Officials want 29th and Grove health testing system to ‘outlive the dollars'
Starting in June, the foundation will open a grant portal to allow local health clinics to apply for funds. The funds are intended to be spent on equipment, testing costs and staffing that will build out the local testing capacity.
An advisory group of city and county officials, health care experts and community members will help guide the grant process. Applications will be considered over the summer before awards are announced in late August.
Funds will be distributed to clinics by late October.
For the past several months, questions have swirled around whether Wichita would be able to secure a $1 million contribution from the state Legislature that was contingent on a local dollar-for-dollar match. The money would be on top of $1.5 million already committed by the Legislature, but fundraising had to be completed by the end of June.
The Kansas Health Foundation promised to contribute half of that goal, while the city of Wichita and Sedgwick County each decided to donate $125,000. That left a $250,000 gap.
This week, donations from the Wichita Foundation, Fidelity Bank, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas, the Stand Together Foundation and Sunflower Foundation met the fundraising goal.
Local leaders said during a press conference at the Atwater Neighborhood Center on Friday that the fundraising was a milestone worth marking, but not the finish line.
'Many months of meetings and planning and raising support have brought us to this point of accomplishment,' Sedgwick County Commission Chair Ryan Baty said. 'People in this community who fear the health effects of contaminated water will have options for testing long into the future.'
'But please know,' Baty added, 'that we're not done here.'
Baty and Wichita City Council member Brandon Johnson said that the last bit of funding was secured by demonstrating to local organizations a more 'sustainable' plan than previous testing efforts.
The city of Wichita discovered groundwater contamination near 29th and Grove in 1994. Water and soil in that area was contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE), which is used as a degreaser. It's a carcinogen that has been linked to kidney, liver and blood cancers, among others.
In 1998, the state identified a Union Pacific rail yard as the source of the spill. Further investigation identified a two-mile plume of contamination stretching south from the rail yard.
In 2023, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment released the results of a health study looking at cancer rates and birth outcomes in an area around the spill. It found that there was a higher incidence of liver cancer and low birth weights among people who lived in the study area than recorded in the county or state.
In late 2023, the Kansas Health Foundation gave $50,000 each to Hunter Health, GraceMed and HealthCore to lead education efforts for potentially affected residents. The foundation then made $400,000 available to cover testing for people who lived near the contaminated groundwater.
Less than a tenth of those funds were ultimately used to test 73 patients.
'We knew that we needed some type of plan that was going to be more inclusive than that, more sustainable than that going forward,' Johnson said. 'It wasn't just going to be screening and testing, it had to be something that would last for multiple years [and] serve a lot of people.'
Johnson said for local leaders, the goal wasn't to come up with a solution for just the next year, but the coming years.
Teresa Lovelady, the CEO of HealthCore Clinic, said at the press conference that much of the work produced by the grant will be about building infrastructure within the local health care system 'to make certain that nobody's left behind.'
Lovelady said that the kind of testing required to monitor a patient that's been exposed to the contamination is much more involved than a simple one-time, positive or negative test like a COVID test.
The city, county and Kansas Health Foundation signed a memorandum of agreement that covers the cost for different cancer screenings and testing methods like metabolic panels, urine tests and blood tests.
'We will set the protocols up within our systems to make certain we're providing routine care to our patients and even if there's something else that comes up, they are now connected to a health care provider,' Lovelady said.
Baty said that while the officials involved are dedicated to making sure that the residents and former residents of the 29th and Grove area get the full benefit of this funding effort, officials also hope they're building something more enduring that can be modeled and mobilized for other environmental issues.
'The idea here is to build a system that can outlive the dollars and make sure that we're serving those that are in the most desperate need,' Baty said.
This story is shared from KMUW through the Wichita Journalism Collaborative, a coalition of 10 newsrooms and community groups, including The Wichita Eagle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
She fell on a Boston sidewalk, fractured her jaw, and got nothing from the city. Why?
And she needs dental implants at an out-of-pocket cost of about $20,000. (Medicare pays medical bills, but not dental costs.) The section of sidewalk where she fell has a history. It was paved long ago by the city of Boston with five-foot sections of concrete. Advertisement Next to where Pagliarulo fell, a tree was planted in a carved-out section of the sidewalk. The tree's roots grew under the sidewalk and gradually lifted a section of concrete a couple of inches higher than its surroundings. Pagliarulo and a former neighbor say they reported the tripping hazard to the city of Boston a couple of years ago. They told me the city responded by placing a couple of shovelfuls of asphalt along each protruding lip. Related : I asked the city of Boston what it did and when, and whether it received reports of a hazard. The city said it was working on my request but did not answer my questions in time for publication. The asphalt patch helped but didn't eliminate the hazard, according to neighbors, who showed me pictures of the uneven and bumpy sidewalk. Advertisement And the city seemed to confirm the hazard when, a couple of months after Pagliarulo's fall, it removed the tree and the section of sidewalk next to it, replacing both with a smooth expanse of asphalt. Pagliarulo wants the city of Boston to pay at least some of her dental costs because she believes it was negligent in maintaining that section of sidewalk. What, if anything, does the city owe her? The dispute : Property owners, including municipalities, have a legal duty to keep their property safe for those who use it. That's why almost all homeowners have liability insurance, in case, for example, someone catches their foot on an unrepaired defect on the front stairs. But several laws passed long ago by the state Legislature are highly protective of municipalities, making it almost impossible for ordinary folks like Pagliarulo to get adequate compensation for injuries. Related : I've previously written about frustrated victims who took nasty falls in the There are three ways the law minimizes the number of cases brought against municipalities. First, That's an extremely short notice period. By contrast, In the days after her fall, Pagliarulo concentrated on merely surviving; it often felt like an hour-to-hour struggle. She had to be fed through a syringe and lost almost 25 pounds. Advertisement For a while, three nieces took turns staying overnight with her. A devout Catholic, Pagliarulo spent much time in prayer. Liability was not foremost in her mind. 'I was just so concerned about staying alive,' she told me. Pagliarulo, a widow and retired nurse, said she also felt disoriented and frequently cried. Tears came several times when we met and talked about her fall. Neighbors on Denton Terrace, near Roslindale Square, rallied around her. 'She was in no shape to be researching liability or anything else,' neighbor Josh Jacks said in an interview. After she fell on a Boston sidewalk and fractured her jaw, Tammy Pagliarulo (seated) got support from neighbors (from left) Kim Fanning, Josh Jacks, and Elana Wolkoff. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff When she first contacted City Hall months later, Pagliarulo got one question from the legal department: When did she fall? When she gave the November date, the legal department representative said she had missed the notice deadline and no claim could be made. 'But I was incapacitated,' she recalled telling him. The legal department rep said he was sorry but there was nothing he could do, Pagliarulo said. Neighbor Elana Wolkoff then found But the city legal department told her the courts have narrowly defined 'incapacitated' in previous, precedent-setting cases. Pagliarulo looked for a lawyer, but none were interested. The reason is the second way the law protects municipalities: a $5,000 cap on compensation. Personal injury lawyers are paid one-third of any amount they win. But lawyers can't justify taking a case when the potential payout is limited to one-third of $5,000, or $1,666. That cap was enacted in 1965 and hasn't been updated. If the cap was adjusted for inflation, it would be about $50,000 today, making it more feasible to hire a lawyer. Related : Advertisement Finally, the law disallows such cases unless the victim can show the defective sidewalk was previously reported to the city or town and that the municipality took no action. The law does not define defects. The resolution : After Pagliarulo's fall, City Councilor Enrique Pepén, whose district includes Roslindale, helped arrange for the removal of the tree and section of the sidewalk. 'It was definitely something that needed repair,' he said. 'It was a big hazard, and they leveled it out.' When he found out about the 30-day notice requirement, Pepén said he was 'taken aback' by how short it is. 'It's not fair to citizens,' he said. Pepén said he wants to collaborate with state lawmakers in reviewing the state laws governing such cases. Bills to change the law get filed virtually every session of the Legislature, but none have passed. Related : The takeaway : The way the law favors cities and towns (and the state, too) is grounded in the centuries-old concept of sovereign immunity, which originated in England and is based on the antiquated notion that 'the King could do no wrong.' Keeping those laws undisturbed saves money for cities and towns. And municipalities do not lack influence on Beacon Hill. But imagine that you or a loved one were affected. You have thousands in medical or dental bills or you've lost income because you can't work, all because of a defective sidewalk and through no fault of your own. Advertisement Wouldn't you want fair compensation? Got a problem? Send your consumer issue to
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
OF COURSE New York's bungled weed legalization fueled a wave of addiction
An explosive Post exclusive revealing that legal weed is fueling a wave of addiction is fresh proof of Albany's feckless legalization. 'It's one of the stupidest things our society has done — they legalized cannabis during the opioid crisis,' grumbled Luke Nasta, president and CEO of Camelot Counseling of Staten Island. Thing is, neither the Legislature's leaders nor Gov. Andrew Cuomo (then eyeing a 2020 presidential run) cared about the risks, the clear downsides or even elementary practicality when they rammed through legalization in 2019. Advertisement They let social-justice obsessions write the new rules, then installed a clueless crew to run the new state Office of Cannabis Management. As the OCM dithered over awarding the new licenses, illegal shops popped up all over the city and state — shielded from law enforcement by the new laws' lunatic provisions. So the outlets that had proven their ability by selling under the 2014 medical-marijuana law got crushed even as qualified new potential sellers couldn't open for business. Advertisement Oh, and Albany didn't even allow for common-sense limits on smoking dope in public, so the reek of weed is everywhere. Worst of all, the politicians shut their ears to warnings about the impact of cannabis on young brains — a prime reason the Medical Society of New York opposed legalization. So the state saw an explosion of flavored weed products and edibles, plainly aimed at hooking young people susceptible to addiction. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Any legalization risked bringing an avalanche of new addicts, but New York's move might as well have been timed and designed to maximize the damage. How mad does it get? Consider the nonprofit Housing Works, which runs drug-treatment services and a cannabis-dispensary arm. It tells its pot customers they're 'helping fund lifesaving services that support thousands of New Yorkers each year' — except that its treatment centers on the addict-enabling 'harm reduction' approach. Prospering by feeding misery: That's pretty much the essence of Albany's approach to legalization.
The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
Cooper's North Carolina Senate bid will put Medicaid front and center
Democrats are hoping health care will be a winning issue across the 2026 midterm elections and see North Carolina as the top potential pickup opportunity in their long-shot play to regain control of the Senate. They think Cooper's record as governor — working with and pressuring the GOP-dominated Legislature across two terms until he could expand Medicaid — makes him the perfect messenger. In his campaign launch video, Cooper previewed what will likely be a common line of attack. He accused Republicans of 'ripping away our health care' and threatening Medicare and Social Security 'just to give tax breaks to billionaires.' In his first television interview after announcing his candidacy, Cooper made it clear he wants to focus on Medicaid and affordability. 'We expanded health care to more than 670,000 North Carolinians. We were able to put a plan in place that helps address the high cost of living for North Carolinians by eliminating $4 billion in medical debt for 2 million North Carolinians,' Cooper told Rachel Maddow. 'We knew we had accomplished something, getting health insurance to people who had never had it before. Now, Washington Republicans are going to strip it away. I think that is such a contrast in this race,' he added. Health care looms over the race — likely between Cooper and Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley, who has President Trump's endorsement — in part because incumbent Sen. Thom Tillis (R) is not running. Tillis said he would retire rather than vote for Trump's massive tax cut and spending legislation. He called the legislation 'devastating' and was one of only three Republicans to vote against the bill after saying it would 'betray the very promise' Trump made about not touching Medicaid. The legislation is projected to push about 10 million low-income people off their health insurance over the next decade. Health policy research group KFF estimates 520,000 North Carolinians will lose their health insurance because of proposed changes to Medicaid and ObamaCare exchange health plans, and if enhanced subsidies expire at the end of 2025. Brad Woodhouse, a longtime Democratic strategist and president of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said Cooper is going to spend the next year linking Whatley to the GOP Medicaid cuts. 'I don't know what positions Michael Whatley is going to take. He's a blank slate … but what he is tied to, it's Trump. And these cuts are Trump's, this health care disaster is Trump's. Michael Whatley can't separate himself from Trump,' Woodhouse said. When he first ran for governor in 2016, Cooper said he wanted expand Medicaid and help low-income residents afford health care. But he faced strong opposition from the GOP-controlled Legislature. Legislation finally passed in March 2023, spurred by a growing chorus of Republican support and the promise of more than $1.5 billion in additional federal money for the state. Health care resonates with voters across the political spectrum, and Cooper is likely to tout his ability to work across the aisle, which experts said is something that helped him consistently win in North Carolina even when Trump was on the ticket. 'Cooper is going to focus on where he knows best, and he's got the track record of six statewide elections under his belt to know how to best frame and message a campaign to North Carolinians,' said Michael Bitzer, a professor of politics and history at Catawba College. 'I think the argument that he will make is, 'We worked together across political aisles to get Medicaid expanded, and now Washington Republicans are cutting just about the same number as we expanded,'' Bitzer said. Yet in trying to tie Whatley to the 'big, beautiful' law, Cooper is going to face the same issue as Democrats nationwide: Most of the cuts in the law are back-loaded and won't take effect until well after the midterm elections. 'Clearly, he's going to bring up [Medicaid]. The problem is people aren't going to feel this until after the election takes place. So the trick for Cooper is going to be to remind people of how beneficial Medicaid expansion has been and get them to believe him about how bad it's going to be,' said Chris Cooper, a Western Carolina University politics professor. It's not clear Republicans will want to engage the former governor on Medicaid directly, and Bitzer said they have their own list of attacks. Federal campaigns often center on much more partisan issues than statewide elections, and Republicans have already started attacking Cooper as a radical liberal.
