Mantashe pulls back on BEE proposals for mining exploration
Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front.
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has changed clauses in the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) that would have imposed BEE requirements on previously exempt exploration companies and projects in the mining space.
The BEE requirements on the high-risk exploration arm of the mining sector provoked backlash from the mining industry, and Mantashe made comments last month that suggested he was not aware that the draft Bill contained such provisions — but if it did, he would correct them.
'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe said in late May during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA.
Earlier this week, Mantashe issued an erratum notice to correct the draft and remove the BEE requirements for exploration and prospecting.
'The granting of such rights will further the objects referred to in section 2(d) and comply with the broad-based socio-economic empowerment prescribed elements,' was in the original wording regarding prospecting, but that has now been removed.
South Africa's share of global exploration spend has collapsed from around 5% two decades ago to less than 1% in the face of a range of challenges, including massive applications backlogs that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources hopes to address soon with a new mining cadastre.
Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front.
'The Minerals Council South Africa notes the gazetting of … corrections to the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill,' said the council, the main mining industry body, in a terse statement.
'The Minerals Council continues to review the Bill amending the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and we will submit our perspectives within the scheduled timeline of 13 August 2025.'
Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goalposts at a time when investors are crying for certainty in a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy.
One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate, which the industry has already won in court.
'Once empowered, always empowered' means that once a company meets a threshold for black ownership, it does not have to keep topping up endlessly if black shareholders sell their stakes.
'The Bill in its current form does not encourage or sustain the growth and investment that the mining industry needs to realise its full potential to create employment, stimulate the economy and fulfil its social mandate,' said the Minerals Council. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees – new report A report released on June 12 by the Solidarity Research Institute (SRI) and the Free Market Foundation (FMF) has sent shockwaves through South Africa's political and economic landscape. The report delivers a scathing critique of the country's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policy, asserting that it is causing substantial damage to the South African economy while enriching only a small, politically connected elite. BEE was initially introduced as a transformative policy aimed at redressing the economic imbalances of apartheid by promoting greater inclusion of black South Africans in the economy. However, the latest findings paint a different picture, highlighting a policy that is now burdening economic growth, exacerbating inequality, and stalling job creation. According to the report, the annual compliance costs for BEE range from R145-billion to R290-billion, which represents between 2% and 4% of South Africa's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This enormous economic burden has resulted in an annual reduction of GDP growth by between 1.5% and 3%, with a concomitant loss of between 96 000 and 192 000 jobs each year. Over the years, this has accumulated to about 3.8 million lost job opportunities for South Africans. 'This huge economic cost is not simply the result of negligence or the mere poor implementation of a plan. It is a deliberate government policy that causes it,' said Theuns du Buisson, economic researcher at the SRI and co-author of the report. 'It is irrelevant when someone then says the policy was introduced with good intentions. Today it serves as a mechanism to enrich the elite at the expense of our country's economy and especially at the expense of its poorest citizens.' The report further outlines that while there has been some progress in terms of black ownership and skills development, these gains are heavily overshadowed by the adverse effects of BEE. Among these are increased inequality, elite capture of policy benefits, and widespread economic stagnation. 'The policy places a particularly heavy burden on critical sectors such as mining and finance,' the report reads, 'and it deters foreign investment, encourages capital flight, and stifles technological progress.' South Africa's economic position on the global stage has deteriorated markedly, falling behind other middle-income countries with which it was once comparable. The report critiques the lack of focus and effectiveness in the implementation of BEE policies, which contrasts with more successful affirmative action or empowerment programmes abroad. Du Buisson pointed to countries such as Brazil and the United States, which have begun to phase out similar race-based economic policies. 'Moreover, in other countries, affirmative action policies are precisely there to prevent discrimination, while in South Africa, they in fact make discrimination compulsory,' he noted. 'South Africa must now follow the path of other countries and get rid of it. BEE has become an instrument that benefits a small, politically connected elite and has long ago stopped being a policy that could empower a disadvantaged society.' Connie Mulder, head of the SRI, emphasised the urgency of the situation: 'South Africa cannot afford to continue down this path. The data is clear. BEE, in its current form, is damaging the economy and hurting those it was meant to help. We need policies that promote real economic participation and growth without racial quotas that cripple progress.' The call to action from the writers of the report is for policymakers to immediately abolish the current BEE framework and replace it with a policy that fosters inclusive growth without impeding the economy. 'We need an economic environment where all South Africans, regardless of race, have the opportunity to contribute and prosper,' Du Buisson said. – Access the full report here: Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Glittering towers, shadowed lives: why Peter Bruce's ‘voluntary' transformation is a cruel mirage
Finally, the Financial Sector Charter saw dramatic shifts once banks were obliged to earn Level-1 BEE status. The Banking Association's 2024 Transformation Report now shows a remarkable 83% of total procurement spend landing with black-owned suppliers, a monumental leap from under 30% just a decade earlier. Critics like Bruce are right that B-BBEE needs sharpening. It has had potentially detrimental shortcomings, including instances of fronting and the enrichment of a politically connected few, creating a new class of black elite that has alienated the very masses the policy was meant to uplift. However, these should be arguments for refining BEE, not for scrapping it altogether. A constructive agenda should build on, not dismantle, the existing scaffold of transformation legislation. A recent peer-reviewed study, by German economists at Ruhr University Bochum and the German Institute of Development and Sustainability, published in the June 2025 Journal of Comparative Economics, analysed firm-level data for 356 JSE-listed companies over 15 years (2004—2019). Their findings are unequivocal: BEE has had no negative impact on profitability, has a small but statistically significant positive effect on turnover and a mildly positive effect on labour productivity. Specifically, a one-point increase in the BEE score is associated with a small increase in turnover of up to 0.8%. This suggests that while there might be costs associated with BEE compliance, these do not necessarily translate into reduced profitability for firms. This disproves the critique that BEE harms businesses, at least within the sample of large listed firms in South Africa. Additionally, reduced discrimination in the labour market and enhanced human capital levels through skills development dimensions are likely to enhance labour productivity. The study highlights that larger firms are particularly likely to benefit from BEE in terms of higher turnover. This evidence directly refutes the claims that BEE universally undermines business performance or confidence. Instead, it suggests a nuanced impact where for many firms, particularly larger ones, BEE compliance can lead to tangible benefits. When a significant portion of the population sees little tangible improvement in their economic circumstances despite political freedom, it corrodes faith in the democratic system and its institutions. This fertile ground of disillusionment and frustration provides a breeding ground for populist movements that promise false radical change and challenge the existing order. The rise of Donald Trump's Make America Great Again movement in the US, the resurgence of Nigel Farage with his Reform UK, the Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, Marine Le Pen's National Rally Party in France, and the recent election of Karol Nawrocki in Poland are the bitter fruits of this widespread disaffection. They weaponise the anger from unmet expectations of those who feel left behind by the current economic order. Our very own EFF and MK Party belong to the same milieu. Abrahams closed Mine Boy with Xuma and his comrades marching up the reef, their lanterns held high, demanding humanity's just dividend — dignity, work and an end to systemic exploitation. Bruce would ask them to dim those lanterns and trust the mine-owners' goodwill. History, however, tells us unequivocally that the shadows at the bottom will only thicken if we succumb to such a deceptive illusion. Transformation in South Africa cannot rely on a handshake or a fleeting promise.
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Mantashe pulls back on BEE proposals for mining exploration
Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front. Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has changed clauses in the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) that would have imposed BEE requirements on previously exempt exploration companies and projects in the mining space. The BEE requirements on the high-risk exploration arm of the mining sector provoked backlash from the mining industry, and Mantashe made comments last month that suggested he was not aware that the draft Bill contained such provisions — but if it did, he would correct them. 'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe said in late May during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA. Earlier this week, Mantashe issued an erratum notice to correct the draft and remove the BEE requirements for exploration and prospecting. 'The granting of such rights will further the objects referred to in section 2(d) and comply with the broad-based socio-economic empowerment prescribed elements,' was in the original wording regarding prospecting, but that has now been removed. South Africa's share of global exploration spend has collapsed from around 5% two decades ago to less than 1% in the face of a range of challenges, including massive applications backlogs that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources hopes to address soon with a new mining cadastre. Exploration is an extremely risky business, and BEE ownership rules on the activity would be a major obstacle to the deployment of capital on this front. 'The Minerals Council South Africa notes the gazetting of … corrections to the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill,' said the council, the main mining industry body, in a terse statement. 'The Minerals Council continues to review the Bill amending the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and we will submit our perspectives within the scheduled timeline of 13 August 2025.' Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goalposts at a time when investors are crying for certainty in a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy. One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate, which the industry has already won in court. 'Once empowered, always empowered' means that once a company meets a threshold for black ownership, it does not have to keep topping up endlessly if black shareholders sell their stakes. 'The Bill in its current form does not encourage or sustain the growth and investment that the mining industry needs to realise its full potential to create employment, stimulate the economy and fulfil its social mandate,' said the Minerals Council. DM
