US business activity moderates; price pressures building up
U.S. business activity experienced a slight slowdown in June, while prices increased due to President Trump's tariffs on imported goods. Input costs for manufacturers surged, leading to higher prices for consumers. Economists anticipate an acceleration in inflation during the second half of the year, potentially influencing the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
INFLATION POISED TO ACCELERATE
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
U.S. business activity slowed marginally in June, though prices increased further amid President Donald Trump's aggressive tariffs on imported goods, suggesting that an acceleration in inflation was likely in the second half of the year.The survey from S&P Global on Monday showed measures of prices paid by factories for inputs and charged for finished products jumped to levels last seen in 2022. Nearly two-thirds of manufacturers reporting higher input costs attributed these to tariffs while just over half of respondents linked increased selling prices to tariffs, S&P Global said.That supports economists' expectations that inflation would surge from June following mostly benign consumer and producer price readings in recent months. Economists have argued that inflation has been slow to respond to Trump's sweeping import duties because businesses were still selling stock accumulated before the tariffs came into effect.S&P Global's flash U.S. Composite PMI Output Index, which tracks the manufacturing and services sectors, slipped to 52.8 this month from 53.0 in May. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the private sector.The survey's flash manufacturing PMI was unchanged at 52.0. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the manufacturing PMI easing to 51.0. Its flash services PMI dipped to 53.1 from 53.7 in May. Economists had forecast the services PMI falling to 53.0. The survey was conducted in the June 12-20 period, before the U.S. joined in the conflict between Israel and Iran."The June flash PMI data indicated that the U.S. economy continued to grow at the end of the second quarter, but that the outlook remains uncertain while inflationary pressures have risen sharply in the past two months," said Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence.So-called hard data on retail sales, housing and the labor market have painted a picture of an economy that was softening because of the uncertainty caused by the constantly shifting tariffs policy. The escalation in tensions in the Middle East added another layer of uncertainty.The S&P Global survey's measure of new orders received by businesses declined to 52.3 from 53.0 in May. A measure of prices paid by businesses for inputs fell to 61.6 from 63.2 last month. But manufacturers faced higher input costs, with this price gauge jumping to 70.0 this month. That was the highest reading since July 2022 and followed 64.6 in May.Prices paid for inputs by services businesses remained elevated, with tariffs, higher financing, wage and fuel costs cited. The pace of increase, however, slowed amid competition.The survey's measure of prices charged by businesses for goods and services remained at lofty levels as manufacturers passed on the increased costs from tariffs to consumers. The prices charged gauge for manufacturers shot up to 64.5, the highest since July 2022, from 59.7 in May.Rising oil prices because of the strife in the Middle East are seen contributing to higher inflation.The Federal Reserve last week kept the U.S. central bank's benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range, where it had been since December. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters he expected "meaningful" inflation ahead."The data therefore corroborate speculation that the Fed will remain on hold for some time to both gauge the economy's resilience and how long this current bout of inflation lasts for," Williamson said.Employment picked up this month, mostly driven by manufacturing, where some factories are experiencing order backlogs. S&P Global noted a slight rise in optimism among manufacturers "in part reflecting hopes of greater benefits from trade protectionism."It, however, added that "companies generally remained less upbeat than prior to the inauguration of President Trump."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US strikes on Iran add to global travel disruptions and flight cancellations
The US entry into Israel's war with Iran has caused travel disruptions to pile up globally. Israelis disembark a bus after they were flown back to Israel in a special flight, on June 16, 2025, in Tel Aviv.(AFP) Following unprecedented bombings ordered by President Donald Trump on three Iranian nuclear and military sites over the weekend, Iran on Monday launched a missile attack on US forces at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base. Qatar had closed its airspace just hours earlier, after both the U.S. and U.K. also urged their citizens to shelter in place there. The region has been on edge following the weekend strikes from the US — and since Israel began the war with a surprise bombardment on Iran, which has responded with its own missile and drone strikes, earlier this month. As deadly attacks escalated between Israel and Iran over recent weeks, sections of airspace and airports throughout the region have temporarily closed. And airlines cancelled more flights in recent days, with some halting select routes through the middle of the week — particularly in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, just across the Persian Gulf from Iran. Singapore Airlines, for example, canceled some flights to and from Dubai starting Sunday and through Wednesday, citing 'a security assessment of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East.' And British Airways has similarly suspended flights to and from Doha through Wednesday. 'Safety is always our highest priority,' British Airlines said in a statement confirming its cancellations to The Associated Press, adding that it 'will keep the situation under review.' Air India on Monday announced it was ceasing 'all operations to the region as well as to and from the East Coast of North America and Europe' immediately until further notice. The airline, which is still reeling from a plane crash that killed at least 270 people earlier this month, added that India-bound flights from North America were being diverted or re-routed away from closed airspaces. Air tracking data from FlightAware showed 705 cancellations worldwide as of Monday afternoon. Dubai International Airport topped the list with 75 cancellations in and out of the airport as of around 5 p.m. ET. And Air India had had the highest amount of cancellations among carriers, totaling 38 as of 5 p.m. ET. Such disruptions have snarled travel, particularly as central hubs in the Middle East often connect flights worldwide — but experts stress that these kind of airspace closures and flight diversions are critical to ensuring safety, especially if future escalation emerges suddenly. 'It is the responsibility of states, countries to ensure that their airspace is safe for passage of aircraft,' Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation. He added that on Monday 'the Qataris did the absolutely right thing to close their airspace because of the threat of conflict.' Beyond Qatari airspace, Flightradar24 reported that UAE airspace was also closed on Monday. After several hours of diversions, flights appeared to be landing and taking off in the country again. Monday marks the latest 'dramatic increase' in this kind of impact, said Ian Petchenik, director of communications at Flightradar24. And while the future is unknown, he added that it's important to remember airspace closures and flight cancellations reflect that 'airlines, air traffic controllers and flight crews are doing their best to keep everybody safe.' Shahidi adds that it's important for travelers to monitor government guidance — such as safety notices from the US State Department. How long the war lasts and what, if any, future escalation comes next could carry more widespread implications. Beyond disrupting global flight networks farther down the road, Shahidi stresses that it's very difficult for people who may need or want to evacuate countries impacted by the war to do so without access to commercial flights. At the same time, he adds, it's critical that state authorities focus on keeping their skies safe — pointing to past tragedies of passenger flights that were shot down by strikes. That includes Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which was shot down by Russian-backed forces while flying over Ukraine in 2014, killing 298 people. 'We are all praying and urging resolution to this conflict — and especially as it relates to protection of civilian air travel," Shahidi said. "We do not want to have an MH17, with innocent lives being lost in a missile strike ... We do not want to repeat that history.'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Jaishankar likely to be in US for meeting of Quad on July 1
Preparations are underway for a meeting of the Quad Foreign Ministers in the US on July 1 and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is likely to travel to Washington DC, sources have told The Indian Express. But given the fluid situation in the wake of the conflict in West Asia where the US has entered the war after bombing nuclear facilities in Iran, a final confirmation is awaited. Jaishankar will also be able to brief the American leadership on India's position on the Israel-Iran issue, as was articulated by PM Narendra Modi after his conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezekshkian in which he called for 'dialogue and diplomacy'. Sources said if all goes to plan, the meeting of the Quad Foreign Ministers will be hosted by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Although the four Quad Foreign Ministers had met in Washington DC at the first multilateral meeting that Rubio held on January 21 — after the inauguration a day earlier of US President Donald Trump — the grouping hasn't been able to focus on the Indo-Pacific agenda over the last five months. The US administration has been focused on the two ongoing wars — in Ukraine and in West Asia — and Trump has put much of his bandwidth on these issues, apart from the trade wars he started following the imposition of tariffs. So, this will be an opportunity for the Quad partners to refocus on strategic threats in the Indo-Pacific, where China's assertive behaviour is a cause for concern. For India, this will be the first opportunity for the External Affairs Minister to engage with the Quad partners — with whom the country has close strategic partnership — after the India-Pakistan military confrontation over four days in May this year. This will also be Jaishankar's first meeting with Rubio and top officials in the US administration, after Modi spoke to Trump over the phone on June 18, weeks after the US President claimed credit for brokering a 'ceasefire' between India and Pakistan and linked it to a trade deal with India. Modi told Trump that at no point was there any discussion, at any level, on an India-US trade deal, or any proposal for mediation by the US between India and Pakistan. The meeting of Foreign Ministers is also crucial before the Quad leaders' Summit to be held later this year in India, sometime in September-October — for which Trump, Australian PM Anthony Albanese and Japan PM Shigeru Ishiba will be travelling to India. This visit by Jaishankar will also take place just over a week before the July 9 tariff deadline. It is expected that the US and India will have concluded a bilateral trade agreement before the deadline for suspension of reciprocal tariffs expires. In an interview to French daily Le Figaro earlier this month, Jaishankar said, 'The threat of reciprocal tariffs was raised on April 2, but we had already begun bilateral negotiations for a trade agreement. Prime Minister Modi was hosted by Donald Trump in February, and they agreed to expand access to each other's markets. We are hopeful of reaching an agreement before the tariff suspension ends on July 9.' Officials said that while travel plans and work on the agenda for the meeting of the Quad Foreign Ministers is being done, it will all depend on the course of the conflict in West Asia. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
NATO's new 5% defence spending target and what it means
NATO leaders are set to endorse a sweeping increase in defence investment at a key summit in The Hague on Wednesday (June 24), responding to rising geopolitical tensions and direct pressure from US President Donald Trump. The landmark agreement would commit member states to spending 5% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence and security-related investments by 2035—a significant jump from the current 2% benchmark. The proposed 5% spending goal will be divided into two parts: 3.5% of GDP on core defence, including troops, weapons systems, and combat readiness—up from the current 2% focus. 1.5% of GDP on broader security investments, such as cyber defence, infrastructure upgrades for military mobility, and energy security. This broader definition reflects modern security challenges, including the need to defend against hybrid threats and safeguard strategic supply chains. While 22 of NATO's 32 members already meet or exceed the 2% defence target, the new 5% threshold presents a major leap. In 2024, NATO countries collectively spent 2.61% of GDP on defence, though with wide disparities—Poland exceeded 4%, while Spain lagged at under 1.3%. If all members had spent 3.5% on core defence last year, total spending would have surpassed $1.75 trillion, compared to the $1.3 trillion actually spent. Member states are expected to meet the new target by 2035, with a review scheduled for 2029 to evaluate progress and potentially adjust expectations. The decision is driven by a combination of: Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine and fears of a broader military threat within the next five years. Concerns over a potential drawdown of US forces in Europe, especially if Trump returns to the White House. A broader reassessment of Europe's ability to defend itself. 'NATO must prepare for a future in which it has to take on more responsibility,' Secretary-General Mark Rutte said, pointing to urgent needs in air defence, tanks, drones, and personnel. While the agreement appears to have broad support, some nations are expressing reservations. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has said Spain will only aim for 2.1% of GDP, even though his government signed off on the final communiqué. Despite such statements, NATO insists there are no opt-outs, and national defence spending will be closely monitored.
