These Pacific Islands are building walls to stop rising seas. Will it work?
By
Doug Dingwall
and
Adel Fruean
, ABC News
A seawall under construction at Ebeye in Marshall Islands.
Photo:
Supplied: Hall Contracting
The sea used to wreak havoc as it crashed into Simeona Tapeneko's village in Samoa.
Water would flood the houses in Lauli'i, on the north coast of the country's most populated island, overwhelming an old seawall built offshore.
"Many things - including our homes - were severely damaged," Tapeneko said. "The waves also destroyed the graves of deceased family members."
When builders laid the last rock of a new seawall there in May, ending six months of construction, Lauli'i breathed a collective sigh of relief.
Tapeneko said the $1.9 million wall, funded by the New Zealand government, would protect the homes from storm surges.
"Families are happy and feel secure with its height," he said.
Simeona Tapeneko has seen rising sea levels damage his village.
Photo:
ABC News / Adel Fruean
It's one of many Pacific Island communities building seawalls to defend themselves against rising sea levels.
One of Marshall Islands' most populated islands, Ebeye, is buttressing its coast with a wall of rock shipped from Dubai and funded by the World Bank and Green Climate Fund.
New seawalls also protect low-lying atolls in Tuvalu, and more will appear in Kiribati, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Fiji and other island nations, many with funding from the Australian government and international development organisations.
They're a source of hope for countries grappling with sea level rise - which scientists say will continue even if the world limits global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial times.
Coastal engineers say places like the Netherlands have long used engineering to hold back the sea from low-lying lands - and that the Pacific could do the same.
But researchers in climate change adaptation say seawalls are usually a costly, short-term fix in a region with limited money.
"A seawall along an eroding coastline is really only a stopgap measure, because we know that [sea level rise] is projected to continue well beyond the end of this century, perhaps by about another 200 or 300 years," Patrick Nunn, a University of Sunshine Coast climate scientist, said.
Lauli'i residents feel safer now the village has a new seawall.
Photo:
ABC News / Adel Fruean
Not far from the shores of Lauli'i, its old seawall sits mostly submerged in water.
Leota Vaimauga, a village chief, estimates it lasted for 10-15 years before it was overwhelmed by the sea.
And while he's relieved the village has a new seawall, he expects Lauli'i will need to replace it in another decade, depending on the weather and the stability of the new barrier.
Climate adaptation researchers say seawalls have a clear downside that makes them hard to sustain in rural areas.
"You have to keep elevating them, have to keep extending them, and so they're very economically costly," Jon Barnett, a climate adaptation researcher at the University of Melbourne, said.
"They're an all-or-nothing strategy that really needs to be considered well in advance and thought through."
Most seawalls in rural coastal areas are funded and built by local communities, and have been too expensive to maintain, researchers say.
Professor Nunn calculates that on average, the structures will collapse after 18 to 24 months.
Photo:
Supplied / Hall Contracting
A study he co-authored in 2021 describes the Pacific's rural coastlines as "littered with the remains of collapsed seawalls".
Climate adaptation researchers also say seawalls have side effects, like diverting erosion to other parts of the coast, forcing waves to scour the seafloor at their seaward side, and pooling water on their landward side.
Professor Nunn said rural villages in the Pacific's higher volcanic islands could better use the labour and resources spent on seawalls on a longer-term solution - relocating further inland and upslope.
But he said seawalls can offer important psychological benefits for communities losing land to rising seas.
They also provide time for them to consider whether to relocate, researchers and coastal engineers say.
It's something Queensland University of Technology climate change adaptation researcher, Annah Piggott-McKellar, observed in one Fiji village that relocated after building a series of seawalls.
"Land is… a way of life. It's a part of who people are," she said.
"So trying everything that's possible before making that decision to move is important."
But Dr Piggott-McKellar said there was also a risk that seawalls give false hope.
"Having that realistic conversation and understanding of what a seawall might be there to do is going to be important."
Leota Vaimauga says Lauli'i's old seawall no longer protects the village.
Photo:
ABC News / Adel Fruean
For the Pacific's low-lying atolls, new seawalls come with fanfare.
In Marshall Islands, 65,000 tonnes of rock shipped from the United Arab Emirates will form a new 1.81 kilometre barrier on the seaward side of Ebeye island.
Hall Contracting, which is building the multi-million-dollar seawall, said it was due to be completed by December.
"The houses in Ebeye are built right up against the ocean … in large storm events those houses can be affected," company chief executive and director Cameron Hall said.
"This seawall will protect them."
Hall said seawalls have an important role to play for Pacific Island nations as sea levels rise.
"Civil engineering is a powerful thing. In my opinion, there's no reason why [it] should be confined to developed countries," he said.
"It's a problem that developed nations have created … and if there's an engineering solution, why wouldn't we do it for them?"
The work is logistically challenging, requiring builders to move machinery to remote atolls, and source material for the seawalls.
In Tuvalu, Hall Contracting dredged sand from the lagoon by the capital Funafuti to build seven hectares of new or "reclaimed" land protected by a seawall of sandbags.
It also constructed a seawall of interlinked hexagonal concrete blocks along part of the coast at Nanumea, another Tuvalu atoll.
It's all part of Tuvalu's coastal adaptation project, funded by the Tuvaluan and Australian governments and the Green Climate Fund, aiming to keep the nation inhabitable.
But a group of Nanumeans is championing a proposal to save their home for the longer-term.
Local engineer Truman Lomi has worked on a concept for the Nanumea Salvation Seawall Project for years.
It involves building a barrier around the entire island - rather than just a section.
He said the barrier would protect the entire coast from large, powerful waves.
For now, it requires funding for a feasibility study.
The Ebeye seawall will protect the island using rocks from a large quarry in the UAE.
Photo:
Supplied: Hall Contracting
His granddaughter Ashleigh Chatelier, a member of the Nanumea Salvation Seawall group, said the project also carried a message about Tuvalu's ability to adapt to climate change.
"We're not helpless. We are resilient, we have the skill set, we have the tools," she said.
"Unfortunately, we are restricted in terms of the funding of this project, but the reality is that this is a community-led resilience project and it essentially has come from the roots of Nanumea."
Countries have long used engineering to protect, or reclaim, land from the sea. In the Netherlands, dams and dykes keep vast, low-lying areas from flooding.
The Maldives, in the Indian Ocean,
has reclaimed land
from rising seas, although at huge financial and environmental costs.
"An engineering solution is possible," Francois Flocard, coastal engineer at the University of New South Wales' Water Research Laboratory, said.
"It's [about] understanding, as a community and as a society, where does it make sense to be applied?"
Professor Barnett says there are other options for communities where seawalls are too costly to build and maintain.
One is to try restoring and conserving ecosystems in a way that lets islands respond naturally to sea level rise.
"That doesn't mean they're going to be easy to live on," he said.
"Shorelines are going to change, the topography of islands is going to change. Some bits are going to erode, some bits are going to grow.
"But the adaptation options there are probably much cheaper."
Reclaimed land at Tuvalu's capital, Funafuti.
Photo:
Supplied: Hall Contracting
The massive Afsluitdijk is more than 32 kilometres long and has protected the Netherlands for 90 years.
Photo:
SANDER KONING / KONING PHOTOGRAP / AFP
Some Pacific Island nations are also creating nature-based barriers, using mangroves, sloping rock walls and vetiver grass to block rising seas.
In some ways, Professor Barnett said, all action is good action compared to the paralysis on climate change adaptation in some countries.
Leaders in countries like Tuvalu are being told there is only decades until their nations are uninhabitable, he said.
"There's no rule book. No country's ever had to face this problem before. Now, what do you do?"
Professor Barnett said.
"You've got to protect the capital. You have to have an airport. You have to have a hospital. You have to have schools.
"It seems perfectly reasonable to engage in the kinds of urban defensive strategies."
-ABC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Politics Panel for 4 June 2025
All things politics are discussed in this laser-focused version of The Panel. Today Wallace Chapman is joined by RNZ host of 30 with Guyon, Guyon Espiner and Maria Slade, BusinessDesk journalist. Political scientist Grant Duncan also provides analysis. They discuss a developing story involving allegations that the Prime Minister's deputy chief press secretary recorded audio of sessions with sex workers. Also, they dissect the latest RNZ Reid Research poll results, the huge press response to Jacinda Ardern's memoir, and more. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Milford Sound plans: 'We've got to get on with it'
The government has announced $15 million will go towards infrastructure upgrades and conservation projects at Milford Sound. File photo. Photo: 123RF Tourism operators are welcoming more clarity on the government's plans for Milford Sound, but say it is now time for action. A 2021 masterplan for the popular tourist destination recommended banning cruise ships, closing the airstrip, a park and ride system and charging overseas visitors a fee. The government announced on Wednesday that about $15 million would go towards infrastructure upgrades and conservation projects, while confirming cruise ships and the airstrip will not be going anywhere , and it was sticking with unrestricted road access. Glenorchy Air managing director James Stokes said the update gave the local aviation industry much needed certainty. "The overall emotion is one of relief that we are going to definitely have an airfield in the future. We were confident that that's the way it was going, but good to hear it finally confirmed," he said. The funding was a good start as Milford Sound had some immediate infrastructure needs it could help to address, Stokes said. The tourism and hospitality and conservation ministers held a call for stakeholders on the day to outline the plans, including wanting to address long-standing concession issues for tourism operators. "I'm keen to see what this reform is going to look like and keen to see how they're going to make it easier for businesses to operate in national parks responsibly," Stokes said. "Just want to get on with it and see the work actually happen. We can't afford another year of nothing happening. We've got to get on with it." Trips and Tramps co-owner Steve Norris said the announcement had been a long time coming and was moving in the right direction. But it left him with questions. A key one was how the traffic and parking would be better managed now the government sought to attract more visitors to the area. "The summer just gone, the carpark's full most days and they're not putting any controls on the road right now... which is fine," Norris said. But in the long term, numbers were expected to increase and there needed to be a solution, he said. Visitor numbers hit 870,000 in 2019, up from 430,000 in 2013. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said they now surpassed one million a year as Milford Sound was a magnet for tourists. Potaka was also keen to address long standing concession issues for tourism operators as part of conservation reform. It was an area Steve Norris also wanted to see addressed. But he was pleased to hear they were replacing the boat ramp in Deepwater Basin for recreational boaties and local operators. "Great news because that's probably 20 years past its use-by-date - the ramp that's in use at the moment - so that's very encouraging," he said. Work on two of the projects that received funding - cleaning up Little Tahiti landfill and flood protections - had either wrapped up or was underway, so he hoped the money would go towards new projects. The funding was coming from the international visitor levy and the Department of Conservation's capital works programme. Initial policy documents released by DOC suggested that one-off investment costs of between $450-500 million were needed to cover new infrastructure, transport services, visitor facilities, experiences, walking, tracks, carparks, and roadside developments. Tourism and Hospitality Minister Louise Upston said she wanted to attract more visitors to Piopiotahi while still protecting it. "We do know it is a real focus point for visitors coming to New Zealand so we don't want to restrict access to it and actually if you then mean the only route in is by road, that creates other difficulties," she said. When the masterplan was launched, the reasoning for removing the airstrip was because it was in a poor state, exposed to flooding and tsunami risks, expensive to rebuild and only carried about three percent of visitors. Upston acknowledged they needed to look at work to upgrade the airstrip, which could involve more helicopter use in the future. Tourism Industry Aotearoa chief executive Rebecca Ingram said the update addressed long standing uncertainty and gave direction to those wanting to invest in the region "There are a lot of things that the industry can agree on when it comes to Milford and improving the experience and safety are two of them," she said. "We have been strong advocates for a well-managed experience that is great for visitors, community, business and for the environment. "We look forward to working with the Department of Conservation as the proposal goes from plan into action." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
'We have massive problems with regulation' - Seymour defends Regulatory Standards Bill
Deputy Prime Minister and ACT Party leader David Seymour has hit back at criticism of his flagship Regulatory Standards Bill, defending the legislation against claims it breaches Treaty of Waitangi principles and contradicts its own standards when compared with the recently passed Pay Equity Bill. In an at-times heated exchange with Guyon Espiner, Seymour stood firm on the need for regulatory reform despite New Zealand's high international rankings in governance and legal standards. Espiner pointed out that New Zealand ranks 99 out of 100 for regulatory quality in the World Bank index, placing it just behind the global benchmark. Seymour dismissed the ranking, arguing it measured whether a country is "basically a third-world country" and failed to capture the real-world frustrations faced by businesses, particularly in agriculture and construction. "You can read all the indices you like, but once you start getting down to talking to the actual people … we have massive problems with regulation," Seymour said, citing delays in approval for lower-emission agricultural chemicals as one. ACT Party leader David Seyour in studio for an interview on season 3 of 30 with Guyon Espiner. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Espiner went on to challenge Seymour on whether the government's recent Pay Equity Bill - pushed through under urgency - violated the principles laid out in the Regulatory Standards Bill itself. These principles include ensuring laws are not retrospective and that proper consultation takes place. Seymour did not deny the lack of consultation or the retrospective nature of the law change - which left 33 current pay equity claimants in the lurch - but argued it was irrelevant. "It was breached because it didn't matter," Seymour said. "All we did was dismantle a Byzantine crazy system… deciding how much the government would pay different workers it was employing anyway." He described the previous equity process as "effectively an internal government activity of arguing with each other" and derided those who had submitted pay appeals under the former system. "They said, 'We work so hard.' I said, 'Really? You think work is arguing with each other?'." The debate turned toward Māori engagement when Espiner pointed out the Waitangi Tribunal's conclusion that the Regulatory Standards Bill, due to a lack of meaningful consultation with Māori, breached the Treaty principles of partnership and active protection. Seymour insisted Māori voices were heard through public consultation. "We had 144 Iwi-based groups who submitted … If that's not enough, then I don't know what is." However, Espiner highlighted that of the 23,000 total submissions, only 76 supported the bill - a support rate of just 0.33 percent. Seymour dismissed the figure as misleading. "That quantum reflects nothing more than the fact that it's got easier and easier for people to make really, frankly, fake submissions … They've got bots, they can make a submission." Despite dismissing the opposing voices as fake, Seymour maintained that what mattered was not the opposition but the quality of the legislative framework, which is non-binding in its nature, thus not enforceable - despite the bill's $20 million price-tag. Seymour argued the Regulatory Standards Bill was about transparency, not enforcement. He compared it to the Public Finance Act and the Reserve Bank Act - also non-binding in nature, but important for government accountability. "There's nothing to stop a minister of finance writing to the governor of the Reserve Bank before an election saying, 'Run the presses, prime the pumps,'" Seymour said. "But it does allow the voters to judge them for doing it… and I want to do the same thing for regulation." Watch the full conversation with David Seymour and Guyon Espiner on 30 With Guyon Espiner . Subscribe to the podcast feed now to get every episode of 30 on your phone when it lands: On Spotify On iHeartRadio On Apple podcasts Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.