
Hezbollah holds firm in Lebanon's municipal elections
Voting took place over four weeks, starting in Mount Lebanon – north of the capital, Beirut – followed by the country's northern districts, Beirut and the eastern Bekaa Valley, and concluding on Saturday in southern Lebanon.
While Hezbollah, a Shia Muslim political and armed group, suffered setbacks to its political influence and military capabilities during 14 months of war with Israel, the group's voter base was still intact and handed it and Amal, its closest political ally, victories across dozens of municipalities.
'The Hezbollah-Amal alliance has held firm and support among the Shia base has not experienced any dramatic erosion,' Imad Salamey, a professor of political science at the Lebanese American University, told Al Jazeera.
Despite establishment parties winning the majority of seats across the country, candidates running on campaigns of political reform and opposition to the political establishment also made inroads in some parts of the country, even winning seats in municipalities in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah historically has enjoyed strong support.
In Lebanon, there is no unified bloc of reformists although political actors and groups that emerged during the 2019 antigovernment protests over the economic crisis are referred to locally as 'el-tagheyereen', or change makers.
'Alternative Shia candidates in some localities were able to run without facing significant intimidation, signalling a limited but growing space for dissent within the community,' Salamey said.
The fact the elections were held at all will be seen as a boon to the pro-reform government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who came to power in January, say analysts. The polls, initially set for 2022, were delayed three times due to parliamentary elections, funding issues and the war with Israel, which started in October 2023.
Critics, however, argued the elections favoured established parties because the uncertainty over when they would be held meant candidates waited to build their campaigns. As recently as March, there were still proposals to delay the elections until September to give candidates a chance to prepare their platforms after Lebanon suffered through the war and a two-month intensification by Israel from September to November, which left the country needing $11bn for recovery and reconstruction, according to the World Bank.
The war left Hezbollah politically and militarily battered after Israel killed much of its leadership, including longtime Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and his successor Hachem Safieddine.
The war reordered the power balance in Lebanon, diminishing Hezbollah's influence. Many villages in southern Lebanon are still inaccessible, and Israel continues to occupy five points of Lebanese territory that it has refused to withdraw from after the ceasefire. It also continues to attack other parts of the south, where it claims Hezbollah still has weapons.
With their villages still destroyed or too dangerous to access, many southerners cast ballots in Nabatieh or Tyre, an act that recalls the 18-year Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon that ended in 2000. During the occupation, elections for southern regions under Israeli control were also held in other cities still under Lebanese sovereignty.
Hezbollah has given up the majority of its sites in the south to the Lebanese army, a senior western diplomat told Al Jazeera and local media has reported.
The recent post-war period also brought to power a new president, army commander Joseph Aoun, and the reform camp's choice for prime minister, Salam, former president of the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Municipal elections are not seen as an indicator of the country's popular sentiment due to low voter interest and local political dynamics differing from those at the national level. Some analysts dismissed the results, calling them 'insignificant' and added that next year's parliamentary elections would more accurately reflect which direction the country is headed.
Voter turnout was lower in almost every part of the country compared with 2016, the last time municipal elections took place. The places it fell included southern Lebanon, where 37 percent of the population voted. In 2016, 48 percent of its voters cast ballots. This was also true in most of the Bekaa Valley, an area that also was hit hard during the war and where Hezbollah tends to be the most popular party. In the north, voter turnout dropped from 45 percent in 2016 to 39 percent in 2025. In Beirut, the turnout was marginally higher – 21 percent in 2025 compared with 20 percent in 2016.
Many people in southern Lebanon are still living through the war as Israel continues to carry out attacks on areas like Nabatieh. While some in and from the south have questioned Hezbollah's standing and decision to enter into a war with Israel on behalf of Gaza when they fired rockets on the Israeli-occupied Shebaa Farms territory on October 8, 2023, others still cling to their fervent support for the group.
'The municipal elections confirmed that Hezbollah and the Amal Movement remain strong,' Qassem Kassir, a journalist and political analyst believed to be close to Hezbollah, told Al Jazeera. 'The forces of change are weak, and their role has declined. The party [Hezbollah] maintains its relationship with the people.'
Although reform forces did win some seats, including in Lebanon's third largest city, Sidon, they were largely at a disadvantage due to a lack of name familiarity, the short campaign time and misinformation circulated by politically affiliated media.
Claims of corruption and contested election results marred voting in parts of the north, where many candidates from traditional political parties dominated.
In Beirut, forces for change were dealt a heavy blow. After receiving about 40 percent of the vote in 2016, which still was not enough to earn them a municipal seat, the reformist Beirut Madinati (Beirut My City) list won less than 10 percent of this year's vote.
The defeat took place despite the worsening living conditions in the capital, which critics blamed on establishment parties, including those running the municipality.
'The municipality lives on another planet, completely detached from the concerns of the people,' Sarah Mahmoud, a Beirut Madinati candidate, told Al Jazeera on May 18 on the streets of Beirut as people went out to vote.
Since an economic crisis took hold in 2019, electricity cuts have become more common, and diesel generators have plugged the gap. These generators contribute to air pollution, which has been linked to cardiovascular and respiratory ailments in Beirut and carries cancer risks.
Despite the criticisms and degraded living situation in the city, a list of candidates backed by establishment figures and major parties, including Hezbollah and Amal, but also their major ideological opponents, including the Lebanese Forces and the right-wing Kataeb Party, won 23 out of 24 seats.
This list ran on a platform that stoked fears of sectarian disenfranchisement and promised sectarian parity.
Municipalities, unlike Lebanon's parliament, do not have sectarian quotas.
The unlikely coalition of establishment parties, which was similar to the successful list in 2016 that aligned establishment parties against reform candidates, puzzled some in the capital. In separate incidents, television reporters confronted representatives from Hezbollah and the Lebanese Forces, drawing angry and confrontational reactions from them but little clarification as to why they'd align with an avowed enemy.
Bernard Bridi, a media adviser for the list, said its priority was to bring in a foreign consultancy that would advise the municipality on how to manage Beirut like other major international capitals. She added that the opposing parties decided to unify because the stakes are so high this year after years of economic suffering, particularly since the war.
Critics, however, accused the establishment parties of trying to keep power concentrated among themselves rather than let it fall to reformists who could threaten the system that has consolidated power in the hands of a few key figures and groups in the post-civil war era.
'The question is what are you fighting for,' Karim Safieddine, a political organiser with Beirut Madinati, said, referring to the establishment list. 'And if they can tell me what they're fighting for, I'd be grateful.'
Now the nation's eyes will turn to May next year as parties and movements are already preparing their candidates and platforms for parliamentary elections.
In 2022, just more than a dozen reform candidates emerged from Lebanon's economic crisis and subsequent popular uprising. Some speculated that the reform spirit has subsided since thousands of Lebanese have emigrated abroad – close to 200,000 from 2018 to 2021 alone – and others have grown disillusioned at a perceived lack of immediate change or disagreements among reform-minded figures.
Many Lebanese will also have last year's struggles during the war and need for reconstruction in mind when heading to the polls next year.
Some have started to question or challenge Hezbollah's longtime dominance after seeing the group so badly weakened by Israel. Others are doubling down on their support due to what they said is neglect by the new government and their belief that Hezbollah is the only group working in their interests.
'Taken together, these developments imply a future trajectory where Shia political support for Hezbollah remains solid but increasingly isolated,' Salamey explained, 'while its broader cross-sectarian coalition continues to shrink, potentially reducing Hezbollah's influence in future parliamentary elections to that of a more pronounced minority bloc.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Lebanese cabinet holds more talks on disarming Hezbollah, under US pressure
Lebanon's cabinet has again met to discuss the disarmament of Hezbollah despite the latter's earlier rejection of the demands, which have largely been driven by the United States. As ministers gathered for more talks on Thursday, two days after they announced they were planning to restrict arms to six official forces by the end of the year, Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc accused the government of 'slipping into accepting American demands' that would serve Israel's interests. Hezbollah ministers and Muslim Shia allies in the Lebanese cabinet withdrew from the cabinet meeting on Thursday in protest during discussions about the proposal to disarm Hezbollah, three Lebanese political sources told Reuters. Beirut's clampdown on Hezbollah comes after prodding from US envoy Tom Barrack, who presented the government with detailed proposals featuring a timetable for disarming the group, even as Israel continued to violate a November truce it signed with Lebanon to end more than a year of hostilities that culminated last year in two months of full-blown war. The phased proposals aim to 'extend and stabilise' the ceasefire, requiring the government to remove Hezbollah's arsenal under 'a detailed [Lebanese army] deployment plan', and calling on Israel to cease attacks and withdraw from the five positions it continued to hold in south Lebanon after the ceasefire deal was struck, according to a copy of a Lebanese cabinet agenda seen by the news agency Reuters. Under the truce, Israel was meant to completely withdraw from Lebanon. Hezbollah, meanwhile, was to pull its fighters north of the Litani River, around 30 kilometres (20 miles) north of the border with Israel, to be replaced by the expanded deployment of the Lebanese army and United Nations Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL). After Tuesday's cabinet meeting, Hezbollah said on Wednesday that it would treat the government's decision to disarm it 'as if it did not exist', accusing the cabinet of committing a 'grave sin'. Citing 'political sources', pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al Akhbar said the group and its ally the Amal movement could choose to withdraw their four ministers from the government or trigger a no-confidence vote by parliament's Shiite bloc, which comprises 27 of Lebanon's 128 lawmakers. Israel, which routinely carries out air strikes in Lebanon despite the November ceasefire, has already signalled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Beirut failed to disarm the group. Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon killed two people on Wednesday, according to the Ministry of Public Health. On Thursday, an Israeli drone strike on a vehicle killed five people and injured 10. The government's decision is unprecedented since the end of Lebanon's civil war more than three decades ago, when the country's armed factions – with the exception of Hezbollah – agreed to surrender their weapons.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Hezbollah to treat Lebanon's disarmament decision ‘as if it does not exist'
Hezbollah has branded the Lebanese government's push to have a state monopoly on arms as a 'grave sin' and is dismissing it out of hand 'as if it doesn't exist'. The group on Wednesday rejected the Lebanese cabinet's decision a day earlier, which authorises the Lebanese army to draw up a plan to confine arms across the country to six official security forces by the end of the year. The government decision followed ramped up pressure by the United States to get the Lebanese armed group to lay down its arms, amid burgeoning fears that Israel could intensify strikes on Lebanon, even while it carries out near-daily violations of the November truce it signed with Hezbollah to end the war. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam confirmed the decree after the cabinet meeting, saying, 'the state's duty to monopolise the possession of weapons', according to Lebanon's state-run National News Agency (NNA). Salam's declaration on Tuesday amounted to an official rejection by the Lebanese government to Hezbollah's military presence in the country, an unthinkable development two years ago when the group held sway in the country and its military powers were a forceful reality in the region. In a written statement on Wednesday, Hezbollah said the move was a result of US 'diktats' and that it would 'deal with it as if it does not exist'. 'The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam committed a grave sin by taking a decision to strip Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy … This decision fully serves Israel's interest,' the group said. The statement said Shia ministers walked out of the 6-hour long cabinet session before the decision was reached as 'an expression of the resistance's (Hezbollah's) rejection of this decision'. The group said it remained ready to discuss a broader national security strategy and urged its supporters to remain patient. 'We are open to dialogue, ending the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal [Israeli] aggression,' Hezbollah's statement read. It added that Israel must first adhere to the ceasefire agreement reached in November of last year – which Israel has been flagrantly breaking. Underscoring regular attacks on its northern neighbour, an Israeli drone strike targeting the southern Lebanese town of Tulin killed a child and injured his father on Wednesday, Al-Akhbar publication reported. Lebanon's National News Agency also said that Israeli jets dropped four bombs over the Wazzani River in the southeast of the country. Lebanon's cabinet is scheduled to meet again on Thursday to continue discussions on US proposals to disarm Hezbollah within a specific time frame. Lebanese politicians have not ruled out disarming Hezbollah by force, with the Lebanese army to step in to do so if such a decision is made. But on Friday, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun warned that disarmament is a sensitive issue due to sectarian divisions within the country, which could have consequences for national peace. Tuesday's session at Lebanon's presidential palace was the first time the cabinet addressed Hezbollah's weapons. Hezbollah emerged weakened from war with Israel last year that saw most of the group's senior leaders assassinated by Israel, including its longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah, killed thousands of its fighters and Lebanese civilians, and left tens of thousands from the Shia and other communities displaced from their destroyed homes. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem reiterated on Tuesday as the cabinet met that the group will not lay down its weapons under Israeli fire, instead stating that the strategy should not be a timeline to disarm, and that resistance to Israel must be discussed in national consensus. In a televised speech from a secure location on, Qassem said, 'The resistance is fine, strong and ready to fight for Lebanon's sovereignty and independence … Hezbollah made heavy sacrifices to defend Lebanon against the Israeli aggression.'


Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Hezbollah supporters protest disarmament ahead of Lebanese government talks
Hezbollah supporters have gathered in the Lebanese capital to protest against the group's disarmament ahead of a government cabinet meeting on the issue. The demonstrations occurred in Beirut on Monday night amid pressure by the United States on Lebanon to get Hezbollah to lay down its arms. Hezbollah emerged weakened from a war with Israel last year that eliminated most of the group's leadership, killed thousands of its fighters, and left tens of thousands of its supporters displaced from their destroyed homes. In recent months, the US and Lebanon have been holding talks on a roadmap for disarmament. Lebanon's new leadership has pledged to extend its authority across all its territory, but has so far avoided acting against Hezbollah. Hezbollah supporters protested because they believe disarmament will have implications for their political standing and security, said Al Jazeera's Zeina Khodr. 'Hezbollah has made its position clear: it will not disarm because to do so would serve Israel's interests, not Lebanon's sovereignty,' said Khodr, reporting from Beirut. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem has told the country's leadership that the group feels blackmailed – that if they don't disarm, they will not be given funds for reconstruction, she reported. Ahead of Tuesday's cabinet meeting, Hezbollah, through Lebanese MP Ali Fayyad, reiterated its demand that the issues of Israel's withdrawal from Lebanese territory, the release of Lebanese prisoners, and the cessation of hostilities take place before any discussion on disarmament, Lebanon's National News (NNA) agency reported. By force? Lebanon's political leadership, however, is pushing for the move – even if it may come by force. 'If there is a cost to be able to centralise the weapons with the … Lebanese armed forces, [it may be] better like that,' Elias Hankash, another member of the Lebanese parliament, told Al Jazeera. 'But everything has been done so far … to avoid any clash with Hezbollah.' The Lebanese army will take on Hezbollah if and when there's a political decision to disarm the group by force, Khodr said. 'I call on all political parties to approach the issue of arms control with full responsibility,' Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun said on Friday, also stating that the issue of disarmament is sensitive due to sectarian divisions, with consequences for national peace. In 2008, a government decision to dismantle the group's telecommunication network led to street violence. Lebanon's Agriculture Minister Nizar Hani told NNA that the president has set a clear timetable for the disarmament process. He added that the Lebanese army has already taken over hundreds of Hezbollah sites and weapons depots. Hani stressed that the group is a part of the 'Lebanese fabric' and has played a major role in 'liberating the land,' but 'the next phase requires that the state alone be the decision maker of war and peace'. Hezbollah was the most powerful military and political actor in Lebanon for years, and while it lost some military capabilities in its conflict last year with Israel, it has not been defeated entirely, Khodr said. 'Hezbollah is still strong in the state because of the monopoly [it has] over Shia representation as well as the appointment of key figures in all of the states,' Mark Daou, another MP, told Al Jazeera. Lebanon's political landscape and society have long been divided with differing views on Hezbollah's role and the need for disarmament. The issue has dominated Lebanese politics for decades, but there is now a sense of urgency with increasing international pressure – as well as increasing military pressure from Israel, which regularly targets Hezbollah despite the ceasefire between the two since November 2024. 'The government is now expected to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah, a decision that could at the least ignite a political crisis,' said Khodr.