Research shows Tonga's Maka Lahi boulder's journey
Photo:
Supplied
New research theorises that Tonga's Maka Lahi boulder was moved more than 200 metres inland by a tsunami around 7,000 years ago.
Maka Lahi
, meaning "Big Rock", is a limestone boulder measuring 6.7 metres tall and 14 metres wide, and weighing approximately 1180 tonnes. It is the second-largest boulder in Tonga, after
Maui Rock
, and sits at an elevation of 39 metres.
The University of Queensland's School of the Environment PhD candidate Martin Köhler is one of the authors of the
study
published in
Marine Geology
.
He said that he and his team were directed to the boulder local farmers.
"We had been surveying the southern side of the island of Tongatapu, looking along the coastal cliffs at evidence of past tsunamis," Köhler said.
"[The boulder] is located far inland, outside of our field work area, and must have been carried by a very big tsunami.
"We made a 3D model and then went back to the coast and found the spot the boulder could have come from, on a cliff over 30 metres above the sea level."
The researchers used numerical modelling to establish that wave heights of around 50 metres, and lasting around 90 seconds, would have been needed to dislodge it from its cliff-edge origin and move it to its resting place.
This suggests its emplacement "likely resulted from a landslide-triggered tsunami event", researchers said.
Several wave-transported boulders (weighing 0.6-1555 t) had previously been reported on Tongatapu.
"The exceptional characteristics of the
Maka Lahi
boulder, including its dimensions, estimated mass of approximately 1180tn and its high elevation, rank it among the three largest coastal boulders globally and the largest cliff-top boulder in the world."
Co-author Dr Annie Lau said Tonga had a long history of tsunamis triggered by volcanic eruptions and earthquakes along the underwater Tofua Ridge and the Tonga Trench.
"The findings we have reported on the Maka Lahi boulder are the evidence of a tsunami in the Pacific region in the Holocene epoch, which began around 11,700 years ago," she said.
"Understanding past extreme events is critical for hazard preparation and risk assessment now and in the future."
The study said like other coastal boulders on Tongatapu such as
Maui Rock
on the west coast and the Haveluliku boulders on the east coast,
Maka Lahi
is also interpreted within a mythological framework as one of the "
Maui
throwing stones" believed to be deposited by the demi-god
Maui
, while chasing chicken(s) from 'Eua to Tongatapu, as described in a Tongan legend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Marshall Islands nuclear legacy: report highlights lack of health research
Half of the Marshall Islands' 50,000-strong population live in the capital city of Majuro. Photo: Public domain A new report on the United States nuclear weapons testing legacy in the Marshall Islands highlights the lack of studies into important health concerns voiced by Marshallese for decades that make it impossible to have a clear understanding of the impacts of the 67 nuclear weapons tests. 'The Legacy of US Nuclear Testing in the Marshall Islands,' a report by Dr. Arjun Makhijani of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, was released late last month. The report was funded by Greenpeace Germany and is an outgrowth of the organization's flagship vessel, Rainbow Warrior III, visiting the Marshall Islands from March to April to recognize the 40th anniversary of the resettlement of the nuclear test-affected population of Rongelap Atoll. Dr Mahkijani said among the "many troubling aspects" of the legacy is that the United States had concluded, in 1948, after three tests, that the Marshall Islands was not 'a suitable site for atomic experiments' because it did not meet the required meteorological criteria. "Yet testing went on," he said. "Also notable has been the lack of systematic scientific attention to the accounts by many Marshallese of severe malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes like stillbirths. This was despite the documented fallout throughout the country and the fact that the potential for fallout to cause major birth defects has been known since the 1950s." Makhijani highlights the point that, despite early documentation in the immediate aftermath of the 1954 Bravo hydrogen bomb test and numerous anecdotal reports from Marshallese women about miscarriages and still births, US government medical officials in charge of managing the nuclear test-related medical program in the Marshall Islands never systematically studied birth anomalies. The US deputy secretary of state in the Biden-Harris administration, Kurt Cambell, said that Washington, over decades, had committed billions of dollars to the damages and the rebuilding of the Marshall Islands. "I think we understand that that history carries a heavy burden, and we are doing what we can to support the people in the [Compact of Free Association] states, including the Marshall Islands," he told reporters at the Pacific Islands Forum leaders' meeting in Nuku'alofa last year. "This is not a legacy that we seek to avoid. We have attempted to address it constructively with massive resources and a sustained commitment." Among points outlined in the new report: Gamma radiation levels at Majuro, the capital of the Marshall Islands, officially considered a "very low exposure" atoll, were tens of times, and up to 300 times, more than background in the immediate aftermaths of the thermonuclear tests in the Castle series at Bikini Atoll in 1954. Thyroid doses in the so-called "low exposure atolls" averaged 270 milligray (mGy), 60 percent more than the 50,000 people of Pripyat near Chernobyl who were evacuated (170 mGy) after the 1986 accident there, and roughly double the average thyroid exposures in the most exposed counties in the United States due to testing at the Nevada Test Site. Women from the nuclear test-affected Rongelap Atoll greeted the Rainbow Warrior and its crew with songs and dances as part of celebrating the 40th anniversary of the evacuation of Rongelap Atoll in 1985 by the Rainbow Warrior. Photo: RNZ Pacific / Giff Johnson Despite this, "only a small fraction of the population has been officially recognized as exposed enough for screening and medical attention; even that came with its own downsides, including people being treated as experimental subjects," the report said. "In interviews and one 1980s country-wide survey, women have reported many adverse pregnancy outcomes," said the report. "They include stillbirths, a baby with part of the skull missing and 'the brain and the spinal cord fully exposed,' and a two-headed baby. Many of the babies with major birth defects died shortly after birth. "Some who lived suffered very difficult lives, as did their families. Despite extensive personal testimony, no systematic country-wide scientific study of a possible relationship of adverse pregnancy outcomes to nuclear testing has been done. It is to be noted that awareness among US scientists of the potential for major birth defects due to radioactive fallout goes back to the 1950s. Hiroshima-Nagasaki survivor data has also provided evidence for this problem. "The occurrence of stillbirths and major birth defects due to nuclear testing fallout in the Marshall Islands is scientifically plausible but no definitive statement is possible at the present time," the report concluded. "The nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands created a vast amount of fission products, including radioactive isotopes that cross the placenta, such as iodine-131 and tritium. Radiation exposure in the first trimester can cause early failed pregnancies, severe neurological damage, and other major birth defects. This makes it plausible that radiation exposure may have caused the kinds of adverse pregnancy outcomes that were experienced and reported. However, no definitive statement is possible in the absence of a detailed scientific assessment." Scientists who traveled with the Rainbow Warrior III on its two-month visit to the Marshall Islands earlier this year collected samples from Enewetak, Bikini, Rongelap and other atolls for scientific study and evaluation.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Tuvalu's coral reefs under stress, yet signs of life offer hope
By Aui'a Vaimaila Leatinu'u Aerial view of Amatuku island in Tuvalu. Photo: ©UNDP Tuvalu/Aurélia Rusek Tuvalu's coral reefs are under stress, but a marine ecologist says there are still signs of life in the lagoons, which brings reason for optimism. In a collaborative expedition between National Geographic Pristine Seas (NGPS) and the Tuvalu government, researchers, including local partner Faulufalega 'Mena' Eou and lead scientist Kat Millage, met with the island nation's Kaupules, the leaders of Tuvalu. The expedition began in early May and spans multiple phases over several months. The first leg was led by oceanographer Dr Keiron Fraser, who surveyed deep-sea ecosystems from Nanumea to Niulakita using submersibles, baited cameras, and environmental DNA. The Argonauta, a three-person submersible which is rated to go down to 1300 metres. Photo: Steve Spence/National Geographic Pristine Seas The findings revealed flourishing deep-water life, including rare sightings of oceanic white-tip sharks and healthy ecological communities, even in Tuvalu's remotest atolls. These findings will be shared with Tuvalu's ministries to help shape the country's first National Ocean Policy. As the expedition enters its second phase, Ryan Jenkinson, the Director of Expeditions, is leading a new team to conduct Tuvalu's first full marine biodiversity assessment in its shallow reef systems. Jenkinson says so far, the coral reefs are not in "great shape". He mentions a researcher with who conducted full-scale surveys about 15 years ago, and the situation has not improved. "It's because the water is so warm that it's killing the corals. So the reefs that we have seen so far do not have a lot of living coral on them. It's tough to see. It's completely a function of the heat that's in the water here and it's getting worse. "Although the coral cover and the reefs don't look great, there's still structure. They haven't just been reduced to rubble and there's quite a few fish around." Jenkinson explains that coral is vital to the ecosystem of any tropical environment, especially the Pacific region. Tuvalu's low-lying islands face threats from rising sea levels and temperatures. Coral reefs provide a buffer against swell and storm surges that can erode the land, as well as food and habitat for sea life. Ryan Jenkinson leads National Geographic Pristine Seas' expedition in Tuvalu. Photo/National Geographic Pristine Seas/Teresa Carante. "The reefs themselves don't look great but the biomass of fish and large fish is pretty high, which is a really nice sign. It's a good indication that there's still resources for the people here but it's really tenuous. There's not much growth going on so it's holding on for now. This is our first location though, other islands might be a little different." Jenkinson remains cautiously optimistic about the expedition. Over the next three weeks, his team plans to visit all six of Tuvalu's islands, including Nuku Fatau, Nuku Laelae, Vaitupu, the island with the primary school, where they will host science sessions for local youth. In the short time they have been in Tuvalu, Jenkinson has found it to be a "staggeringly beautiful" place and culture, with the locals welcoming them with open arms. Jenkinson says Tuvaluans are at the forefront of climate change consequences, and he hopes the data collected can be helpful. "This isn't something that the people of Tuvalu are doing. They're just on the brunt end of it. We're really hoping to find some pockets of living coral and things because it would be a good sign that reefs could bounce back quickly. We want to make sure we visit as many places and get as many dives in to try to see," Jenkinson says. "There is hope, we never have lost hope and the fact that the structure of the reefs are still in place makes us think that they could bounce back. We're just starting and I think our message will coalesce as we visit more areas in the country." - PMN
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
These Pacific Islands are building walls to stop rising seas. Will it work?
By Doug Dingwall and Adel Fruean , ABC News A seawall under construction at Ebeye in Marshall Islands. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting The sea used to wreak havoc as it crashed into Simeona Tapeneko's village in Samoa. Water would flood the houses in Lauli'i, on the north coast of the country's most populated island, overwhelming an old seawall built offshore. "Many things - including our homes - were severely damaged," Tapeneko said. "The waves also destroyed the graves of deceased family members." When builders laid the last rock of a new seawall there in May, ending six months of construction, Lauli'i breathed a collective sigh of relief. Tapeneko said the $1.9 million wall, funded by the New Zealand government, would protect the homes from storm surges. "Families are happy and feel secure with its height," he said. Simeona Tapeneko has seen rising sea levels damage his village. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean It's one of many Pacific Island communities building seawalls to defend themselves against rising sea levels. One of Marshall Islands' most populated islands, Ebeye, is buttressing its coast with a wall of rock shipped from Dubai and funded by the World Bank and Green Climate Fund. New seawalls also protect low-lying atolls in Tuvalu, and more will appear in Kiribati, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Fiji and other island nations, many with funding from the Australian government and international development organisations. They're a source of hope for countries grappling with sea level rise - which scientists say will continue even if the world limits global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial times. Coastal engineers say places like the Netherlands have long used engineering to hold back the sea from low-lying lands - and that the Pacific could do the same. But researchers in climate change adaptation say seawalls are usually a costly, short-term fix in a region with limited money. "A seawall along an eroding coastline is really only a stopgap measure, because we know that [sea level rise] is projected to continue well beyond the end of this century, perhaps by about another 200 or 300 years," Patrick Nunn, a University of Sunshine Coast climate scientist, said. Lauli'i residents feel safer now the village has a new seawall. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean Not far from the shores of Lauli'i, its old seawall sits mostly submerged in water. Leota Vaimauga, a village chief, estimates it lasted for 10-15 years before it was overwhelmed by the sea. And while he's relieved the village has a new seawall, he expects Lauli'i will need to replace it in another decade, depending on the weather and the stability of the new barrier. Climate adaptation researchers say seawalls have a clear downside that makes them hard to sustain in rural areas. "You have to keep elevating them, have to keep extending them, and so they're very economically costly," Jon Barnett, a climate adaptation researcher at the University of Melbourne, said. "They're an all-or-nothing strategy that really needs to be considered well in advance and thought through." Most seawalls in rural coastal areas are funded and built by local communities, and have been too expensive to maintain, researchers say. Professor Nunn calculates that on average, the structures will collapse after 18 to 24 months. Photo: Supplied / Hall Contracting A study he co-authored in 2021 describes the Pacific's rural coastlines as "littered with the remains of collapsed seawalls". Climate adaptation researchers also say seawalls have side effects, like diverting erosion to other parts of the coast, forcing waves to scour the seafloor at their seaward side, and pooling water on their landward side. Professor Nunn said rural villages in the Pacific's higher volcanic islands could better use the labour and resources spent on seawalls on a longer-term solution - relocating further inland and upslope. But he said seawalls can offer important psychological benefits for communities losing land to rising seas. They also provide time for them to consider whether to relocate, researchers and coastal engineers say. It's something Queensland University of Technology climate change adaptation researcher, Annah Piggott-McKellar, observed in one Fiji village that relocated after building a series of seawalls. "Land is… a way of life. It's a part of who people are," she said. "So trying everything that's possible before making that decision to move is important." But Dr Piggott-McKellar said there was also a risk that seawalls give false hope. "Having that realistic conversation and understanding of what a seawall might be there to do is going to be important." Leota Vaimauga says Lauli'i's old seawall no longer protects the village. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean For the Pacific's low-lying atolls, new seawalls come with fanfare. In Marshall Islands, 65,000 tonnes of rock shipped from the United Arab Emirates will form a new 1.81 kilometre barrier on the seaward side of Ebeye island. Hall Contracting, which is building the multi-million-dollar seawall, said it was due to be completed by December. "The houses in Ebeye are built right up against the ocean … in large storm events those houses can be affected," company chief executive and director Cameron Hall said. "This seawall will protect them." Hall said seawalls have an important role to play for Pacific Island nations as sea levels rise. "Civil engineering is a powerful thing. In my opinion, there's no reason why [it] should be confined to developed countries," he said. "It's a problem that developed nations have created … and if there's an engineering solution, why wouldn't we do it for them?" The work is logistically challenging, requiring builders to move machinery to remote atolls, and source material for the seawalls. In Tuvalu, Hall Contracting dredged sand from the lagoon by the capital Funafuti to build seven hectares of new or "reclaimed" land protected by a seawall of sandbags. It also constructed a seawall of interlinked hexagonal concrete blocks along part of the coast at Nanumea, another Tuvalu atoll. It's all part of Tuvalu's coastal adaptation project, funded by the Tuvaluan and Australian governments and the Green Climate Fund, aiming to keep the nation inhabitable. But a group of Nanumeans is championing a proposal to save their home for the longer-term. Local engineer Truman Lomi has worked on a concept for the Nanumea Salvation Seawall Project for years. It involves building a barrier around the entire island - rather than just a section. He said the barrier would protect the entire coast from large, powerful waves. For now, it requires funding for a feasibility study. The Ebeye seawall will protect the island using rocks from a large quarry in the UAE. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting His granddaughter Ashleigh Chatelier, a member of the Nanumea Salvation Seawall group, said the project also carried a message about Tuvalu's ability to adapt to climate change. "We're not helpless. We are resilient, we have the skill set, we have the tools," she said. "Unfortunately, we are restricted in terms of the funding of this project, but the reality is that this is a community-led resilience project and it essentially has come from the roots of Nanumea." Countries have long used engineering to protect, or reclaim, land from the sea. In the Netherlands, dams and dykes keep vast, low-lying areas from flooding. The Maldives, in the Indian Ocean, has reclaimed land from rising seas, although at huge financial and environmental costs. "An engineering solution is possible," Francois Flocard, coastal engineer at the University of New South Wales' Water Research Laboratory, said. "It's [about] understanding, as a community and as a society, where does it make sense to be applied?" Professor Barnett says there are other options for communities where seawalls are too costly to build and maintain. One is to try restoring and conserving ecosystems in a way that lets islands respond naturally to sea level rise. "That doesn't mean they're going to be easy to live on," he said. "Shorelines are going to change, the topography of islands is going to change. Some bits are going to erode, some bits are going to grow. "But the adaptation options there are probably much cheaper." Reclaimed land at Tuvalu's capital, Funafuti. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting The massive Afsluitdijk is more than 32 kilometres long and has protected the Netherlands for 90 years. Photo: SANDER KONING / KONING PHOTOGRAP / AFP Some Pacific Island nations are also creating nature-based barriers, using mangroves, sloping rock walls and vetiver grass to block rising seas. In some ways, Professor Barnett said, all action is good action compared to the paralysis on climate change adaptation in some countries. Leaders in countries like Tuvalu are being told there is only decades until their nations are uninhabitable, he said. "There's no rule book. No country's ever had to face this problem before. Now, what do you do?" Professor Barnett said. "You've got to protect the capital. You have to have an airport. You have to have a hospital. You have to have schools. "It seems perfectly reasonable to engage in the kinds of urban defensive strategies." -ABC
