Singapore shipping line PIL quadruples profits for 2024, but warns 2025 will be challenging
PIL chief executive Lars Kastrup noted that the liner's operational strength, strong cash position and efficient cost-cutting enabled it to perform well. PHOTO: PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL LINES (PIL)
Singapore shipping line PIL quadruples profits for 2024, but warns 2025 will be challenging
SINGAPORE - Pacific International Lines (PIL) has more than quadrupled its earnings for 2024, thanks to a surge in demand for container shipping and higher freight rates, but warned that 2025 will be a tougher year with more disruptions.
The Singapore shipping line on May 16 announced 2024 earnings amounting to US$1.34 billion (S$1.73 billion), which is up by more than 330 per cent compared with 2023.
Revenue surged 49 per cent year on year to US$4.31 billion, largely driven by growth in its container shipping segment, which enjoyed higher freight rates and a 9.6 per cent increase in the number of containers moved on its ships.
Container shipping accounted for more than 87 per cent of the liner's revenue in 2024. The liner's key routes are Africa, South America and the Middle East and intra-Asia.
PIL's container manufacturing business also grew, boosted by increased demand for containers amid Red Sea shipping disruptions and pre-election restocking activity in the US.
The home-grown liner has been expanding its revenues and investing in its fleet of vessels since receiving a US$600 million lifeline from Temasek's wholly owned Heliconia Capital Management in 2021 to help it stave off bankruptcy. The bailout involved Heliconia taking a majority stake in the liner.
As at end-2024, PIL reported healthy cash reserves of US$2.33 billion and a fleet of 101 ships able to transport a total of 442,000 twenty-foot containers. The fleet comprises 89 owned and 12 chartered ships.
In 2024, the liner rolled out a US$2 billion plan to replace part of its fleet with dual-fuel container ships that can run on both liquefied natural gas and conventional marine fuel as pressure widens for shipping to comply with the industry's net-zero targets.
It has received six newbuilds since October 2024, including two that have the capacity to move 14,000 containers, and has another 12 newbuild vessels on order.
PIL chief executive Lars Kastrup noted that the liner's operational strength, strong cash position and efficient cost-cutting enabled it to perform well despite a challenging environment for shipping.
In 2024, the industry faced major disruptions caused by disruptions in the Red Sea. These include congestion in key ports due to scrambled shipping schedules and more vessels being deployed to longer routes to ensure goods are delivered on time.
More shippers also accelerated shipments in anticipation of potential disruptions, including dockworker strikes at major US ports and new tariffs on US-bound goods. This surge in early deliveries contributed to supply chain bottlenecks and tightened shipping capacity.
These challenges are expected to intensify in 2025, at a time when many terminals are not able to develop fast enough to keep up with the volume growth and larger-sized container vessels that are being introduced into existing and emerging markets, Mr Kastrup said.
'The year ahead is expected to be filled with uncertainty and heightened challenges. The additional capacity brought on by newbuild vessels coming on stream in 2025 is expected to outpace the market demand for goods, although continued port congestions may absorb some of the capacity growth,' he said.
He added that the liner's strong cash position will enable it to continue to seek business growth.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US slams sanctions by UK, allies on far-right Israeli ministers
Mr Rubio said the sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war in Gaza. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctions imposed on June 10 by Britain and other nations against two Israeli Cabinet members accused of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians. 'These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war' in Gaza, Mr Rubio said in a statement. Britain's foreign ministry earlier announced that Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir will be banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the country frozen. Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway also imposed fresh measures against the ministers, as the Israeli government faces growing international criticism over the conduct of its conflict with Hamas. The sanctions mark a break between the five countries and Israel's closest ally, the United States, with Mr Rubio urging partners 'not to forget who the real enemy is' and to stand 'shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel' against Hamas. Mr Ben Gvir and Mr Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights,' the foreign ministers of the five countries said in a joint statement. 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account,' they added. A UK government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Canada and Australia had also imposed sanctions, while Norway and New Zealand had implemented travel bans only. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar slammed the sanctions as 'outrageous.' 'Horrendous language' Mr Smotrich and Mr Ben Gvir are part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile ruling coalition. Both have drawn criticism for their hardline stance on the Gaza war and comments about settlements in the occupied West Bank, the other Palestinian territory. Mr Smotrich, who lives in a West Bank settlement, has supported the expansion of settlements and has called for the territory's annexation. He said in May Gaza would be 'entirely destroyed' and that civilians would 'start to leave in great numbers to third countries.' Mr Ben Gvir has also called for Gazans to be resettled from the besieged territory. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the pair had used 'horrendous extremist language' and that he would 'encourage the Israeli government to disavow and condemn that language.' New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters insisted the measures were not directed against the Israeli people or government. 'Rather, the travel bans are targeted at two individuals who are using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution,' he said in a statement. 'Violence must stop' The UK foreign ministry said in its statement that 'extremist settlers have carried out over 1,900 attacks against Palestinian civilians since January last year.' It said the five countries were 'clear that the rising violence and intimidation by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the West Bank must stop.' 'Measures today cannot be seen in isolation from events in Gaza where Israel must uphold international humanitarian law,' the ministry said. It added that the five nations 'support Israel's security and will continue to work with the Israeli government to strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.' Britain had already suspended free-trade negotiations with Israel in May and summoned Israel's ambassador over the conduct of the war. It also announced financial restrictions and travel bans on several prominent settlers, as well as two illegal outposts and two organisations accused of backing violence against Palestinian communities. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
GM dodges tariffs with production shift to US from Mexico
GENERAL Motors plans to invest US$4 billion in its US plants over the next two years to boost output of some of its top-selling gas-powered vehicles as the company works to manage President Donald Trump's tariffs. The move will expand finished vehicle manufacturing at factories in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee, GM said on Tuesday in a statement. The automaker will be able to assemble more than two million vehicles a year in the US as a result of the investment. GM is moving production of several top-selling models, including a profitable pickup truck line and the Chevrolet Equinox SUV, to factories in the US from Mexico. It will build its Chevy Silverado pickup at a plant outside Detroit that was slated to make slow-selling electric pickups. The largest importer of vehicles into the US, GM is seeking to mitigate an estimated US$5 billion exposure to Trump's tariffs. The import taxes aim to boost US manufacturing by driving up costs to build vehicles overseas. GM's shares were little changed in after-hours trading on Tuesday. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Musk is the US$350 billion Rocket Man who fell to Earth
THE popcorn emoji is out in force as the world's richest person feuds with its most powerful leader. Even Thierry Breton, the European regulator who was a frequent target of Elon Musk's ire, is at it. Still, as entertaining as the billionaire's spat with Donald Trump may be, it also carries costly lessons for a US$630 billion space economy dominated by Musk's Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX – such is the danger of co-dependence between de facto monopolies and increasingly protectionist states. This danger wasn't high on the agenda at the peak of Trump's 'bromance' with Musk, when the then-president-elect described SpaceX's reusable rocket revolution in the way a Renaissance monarch might have praised a successful colonial expedition – with a mix of national pride, geopolitical influence and financial potential: 'I called Elon. I said, 'Elon, was that (landing manoeuvre) you?' He said, 'Yes, it was.' I said, '...Can Russia do it?' 'No.' 'Can China do it?' 'No.' 'Can the United States do it, other than you?' 'No, nobody can do that.' 'That's why I love you, Elon.'' Since then, the love has turned to stardust as the contradictions inherent in Musk's US$350 billion space empire spill over. The hypocrisy of a billionaire pitching himself as 'dark Maga' – 'Make America Great Again' – and taking a chainsaw to government spending while SpaceX (and Tesla) benefits from US$22 billion worth of government contracts is exacerbating the clash of egos, with Trump threatening to withdraw taxpayer support. Meanwhile, Musk's casual threat – quickly withdrawn – to halt the Dragon capsule upon which the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa) relies to ferry astronauts echoed the geopolitical blackmail exerted on the battlefield in Ukraine, where the billionaire has in the past halted attacks against Russia via SpaceX unit Starlink. These are high-stakes threats with huge societal costs. We are no longer in the realm of enterprising conquistadors but conflicted taxpayer-backed trade empires. Even if Musk deserves credit for his part in SpaceX's domination in both rocket launches and satellite communications, with 80 per cent market share in the former and more than 8,000 Starlink satellites in orbit, the feud's weaponisation of space suggests innovation has taken a backseat to favouritism. SpaceX's successes this year have not been on the launchpad but rather inside the corridors of power, where its market share looks like a lever for rent extraction instead of exploration. Rule changes to high-speed Internet subsidies have opened the door to Starlink awards, as has the prospect of a defence 'Golden Dome'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump's tariff bullying of other countries has been reportedly accompanied by a push for regulatory approvals for Starlink. And putting a Musk ally atop Nasa appears to have been a last straw for the Maga movement. While Nasa and the Pentagon remain heavily reliant on SpaceX, the silver lining to all this is that Musk's competitors must get the message and step up their game. US commercial space companies including Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin have been contacted by government officials about rocket readiness, according to the Washington Post (owned by Bezos). Over in the European Union, which is desperately trying to not miss another technological revolution, governments are getting serious about reenergising legacy players such as Eutelsat Communications, which is in talks to raise 1.5 billion euros (S$2.2 billion) that would double the French state's stake to 30 per cent. The continent is also eyeing its first 'hop' test of a reusable booster project called Themis, which I glimpsed while on a recent tour of Airbus and Safran's Arianespace manufacturing facility near Paris. But one gloomy possibility is that a prolonged Maga-Musk war makes space a chillier place for everyone. Nasa is already facing hefty budget cuts; snapbacks and U-turns driven by personal rivalries won't inspire confidence. (Let's not forget Amazon once blamed Trump's personal dislike of Bezos for the loss of a US$10 billion Pentagon contract.) And Europeans have a huge gap to close: A report by think tank Institut Montaigne notes that its military space spending is one-fifteenth the US', while Bloomberg Intelligence's John Davies estimates Eutelsat's OneWeb network requires an extra four billion euros or more of capital spending by 2030. More mergers and more state meddling are likely in a de-Musking world – though hopefully with some lessons learnt ahead of time. BLOOMBERG
