logo
Elmhurst University's Holocaust Service of Remembrance program focuses on helpers

Elmhurst University's Holocaust Service of Remembrance program focuses on helpers

Chicago Tribune25-03-2025
Historians have studied for decades the issues of who rescued Jews during the Holocaust and why they risked their lives to do it. Rebecca Carter-Chand, director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum's Programs on Ethics, Religion and the Holocaust, will discuss the evolution of the study of rescue and the motivations of rescuers on April 6 at Elmhurst University.
The lecture, 'Understanding Rescue During the Holocaust,' part of the university's 35th Annual Holocaust Service of Remembrance and Lecture, will be held at 7 p.m. in the Founders Lounge of the Frick Center Chapel, 190 Prospect Ave., Elmhurst. Admission is free but reservations are encouraged at elmhurst.edu/cultural.
'Earlier studies, starting in the 1980s, were coming from social scientists and ethicists mostly,' Carter-Chand said. 'They viewed rescue less as a historical phenomenon and more as a psychological phenomenon. They were really interested in how rescue could be attributed to a person's ethical predisposition or something that they called the empathetic personality or as a result of someone's individual piety or theological commitment.'
Carter-Chand said that recently there are two newer approaches to the study of rescue. 'One is more of a focus on circumstances rather than motivation,' she said. 'The second is more a focus on Jewish agency and self-help.'
In terms of circumstances, Carter-Chand indicated that people often helped Jews who were in their social or professional circle, or if they were asked to help by someone in their religious community.
Sometimes the rescue was a continuation of work the rescuers were already doing. Carter-Chand cited the case of Catholic convents that ran schools where they were able to take in Jewish children and thereby hide them.
Through her own research, Carter-Chand reported, she discovered that the Salvation Army was able to hide Jews in women's hostels that were already set up.
Carter-Chand agreed that empathy could have played a part in the rescues based on circumstances.
Studying the issue of rescue during the holocaust is important because 'There's so much mythology around rescue,' Carter-Chand said. 'People think that it happened a lot more often than it did. It really is the rare exception rather than the norm. And there's the mistaken idea that most Christians must have been rescuers. Also, people think that this topic is a good place to look for inspiring people today to have compassion or a strong moral compass.'
She added that it shows people did know what was happening during the Holocaust. 'Also, it helps to better understand the experience of Jews and the strategies that they used, for people who are trying to survive persecution,' Carter-Chand said.
She noted that the topic of rescue is a special interest of hers. Her research leads her to explore 'the rescuer's side but also understanding the experience of those people being rescued,' she said. 'It's a way to study the history where people are interacting with each other — Jews and gentiles — in a very personal, grassroots kind of way. Also, I'm drawn to it because of how it's misunderstood and there's this mythology around it. I'm always compelled to show this history in a more accurate way.'
Carter has done other lectures on this topic, in addition to the upcoming one at Elmhurst University.
'I find overall audiences are very receptive to learning about this history including the painful and maybe unflattering parts,' she said. 'And also talk about the times when maybe aid was given and it wasn't so altruistic. Maybe the nuns in charge baptized the kids that were under their care. Maybe other people took payment and profited from rescue. Although it might seem like a very uplifting part of this history, it brings a lot of difficult questions when you start to dig into it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Inspiring leaders of tomorrow — St. Luke, the first Catholic IB School in the Pacific NW."
"Inspiring leaders of tomorrow — St. Luke, the first Catholic IB School in the Pacific NW."

Business Journals

time20 hours ago

  • Business Journals

"Inspiring leaders of tomorrow — St. Luke, the first Catholic IB School in the Pacific NW."

St. Luke School — Inspiring Leaders of Tomorrow The First Catholic International Baccalaureate (IB) School for Primary and Middle Years in the Pacific Northwest. Since 1957, St. Luke School has been a cornerstone of academic excellence and community engagement in the north King/south Snohomish region. Initially staffed by three Edmond Dominican Sisters and one lay teacher, our first classes welcomed 125 students in grades one through five. Over the decades, we've grown and evolved—today serving over 260 families and 450 students in Preschool through eighth grade. Our reputation as one of the marquee Catholic schools in the area is built on a steadfast commitment to academic rigor, values-based education, and continuous innovation. Facilities and instructional programs are continually enhanced, and students enjoy a variety of extracurricular opportunities that enrich the learning experience. A Regional First in Catholic IB Education: In February 2021, St. Luke School became the first Catholic school in the Pacific Northwest authorized to offer both the International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) and Middle Years Programme (MYP). This distinction places St. Luke in an elite category of schools worldwide, blending the depth and discipline of Catholic education with the globally recognized inquiry-driven IB framework. The PYP serves students from Preschool through grade five, fostering curiosity, critical thinking, and the ability to make connections across disciplines. Students explore transdisciplinary themes such as Who We Are and How We Express Ourselves, building essential skills for lifelong learning. The MYP, designed for grades six through eight, challenges students through a broad curriculum that includes language acquisition, sciences, mathematics, arts, and design, while encouraging independent thinking, collaboration, and service. The program culminates in an 8th Grade Community Project, a meaningful capstone that demonstrates each student's ability to apply their learning to real-world challenges. Educating the Whole Child: Our mission—Inquiring minds, hearts for Jesus, and hands for service—guides every aspect of the St. Luke experience. We aim to educate the whole child: intellectually, spiritually, emotionally, and socially. Through a combination of academic excellence, faith formation, and community involvement, we prepare students to lead lives of purpose, compassion, and integrity. A Strong, Supportive Community: St. Luke is more than a school—it's a network of connection and support. Our close-knit community includes dedicated faculty and staff who know students by name, active parent organizations that support and enrich school life, and a parish that is deeply invested in the well-being of every family. These relationships help foster an environment where students feel valued, engaged, and inspired to reach their potential. Why St. Luke Stands Out: Proven Excellence — Over 68 years of continuous growth and achievement. Innovative Approach — First Catholic IB Primary and Middle Years School in the Pacific Northwest. Mission Alignment — Grounded in Catholic faith and the IB's global perspective. Community Focus — Strong partnerships among families, faculty, and parish. Holistic Development — Academic rigor combined with character formation and service. Join Us: We invite families and community members to learn more about what makes St. Luke School exceptional. Whether you are seeking a high-caliber education for your child, an engaged and values-driven community, or a school that blends tradition with innovation, St. Luke offers an unparalleled experience. Where leaders of tomorrow begin today — discover St. Luke School, the first Catholic IB School for Primary and Middle Years in the Pacific Northwest. Visit to explore our programs, schedule a tour, and see firsthand how St. Luke inspires students to think deeply, act justly, and lead with heart.

19 Of The Biggest Historical Lies People Still Believe
19 Of The Biggest Historical Lies People Still Believe

Buzz Feed

time3 days ago

  • Buzz Feed

19 Of The Biggest Historical Lies People Still Believe

Recently, a post from Reddit user Repulsive-Finger-954 on the popular Ask Reddit forum caught my eye. In it, they asked people, "What is the biggest historical lie that many people believe?" and the answers were both entertaining and informative. I decided I had to share; so, here are some of the best: "Vikings didn't wear horned helmets." "People believe that Napoleon was this abnormally short man. He was 5'6, which was pretty average back then. I'm pretty sure it was this smear campaign of sorts that painted him as this weirdly short, unpowerful guy." "George Washington's dentures were not made of wood, but rather a combination of teeth from slaves, ivory (hippopotamus, walrus and/or elephant), animal teeth, and metals." "While Paul Revere is often credited with being the sole rider to warn the colonies of the British, he was actually one of five riders who alerted colonists on the night of April 18. Revere's mission relied on secrecy, and he didn't shout 'The British are coming!' as the phrase would have been confusing to locals who still considered themselves British. Instead, Revere's network of riders, signal guns, and church bells effectively spread the alarm." People believe that the Nazis were hated and opposed for their treatment of Jewish people from the beginning. There has been plenty of narrative building through the years around the idea that the Allies were seeking justice for the Jewish people from the start. It was only when we witnessed the extent of the Holocaust that the villainy of the Nazis became more widely recognized and acknowledged." "The idea that people used to believe the world was flat. In elementary school, I was taught that no one wanted to fund Columbus's voyage because they thought he'd just sail off the end of the world. Utter nonsense." "People believe that Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb. He did not. Several other men pioneered it before him." "People believe that women stayed home and only men worked. For the poor, which was the vast majority of people throughout history, everybody who could work worked, even the kids. If you didn't, the whole family would starve and die." "People believe that the US Civil War was over states' rights." "People believe that MLK was socially acceptable to white people during the 1960s, and not in favor of radically changing the socioeconomic order of the US. He was a socialist who was widely reviled by the white culture of the time. He's been re-imagined by white people as someone willing to accept slow electoral solutions to racial problems." "Many people still believe that Marie Antoinette said, 'Let them eat cake.'" "The myth that there ever was a famine in Ireland. It was a genocide, and the English were exporting enough meat and grain from Ireland to feed three times the Irish population." "People in ancient and medieval times lived past 30 or 40 on a regular basis. The 'life expectancy' was low due to child mortality." "The idea that Galileo was imprisoned because of the heliocentric model. Nope, it was because he pissed off the pope, who was funding his research." "There is a myth that the US has never experienced an authoritarian government. In actuality, a large portion of its history has been authoritarian. The Jim Crow South was an authoritarian government that existed until 1964." "The myth that carrots give you good eyesight. That lie came from Britain during WWII to hide the fact that they had a new technology called radar." "The idea that Catherine of Aragon failed Henry VIII because she didn't have a son and heir. She and Henry had — at least — three sons." "That Samurai despised guns and saw them as 'dishonorable tools.'" And finally: "That nothing much happened in the 'Dark Ages.'" What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments. Better yet, tell me your own historical pet peeves that drive you up the wall! If you have something to share but prefer to remain anonymous, feel free to check out this anonymous form. Who knows — your comment could be included in a future BuzzFeed article! Please note: Some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity.

Food for all over security for some
Food for all over security for some

Los Angeles Times

time3 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Food for all over security for some

My grandmother escaped the Warsaw ghetto after her first of four sisters died from hunger. She slipped through a few missing bricks in the wall that sealed the Jewish population away from their Aryan neighbors, where they were trapped in poverty and malnourishment and subject to Nazi plans for extermination. Scholars report that 92,000 Jews died of starvation in the ghetto before 300,000 were deported to camps. After escaping, my grandmother — just a teenager — snuck food to her family several times before the rest of her family died, and my grandmother stayed hungry for many years, as she survived the Holocaust on her own. 'When you hungry, you soul flies out,' Bubbe, as I called her, said in her testimony of survival. Bubbe is most tragically poetic in her descriptions of hunger, and she never forgot the way her sister died asking for a piece of bread, just a shtickle fun broyt. Bulging eyes and blue lips. My grandmother's relationship to food was forever marked by the ghost of hunger. Once she was living safely in the American suburbs, she was never without a loaf of rye bread in the freezer. My grandmother knew about the essential dignity of every human being. At the end of the war, when she was liberated by the Russians in the Polish city of Lukov, she noticed the German soldiers walking around without boots, and she felt sad for them. 'You see a person is hurt,' she said, 'you want to help.' How we respond to the needs of those around us — this is what forms the basis of our character. In drawing a book about my grandmother's story, I thought often about the psychologist Abraham Maslow's 'hierarchy of needs.' At the bottom of the pyramid is our basic physiology, our need for food and water, and above that our need for security and safety. Only when these needs are met, can we focus on higher planes, seeking belonging, self-esteem and self-actualization. It is only because my grandparents fought so hard, endured so much, for their bread that I am in a position to reflect on what my grandmother's struggle for survival means for my identity, my sense of meaning and my politics. Her legacy taught me that every group of people deserves to live free from hunger and fear of violence in their homes, that we all need bread and boots. She taught me that we should tell the stories, all stories, of exile and loss and persecution. She taught me to love and believe in America, and that the Jews of the world are safest in liberal democracies, with governments that grant equal opportunity for all in their jurisdiction. As I learned more about Jewish history, I came to believe that the long story of Jewish suffering resulted in an attempt to solve 'the Jewish Problem' by creating a Palestinian Problem, that the Israeli government has never sufficiently reckoned with its role in Palestinian persecution, and that the fate of Palestinians and Israelis is, consequently, forever linked, and therefore the only viable future for either peoples lies in the two learning to break bread together. I can more easily imagine this future because I — unlike my grandmother, unlike my Jewish cousins in Israel, and unlike all Palestinians living under occupation — have not feared for basic survival. But those who've lost more than I have share this vision. And I believe it's my duty, at the very least, to hold on to my imagination. But in the face of hunger, words and ideas begin to melt, then evaporate. Hunger is stupifying. The mounting starvation statistics in Gaza change daily, and they are all bad. In May, 5,000 children diagnosed with malnutrition. A 24-hour period with 19 deaths from starvation. At least 1,400 people have been killed in Gaza while trying to access food since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an opaquely funded American and Israeli organization that 25 experts have called an 'insult to the humanitarian enterprise and standards,' began dominating distribution of aid in the Gaza Strip, in the name of diverting food from Hamas. The blockade, the system of severe restrictions on the movement of goods and people into and out of Gaza, has halted the flow of food and medical supplies, and frequent breakdowns in telecommunications have severely challenged the efforts to distribute what aid does get in. Outside of Gaza, we are in a position to quibble about statistics and argue about what words we use to describe other people's suffering. Many scholars have called the constant killings, the reduction of Palestinian infrastructure to rubble and the systematic blockade of humanitarian aid a genocide. For many Jewish people with direct connections to the Holocaust, the story of genocide is so total, so unimaginable, it's hard to reconcile a word with such totemic power with something happening right now, in front of our eyes, on our phones. Yet some Jewish Holocaust survivors identify with the images of Gaza's destruction and feel compelled to use the strongest language available in condemnation. Others use the terms ethnic cleansing, or crimes against humanity, while some just want to call this a war. These distinctions matter; a designation of genocide would, theoretically, oblige the international community to act, with sanctions or criminal prosecution for those responsible. But this semantic dialogue can produce a kind of blank despair. Starving children make fine distinctions feel hollow. The Israeli government claims there is 'no starvation' in Gaza, even as officials have moved to address this starvation in response to international and internal pressure, with pauses in fighting and minimal air drops. Israel's defenders admit there is a starvation problem in Gaza, but blame Hamas and Hamas-infiltrated international organizations for looting humanitarian aid, a claim that has been widely debunked. The Israeli government says this is a war of defense. This is the logic that has led, for example, to the siege of Gaza's already limited clean water supply. We can acknowledge the violence, the constant fear and the deep disappointment both peoples have experienced for decades, without equating these experiences, all the while seeing the moral imperative clearly: Food and water for all must come before security for some, all of which must come before ideology. This formulation implies that those wielding the most resources, Israeli and American institutions, must be willing to sacrifice some security in the name of ensuring hungry people are fed. There's no future for Israelis or Palestinians in which one people's security comes before another people's basic physiological needs, in wartime or after. All of us attending to the news today are squinting through intergenerational memories. I've looked at pictures of starving Gazans and been swept back to the Polish ghetto I never lived in, watching a family member die. I've seen Jewish people I love walk freely down the streets of American cities and perceive menace in symbols of Palestinian liberation they don't understand. I've listened to panicked complaints from Jewish acquaintances about how loud the sirens are at protests in front of Israeli embassies. To them, perhaps the sirens feel like war planes. The thing about those of us living at the top of Maslow's hierarchy is that sometimes we fall through loopholes and touch the panic of basic survival, bringing our identities, and our politics, with us. We can have compassion for each other in these moments. But we must anchor ourselves with these facts: At this point, in Gaza, some people aren't eating. This is why so many around the world are crying out and risking their safety and their status to protest. Our intergenerational grief should lead us all to cry together, in the name of those most vulnerable. Artists and activists don't have perfect plans for solving the most complex political crises of our lifetimes, and we don't command armies or wield many resources. What we can do is cry. We can cry about what is deeply wrong with now, and we can use our imaginations to light the way forward. Where our imaginations fixate might guide our collective priorities. So I imagine the children of Palestine in my drawings. They are breaking bread with my grandmother's sisters, if only in my imagination. Amy Kurzweil is a New Yorker cartoonist and the author of 'Artificial: A Love Story' and 'Flying Couch: A Graphic Memoir.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store