Singapore shipping line PIL quadruples profits for 2024, but warns 2025 will be challenging
PIL chief executive Lars Kastrup noted that the liner's operational strength, strong cash position and efficient cost-cutting enabled it to perform well. PHOTO: PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL LINES (PIL)
Singapore shipping line PIL quadruples profits for 2024, but warns 2025 will be challenging
SINGAPORE - Pacific International Lines (PIL) has more than quadrupled its earnings for 2024, thanks to a surge in demand for container shipping and higher freight rates, but warned that 2025 will be a tougher year with more disruptions.
The Singapore shipping line on May 16 announced 2024 earnings amounting to US$1.34 billion (S$1.73 billion), which is up by more than 330 per cent compared with 2023.
Revenue surged 49 per cent year on year to US$4.31 billion, largely driven by growth in its container shipping segment, which enjoyed higher freight rates and a 9.6 per cent increase in the number of containers moved on its ships.
Container shipping accounted for more than 87 per cent of the liner's revenue in 2024. The liner's key routes are Africa, South America and the Middle East and intra-Asia.
PIL's container manufacturing business also grew, boosted by increased demand for containers amid Red Sea shipping disruptions and pre-election restocking activity in the US.
The home-grown liner has been expanding its revenues and investing in its fleet of vessels since receiving a US$600 million lifeline from Temasek's wholly owned Heliconia Capital Management in 2021 to help it stave off bankruptcy. The bailout involved Heliconia taking a majority stake in the liner.
As at end-2024, PIL reported healthy cash reserves of US$2.33 billion and a fleet of 101 ships able to transport a total of 442,000 twenty-foot containers. The fleet comprises 89 owned and 12 chartered ships.
In 2024, the liner rolled out a US$2 billion plan to replace part of its fleet with dual-fuel container ships that can run on both liquefied natural gas and conventional marine fuel as pressure widens for shipping to comply with the industry's net-zero targets.
It has received six newbuilds since October 2024, including two that have the capacity to move 14,000 containers, and has another 12 newbuild vessels on order.
PIL chief executive Lars Kastrup noted that the liner's operational strength, strong cash position and efficient cost-cutting enabled it to perform well despite a challenging environment for shipping.
In 2024, the industry faced major disruptions caused by disruptions in the Red Sea. These include congestion in key ports due to scrambled shipping schedules and more vessels being deployed to longer routes to ensure goods are delivered on time.
More shippers also accelerated shipments in anticipation of potential disruptions, including dockworker strikes at major US ports and new tariffs on US-bound goods. This surge in early deliveries contributed to supply chain bottlenecks and tightened shipping capacity.
These challenges are expected to intensify in 2025, at a time when many terminals are not able to develop fast enough to keep up with the volume growth and larger-sized container vessels that are being introduced into existing and emerging markets, Mr Kastrup said.
'The year ahead is expected to be filled with uncertainty and heightened challenges. The additional capacity brought on by newbuild vessels coming on stream in 2025 is expected to outpace the market demand for goods, although continued port congestions may absorb some of the capacity growth,' he said.
He added that the liner's strong cash position will enable it to continue to seek business growth.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Oil prices hit multi-week highs amid US-China trade talks
[NEW YORK] Oil prices hit multi-week highs on Monday, buoyed by a weaker US dollar, while investors awaited news from US-China trade talks in London in hopes a deal could boost the global economic outlook and subsequently fuel demand. Brent crude futures settled 57 cents higher, or 0.9 per cent, to US$67.04 a barrel. During the session, the benchmark rose to US$67.12 a barrel, the highest since April 28. US West Texas Intermediate crude rose 71 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to US$65.29. The contract reached US$65.38 a barrel during the session, the highest since April 4. A weaker US dollar gave some support to oil prices, as the dollar index dropped 0.3 per cent, making oil cheaper for holders of other currencies. Last week, Brent rose 4 per cent and WTI gained 6.2 per cent as the prospect of a US-China trade deal boosted risk appetite for some investors. 'Much of this advance appears technically driven and such rallies can easily subside without new bullish headlines,' analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note. 'Much attention will be given to the ongoing US-China trade talks.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up US President Donald Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping spoke by telephone on Thursday before US and Chinese officials met in London on Monday to calm trade tensions between the two nations. A trade deal between the United States and China could support the global economic outlook and in turn boost demand for commodities including oil. Monday's talks could dampen the impact on prices of Chinese data releases, IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said. Chinese export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as US tariffs curbed shipments while factory gate deflation deepened to its worst in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy at home and abroad. 'Bad timing for crude oil, which was testing the top of the range and knocking on the door of a technical break above US$65,' Sycamore said, referring to WTI prices. The data also showed that China's crude oil imports declined in May to the lowest daily rate in four months as state-owned and independent refiners began planned maintenance. The prospect of a potential China-US trade deal outweighed concern over the price impact from increased output by the Opec+ group of oil producers next month. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' oil output rose in May by less than the volume planned, a Reuters survey found, as Iraq made further cuts to compensate for earlier pumping above target and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates made smaller hikes than allowed. Opec pumped 26.75 million barrels per day last month, up 150,000 bpd from April's total, the survey showed on Monday, with Saudi Arabia making the largest increase. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Can Tim Cook stop Apple going the same way as Nokia?
A YEAR ago, when Apple used a jamboree at its home in Silicon Valley to unveil its artificial-intelligence (AI) strategy, grandly known as Apple Intelligence, it was a banner occasion. The following day the firm's value soared by more than US$200 billion – one of the biggest single-day leaps of any company in American history. The excitement was fuelled by hopes that generative AI would enable Apple to transform the iPhone into a digital assistant – in effect, Siri with a brain – helping to resuscitate flagging phone sales. Twelve months later, that excitement has turned into almost existential dread. It is not just that many of last year's promises have turned out to be vapourware. Siri's overhaul has been indefinitely postponed, and Apple Intelligence is no match for other voice-activated AI assistants, such as Google's Gemini. Meanwhile, Apple's vulnerabilities in China have been exposed by US President Donald Trump's trade war. Moreover, it faces new legal and regulatory challenges to the two biggest parts of its high-margin services business. Its shares, down by almost a fifth this year, have lagged behind its big-tech peers, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft. But those are not the most alarming comparisons. In a new book, Apple in China, Patrick McGee draws an ominous parallel between Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and Jack Welch, boss of General Electric from 1981 to 2001. Like Welch, Cook has made a fortune for investors – when Apple's market value first exceeded US$3 trillion, in 2022, it had risen by an average of more than US$700 million per day since he took over from Steve Jobs in 2011. But McGee raises the possibility that, as at GE, Apple's success may obscure serious vulnerabilities. If that is the case, what can Cook do to avoid the sort of fate that befell GE, Nokia and other great companies that suddenly lost their way? The answer is unlikely to emerge during Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference that starts on Jun 9. Amid reports of upheaval among executives, it is expected to return to its unflashy roots of announcing software updates for its phones and computers, rather than revealing a refreshed approach to AI. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Many would prefer to see Cook work on a new hardware strategy instead. Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson, an equity research firm, notes that the greatest moments in Apple's history have come from the reinvention of what techies call 'form factors': the Mac reimagined desktop computing, the iPod transformed personal music habits and the iPhone popularised touchscreen smartphones. AI looks like it will be another such pivot point. (Eddy Cue, Apple's head of services, recently admitted that AI could make the iPhone irrelevant in ten years.) For now, Apple's rivals have been faster to explore new opportunities. Meta and Google are pinning hopes on AI-infused smart glasses, as are Chinese tech firms such as Xiaomi and Baidu. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, recently announced a US$6.4 billion deal to buy a firm created by Jony Ive, Apple's former chief designer, to build an AI device. As yet there is only hype to go on, but it has put Apple's lack of AI innovation in the spotlight. Apple's response may seem like dogged incrementalism. Next year it is expected to unveil a foldable phone, following a path blazed previously by the likes of Samsung and Motorola. But Richard Windsor of Radio Free Mobile, a tech research firm, thinks Apple may still have an ace up its sleeve. If smart glasses take off, its investment in the Vision Pro virtual-reality headset, though so far an expensive flop, may be an insurance policy. It could provide Apple with enough expertise in headgear and eyewear to shift quickly to glasses. If so, the company will avoid 'doing a Nokia', he says. Likewise, Apple might make use of this moment of soul-searching to rethink other shibboleths of Cook's tenure, such as the obsession with privacy and the high walls it puts around its family of products. As Ben Thompson of Stratechery, a newsletter, points out, sanctifying the privacy of its users' data has been an easy virtue for Apple to uphold because until recently it did not have much of an advertising business. Yet in the AI era, it has drawbacks. First, Apple's reluctance to scrape customers' individual information makes it harder to train personalised AI models. Apple uses what it calls 'differential privacy' based on aggregate insights, rather than the rich, granular data hoovered up by firms such as Google. Second, privacy has encouraged it to prioritise AI that runs on its own devices, rather than investing in cloud infrastructure. Chatbots have advanced more rapidly in the cloud because the models can be bigger (awkwardly, this led Apple to offer some users of Apple Intelligence an opt-in to ChatGPT). In order to overcome its AI deficiencies, it could splash out on buying a builder of cloud-based large language models (LLMs). But it has left it quite late. OpenAI's deal with Ive makes it less likely to ally with Apple. Anthropic is close to Amazon, which has a big stake in the maker of the Claude family of LLMs. Other options are either Chinese or too small for a company of Apple's heft. Alternatively, it could relax its 'walled garden' ethos of seamless integration, and partner with a variety of third-party LLMs, as Motorola, owned by the Chinese firm Lenovo, has done. Third-party voice-activated chatbots could quickly solve its Siri problem, giving renewed reason for people to upgrade their phones. The likelihood is that Cook will do nothing radical. As Moffett puts it, his tenure has been marked by the steady ascendancy of 'process over product'. Instead of flashy innovations, his hallmark has been metronomic reliability, especially with regard to financial performance. Nor has he any hope of swiftly extricating Apple from China. As McGee points out, even if Apple's final assembly moves to India and elsewhere, the supply chain's roots remain deeply embedded in the Middle Kingdom. Yet this is no time for complacency. Whatever the ups and downs of AI – as Google has recently shown, yesterday's losers can quickly become today's winners – nothing turns investors off quicker than a profits shock. That is what makes the threats to Apple's services business so serious. The most striking risk is that the judge who declared Google a monopolist may order it to suspend payments to Apple that make Google's search engine the default on the iPhone. The payments, which are partly for exclusivity and partly a revenue-sharing arrangement, generate about US$20 billion a year for Apple (last year its services revenue was US$96 billion). David Vogt of UBS Investment Bank says that, if the judge imposes a ban on the exclusivity part of the payments, it could cut Google's revenues by about US$10 billion. 'I'm getting calls every day of, 'What will the market do to Apple stock if that happens?'' he says. Google has vowed to appeal. Another looming threat is to app-store revenues, which are under scrutiny as a result of the European Union's Digital Markets Act, as well as from an antitrust lawsuit brought by Epic, a gaming firm, against Apple in America. Bank of America estimates that app-store commissions generate US$31 billion a year of high-margin services revenue for Apple. If app developers steer customers away from Apple's app store as a result of the rulings, it could clobber the lucrative cash cow. Services have been the brightest spot of Cook's tenure in recent years, helping to mitigate stagnation in iPhone sales. It will certainly be a blow if the line of business suffers. But if it prompts Cook to tear up his own rule book on AI and everything else, it may be worth it in the end. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
US, China begin key trade talks in London
US Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng shake hands as they pose for a photo during trade talks at the Lancaster House in London. PHOTO: AFP LONDON - China and the United States began a new round of trade talks in London on June 9, Beijing's state media reported, as the world's two biggest economies seek to shore up a shaky truce after bruising tit-for-tat tariffs. The two sides are meeting in the historic Lancaster House, run by the UK Foreign Office, following a first round of talks in Geneva in May. Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng was again heading the team in London. Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported the start of the talks. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are leading the US delegation, President Donald Trump said on June 6. 'The meeting should go very well,' Mr Trump said on his Truth Social platform. His press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, told Fox News on June 8: 'We want China and the United States to continue moving forward with the agreement that was struck in Geneva.' While the UK government reiterated that it was not involved in the discussions, a spokesperson said: 'We are a nation that champions free trade.' UK authorities 'have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks', the spokesperson added. Rare earths The talks in London come just a few days after Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping finally held their first publicly announced telephone talks since the Republican returned to the White House. Mr Trump said June 5's call reached a 'very positive conclusion'. Mr Xi was quoted by Xinhua as saying 'correcting the course of the big ship of Sino-US relations requires us to steer well and set the direction'. Tensions between the two nations have soared, with Mr Trump accusing Beijing of violating a tariff de-escalation deal reached in Geneva in mid-May. (From left to right) US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, US Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent, Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, and Chinese International Trade Representative and Vice-Minister of Commerce Li Chenggang, posing for a photo at the Lancaster House on June 9. PHOTO: AFP 'We need China to comply with their side of the deal. And so that's what the trade team will be discussing tomorrow,' Ms Leavitt said on June 8. A key issue will be Beijing's shipments of rare earths – crucial to a range of goods including electric vehicle batteries and which have been a bone of contention for some time. 'Rare earth shipments from China to the US have slowed since President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April,' said Ms Kathleen Brooks, research director at trading group XTB. 'The US wants these shipments to be reinstated, while China wants the US to rethink immigration curbs on students, restrictions on access to advanced technology including microchips, and to make it easier for Chinese tech providers to access US consumers,' she added. In April, Mr Trump introduced sweeping worldwide tariffs that targeted China most heavily. At one point, Washington hit Beijing with additional levies of 145 per cent on its goods, prompting China to respond with tariffs reaching 125 per cent on US goods. After two days of talks in Switzerland, both sides agreed to slash the eye-watering tariffs for 90 days, but key differences remain – especially over China's rare earth export restrictions. The impact was reflected in the latest official export data released on June 9 in Beijing. Exports to the United States fell 12.7 per cent in May from the previous month, with China shipping US$28.8 billion (S$37 billion) worth of goods. This was down from US$33 billion in April, according to Beijing's General Administration of Customs. 'Green channel' Throughout its talks with Washington, China has also launched discussions with other trading partners – including Japan and South Korea – to try to build a united front to counter Mr Trump's tariffs. On June 5, Beijing and Canada agreed to regularise their channels of communication after strained ties. Beijing has also proposed establishing a 'green channel' to ease exports of rare earths to the European Union, and fast-tracking approval of some export licenses. China is expected to host a summit with the EU in July, marking 50 years since Beijing and Brussels established diplomatic ties. According to a spokesperson for Mr Starmer, Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves took advantage of the talks in London to meet with her US counterpart Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng on June 8. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
