Crestline class of 2025 earns 104 seals, college credits and a scholarship
According to an announcement, 17 of the seniors attended Crestline High School, while 21 were enrolled at the Pioneer Career and Technology Center. The highest GPA in the class reached 4.116, showcasing the academic achievements of the graduates.
The class of 2025 collectively earned 104 graduation seals, exceeding the 76 seals required for graduation under state guidelines. The accomplishment reflects the hard work and determination of the students throughout the year. Additionally, the senior class pursued 40 College Credit Plus (CCP) dual credit courses, with one senior completing 17 CCP courses and earning an associate's degree through Ohio State University at Mansfield before graduation.
Beyond academics, the class showed strong career preparation. One graduate participated in the TurboCert credentialing program at the Crawford County Success Center, receiving specialized training for workforce entry with a professional certification.
In honor of the graduating class, the district introduced the Jeff Belcik Memorial Scholarship this year. The $1,000 scholarship was awarded to a Crestline High School senior who exemplified the spirit and values of the district.
This story was created by Jane Imbody, jimbody@gannett.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct or share your thoughts at http://bit.ly/3RapUkA with our News Automation and AI team.
This article originally appeared on Bucyrus Telegraph-Forum: Crestline's class of 2025 earned more than diplomas; here's what else
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
The Link Between Hyper-Competition and Freight Fraud
Training gaps and outdated tools have left freight security full of blind spots; competition makes them wider. The trucking industry carries roughly 70% of all goods across the United States, yet it's operating in the middle of a freight recession. Volumes are down, rates are volatile, and with many providers fighting load to load just to stay in operation, competition is at an all-time high. This downturn isn't happening in a vacuum. A slowing economy means both businesses and consumers are purchasing less. Lower demand ripples directly into trucking, driving fierce competition for every shipment. And despite frequent headlines claiming otherwise, this isn't a driver shortage story. Capacity exists; it's freight demand that has shrunk, leaving carriers and brokers battling harder for fewer loads. The people on the front lines of this industry are working harder than ever – balancing coverage speed, customer service, and compliance under extreme pressure. But that same intensity comes with a cost: security practices are being stretched thin at the exact moment fraud is growing more sophisticated. The challenge isn't that companies are careless or unwilling to train their people. It's that many systems in use were built for a different market cycle, and they're showing their age. Paired with the reality of today's fraud schemes, blind spots are inevitable. The Competitive Trap Competition has always been part of freight, but a recession magnifies it. With volumes down and margins razor-thin, providers are under relentless pressure to win business. That pressure reshapes security in three ways: Immediate rewards, delayed risks: Shippers reward speed. A load booked in minutes looks like a win, while fraud may not be uncovered until weeks later. That lag makes it harder for operators under pressure to slow down and double-check. Coverage over caution: When customers are pushing for lower rates and faster turnarounds, pausing to investigate anomalies feels impossible. If one provider hesitates while another jumps, the load is gone. In this climate, every second feels like the difference between keeping and losing business. Tools outpaced by fraud: Many of the systems in use today were designed to catch traditional compliance issues, not the sophisticated identity theft and document fraud that dominate now. Providers may be following the process, but the technology itself can't see what's hiding in plain sight. Fraudsters count on that. This isn't about anyone 'cutting corners.' It's about a market that demands speed at the same time fraud has become more complex. That combination leaves blind spots wide open. The Gaps Technology Doesn't Flag Technology has transformed how freight is booked, tracked, and vetted, but it hasn't eliminated risk. Systems are built to catch what they're programmed to see: safety scores, expired insurance, duplicate MC numbers. But fraud doesn't always follow those patterns. In today's market, the absence of an alert isn't proof of safety. It's just silence. Busy, overworked operators in high-pressure, high-volume roles often have to keep moving if nothing obvious is flagged. That isn't neglect; it's the reality of covering freight in minutes, not hours. The challenge is that fraudsters know how to design their scams to pass as 'normal' inside these systems. Fraudsters count on this. They know how to slip inside the gaps: activating dormant authorities with a few legitimate trucks to appear 'normal,' forging insurance certificates that pass at first glance, or impersonating carriers whose data looks clean on a platform. On the surface, everything checks out. Underneath, the risk is already in motion. It does not help the industry when many so-called fraud prevention experts are exposing 'how' they are catching some of these anomalies. Broadcasting how a scam was detected may generate views, engagement, and impressions, but it is also tipping our hand as to what the bag guys are doing wrong. In the short term, fraudsters may be getting caught in some of these publicly advised traps, but at the end of the day we have only shown the bad guys what exactly they did wrong, and they will change it. This keeps the already battle-weary groups of legitimate carriers and brokers wondering what the next evolution of scam is coming their way. Case Studies: How Blind Spots Become Breaches Case Example 1: The Ghost Carrier with Rented Authority A logistics provider onboarded a carrier whose MC and DOT numbers checked out as valid. Their authority was active, insurance was current, and they even had a couple of trucks on file – enough to pass a surface-level review. On paper, everything looked normal. But behind the scenes, the carrier wasn't hauling most of the freight they booked. Instead, they were renting out their authority to other operators and sub-brokering loads. Because they had a minimal fleet, they could appear legitimate while moving most shipments through unaffiliated drivers. This is a classic example of illegal brokerage. The provider only realized the problem when a shipment failed to deliver and could not be traced to the supposed carrier. The authority holder insisted they hadn't hauled it themselves – and technically, they hadn't. The fraudster had simply leveraged their 'legitimacy' to hide the scheme in plain sight. Case Example 2: The Recycled MC Number A dormant authority suddenly reappeared in FMCSA records as 'active.' To a logistics provider under pressure to cover a load, it looked like a small fleet restarting operations. The system showed it as compliant, so the load was booked. What didn't show: the carrier's authority had been hijacked. The listed address no longer matched the company's history, the phone number was a VoIP line, and the 'carrier' had no verifiable equipment. The freight was immediately re-brokered, and by the time the scam was uncovered, it had vanished. Case Example 3: The Stolen Identity A mid-sized 3PL was stung by a fraud ring that impersonated a well-known regional carrier. The scammers didn't stop at recycling the carrier's MC number – they layered their deception. They created a nearly identical Gmail domain to mimic the company's email addresses, set up a prepaid phone to field calls, and even spoofed phone numbers to appear as if they were calling from the carrier's real office. In some cases, fraudsters go further still by exploiting call forwarding or even SIM hijacking, a tactic where they convince a phone carrier to transfer a number to their own device. When that happens, all calls and texts, even verification codes, are routed to the fraudster. From the outside, it looks like you're speaking to the real carrier. On the surface, everything matched. With freight moving fast, it was almost impossible for busy staff to distinguish the scammer from the legitimate carrier. By the time the deception came to light, the freight – and the money – were long gone. Turning Tools Into Real Protection No technology can replace the discipline of looking past the surface. Fraudsters know how to make their paperwork look clean and their records appear compliant inside the very systems providers trust. That's why technology should be used to support human judgment, not replace it. Compliance platforms like Carrier411, Highway, and Carrier Assure can surface carrier history, safety scores, and operating patterns. Fraud-prevention tools such as FreightValidate add identity verification and facial recognition, while DAT and Truckstop have rolled out stronger anti-fraud features on their load boards. Insurance verification services like RMIS give real-time policy checks. All of these are valuable. But the reality is that fraud doesn't always show up in a system. A COI can still be forged. An reinstated authority can still be hijacked. An email domain can still be off by a single letter. These are the small details that systems miss, and the cracks fraudsters step through. And while time is the scarcest resource in a freight recession, the few extra moments it takes to verify what's behind the data can be the difference between protecting freight or losing it. Why Security Has to Evolve The freight recession has created a paradox: at the very moment providers are working harder than ever to win and protect business, fraud is getting more sophisticated and harder to spot. Competitive pressure demands speed. Systems deliver data. But neither alone is enough to close the gaps that fraudsters exploit. The blind spots aren't the result of neglect. They're the natural outcome of a market moving faster than the tools designed to secure it; of teams asked to do more with less, in an environment where every load feels like survival. Security doesn't have to slow providers down, it simply has to evolve with the market. But the tools have to be matched with training, the process has to adapt to today's fraud schemes, and the industry has to share more openly about what's working and what isn't. Freight isn't failing because people don't care. It's failing where competition collides with outdated tools and limited time. Until that alignment is addressed, fraud will keep finding its way in. For 3PLs, brokers, and providers of every size, the path forward is clear: keep competing on speed and price alone – and risk opening the door to more fraud – or build resilience into security and give customers a reason to stay. The post The Link Between Hyper-Competition and Freight Fraud appeared first on FreightWaves.

Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Rezoning request for Lower Moncure Road draws fire from residents
Lower Moncure Road residents were vocal in their opposition to a rezoning request for the development of a light industrial park in the community. At least 15 residents spoke against the proposed zoning change during a public hearing at Monday's meeting of the Lee County Board of Commissioners. Trustwell Property Group LLC and HV Vector Park LLC have asked to rezone the 430-plus acre tract fronting the west side Lower Moncure Road from Residential Agricultural to Light Industrial. 'Our vision is to create a light industrial business park that furthers the economic growth for Sanford and Lee County,' the applicants wrote as their reason for the rezoning. Ammons Farmland LLC is listed as a co-owner on the application. Jon Keener, managing partner with Trustwell Group and Helix Ventures, said there would be no residential development on the site. Under the Light Industry designation, uses allowed are light manufacturing assembly, packaging or similar uses, he said during the presentation. The project has been in development for about three years, Keener said. The site is conducive for several reasons including a rail track that runs through the property. The community would benefit from an increase in employment and growing the county's tax base, Keener said. There would be no development in the flood plain, buffers would be placed along waterways on the property and up-to-date storm water control practices would be in use. The company is developing the Helix Innovation Park at The Brickyard off U.S. 15-501 in the Deep River community. Kyowa Kirin, a Japanese pharmaceutical manufacturer, is planning to open a facility in the Park. However, residents living in and around the property are firmly against the proposed development. The primary concern was the loss of the rural farmland and a community's way of life. 'I've lived at this address since 1985, 1986 and when I moved here, I realized I'd moved into a very special community,' said Rex Chisholm, who lives on Lower Moncure Road. 'Development is wonderful, but it comes with a price. It changes the way of life for a lot of Lee County residents. Do we really want to be the next Holly Springs or Apex? I implore you to think about this,' Chisholm said. 'This cat must have been a car salesman,' Mark Mansfield, a Lower Moncure Road resident, said of Keener's presentation. Mansfield is the third generation to live on the family property. 'We don't need no light industrial park. It will change the whole way of life down there,' Mansfield said. 'I hope you all really think about it. We need to slow down on the growth. We're growing way too fast. Let's leave some things alone.' Other concerns included the potential contamination of waters that flow into the Cape Fear River, constant noise, light pollution and increased traffic. Micki Hunt lives in Washington, D.C. but owns 285 acres across the road from the property. Her family has owned the property since the 1700s. 'Roberts Creek flows along the boundary on my property. Anything that goes into Roberts Creek ends up in the Cape Fear River,' Hunt said. 'I ask you to consider the traffic and the need for infrastructure that would pose hazards to wildlife. 'I believe it would be unwise … and I ask that you reject it.' However, Jimmy Randolph, CEO of the Sanford Area Growth Alliance, presented another viewpoint. 'SAGA is charged by the community to encourage expansion of existing or attraction of new businesses to Lee County,' he said. With the fierce competition for jobs, ready-to-use industrial sites are vital, according to Randolph. Two of them are the Central Carolina Enterprise Park and the new Brickyard Park. 'Growth is coming to Lee County as long as Americans believe in private property rights. I field phone calls … many are looking on Lower Moncure Road for sites,' Randolph said. 'You're faced with a very challenging decision tonight. Regardless of the decision you make about this site, you'll have to make it again. I'm encouraged by the turnout of the community. We're going to face this as a county for the foreseeable future.' The commissioners will vote on the request at a future meeting. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Tecnoglass Responds to Short Seller Report
Company Categorically Rejects All Allegations Which it Believes to be False, Misleading and Malicious Company Reaffirms Recently Increased Full Year 2025 Guidance Miami, FL, Aug. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tecnoglass, Inc. (NYSE: TGLS) ("Tecnoglass" or the "Company"), a leading producer of high-end aluminum and vinyl windows and architectural glass for the global residential and commercial end markets, today issued the following statement in response claims made in a short seller report: Tecnoglass categorically rejects what it believes are false, misleading, and unsubstantiated allegations contained in the report. Tecnoglass believes the publication is a clear attempt to manipulate the market and harm the Company's shareholders. The report largely focuses on previous claims that were thoroughly reviewed and addressed in 2022 by a Special Committee of the Company's independent Board members, with the support of highly respected external legal and accounting advisors. That review concluded with no evidence of wrongdoing, fraud, or financial misstatement. Tecnoglass remains committed to highest standards of ethical conduct, transparency and sound corporate governance. The Company is reviewing all available options, including potential legal action against parties responsible for disseminating the report, to protect the interests of Company shareholders and the integrity of the market. The Company will continue to cooperate fully with regulators and stakeholders, as it always has, and will not allow unfounded speculation or attempts to manipulate the market to distract from the Company's mission of building long-term value for customers, employees, and shareholders. The Company reaffirmed its recently increased full year 2025 financial guidance announced on August 7, 2025 that reflects the Company's solid performance through the first half of 2025 and the continued strength across the business and belief that the business will achieve another year of strong profitability and cash generation. Reflecting confidence in the strength and long-term prospects of the business, Tecnoglass also notes that its active share repurchase program will be used when appropriate, underscoring management's belief that the Company's fundamentals and growth outlook are not reflected in the current market price. Tecnoglass remains focused on delivering exceptional, best-in-class services and solutions for our residential and commercial customer base, and delivering long-term value for our shareholders. About Tecnoglass Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading producer of high-end aluminum and vinyl windows and architectural glass serving the multi-family, single-family, and commercial end markets. Tecnoglass is the second largest glass fabricator serving the U.S. and the #1 architectural glass transformation company in Latin America. Located in Barranquilla, Colombia, the Company's 5.8 million square foot, vertically integrated, and state-of-the-art manufacturing complex provide efficient access to nearly 1,000 customers in North, Central and South America, with the United States accounting for 95% of total revenues. Tecnoglass' tailored, high-end products are found on some of the world's most distinctive properties, including One Thousand Museum (Miami), Paramount (Miami), Salesforce Tower (San Francisco), Via 57 West (NY), Hub50House (Boston), Aeropuerto Internacional El Dorado (Bogotá), One Plaza (Medellín), Pabellon de Cristal (Barranquilla). For more information, please visit or view our corporate video at Forward Looking Statements This press release includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding future financial performance, future growth and future acquisitions. These statements are based on Tecnoglass' current expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors, and other risks and uncertainties affecting the operation of Tecnoglass' business. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies are indicated from time to time in Tecnoglass' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information set forth herein should be read in light of such risks. Further, investors should keep in mind that Tecnoglass' financial results in any particular period may not be indicative of future results. Tecnoglass is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events and changes in assumptions or otherwise, except as required by law. Investor Relations: Santiago GiraldoCFO305-503-9062investorrelations@ while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data