logo
The Rise—And Risk—Of AI In Offensive Security

The Rise—And Risk—Of AI In Offensive Security

Forbes15-07-2025
Gunter Ollmann is a global cybersecurity innovator with decades of experience, patented tech and leadership across 80+ countries.
Offensive security tools, which are designed to proactively identify threats and vulnerable attack vectors before they occur, have long been exploited by threat actors. AI is, unfortunately, perpetuating the issue and, in particular, is making social engineering easier since it empowers criminals with native language capabilities, supercharging their effectiveness. But AI is also working to the defender's advantage by shaking up the traditional penetration testing sector, which once centered on "breadth," e.g., identifying as many vulnerabilities as possible using scanners and automated tools, so that it has now evolved into full-scale attack and breach simulation.
This capability effectively puts the defenders in the attacker's "shoes" so they replicate the tactics of threat actors to help organizations understand how far an attacker could infiltrate their systems.
How AI Enhances Offensive Security While Introducing New Risks
As with most things AI-related, innovation is a double-edged sword. As tools improve, they benefit not only defenders but also attackers. For defenders, tools that once required manual triage are now equipped with AI that can scan, correlate and validate vulnerabilities. For instance, when different scanners return conflicting information, AI can determine which findings are likely false positives, saving human analysts hours of triage. Now, instead of sifting through lengthy lists of potential issues, testers can focus on what truly matters: issues that are exploitable and impactful.
For attackers who used to rely heavily on manual efforts to gather intelligence on targets, they can now use AI to mine the internet, analyze social networks, access data dumps and even build virtual personas that can infiltrate private online communities. These personas can be tailored to a specific user's interests—we have seen train hobbyists targeted and used to establish trust before delivering a targeted phishing link or malware payload. These AI-generated personas may join relevant forums, interact with the target over time and build credibility in a way that was previously too labor-intensive to execute.
AI also plays a major role in passive reconnaissance. Oftentimes, attackers don't even need to touch a target system and can use AI to collect extensive intelligence about an organization from public and semi-private sources. For example, it can determine which individuals have administrative access, what systems are publicly exposed and what historical vulnerabilities exist. This reduces the need for noisy scans and increases the chances of a successful, undetected breach. But of course, defenders can use these capabilities too, hence an ongoing game of "cat and mouse" between red teamers and threat actors.
Evaluating Offensive Security Vendors
AI without human expertise generates "noise," particularly hallucinations, which throw false positives and negatives into the mix, so it needs highly skilled experts who know how to interpret the findings and use the tools effectively. This pool exists as the discipline has evolved from an "art" into a "science," where a global community of elite testers all perform to the same standardized methodologies and regulatory standards. This has helped streamline the logistics of launching high-quality tests quickly, enabling better remediation, retesting and translation of findings into business-relevant language for developers and executives. With organizations assured of consistency across processes, it's up to vendors to differentiate on their ability to simulate modern threats, collaborate closely with internal teams and provide testing agility. Features such as retesting, contextual reporting and access to global talent pools are also critical.
Humans Versus AI
Pentesting has evolved from a niche security function to a broad organizational priority. Reports no longer go just to security teams; they are reviewed by engineering leaders, product owners and other business stakeholders. Findings are now written in context for the end audience, and AI helps facilitate this translation, ensuring that vulnerabilities are understood and fixed by the right teams. This ensures not only a faster resolution but also that development teams remain focused on delivering secure code from the outset.
The biggest question facing the industry is whether AI will replace pentesters. The answer is "yes" for traditional average pentesting and "no" at the top end. AI can excel at automating routine tasks, but skills like red teaming at the highest level are a human endeavor. Elite testers bring knowledge of the best tools to use and the experience that can't be replicated by algorithms.
We're seeing that currently, the best results come from hybrid teams where AI handles repetitive, data-intensive tasks and human experts focus on strategy, interpretation and innovation. This is a continuation of a long-term trend whereby so-called "tier one" security analysts were automated some ten years ago. It means smaller teams can achieve more with routine tasks such as scanning, correlation and log analysis handled by AI, while expert humans focus on complex and strategic areas.
Cybersecurity Is About People
AI is revolutionizing offensive security, bringing with it both immense promise and considerable peril. The tools of the trade have evolved, and so too must the people and processes that govern them. As the attacker-defender arms race accelerates, the role of AI will only grow. But in the end, cybersecurity is still about people. Penetration testing and Red Teaming are driven by highly skilled individuals who understand how adversaries think, and they leverage AI as a tool to sharpen their edge.
The adversaries are human—and so too must be the defenders. To truly stay ahead, organizations need to blend elite research talent with smart technology and never lose sight of the human element that defines success in security.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple AI Plan Hinges on Robots, Cisco CEO Talks Tariffs
Apple AI Plan Hinges on Robots, Cisco CEO Talks Tariffs

Bloomberg

time17 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Apple AI Plan Hinges on Robots, Cisco CEO Talks Tariffs

Bloomberg's Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss Apple's AI push, which relies on robots, a lifelike version of Siri, and home security devices. Plus, Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins talks about AI sales and the impact of tariffs following the company's earnings report. And WHOOP CEO Will Ahmed defends his company's decision to keep its blood oxygen tracker operational despite a request from the FDA to disable it. (Source: Bloomberg)

Small Businesses Are Enthusiastic About Agentic AI But Understand The Challenges
Small Businesses Are Enthusiastic About Agentic AI But Understand The Challenges

Forbes

time17 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Small Businesses Are Enthusiastic About Agentic AI But Understand The Challenges

Longtime computer scientist and Stanford University professor emeritus Yoav Shoham recently acknowledged the great promise of AI agents — and emphasized the need for caution. 'The vision is exciting,' he teased in a recent editorial. 'Intelligent software agents that act like digital coworkers, booking your flights, rescheduling meetings, filing expenses and talking to each other behind the scenes to get things done. But if we're not careful, we're going to derail the whole idea before it has a chance to deliver real benefits.' Shoham warns of an AI backlash if expectations of the technology exceed what it's able to reliably and accurately accomplish. According to the Forbes Research 2025 Small Business Survey, many small business owners also have mixed feelings, showing both enthusiasm for agentic AI and uncertainty about how to introduce it into their businesses. In March, 50% of the 535 small business owners surveyed had plans to introduce AI agents in their companies within a year's time. Respondents also acknowledged that pulling it off won't be easy, citing AI implementation as their second-biggest technology challenge (27%). Haphazard AI Could Undermine Early Success Shoham would rather see companies be thorough than quick. 'We need to stop treating LLMs as standalone products and start building complete systems around them — systems that account for uncertainty, monitor outputs, manage costs and layer in guardrails for safety and accuracy,' he said. Meanwhile, early reviews of agentic AI are mostly positive from the enterprise world, where bigger budgets often enable earlier adoption. According to a 2025 PwC survey, 52% of enterprises reported either broad or full AI agent adoption, and those early users said they experienced increased productivity, faster decision-making and improved customer experience. Shoham also sees the potential, which is why he said business leaders should temper the excitement now by setting realistic expectations for the time and effort that is required to do it right. "If we can do that, agents won't just be another passing trend," he added. 'They could become the backbone of how we get things done in the digital world.'

This Startup Is Adding $15M a Month--and Says $1B Is Just 12 Months Away
This Startup Is Adding $15M a Month--and Says $1B Is Just 12 Months Away

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Startup Is Adding $15M a Month--and Says $1B Is Just 12 Months Away

Lovable may have called itself the world's fastest-growing startup in Julybut that might've been just the warm-up. The Swedish AI newcomer is now adding $8 million to $15 million in annualized recurring revenue every month, with CEO Anton Osika stating the company is on pace to hit $250 million ARR by year-end and targeting $1 billion within the next 12 months. Founded in late 2023, Lovable reached a $1.8 billion valuation after its July funding round and now serves around 250,000 paying customers, many of whom use its no-code platform to build apps and websites without writing a line of code. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with META. What sets Lovable apart isn't just growth speedit's where it's positioned in the AI stack. While the company leverages foundational models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), it's also moving up the value chain and starting to compete with them. Osika told Bloomberg that Lovable was an early tester of OpenAI's new GPT-5 model but isn't worried about overlap. Instead, he pointed to Lovable's broader offering, which includes QA, security, and end-to-end functionality, not just code generation. It helps you do much more than just write the code, he said, pushing back on the idea that GPT-5 might compress the company's runway. As AI startups continue to wrestle with tech giant pressure, Lovable is signaling that it won't be one of those quietly acqui-hired. Osika made it clear he'd reject a buyout offer, referencing last month's backlash over Windsurf's leadership defecting to Google. Lovable, he said, is not cash constrained and may raise again next yearbut on its own terms. Investors tracking the next phase of AI infrastructure plays may want to watch how Lovable navigates the tension between hyperscaler dependence and platform independence. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store