Of Course ‘Dan Da Dan' Season 2's Big Okarun Evil Eye Fight Has a ‘JoJo' Anime Reference
During his perilous endeavor to save his friends, Jiji encounters a yokai known as Evil Eye. Much like season one's standout episode featuring Acrobat Silky, viewers see that Evil Eye is more than just a menacing adversary. After learning Evil Eye's tragically moving backstory, Jiji befriends the yokai, but things quickly take a turn for the worse. Similar to how Turbo Granny possessed Okarun, Jiji finds himself being body-snatched by Evil Eye. As a result, Jiji now sees Momo as an enemy. Just in time for the climax of episode two, Okarun makes a cool return, setting the stage for their battle in episode three.We'll spare you the blow-by-blow play-by-play of their battle because there's absolutely no way we can do it justice. However, one climactic moment in their battle sees Okarun dig in deep and lay Evil Eye Jiji on his generous underwear-clad ass. After spending the majority of their fight on the back foot, Okarun manages to eke out a victory with a volley of double-fist uppercuts propelled very awkwardly by a series of lightning-fast leg crunches. While Okarun isn't wont to deliver one-liners, he rises to the triumphant occasion with one referencing JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders protagonist Jotaro Kujo's climactic battle with DIO.
Similar to Jotaro, Okarun tells his adversary—and ostensibly the audience—how he was able to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. It's all because Evil Eye made a grave mistake; he put his hands on Momo and pissed Okarun off. The line close to Jotaro's quote to DIO after his terror nearly killed his own grandfather. Given Okarun's Turbo Granny mode sees the teenager act not dissimilar to the stoic JJBA protagonist (down to his catchphrase, 'Good grief'), it's no wonder Okarun would tap into that cool guy persona to emphasize his decisive win over Evil Eye. The moment is made all the funnier when you take into account that Okarun, who at this point in the anime is roughly 17 years old, is somehow the same age as the towering JJBA protagonist. Guess they fed anime protagonists nothing but red meat and cigarettes back in the day.
In an interview with AJ Beckles and Aleks Le, the English voice actors of Okarun and Jiji told io9 that their characters' clash was significant to them as it represented Okarun's first genuine battle.
'[Okarun] has to dodge and punch, or whatever else, which he doesn't really know how to do. You get to see that bit of awkwardness, too, that he clearly doesn't know what he's doing versus Evil Eye, who seems so experienced in comparison,' Beckles told io9. 'It's interesting, and [Science Saru] did a great job of showing that.'
This isn't the first time Jiji and Okarun's butting of heads (ostensibly over Momo) has yielded a deep-cut anime reference. Back in season one, an innocuous scene where the two boys sang and chanted at each other after vying for Momo's attention featured the pair singing the opening and ending theme song to the '90s-era basketball anime, Slam Dunk. Serendipitously, despite the love triangle leads in the Toei Animation series, Hanamichi Sakuragi and Kaede Rukawa are not direct one-to-one spiritual predecessors to Okarun and Jiji in terms of personality; the basketball rivals do share similar hair colors, making their comparison somewhat apt.
So glad they didn't skip nor change Okarun and Jiji singing the Slam Dunk ending and opening pic.twitter.com/BwPfgEhJHo
— Mobu☄️ (@Captain_Atomsk) December 19, 2024Given Dan Da Dan's propensity for referencing pop culture touchstones like Shin Godzilla and Ultraman, Science Saru's breakout hit anime is likely to have more kitschy Easter eggs in store for fans to appreciate the series all the more. For the time being, we can all take pride in witnessing its bully-whip-armed occult nerd, Okarun, delivering a cool guy line straight out of one of anime's most prolific cool guy series.
New episodes of Dan Da Dan season two air every Thursday on Netflix, Crunchyroll, and Hulu.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
15 minutes ago
- Vogue
Soshiotsuki Tokyo Spring 2026 Collection
How great Soshi Otsuki's lookbooks have been for his past three collections (and how viral they've gone as a result) is testament to the designer's deftness for realizing his vision. That vision in recent seasons has been a contemporary crystallization of Japan's Bubble Era, when bank balances were big and the suits were bigger (and made in Italy). This season's was his best iteration of it yet—the men and women in their beautifully draped, louchely oversized tailoring look like work portraits from the swaggiest Zaibatsu you've ever seen—and his vision of Japanese masculinity feels fresh, punchy, and cool. His task over the next few seasons is to find new ways to keep the momentum going. Otsuki's experience with the LVMH Prize was a big influence on the smaller details of this season. Part of this year's cohort of eight finalists, he couldn't help but feel conscious of how his clothes appeared hanging in the presentation space in comparison to everyone else's (ah, that old thief of joy). 'The judges look at the clothes as they are on the racks, so this time I wanted to create something that wasn't just based on how the clothes look in the photos,' he said during a showroom walkthrough in Tokyo. 'This time I focused more on product.' Otsuki was being unfair on himself—his fabrics and draping typically look excellent on and off the body, but his effort to boost hanger appeal is wise. For example: extra fabric was built into the inside placket of a shirt (see look 16) to give the suggestion of a tucked-in necktie, that could be hidden or exposed depending on how it was buttoned up. 'It's technically a styling suggestion, but there's also a pocket for the tie. It's about enhancing the affinity between the styling and the product,' Otsuki said. Deadstock kimono silk had been repurposed into the button-up shirts, and 1980s cotton-washi fabric had been used for much of the tailoring, which recalled the glamour and prosperity of the era that the designer enjoys riffing on. He aimed for what he called a 'quiet intensity' in each piece, and achieved it. The announcement of the prize looms in September, and with a 300,000-euro endowment at stake, the pressure is on. When asked if he was pleased to get this far, to the finals, he frowned as if the question was insane. 'No, not at all,' he deadpanned, before grinning. 'I want to win.'
Vogue
15 minutes ago
- Vogue
Kamiya Tokyo Spring 2026 Collection
Koji Kamiya is a likeable 30-year-old who is doing a good job of building a world around his brand, which is focused on adolescent grunge and impressive fabric innovation. 'I wanted to bring in a bit more sexiness this time,' he said as he flicked through some photos of Steven Tyler. The Aerosmith singer had been a big influence on the designer for this collection, and a dash of bohemian lustiness was duly sprinkled into Kamiya's grungy universe. This came through most obviously in the dress shirts—a first for the brand—which were made of floaty cupro or cotton-silk, and styled under faded MA-1 jackets, pulpy knitted cardigans, and bandana-printed denim. Elsewhere distressed jeans were stitched up with boro detailing, sometimes layered with denim wrap skirts (a fun Kamiya trademark), and accessorized with studded belts made in collaboration with Hollywood Trading Company. The original footwear, with its white rubber soles, canvas uppers and hefty silhouettes, looked like the love child of a pair of Wellington boots and Chuck Taylors. As usual, there were excellent colors across the board: sweatpants in faded cherry; cobalt shorts and collars; chore jackets in blazing tangerine. As well as sexiness, the idea was to add lightness (something we keep hearing about from menswear designers this season). Kamiya put his own spin on it, calling it 'The Darkness Will Disappear' after the lyrics in a Chemical Brothers song he'd been listening to. The show, which took place in a shadowy warehouse on Tokyo Bay, featured a tough-looking trumpet player and beatboxer who provided the soundtrack Japanese fashion audiences are not known for doling out raucous applause. (This writer has seen painfully mediocre shows in Paris or London met with stamping feet and shrieks of excitement, and great ones in Tokyo that barely inspire a patter.) But after Kamiya's finale run this season, he felt a tangible loosening of inhibition in the room, and a rare sense of celebration in the ensuing applause. 'It felt good to hear that!' he noted.
Digital Trends
44 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
With $80 Xbox games on the horizon, it's time to stop equating game length to value
The threat of the first $80 video game loomed in the distance for months and was ultimately broken by an unlikely candidate in Nintendo. Regardless of which company took that initial leap, this price increase was always a matter of when, not if. I was one of the many who assumed GTA 6 would be the first game to raise the price, but it seems the industry needed to start flirting with a new standard sooner rather than later. While we haven't heard Sony's plans to increase any PS5 game costs just yet, Xbox didn't wait long to announce that it was going to embrace this new price point as early as this winter on certain titles. Well, that was the original plan, anyway. Recommended Videos The Outer Worlds 2 bore the unfortunate weight of being Xbox's first $80 game for around a month before the decision was reversed and refunds were issued. While that is a minor win for us gamers, make no mistake — we are going to lose the war. $80 games are coming, and besides becoming more discerning consumers, we also need to start having better conversations about what makes a game worth $80. Putting a price on art I think it is important to recognize that having a standard price for art is weird. We all kind of accept it for games because that's how it's been after the N64 era when pricing became standardized. Ask any gamer who lived through those times — and was buying games with their own money — and they will gladly tell you about some games costing over $100 at launch. The advent of digital games and a growing indie and AA scene has provided a space for some games to explore the pricing scale, but the rule of thumb for 'major releases' has always been the standard $60, $70, and soon-to-be $80 price tag. Dear Galactic Citizens!⁰⁰We have received your SOS via skip drone about the pricing. As an organization devoted to making sure that corporations do not go unfettered, we at the Earth Directorate have worked with [REDACTED] to revise the price of The Outer Worlds 2. While this… — The Outer Worlds (@OuterWorlds) July 23, 2025 And that's just such an odd thing to do. It treats all games as a singular product rather than individual works of art. It simplifies the process of having a publisher somehow determine how valuable its own work is for the consumer, plus makes it far easier for budgets and projections, but has conditioned us to view games as products rather than art. We believe a game should cost $70, so a game that costs more had better be something spectacular, right? Not everyone operates that way, but I think it has seeped into a lot of our thought processes when it comes to what games we invest in. Don't get me wrong, we all should be highly conscious about what games we decide to buy at full price. $70 is already a huge investment for the majority of people, so taking advantage of sales, cheaper games, or even ways to get free games is only natural. But when we're so accustomed to treating games as monetary investments, I think we start to lose sight of their primary value — art. Almost every discussion about game pricing will include a portion of the community attempting to qualify whether a game is 'worth' its price based on objective metrics. The main factor that never seems to die off is game length. I'm too exhausted to fully dismantle this argument, but if you're reading this, I assume you don't need me to. Basing any work of art's value on its length has never held up to scrutiny. There are games I've beaten in less than two hours that I would pay way more for than games I've sunk 100+ hours into. Length is about the only yardstick we can use to compare all games with. In that regard, it makes sense why some try to wield it as a tool to measure a game's value. While I disagree with that wholeheartedly, I do have to concede that sometimes length is an important factor. However, it shouldn't be talked about in isolation. We can't stop the discussion at 'X game is Y hours long, therefore it is/isn't worth the price.' How are those hours spent? Does the game justify its short or long duration? The tricky thing here is that the answer is different for every person and every game. Would The Outer Worlds 2 be worth $80? I can't say. I think for some people it very much would be, but not for others. This is where the value in having trusted reviewers lies. Reviews (at least good ones) don't view a game as a product and judge it as such. Instead, they should discuss the message the game is trying to communicate through its narrative and gameplay systems, and how successful or not it is in that. They should be subjectively examining its artistic merit and how it affected them. If you have a reviewer who shares your taste in games, or you at least trust to critique a game in a way that communicates whether or not you'd enjoy it, that's the second best way to determine if a game is worth $80. The absolute best way is to play it yourself, but most of us can't do that without paying upfront cost and hoping it ends up being worth it. There's nothing wrong with wanting to know if you will like a game before you purchase it. The feeling of spending $70 on a game only to be disappointed can be gut-wrenching, and the risk only gets higher when we talk about $80 games. It would be so much easier if there were a simple metric to know with certainty if a game was worth your hard-earned cash, but there simply isn't. Games are art, and art is nuanced and deeply personal. I know times are tough out there and your dollars are more precious than ever, so I'm not suggesting you be careless. In fact, I'm asking the opposite. Let's have deeper conversations about what makes a game worth $80 or not while also understanding that the answer is going to be different for everyone.
