Man is jailed for kicking teenager off e-scooter and punching him
A man kicked a teenager off an e-scooter then punched him several times on a busy Dublin street, a court has heard.
Graham Kinsella (21) was handed a sentence of two years on Wednesday, with the final six months suspended on strict conditions.
He admitted assault causing harm on May 19th last year.
Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard how the 18-year-old victim was travelling by e-scooter on the boardwalk beside the Liffey when he became aware he was being followed by another e-scooter, which Kinsella was driving.
READ MORE
The teenager continued to Liffey Street where Kinsella kicked him off the e-scooter.
He fell on to construction railings and was then assaulted in the busy street.
Kinsella punched him several times during the attack and told the teenager to 'get out of town'.
A co-accused, who is before the courts, then stabbed the injured party, the court heard.
The teenager fled the area and heard Kinsella shouting after him: 'You're not getting the electric scooter back.'
The victim spent several days in hospital. The court heard Kinsella was not responsible for the puncture wounds sustained by the teenager.
CCTV of the incident was played to the court. Kinsella was seen leaving the area on an e-scooter, with a co-accused using a second e-scooter.
Kinsella was identified from CCTV. When interviewed by gardaí, he told them he had been assaulted in Dublin city centre days before by a third party whose scooter was identical to the injured party's one.
Kinsella, of Liscarne Gardens, Clondalkin, Dublin 22, admitted kicking the teenager off the scooter and giving him 'a few thumps'.
He also identified himself on CCTV footage. He told gardaí he had no knowledge of a knife or that it was used.
No victim impact statement was provided to the court, which also heard the teenager had made a full recovery.
Kinsella has no previous convictions, but has come to adverse Garda attention since this incident, the court heard.
The investigating garda agreed with Marc Thompson-Grolimund, defending, that Kinsella made admissions when interviewed.
It was further accepted that Kinsella's guilty plea was of value to the prosecution and his expressions of remorse were genuine.
Mr Thompson-Grolimund said his client has made efforts to address drug issues, but has been smoking cannabis to deal with anxiety.
Judge Elva Duffy said Kinsella's focus appeared to be on the e-scooter more than on the individual driving it.
She said the incident was unprovoked, noting there was 'absolutely no justification' for the violence.
She said Kinsella was on a 'revenge mission' as he followed the injured party, then instigated the assault.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has defended the State's handling of the deportation of 35 people to Nigeria on Wednesday, saying those removed had previously been asked to leave voluntarily. Speaking on Sunday on RTÉ Radio 1's This Week programme, the Minister said: 'Each person who was on the aeroplane that went back to Nigeria had their own individual narratives of persecution assessed by the International Protection Office , and on appeal, and subsequently they got a deportation order that wasn't responded to. 'They were requested to leave voluntarily and that didn't happen.' The Garda National Immigration Bureau carried out the operation, which involved 21 men, nine women and five children, who were deported on a chartered flight from Dublin Airport to Lagos, Nigeria on Wednesday night. The children involved were deported as part of family groups. READ MORE Friends of the families deported, who were living with them at an International Protection Accommodation Services (Ipas) centre in west Dublin, described the scenes last week as upsetting and 'traumatising'. Farhiya Ali, a mother living with her four children in the centre, said: 'The kids were coming down for breakfast when these five men wearing cargo pants, big jackets arrived. 'They came into the third floor, stood in front of the bedroom door, took the three kids back in and told them to pack up. We heard them say: 'You are going to be deported.' As soon as the other children heard then they were all crying. It was such a horrific scene.' Three siblings from one family were among those deported. They had lived at their accommodation since January 2022 with their mother and father. [ Families facing deportation are 'at serious risk of destitution', warns refugee council Opens in new window ] Asked about the criticism from families at the Ipas centre about the manner of the deportation of children, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'This is not a pleasant part of my job. I don't relish doing this, but it has to be done. If we have an immigration system or an asylum system that doesn't have a consequence for people who are ruled not to be entitled to stay here then the system becomes meaningless.' Asked whether he would put Nigeria on Ireland's safe list of countries, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'There's a difference here between putting a country on the safe list for the purposes of international protection under the [International Protection] Act, and determining whether or not to send somebody back to a country from whence they came.' [ Ministers accused of giving 'half the picture' on refugees as more than 40% get positive decisions Opens in new window ] Applicants from designated safe countries of origin receive their interview date on the day they apply for international protection, reducing their waiting time for an interview. 'There's faster time frames for Nigeria at present anyway because of the heightened number of people from Nigeria claiming asylum in Ireland,' said the Minister. 'It doesn't mean if you're not on the safe list of countries from international protection, we can't send you back to the country where you came from.'
Irish Times
20 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘The country is going to the dogs': How agitators exploited the Carlow shooting
The shooting in Carlow last Sunday was shocking, but what followed online was depressingly familiar. As soon as word emerged of an incident at the Fairgreen Shopping Centre, far-right agitators surfaced online, like moths to a flame, spouting confident falsehoods before any facts were known. How could they know the details so quickly? They couldn't, but that didn't deter them. Offline, figures from the same ideological milieu travelled to the town to use the backdrop of the shooting as an opportunity to rant about immigration, the Government or the media – again, a well-established playbook that by now is both predictable and exhausting. And all details that had little to nothing to do with the incident itself. Just one hour after the incident in Carlow, Derek Blighe, formerly the president of the minor far-right Ireland First political party, posting on X, claimed – without evidence, because there was none – that 'apparently 7 people including a child have been shot'. This post has been viewed just shy of 400,000 times on the platform, but at the time of writing includes no note by X stating that it is false. Philip Dwyer, once associated with Ireland First, travelled to Carlow and livestreamed himself shouting at members of the fire brigade outside the shopping centre for not furnishing him with details about the supposed number of casualties. He then returned to a familiar topic. 'The country is going to the dogs. Everyday there's something going on … crime, mental health … migrant crime. I'm looking around me here in Carlow … good God. The diversity … the non-Irish people,' he said. READ MORE Back online, British far-right agitator Tommy Robinson posted on X that there were 'multiple reports of a suspected terror attack in Carlow, Ireland … gunman shot dead by Gardaí'. Another viral post, viewed over 200,000 times on X. Journalists, gardaí and emergency responders at the scene were berated for not releasing details about the incident fast enough. And when they did release details, they were admonished when those details didn't match the narrative circulating on social media. Carlow has quickly become another case study in how false and misleading information pollutes our online information environment, and why our democratic institutions must better equip themselves to counter this challenge. By now, we have a good grasp of the facts. Shortly after 6.15pm last Sunday, a man entered the Fairgreen Shopping Centre and fired a number of shots into the air. In the ensuing panic, a young girl suffered a minor leg injury when fleeing the scene. Outside the shopping centre, the man used his firearm again and died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. No one else was shot and gardaí did not discharge their firearms. Evan Fitzgerald, from Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, walked through the Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow firing a shotgun into the air The gunman was later named as Evan Fitzgerald, from Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, a 22-year-old who appeared in court last month on charges related to offences associated with purchasing firearms on the dark web last year. This was established through media reporting and garda statements, four of which were released by Monday lunchtime. In the second of those statements , gardaí confirmed the ethnicity and nationality – white Irish – of the man who died at the scene. In their fourth statement, they shared detailed information about the incident. Media reports described him as 'vulnerable'. [ Man dead after shots fired in Carlow shopping centre, Army bomb disposal team called to scene Opens in new window ] The practice of gardaí sharing such specific information regarding a suspect and an unfolding situation is unprecedented. It signals the force's attempts to combat the spread of harmful misinformation before it has potentially deadly consequences. We don't have to look too far back to recall how online misinformation and hate can fuel offline violence in the space of a few hours. Rioting broke out across the UK last summer after the Southport stabbing when anti-migrant and anti-Muslim narratives helped instigate violence, while closer to home, we all remember the Dublin riots of November 2023. More recently, police in Merseyside acted similarly in the aftermath of the car ramming incident at the Liverpool FC parade . Blighe, Dwyer and Robinson have a track record of portraying their respective countries as places of lawlessness, neglected by authorities and riven by (typically migrant) crime. They opportunistically jump on any purported incident they believe – usually incorrectly – reinforces this sentiment and, in the words of Steve Bannon, accordingly 'flood the zone with shit' online. It is, at its heart, part of a wider nativist, populist strategy employed internationally by the far right to appeal to the public for political support, monetised subscriptions and broader cultural influence. While evidence was still being gathered, none of these figures could have been aware of what had transpired. Yet they – and many others – worked swiftly to fill an information vacuum that develops after such incidents while gardaí, local services and the media work to establish the facts. It is no coincidence that the three operate 'blue tick' accounts on X. The platform offers financial rewards for creating viral, sensationalist content, with few repercussions when that content later turns out to be wrong. These posts are then weaponised by far-right figures for their own ideological agendas, and sometimes used to exploit tragic cases such as this one. [ Carlow shooting: Taoiseach criticises spreading of misinformation and 'blatant lies' online Opens in new window ] There is an ongoing conflict between old and new media systems here. The slower, methodical practices of police and media in reporting on such incidents is rarely a match for the rapid sharing of content online that includes serious and potentially harmful claims with no factual basis. All of this signals how fundamentally broken our online information ecosystem has become. This is best encapsulated in the tiring trope that is typically found in online spaces after reports of an incident like the Carlow shooting emerge: repeated cries that the gardaí or mainstream media are deliberately not releasing information about an incident. Delay is interpreted as deceit and fact checking becomes censorship. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said this kind of misinformation can result in a lot of 'public disquiet' and needs to be addressed. 'There is a family in mourning right now. The level of misinformation on Sunday was quite shocking, and we can't just ignore that and say: 'Well, we don't have to do anything about that.'' This wasn't a question of freedom of speech, he said. 'I wouldn't overstate the impact on clamping down on blatant lies online as a sort of incursion or an undermining of freedom of speech.' The Carlow shooting has quickly become another reminder that unless we address these imbalances – between old and new media, the power of social media and the need to stop misinformation – trust in our core democratic principles and institutions will continue to erode. Ciarán O'Connor is a researcher and journalist who focuses on extremism and technology
Irish Times
20 hours ago
- Irish Times
Woman tells court husband has abused her ‘many times in his sleep'
A woman who alleged that her husband of more than a decade has become increasingly abusive to the point of abusing her while he was sleeping has been granted an interim barring order against him. The woman told Dublin District Family Court she has been attacked by her husband 'many times in his sleep' further claiming that, on several occasions, she has woken to find him sexually assaulting her. She told Judge Gerard Furlong that her husband was also 'extremely abusive and controlling when he's not asleep,' saying he does not want her to work, and does not want her 'going out with anybody or seeing my family'. Her husband left their family home for several months and, after returning, his behaviour in his sleep was 'way worse' and happens every night, he said. READ MORE 'He tells me regularly that I'm mad, mental, unhinged and said that I should kill myself, that my children would be better off without me,' she said in a sworn statement. On one recent occasion, she said her husband followed her 'everywhere' including to shops, making comments about her throughout, adding that he 'humiliates' her in front of their children. She said one of her children, who is currently completing their State exams, is in a 'desperate state' and that the atmosphere in the house is 'unbearable'. the judge granted the interim barring order until a full hearing later this month, saying he did not believe a protection order would be sufficient, given the evidence heard. 'In those circumstances, I'd be asking the gardaí to remove him from the house and he's not to come back,' he said. The woman, who broke down once the interim barring order was granted, thanked him, saying the length of the order 'will be enough time to get the exams out of the way'. In a separate case, a woman who claimed her former partner had lost thousands due to gambling was granted a protection order after an alleged recent rape. The woman originally from eastern Europe, told Judge Furlong their relationship had been 'abusive from the start' but had worsened in recent months due to fights regarding his gambling addiction. 'He's lost thousands of euro,' she said, further claiming that he recently lost his entire wages shortly after being paid, first losing €200 through online gambling before losing a further €800 in city centre casinos days later. 'When he came home, he had 54c in his bank account and no money to pay the rent,' she said, adding that the gambling 'was destroying' their lives. The woman told the judge that, last week, her former partner 'became aggressive and he raped me'. She said following the incident, she tried to call gardaí but he 'shouted and commanded me to go back to bed', adding that he subsequently took her phone and placed it on his side of the bed for the night. She said she believed the rape was 'revenge' for refusing to give him money, and for arguments and her repeated refusals to have sex with him. She said after attending the Rotunda Hospital and reporting the rape to gardaí, she was brought to a women's refuge centre where she has stayed since. She fears seeing her former partner, who has called her mother in an attempt to locate her since, the woman added. The judge said the option of a barring order was available to her, which would result in him having to leave their apartment, though the woman said she could not afford to pay €1,300 in rent. He granted an interim protection order 'with no hesitation' until her case returned to the court.
