California School District Votes to Ban Boys From Girls' Sports
In a more than five hour board meeting on April 22, parents, students, and community members argued their positions in regards to a resolution titled 'Supporting Title IX and Fairness in Girls' Interscholastic Sports.'
In certain instances, crowd members interrupted speakers, while others could be seen shaking their heads while those with opposing views spoke. Several security guards were at the meeting, and at least one remained next to each speaker as they let their views be known.
The board ultimately approved the resolution in a 3–2 vote.
Board members later in the meeting considered censuring a member of the board as debate on cultural topics on numerous fronts boiled over. The board has also floated controversial new library policies, as well as a policy curtailing use of the LGBT rainbow flag on campus.
The board's vote does not create a binding policy for the district's athletics program, which serves high schools such as Redlands High School and Citrus Valley High School. The district altogether serves more than 20,000 students in the Inland Empire.
Related Stories
4/3/2025
4/23/2025
'It's fair. It's about ensuring that our daughters who train, sacrifice, and give everything to their sport are not robbed of the opportunities. That's not discrimination,' said Sonia Shaw, mother of two female athletes and president of Chino Valley Unified School Board.
'Being here tonight is upsetting; it's upsetting because we shouldn't have to be here,' said another public speaker. 'We shouldn't have to come here to say we need to save girl's sports. We shouldn't be begging for common sense.'
Others spoke out against the resolution, arguing it was a waste of time and resources.
Candy Olson proposed the resolution, and was joined by Jeanette Wilson, as well as board President Michele Rendler, in backing the resolution. The resolution was similar to one state lawmakers earlier this month voted
According to a recent Pew Research Center
The Redlands Unified School District Board vote came almost a year after the Department of Education
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Transgender runner Evie Parts sues NCAA and Swarthmore College for removal from track team
Long-distance runner Evie Parts sued the NCAA and Swarthmore College as well as members of its athletic department on the grounds they illegally removed her from the track team because she is a transgender athlete. Parts' lawsuit said the NCAA's ban on transgender athletes in women's sports did not have legal grounds because it's not a governmental organization and therefore does not have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or the Title IX federal statute. She was removed from the team on Feb. 6, the day the NCAA issued its new policy on transgender athletes. Swarthmore men's and women's track coach Peter Carroll, athletic director Brad Koch and athletics officials Christina Epps-Chiazor and Valerie Gomez also were named in the lawsuit. According to the complaint, they sent Parts into 'such a depressive state that she engaged in self-harm and in one moment told a friend that she wanted to kill herself.' 'We stand by the allegations in the complaint,' said Susie Cirilli, an attorney who, along with the law firm Spector, Gadon, Rosen and Vinci, represent Parts. 'As stated in the complaint, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a bigoted policy. Swarthmore College chose to follow that policy and disregard federal and state law.' Swarthmore did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The NCAA chose not to comment. The NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth. That change came a day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Pennsylvania's state Senate approved a bill by a 32-18 margin on May 6 to ban transgender athletes from competing in women's and girls' sports at the collegiate and K-12 levels. But the state's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives isn't expected to vote on the bill. Parts joined the Swarthmore track team in the fall 2020 before then taking off the following four winter and spring seasons. She went back to the Division III team in 2023 to compete in the indoor and outdoor track seasons and in cross country. When the NCAA issued its ban, the lawsuit states, Parts was told by Epps-Chiazor and Gomez that she could compete with the men's team or as an unattached athlete. She would only receive medical treatment, the complaint says, if she competed on the men's team. Also, according to the lawsuit, Carroll and his staff were not allowed to coach Parts, she could not travel with the team, was not allowed to receive per diem or food and had to pay her way into meets. Parts also couldn't wear a Swarthmore uniform. Swarthmore 'fully reinstated' Parts on April 11, the lawsuit says, and she competed on the women's team until graduating in May. Parts won the 10,000 meters in April at the Bill Butler Invitational.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Another trans athlete sues school over being banned from women's sports in growing trend
A third transgender athlete has sued a U.S. college in the span of one month in response to the ongoing national crackdown on biological males in women's sports. However, the latest lawsuit also claims a trans athlete was reinstated to a women's team in April despite NCAA policy and federal law prohibiting it. Trans track and field runner Evelyn Parts is suing Swarthmore College and the NCAA, alleging the school violated Title IX when it banned Parts from competing on the women's track and field team earlier this year. Parts alleges the school said Parts could no longer compete on the women's team in February, the same month the NCAA changed its gender eligibility policy to prevent biological males from competing in the women's category after President Donald Trump signed the "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order. Parts' lawsuit also claims the trans athlete was "fully reinstated" to the Swarthmore women's track team April 11. Parts claims to have been allowed to compete on the women's team until graduating in May, even after the policy changes and Trump's executive order went into effect. Parts is listed as the winner of the women's 10,000 meters at the Bill Butler Invitational in April and as a participant in the Paul Donahue Invite that same month and the Centennial Championships in early May, according to the athlete's Swarthmore Athletics page. Fox News Digital has reached out to Swarthmore College and the NCAA for comment. Parts sued less than a month after fellow trans runner Sadie Schreiner filed a lawsuit against Princeton University after allegedly being excluded from a women's race in May. Parts' lawsuit was filed less than a week after trans volleyball player Emma Morquecho filed a lawsuit against Westcliff University and the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletes (NAIA), an alternate college sports governing body to the NCAA, alleging a scholarship offer was revoked and eligibility was denied. Lawsuits filed by trans athletes against schools that have excluded them from women's sports are a growing trend after Trump's new federal mandate on the issue. It contrasts with the previous trend of female athletes suing the NCAA and universities for having to compete with and share locker rooms with biological males. Former President Joe Biden had an executive order in place that protected the rights of trans athletes to compete in women's sports, and the NCAA's previous policy enabled trans athletes. The participation of former University of Pennsylvania trans swimmer Lia Thomas and former San Jose State trans volleyball player Blaire Fleming prompted multiple lawsuits against those institutions and the NCAA led by Riley Gaines and Brooke Slusser. Schreiner was previously allowed to compete on Rochester Institute of Technology's (RIT) women's track and field team for two years before the February NCAA rule change. Former RIT women's track runner Caroline Hill joined Gaines' lawsuit against the NCAA, citing her experience competing with and sharing a locker room with Schreiner. Parts is being represented by attorney Susie Cirilli, the same attorney representing Schreiner in the lawsuit against Princeton. Cirilli provided a statement to Fox News Digital addressing Parts' lawsuit. "We stand by the allegations in the complaint. As stated in the complaint, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a bigoted policy. Swarthmore chose to follow that policy and disregard federal and state law," Cirilli said. Cirilli previously provided a statement to Fox News Digital addressing Schreiner's lawsuit against Princeton. "The action of the two Princeton officials were in blatant and willful disregard of Sadie's rights as a transgender woman under controlling New Jersey law," the statement said. "The actions of the defendants were utterly intolerable in a civilized community and go beyond the possible bounds of decency." Trump's Department of Education has already taken action against multiple universities over incidents of trans inclusion in women's sports prior to Trump's executive order. The DOE reached an agreement with UPenn over Thomas' participation in women's swimming in early July. The university agreed to expunge the trans athlete's records and apologize to all the female athletes affected by Thomas' presence on the women's team. Earlier in August, the DOE reached an agreement with Wagner College for a similar resolution regarding former trans fencer Redmond Sullivan. The DOE's investigation into San Jose State over the Fleming controversy is ongoing. If Parts' allegations are true, Swarthmore would be the second school with a recorded instance of a trans athlete competing on a women's team after the NCAA policy change and Trump's executive order in February. Ithaca College in New York admitted to allowing a trans athlete compete in a Division III rowing competition in March. The trans athlete competed in the Cayuga Duals, but only in the third varsity eight event, which is not factored into NCAA championship qualification. Ithaca provided a statement to Fox News Digital saying the trans athlete's participation was due to a "misunderstanding" by the coaching staff. The NCAA provided a statement to Fox News Digital addressing Ithaca's breach of policy. "The policy is clear that there are no waivers available, and students assigned male at birth may not compete on a women's team with amended birth certificates or other forms of ID," the NCAA said. "If competition occurs, the team will be considered a mixed team and not eligible to compete against women's teams. Ithaca stated their intent to adhere to the policy which allows for practice opportunities, and the NCAA appreciates Ithaca's responsiveness." The NCAA did not indicate whether results from the event would be voided or if Ithaca will face any consequences.
CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
Transgender runner Evie Parts sues NCAA and Swarthmore College for removal from track team
Long-distance runner Evie Parts sued the NCAA and Swarthmore College as well as members of its athletic department on the grounds that they illegally removed her from the track team because she is a transgender athlete. Parts' lawsuit said the NCAA's ban on transgender athletes in women's sports did not have legal grounds because it's not a governmental organization and therefore does not have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or the Title IX federal statute. She was removed from the team on Feb. 6, the day the NCAA issued its new policy on transgender athletes. Swarthmore men's and women's track coach Peter Carroll, athletic director Brad Koch and athletics officials Christina Epps-Chiazor and Valerie Gomez also were named in the lawsuit. According to the complaint, they sent Parts into "such a depressive state that she engaged in self-harm and in one moment told a friend that she wanted to kill herself." "We stand by the allegations in the complaint," said Susie Cirilli, an attorney who, along with the law firm Spector, Gadon, Rosen and Vinci, represents Parts. "As stated in the complaint, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a bigoted policy. Swarthmore College chose to follow that policy and disregard federal and state law." Swarthmore did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The NCAA chose not to comment. The NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth. That change came a day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Pennsylvania's state Senate approved a bill by a 32-18 margin on May 6 to ban transgender athletes from competing in women's and girls' sports at the collegiate and K-12 levels. But the state's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives isn't expected to vote on the bill. Parts joined the Swarthmore track team in the fall of 2020 before then taking off the following four winter and spring seasons. She went back to the Division III team in 2023 to compete in the indoor and outdoor track seasons and in cross country. When the NCAA issued its ban, the lawsuit states, Parts was told by Epps-Chiazor and Gomez that she could compete with the men's team or as an unattached athlete. She would only receive medical treatment, the complaint says, if she competed on the men's team. Also, according to the lawsuit, Carroll and his staff were not allowed to coach Parts, she could not travel with the team, was not allowed to receive per diem or food and had to pay her way into meets. Parts also couldn't wear a Swarthmore uniform. Swarthmore "fully reinstated" Parts on April 11, the lawsuit says, and she competed on the women's team until graduating in May. Parts won the 10,000 meters in April at the Bill Butler Invitational.
