Budapest mayor questioned by police for organizing banned LGBTQ Pride event
The Pride march in Budapest on June 28 was the largest event of its kind in the country's history, according to organizers, despite Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's government earlier passing an anti-LGBTQ law that banned such events.
Budapest Mayor Gergely Karácsony arrived at Hungary's National Bureau of Investigation Friday morning where a crowd of around 200 of his supporters had gathered. Before entering the investigators' headquarters under police escort, he told supporters that freedom for Hungarian society was at stake.
"A month ago at Budapest Pride, very, very many of us told the whole world that neither freedom nor love can be banned in Budapest," Karácsony said. "And if it cannot be banned, then it cannot be punished."
Orbán's ruling party in March passed the contentious anti-LGBTQ law, which banned Pride events and allowed authorities to use facial recognition tools to identify those attending the festivities.
Despite the threat of heavy fines, participants proceeded with June's Pride march in an open rebuke of Orbán's government. Organizers said that some 300,000 people participated.
The government's move to ban Pride was its latest action against LGBTQ people.
Orbán's party has passed other legislation — including a 2021 law barring all content depicting homosexuality to minors under 18 — that rights groups and European politicians have decried as repressive against sexual minorities and compared to similar restrictions in Russia.
Orbán and his party have insisted Pride, a celebration of LGBTQ visibility and struggle for equal rights, was a violation of children's rights to moral and spiritual development. A recent constitutional amendment declared these rights took precedence over other fundamental protections including the right to peacefully assemble.
While Hungarian authorities maintained that the Pride march had taken place illegally, they announced in July they would not press charges against attendees but said investigations were ongoing against the organizers.
One of the organizers, Budapest Pride President Viktória Radványi — who has not been summoned for police questioning — said at the gathering outside the investigators' headquarters Friday that Karácsony had demonstrated "courage and very strong morals" for helping organize Pride.
Radványi said Karácsony had showed that "being a mayor is not just about arranging public transportation and making sure that the lights turn on on the street at night. It also means that when your citizens' fundamental rights are attacked, you have to stand up and protect them."
Karácsony on Friday emerged from the investigators' headquarters after having been inside for a little more than an hour. Speaking to reporters, he said he had been formally accused of organizing a prohibited event but that he had declined to respond to police questions.
Orbán's government, he said, had been weakened by its failed efforts to ban Pride.
"Until now, they've only been able to understand the language of force," Karácsony said. "This force is weakened now and no longer has any effect over people's thinking."
Addressing the crowd, Karácsony said the "fateful" national elections expected next spring would be a chance to "take Hungary back onto the European path."
"We want to live in a country where freedom is not for the holders of power to do what they want, but for all our compatriots," he said.
He added that so many people had defied the government to participate in Pride "because we know exactly that either we are all free together, or none of us are."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
5 hours ago
- American Military News
Iran Accused Of Kidnap Plot As US, Allies Warn Of Growing Threats In West
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. It was a chilling message in a call from the police: 'The Islamic republic is trying to kidnap you and take you to Iran.' Darya Safai, a Belgian lawmaker of Iranian origin, revealed details of the call this week. In an interview with RFE/RL's Radio Farda, she said the plot followed earlier death threats from Iran. 'The security forces themselves were really surprised at how it was possible for them to be going after a member of parliament because this is an open declaration of war against European countries,' she said. Safai's is not an isolated case. Three days after she revealed the warning she had received from Belgian police, a joint statement was issued by the United States and 13 Western allies on 'Iranian State Threat Activity.' 'We are united in our opposition to the attempts of Iranian intelligence services to kill, kidnap, and harass people in Europe and North America in clear violation of our sovereignty,' the July 31 statement said. It did not go into details but follows a series of recent cases in Western countries. British spy chief Ken McCallum said in October 2024 that police and intelligence services had thwarted more than 20 Iran-linked plots to kidnap or murder people in the United Kingdom since early 2022, including British nationals. In March, two Russian men were convicted for a plot, with Tehran's support, to assassinate Iranian-American dissident journalist Masih Alinejad. There have been similar incidences reported in other countries that signed the statement, including Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain. Iran's Foreign Ministry rejected the joint statement on August 1, saying the accusations were 'blatant fabrications and a diversionary tactic, part of a malicious campaign of Iranophobia aimed at pressuring the Iranian people.' Safai welcomed the joint statement, having told RFE/RL days before that 'the first thing European governments can do is believe that the Islamic republic does not understand the language of diplomacy.' Born in Tehran in 1975, Safai was briefly detained for taking part in student protests in 1999 before fleeing to Belgium. Elected to parliament in 2019, she has campaigned for Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) to be added to the European Union's list of designated terrorist organizations. The United States gave it the designation in 2019. Safai has also been a prominent campaigner for the rights of women to enter sports stadiums in Iran, which are restricted. She told RFE/RL that her activism had clearly put her in the regime's sights. 'This is actually an attack on the entire democratic system of all Western countries because I was elected through the people's will to do the things I am doing there,' she added.
Vox
7 hours ago
- Vox
Some countries still want to save the world
is a fellow for Future Perfect , Vox's section on making the world a better place. She writes about global health, philanthropy, labor, and social movements. If the world has had enough of helping others, then somebody forgot to tell Spain. Yes, Spain. The same country that, a little more than a decade ago, desperately accepted billions in bailout money from its European neighbors to keep its economy afloat. That Spain is now doing something almost unthinkable. It's ramping up aid spending just as the United States notoriously retreats. And in the process, Spain is trying to remind the world why we give back in the first place. The crisis is steep. The pot of money going to global development is set to shrink by 17 percent, or $35 billion, in 2025, on top of a $21 billion drop the year before, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. That's a $56 billion funding vacuum where global aid for mosquito nets, vaccine research, and food assistance used to be. And the declines are likely to become even steeper in the years ahead, as cuts in the US take full effect. Future Perfect Explore the big, complicated problems the world faces and the most efficient ways to solve them. Sent twice a week. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. It's far from enough to fill the foreign aid gap, however. And while the pain will fall primarily on impoverished recipient countries, foreign aid doesn't just help the countries that receive it. It helps everyone. Diseases and conflict don't recognize legal borders and aid helps keep these deadly problems at bay. Every $100 million spent on preventing tuberculosis, HIV, and malaria helps prevent about 2.2 million new infections total. And global cuts are already expected to exacerbate the spread of diseases; former USAID officials anticipate cuts from the US alone could cause 28,000 new cases of infectious diseases like Ebola and Marburg each year. 'Even if you're in this isolationist mindset, you can't actually isolate yourself from the rest of the world,' said Rachael Calleja, a research fellow at the Center for Global Development. The fact that some countries have managed to fight the impulse to isolate — convincing their citizens that problems abroad are interconnected with our problems at home — could help reshape the future of aid for the better. Their decisions point to the possibility of a new future for foreign aid that could be more collaborative and less paternalistic than before. Ready or not, the old club's grip on global influence is now breaking down. 'Nobody who works in development sat around saying, 'The system is great. We're awesome. Let's just spend more money to do more of the same,'' said Dean Karlan, who was, until recently, the chief economist at USAID. 'There is a blank slate. Let's put in place a better system.' Why are some countries bucking the trend? Spain, Ireland, Italy, and South Korea are all increasing aid — but most have a lot of room for growth. The United Nations set a lofty goal in the 1970s for wealthy countries to give away 0.7 percent of their gross national income (GNI) as development assistance. Half a century later, almost none do. That includes this year's overachievers. Ireland spent 0.57 percent of its GNI — $2.47 billion — on development aid last year. Spain spent 0.25 percent or $4.35 billion, and Italy, 0.28 percent or $6.67 billion. South Korea spent 0.21 percent or $3.94 billion. It's not a lot, especially compared to the $63.3 billion the US spent in 2024, although that only added up to 0.22 percent of its GNI. But these countries are moving forward at a time when everyone else seems to be moving backward. According to the global development consultancy SEEK Development's donor tracker, the US is now projected to spend just 0.13 percent of its GNI on overseas aid this year. There is a growing recognition that someone has to fill the gaps left by the US, but everybody balks at the price tag, Arturo Angulo Urarte, a Madrid-based development expert, said in Spanish. 'It's like, 'Yes, but gosh, and how much does that mean? Oh, it means money? Well, then no.'' Spain's aid increase, however, has been a long time coming. Spanish activists launched a kind of Occupy Wall Street in favor of overseas aid back in the 1990s. A group of global development workers and grassroots activists staged hunger strikes and protest encampments, chaining themselves to government buildings to demand that Spain give at least 0.7 percent of its GNI to aid. At the time, Spain was giving around 0.24 percent of its GNI to aid, but the protests helped propel the country to double its commitment to a high of nearly 0.5 percent in 2008. Then the 2008 economic turmoil left Spain once again with a wisp of an foreign aid budget. By the time its economy crawled closer to pre-crisis levels in 2015, its development spending had cratered to 0.12 percent of GNI. But the idea of Spain becoming a bigger player in global development never really left the public consciousness, remaining broadly popular even during the country's worst financial straits. In 2023 the country passed a law promising to rebuild its aid agency and bump up spending to 0.7 percent of GNI by 2030 — effectively tripling its current rate. Spain has since increased its aid budget to about 0.25 percent of its GNI, or $4.4 billion last year — roughly $490 million more than it spent the year prior at 0.24 percent of its GNI — and says it will continue to give more in the year ahead. That's more money for climate resilience projects in Morocco and Algeria, LGBTQ rights in Paraguay, and HPV vaccine campaigns across Latin America and the Caribbean. A mother living with HIV since 2017 visits Kuoyo Sub-county Hospital with her child to collect their medications, on April 24, 2025 in Kisumu, dismantling of USAID has destroyed longstanding and hard-won infrastructure for implementing aid programs, especially in critical areas like HIV prevention. There's little that anyone can do to bring that infrastructure back, but countries like Spain, Ireland, or South Korea have been able to uplift and increase funding to the initiatives most affected by the cuts, like Gavi, the international vaccine alliance, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Ireland also aims to increase its aid spending to 0.7 percent of GNI by 2030. It inched closer to that goal this year by boosting its development budget by about $40 million to $925 million. 'We wouldn't expect Ireland to be able to fill the USAID gap in any shape or form,' Jane-Ann McKenna, who heads Dóchas, an umbrella group for Irish development organizations, said. 'But that's where our positioning and our voice becomes more important.' That said, foreign aid has always been about more than just charity. It's a geopolitical tool that countries have used for decades to win friends and influence people. It's no coincidence that, according to a 2006 study, US aid increased about 59 percent to nations when they temporarily joined the UN Security Council. The birth of PEPFAR — the HIV/AIDS program that saves around a million lives per year, which makes it perhaps America's most effective ever form of foreign aid — helped boost public opinion of the US across sub-Saharan Africa. Much of Italy's recent aid budget has gone to its $6 billion Mattei Plan in Africa, which aims to collaboratively influence the continent's energy development and migration flows, but which some critics contend recreates old colonial patterns by relying too heavily on European priorities — not local expertise — to decide where the money ought to go and how its vision should take shape. But if you take countries like Ireland and Spain at their word, their approach to foreign aid is not just about soft power anymore. These countries also have something in common that can differentiate them from other larger donors: recent histories of underdevelopment. Some of the newcomers might have been aid recipients rather than donors just a few decades ago. South Korea received billions in foreign aid in the decades after the Korean War, which helped it grow to the point where it became the first former recipient to join OECD's forum for major aid providers in 2010. Spain's wealthier neighbors offered the country major financial support when it began integrating with Europe in the 1980s in the aftermath of the Franco dictatorship. That dynamic can make it easier, Calleja says, to empathize with others who need aid today. (Though let's not forget that Spain once colonized much of Latin America and the Caribbean — places that now receive the bulk of Spanish foreign aid — and therefore laid the groundwork for many patterns of exploitation and inequality there that its aid now seeks to resolve.) Ireland was never a colonizer, but was once colonized itself by Britain. That legacy, McKenna said, means that many Irish people are passionate about human rights abroad and highly supportive of overseas aid. 'We have the history of the famine and we've had conflict on the island and we've had to engage in a whole peace process ourselves,' McKenna explained. 'That's there in the background of all of our psyches.' As these smaller players like to say, it's about 'solidarity.' Spain's own development agency's four-year plan mentions the word solidarity 84 times. It explicitly calls for a move away from the old model, where wealthy nations dictated terms to grateful recipients, and toward a more equitable and collaborative model built on shared priorities and mutual respect. Crisis as catalyst? Of course, not everybody is buying it. Henry Morales is an economist and director of the Movimiento Tzuk Kim-Pop, a Guatemalan human rights group. He let out a little laugh when I asked him about Spain's solidarity plan. After all, he's seen foreign funders renege on their promises before. He's seen European powers pledge numerous times to do more to promote climate resilience in low-income countries before watching them give up when the politics become too difficult. Spain's plan for development stresses that it aims to approach its funding priorities — like combating climate change and promoting gender equality — from a place of consistency and genuine partnership, the kind that can't be abandoned on a whim when a new government takes power. Whether Spain's plan represents a form of global reparations or just colonialism with better PR remains to be seen, he said, but regardless, the old top-down model is clearly cracking. Countries who receive aid now want 'a voice and a vote, so that the decisions are no longer made by a private club of the big donors, the big traditional financiers,' he said. 'But by debates and global agreements that are much more transparent and much more democratic.' Fifty countries in the Global South now have their own agencies to exchange ideas, technical advice, and reciprocal funds for solving poverty, fighting climate change, and improving education. Ensuring that recipients have a big say in how aid gets around is not only good for building a better, more democratic system — it can also make it much more efficient. According to Vox's previous reporting in 2022, aid programs tend to work better when people from the countries they're targeting play a big role in directing how and where the money's used. Morales thinks that kind of collaboration is the real future of aid, which he prefers to see not as charity but as 'simply the fair distribution of wealth.' He's not the only one who thinks so. The director-general of the World Trade Organization, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, called foreign aid 'a thing of the past' at a meeting with African leaders in February. For his part, Karlan, the former USAID economist, doesn't think USAID will ever come back as the acronym or institution it once was, and although that's mostly a very bad thing, he sees a flicker of opportunity. Still, he isn't sure if he believes that a real change to the aid paradigm is afoot. 'Solidarity strikes me as a little bit of a softer way of saying soft power,' he mused, even if countries like Spain or Ireland aren't necessarily 'looking for flyover rights for the military.' What he is sure of is that the US is moving in a very different direction. If Spain's soft power is softening, then the United States' is calcifying into something more toxic, more transactional, and — as Karlan likes to add — less efficient than before. 'Imagine a marriage in which you never did something considerate for your partner just because you cared about them,' he said. Instead, everything is a negotiation. 'That isn't a healthy relationship. What we're risking is losing these long-term relationships, those long-term friendships.' By the time the US is ready to reopen the door on them, it may find a world that has already moved on.
Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: The Arab League takes a positive step. Now, feed the children, Israel.
Nations like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are going to be crucial to the future of the Palestinian people trapped and famished in the Gaza Strip, so it was a positive development last week when those countries collectively called on Hamas to disarm and give up power in Gaza. This was the first time such a collective declaration has been issued by the Arab League, which includes Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and Iraq, and it's a reminder that things in the Middle East don't really follow the simplistic political binaries found in the United States. Hamas and its influence over Gaza is more of a scourge among its Arab neighbors than many Americans realize. 'Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support,' the statement said, 'in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State.' How likely a once promising two-state solution is to become reality is up for debate, to say the least. But the Arab League's views (and resources) surely matter more than performative gestures from European nations. The league made it clear that it believes Hamas has no future role in Gaza and should go away forever. 'Governance, law enforcement and security across all Palestinian territory must lie solely with the Palestinian Authority,' it said. Better than having Hamas in terrorizing charge, we all can agree. Now an appropriate response from Israel, and from the U.S., would be to move aid far more expeditiously and at a greater scale into the Gaza Strip to alleviate the human suffering. As the U.S. media well knows, facts in Gaza are difficult to ascertain amid an ongoing propaganda war, and we don't doubt for a moment that some aid ends up in the wrong hands. We also note that Hamas has not freed all the Israeli hostages. But what civilized nation, confronted with hungry children, would not move to relieve that suffering? The Arab League, which notably also resoundingly condemned the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel, has taken a major step and its member nations appear ready to make real financial commitments toward the future of Gaza, too. But nothing can move forward unless the children of Gaza get enough to eat.
