logo
Foreign aid groups want Rubio held in contempt over funding freeze

Foreign aid groups want Rubio held in contempt over funding freeze

Politico20-02-2025

Two nonprofits that have had their foreign aid grants frozen asked a judge Wednesday to hold Secretary of State Marco Rubio and another top State Department official in contempt for not following a court order to restart the money flow.
Billions of dollars in U.S. foreign aid, for everything from HIV prevention to food assistance to support for foreign journalists, are at stake as the groups fight against the Trump administration's 90-day foreign aid freeze.
Administration officials have said they are pausing the funding while they review if the projects comply with President Donald Trump's 'America First' policy.
The groups — the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Journalism Development Network — asked U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, a President Joe Biden appointee, to hold Rubio and Peter Marocco, the State Department's foreign aid assistance director, in civil contempt until they comply with Ali's order from Feb. 13 directing them to restart foreign aid funding. The court should also impose penalties on the two until they comply, the plaintiffs said.
'This Court should not brook such brazen defiance of the express terms of its order,' the plaintiffs wrote in their motion Wednesday.
Marocco — who's also managing the U.S. Agency for International Development — argued in a statement submitted to the court Tuesday night that despite the court's order, he still believed the agency has authority under federal laws and the terms of foreign aid contracts to pause or terminate payments. He said he wants to ensure payments aren't being directed to unreliable or fraudulent purposes and that he would continue to examine outgoing payments as part of a new system to ensure their integrity.
The aid groups argued Wednesday that the judge's order was clear that the administration had to lift the suspension of foreign aid programs and they have not done so.
They also asked the court to order the administration to rescind all suspensions, stop-work orders and terminations issued since Trump returned to the White House and to reimburse foreign assistance recipients for work they've already done, as well as for future work.
Ali ordered the defendants to respond to the contempt motion by 1 p.m. Thursday.
The judge on Feb. 13 ordered the administration to restore funding for hundreds of foreign aid contractors and grantees, arguing that the administration failed to account for the extraordinary harm its broad-based foreign aid halt has caused.
The Trump administration's sudden halt on U.S. foreign aid in late January interrupted foreign programs ranging from food and drug distribution to land mines removal. Thousands of people working for companies and nonprofits in the foreign aid sectors lost their jobs, in the U.S. and abroad.
'Each day, their irreparable harm increased, as did the suffering of millions of people across the world who depend on the work performed with these grants,' the two nonprofits wrote in their filing. They claimed the freeze has already killed people, citing a report from a U.K. media outlet that an elderly refugee woman from Myanmar living in a camp in Thailand died after her oxygen supply was cut off due to the funding freeze.
Plaintiffs also challenged an assertion by the State Department that it and USAID conducted a review of thousands of grants, contracts and other agreements in the last five days and determined the funding termination or suspension was allowed.
'This assertion strains credulity,' the plaintiffs wrote.
The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Josh Gerstein and Nahal Toosi contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The success of a key NATO summit is in doubt after Spain rejects a big hike in defense spending
The success of a key NATO summit is in doubt after Spain rejects a big hike in defense spending

Associated Press

time5 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

The success of a key NATO summit is in doubt after Spain rejects a big hike in defense spending

BRUSSELS (AP) — The success of a key NATO summit hung in the balance on Friday, after Spain announced that it cannot raise the billions of dollars needed to meet a new defense investment pledge demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump and his NATO counterparts are meeting for two days in the Netherlands from next Tuesday. He insists that U.S. allies should commit to spending at least 5% of gross domestic product, but that requires investment at an unprecedented scale. Trump has cast doubt over whether the U.S. would defend allies that spend too little. Setting the spending goal would be a historic decision. It would see all 32 countries invest the same amount in defense for the first time. Only last week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte expressed confidence that they would endorse it. But in a letter to Rutte on Thursday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote that 'committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' 'It would move Spain away from optimal spending and it would hinder the (European Union's) ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defense ecosystem,' Sánchez wrote in the letter, seen by The Associated Press. Spain is not entirely alone Belgium, Canada, France and Italy would also struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars, but Spain is the only country to officially announce its intentions, making it hard to row back from such a public decision. Beyond his economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern, and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He's under growing pressure to call an early election. In response to the letter, Rutte's office said only that 'discussions among allies on a new defense investment plan are ongoing.' NATO's top civilian official had been due to table a new proposal on Friday to try to break the deadlock. The U.S. and French envoys had also been due to update reporters about the latest developments ahead of the summit but postponed their briefings. Rutte and many European allies are desperate to resolve the problem by Tuesday so that Trump does not derail the summit, as he did during his first term at NATO headquarters in 2018. Budget boosting After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO allies agreed that 2% of GDP should be the minimum they spend on their military budgets. But NATO's new plans for defending its own territory against outside attack require investment of at least 3%. Spain agreed to those plans in 2023. The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP. A further 1.5% would go to upgrade roads, bridges, ports and airfields so that armies can better deploy, and to prepare societies for future attacks. Mathematically, 3.5 plus 1.5 equals Trump's 5%. But a lot is hiding behind the figures and details of what kinds of things can be included remain cloudy. Countries closest to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine have all agreed to the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the June 24-25 summit. The Netherlands estimates that NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Supplying arms and ammunition to Ukraine, which Spain does, will also be included as core defense spending. NATO estimates that the U.S. spent around 3.2% of GDP on defense last year. Dual use, making warfighting possible The additional 1.5% spending basket is murkier. Rutte and many members argue that infrastructure used to deploy armies to the front must be included, as well as building up defense industries and preparing citizens for possible attacks. 'If a tank is not able to cross a bridge. If our societies are not prepared in case war breaks out for a whole of society approach. If we are not able to really develop the defense industrial base, then the 3.5% is great but you cannot really defend yourselves,' Rutte said this month. Spain wanted climate change spending included, but that proposal was rejected. Cyber-security and counter-hybrid warfare investment should also make the cut. Yet with all the conjecture about what might be included, it's difficult to see how Rutte arrived at this 1.5% figure. The when, the how, and a cunning plan It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit the 2% target, although most will this year, and they had a decade to get there. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That's far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate that Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within 5-10 years. The U.S. insists that it cannot be an open-ended pledge, and that a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. Another issue is how fast spending should be ramped up. 'I have a cunning plan for that,' Rutte said. He wants the allies to submit annual plans that lay out how much they intend to increase spending by. The reasons for the spending hike For Europe, Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat. A major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents is blamed on Moscow. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The United States also insists that China poses a threat. But for European people to back a hike in national defense spending, their governments require acknowledgement that the Kremlin remains NATO's biggest security challenge. The billions required for security will be raised by taxes, going into debt, or shuffling money from other budgets. But it won't be easy for many, as Spain has shown. On top of that, Trump has made things economically tougher by launching a global tariff war — ostensibly for U.S. national security reasons — something America's allies find hard to fathom.

The White House Plans for Texas Could Backfire
The White House Plans for Texas Could Backfire

Bloomberg

time9 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

The White House Plans for Texas Could Backfire

President Donald Trump's push for Texas lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts in hopes of preserving the slim Republican majority in the US House is yet another example of the president putting his own fortune above his party's. In an ideal world, it's also a good idea — because it could lead to more competitive elections and a more representative democracy. Of course, that's the opposite of Trump's intention: He wants to make it more difficult for voters to punish him for his unpopular policies.

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed' Newsletter: Evangelicals with Trump in support of Israel's war on Iran
Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed' Newsletter: Evangelicals with Trump in support of Israel's war on Iran

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed' Newsletter: Evangelicals with Trump in support of Israel's war on Iran

Fox News' "Antisemitism Exposed" newsletter brings you stories on the rising anti-Jewish prejudice across the U.S. and the world. IN TODAY'S NEWSLETTER: - Evangelical leaders praise Trump's support for Israel amid war with Iran- DeSantis-sponsored rescue flights evacuate 1,500 Jewish Americans from Israel- 'Globalize the intifada' phrase stirs tensions on NYC campaign trail TOP STORY: Some of the most influential evangelical leaders in the U.S. told Fox News Digital that they believe President Donald Trump's support for Israel is unwavering as the Jewish state finds itself at war with Iran. Pastor John Hagee, founder and chairman of Christians United for Israel, which numbers 10 million members, said, "I do not think President Trump will allow himself to be played by Iranian negotiators or American isolationists. VIDEO: Americans Against Antisemitism founder Dov Hikind joins 'Fox & Friends First' to discuss the latest on escalating tension between Israel and Iran and the possible role the U.S. could play as both nations trade missile strikes. WATCH HERE: RON TO THE RESCUE: As violence escalates in Israel during its conflict with Iran, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is dispatching four planes to evacuate 1,500 stranded Americans. Mano Maritime cruise ship Crown Iris picked up the evacuees in Ashdod, Israel, and took them on a 13-hour steam trip to Lanarca, Cyprus. Most passengers were from a program called Birthright Israel, which provides educational trips to the Holy Land. BIG APPLE BIGOTRY: Middle East tensions seeped onto the New York City campaign trail this week as President Donald Trump considers striking Iran. Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani refused to support banning the phrases "Globalize the intifada" and "From the river to the sea", comparing that leadership style to Trump. See what rival Andrew Cuomo had to say. HARDENING TARGETS: The NYPD ramped up security at Jewish sites across New York City after Israel launched strikes on Iran, kicking off a new war in the Middle East. "Out of an abundance of caution, we are increasing security at houses of worship and at Israeli diplomatic sites,' Mayor Eric Adams wrote on X. "I am praying for peace in the region." UN REPORT BLASTS ISRAEL: A new UN report accuses Israel of committing "the crime against humanity of extermination." Israel is restricting religious freedoms at holy sites in Jerusalem by subjecting Palestinians to "increased security checks, checkpoints, harassment and assault. DEGREES OF HATE - Recent UCLA graduate Isabella Brannon writes about how her Humanities commencement and others at the school were marred by blatant antisemitism, while students cheered and faculty stood by. GUEST EDITORIAL: Helena Ivanov, an associate research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, writes that unchecked misinformation on social media is helping to fuel campus antisemitism. Fabricated stories about Israel and Hamas in the wake of Oct. 7 have left students with a warped perspective on Jews and the Middle East, she found. QUOTE OF THE WEEK: "They claim Jews exclude non-Jews from religious sites when the exact opposite is true. Only Israel protects freedom of religion for Christians, Muslims and Jews, while Jews have been banned and Jewish religious sites have been systematically trashed by Palestinian Arabs for a century." - Ann Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust, responding to new UN report blasting Israel. - Looking for more on this topic? Find more antisemitism coverage from Fox News here. - Did someone forward you this email? Subscribe to additional newsletters from Fox News here. - Want live updates? Get the Fox News app here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store