequality we have now. It's kind of hard to forget that. But I find the position of the Minerals Council – that the main aim of the bill should be to incentivise investment – quite compelling. It makes sense to me that we should want our mining sector to grow as much as possible, and basically to create jobs. From what I can see, that is not the priority of the ministry. Now, with the obvious exception of the Health Ministry, it seems the rest of the government is pretty keen on working with business at the moment. And it's obvious that the more jobs are created in the next three years, the better for the ANC in future elections. I know I might get another angry phone call from him for saying this, but I can't help but wonder if this is all about Mantashe. That perhaps he hasn't changed as much as the rest of the ANC is clearly changing. I'm intensely curious about how this is going to go from here. I think the Minerals Council is right about the two big things: we want investment, and they must talk. And they are in a stronger position than business was back in 2011. The power of the ANC has been greatly weakened, people are desperate for jobs, and there are other officials in government who might well give the industry a hearing. Perhaps more importantly, public opinion probably matters more than ever before. I suspect that any breakthroughs this time will not come in a bar in a lodge, the location of which I can no longer remember. I think they might happen in public. And put to bed some of my questions about who met whom, and whether their drinks were hot or cold. DM
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Mining industry raises concerns over impact of proposed legislation on investment and jobs
The Minerals Council, whose members account for 90% of South Africa's annual mineral production, lodged its extensive Board-approved submission on the Bill within the 13 August deadline. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers. The Minerals Council South Africa has raised concerns regarding the recently published Mineral Resources Development Bill, arguing it fails to foster an environment conducive to investment and job creation. The draft Mineral Resources Development Bill, published for public comment in May until 13 August, aims to transform South Africa's mining industry by strengthening regulations, promoting inclusive growth, and enhancing the legal governance of mineral exploitation. The Bill addresses various aspects of the mining sector, including artisanal and small-scale mining, transfer of mining rights, and empowerment requirements. However, concerns remain regarding the impact on agricultural land, investor confidence, and the potential for unintended consequences. Speaking during a media briefing on Monday, Minerals Council's CEO Mzila Mthenjane emphasised that the bill, in its current form, cannot drive the necessary transformation and growth that South Africa's mining sector requires. Mthenjane said it was of fundamental importance for the Minerals Council that the Bill creates certainty, predictability, and a competitive regulatory environment, while eliminating ambiguity in what will become the Act to ensure we build on the successes we have had to date. 'The regulatory environment must be conducive to encouraging investment in exploration, mine development and sustain existing mining operations so that the industry can grow, create jobs and generate the wealth it is capable of delivering for the benefit of all South Africans,' Mthenjane said. 'Our key point of departure in engagements with the Department is to have pragmatic conversations that address elements of the Bill that discourage investment and growth of the industry which we all agree has untapped potential that is not being realised.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The Minerals Council, whose members account for 90% of South Africa's annual mineral production, lodged its extensive Board-approved submission on the Bill within the 13 August deadline. Mthenjane said they will continue to engage with the Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources on the Bill, adding that they made a submission on time to the department outlining the areas of interest for their members. 'We are positive about our engagement with the department and we are confident they will consider our submissions, along with contributions from other stakeholders, which call for a regulatory environment that is conducive to encouraging investment in exploration, mine development, and also to sustain existing mine operations,' he said. The need for regulatory clarity is compounded by issues surrounding ministerial discretion, which has previously raised eyebrows. The Council called for a transparent and predictable regulatory framework that can rebuild trust between the mining industry and the department. One of the primary concerns identified relates to the empowerment provisions embedded in the upcoming bill, which, as of yet, have not been fully revealed through regulations. While industry officials acknowledge the intent to clarify these provisions by late June, concrete comments on their implications remain elusive. The removal of requirements for empowerment during the prospecting phase might pave the way for a more inclusive mining environment, yet clarity is crucial for stakeholders to fully grasp their operational impact. Ursula Brown, head of legal at the Council, said one of the primary concerns identified related to the empowerment provisions embedded in the Bill, which, as of yet, have not been fully revealed through regulations. Brown said the removal of requirements for empowerment during the prospecting phase might pave the way for a more inclusive mining environment, yet clarity was crucial for stakeholders to fully grasp their operational impact.
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
SA mining sector burnishes transformation credentials as battle looms over draft bill
The mining industry is arming itself with facts before what may be a long slog as it pushes for changes in the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill. South Africa's mining sector is digging in for lengthy talks with the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy over the contentious draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP). The Minerals Council SA, the main umbrella group for the industry, maintains that the bill has many shortcomings that will discourage investment and job creation. The council lodged an extensive submission on the draft bill before the 13 August 2025 deadline. 'It is of fundamental importance for the Minerals Council that the bill creates certainty, predictability and a competitive regulatory environment, while eliminating ambiguity in what will become the act to ensure we build on the successes we have had to date,' the council said in a statement on Monday, 18 August 2025. At a media briefing, Mzila Mthenjane, the CEO of the Minerals Council, said the industry would be engaging with the department on the bill in what was expected to be a marathon rather than a sprint. 'We will not negotiate the bill in public… It will take time. It will be a lengthy process,' he said. 'We will take it one step at a time, but from the progress we have seen so far in submitting our detailed submission I think there's a possibility that we can avoid seeing ourselves in court.' Not negotiating in public means that the council is keeping its specific concerns under wraps for now, though when the bill was first flagged in May it did raise alarms over the failure to exclude BEE requirements for exploration. That has since been amended. 'The Minerals Council's overarching concern with the bill is that in its current form it does not encourage investment in the industry for growth. Its reliance on regulations that have yet to be published for public scrutiny make it impossible to fully engage the department in detail on key elements of the bill,' the council said. Like a miner without a headlamp, this means that the industry is groping in the dark. What this means for the industry Regulatory clarity is crucial for investment in the mining sector. Without investment, there is no mining and no transformation in the sector. A lengthy engagement where both sides display compromise would be the best outcome. Otherwise it will probably end up in court — and the regulator usually loses on that front. In a presentation, the council said key areas of broad focus and contention included transformation and empowerment — subjects that have long been bones of contention in post-apartheid South Africa. On that front, the Minerals Council produced a new factsheet to burnish its transformation credentials. Historically disadvantaged South Africans now have a 39% ownership stake in the mining sector, far above the 26% target. Much of this stems from pension funds. 'In 2023, a study on employment equity and human resource development showed women now make up 19% of the full-time workforce, with ongoing efforts to improve representation and safety,' the factsheet reads. 'Through Social and Labour Plans (SLPs), the mining sector invests more than R3-billion annually in community development — far exceeding the 1% Net Profit After Tax benchmark in other sectors — funding schools, roads, clinics, water and sanitation projects, and much more.' In the presentation, one chart showed that monthly per capita earnings for miners have soared about six-fold the past 20 years to more than R30,000.
