Taiwanese court sentences ex-legislator's son for illegal fuel transfers to North Korea
Huang Chung-wei was sentenced to 28 months in prison by the district court in the southern port city of Kaohsiung on Tuesday. Five others also received prison terms.
They were convicted of taking part in loading the fuel onto ships in Taiwan and making the transfers in collaboration with Kwek Kee Seng, a Singaporean businessman wanted by the U.S. whose whereabouts were unknown.
Such activity is a violation of Taiwan's Counter-Terrorism Financing Act and other statutes. the court said.
Illegal transfers at sea are one of the few ways North Korea, an authoritarian dictatorship considered one of the world's biggest violators of human rights, can obtain fuel because of strict United Nations sanctions against its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
While Taiwan is not a U.N. member at the insistence of North Korean ally China, it has pledged to follow all of the world body's rulings on Pyongyang.
The case against Huang dates back to 2019, when he and Kwek allegedly purchased a fleet of tankers, loaded them with fuel and sent them to make the transfers.
North Korea is known to operate a 'shadow fleet' of ships operating without active electronic identification equipment. However, U.S. intelligence agencies were able to track the transfers by satellite and provided the information to Kaohsiung investigators, the court said. .
Huang's father was a member of Taiwan's legislature for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party. It wasn't clear how much money he made from the scheme or whether he would appeal the sentence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel approves settlement plan to erase idea of Palestinian state
Israel approves settlement plan to erase idea of Palestinian state JERUSALEM (Reuters) -A widely condemned Israeli settlement plan that would cut across land that the Palestinians seek for a state received final approval on Wednesday, according to a statement from Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The approval of the E1 project, which would bisect the occupied West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, was announced last week by Smotrich and received the final go-ahead from a Defence Ministry planning commission on Wednesday, he said. "With E1, we are delivering finally on what has been promised for years," Smotrich, an ultra-nationalist in the ruling right-wing coalition, said in a statement. "The Palestinian state is being erased from the table, not with slogans but with actions." Restarting the project could further isolate Israel, which has watched some Western allies frustrated by its continuation and planned escalation of the Gaza war announce they may recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. "We condemn the decision taken today on expanding this particular settlement, which ... will drive a stake through the heart of the two-state solution," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric. "We call on the government of Israel to halt all settlement activity." The Palestinian Foreign Ministry also condemned the announcement, saying the E1 settlement would isolate Palestinian communities living in the area and undermine the possibility of a two-state solution. British Foreign Minister David Lammy said on X: "If implemented, it would divide a Palestinian state in two, mark a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution." A German government spokesperson commenting on the announcement told reporters that settlement construction violates international law and "hinders a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not commented on the E1 announcement. However on Sunday, during a visit to Ofra, another West Bank settlement established a quarter of a century ago, he made broader comments, saying: "I said 25 years ago that we will do everything to secure our grip on the Land of Israel, to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, to prevent the attempts to uproot us from here. Thank God, what I promised, we have delivered." The two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel. Western capitals and campaign groups have opposed the settlement project due to concerns that it could undermine a future peace deal with the Palestinians. The plan for E1, located adjacent to Maale Adumim and frozen in 2012 and 2020 amid objections from the U.S. and European governments, involves the construction of about 3,400 new housing units. Infrastructure work could begin within a few months, and house building in about a year, according to Israeli advocacy group Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank. Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area and saying the settlements provide strategic depth and security. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Palestinian State Recognition Backed by Nearly 6 in 10 Americans: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly six in 10 Americans believe members of the United Nations should recognize a Palestinian state, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to the State Department for comment via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters The poll comes amid ongoing concerns about the humanitarian conditions in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 58 hostages remain in Gaza, and that only about 20 are believed to be alive. Israel has since launched a massive counteroffensive in Gaza, killing more than 62,000 people, according to the Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry. Critics have sounded the alarm on Israel's military operation, with worries over the number of civilians killed or displaced. In recent weeks, more countries have moved to recognize a Palestinian state amid fears of the potential starvation of civilians in Gaza, an accusation denied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. What To Know A majority of Americans—58 percent—believe every country should recognize Palestinian territory as an independent nation, according to a poll from Reuters and Ipsos released on Wednesday. Only 33 percent said they do not believe U.N. members should recognize a Palestinian state, while 9 percent did not answer the question, found the poll, which surveyed 4,446 adults across the U.S. and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. OMAR AL-QATTAA/AFP via Getty Images Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced earlier in August that Australia would recognize the Palestinian state as a nation in September. "Australia will recognize the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority," he said in a video posted to X. France in July also said it would recognize a Palestinian nation. The United Kingdom said the same, if conditions are not met by Israel. But it has been U.S. policy across Democratic and Republican administrations to not recognize a Palestinian state. The administration of President Donald Trump has not signaled any shift from the status quo on the matter. Polling over recent months has shown a decline in American compassion for Israel. A Quinnipiac University poll released in June found that sympathies for Israel dipped to a record low, with only 37 percent of Americans saying they feel more sympathetic toward Israel. What People Are Saying U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in July: "I have always said that we will recognize a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. I can confirm the U.K. will recognize the State of Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly in September, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after France announced it would recognize a Palestinian state: "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th." Netanyahu, on X July 24: "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel—not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." What Happens Next Starmer will wait until September to render a formal decision on recognizing a Palestinian state. Israel continues facing international pressure over its military operations in Gaza, while Hamas has been pressed to return the remaining hostages. There have been recent attempts at peace talks to achieve a lasting ceasefire, but they have stalled.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration reportedly wants a 10% stake in Intel
The Trump administration is in talks to take a roughly 10% stake in Intel in a deal that would make the U.S. the largest shareholder in the struggling chipmaker, according to a report. The federal government is mulling an investment that would convert some or all of the grants allocated to the company under the U.S. bipartisan Chips and Science Act into equity, Bloomberg reported. Intel was granted a combined $10.9 billion in grants under the act for commercial and military manufacturing, which former President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. That figure would equate to a little over 10% of Intel's $103.8 billion market value as of Aug. 18, though sources told the news outlet that the White House has not yet decided whether to go ahead with the plan. The potential investment, first reported last week , would support Intel's plans to build a factory hub in Ohio and would come at a time when Intel has been cutting jobs as part of a cost cutting drive, having fallen behind rivals like Nvidia in the global AI chipmaking race. A stake in Intel would be President Donald Trump's latest try at intervening in the chipmaking industry. Earlier this week, the U.S. government announced a deal that would have two of Intel's rivals, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, pay it 15% of their revenues from sales in China. The reported deal with Intel would also mark a sharp turnaround after Trump demanded last week that its CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign over purported connections to the Chinese government, describing him as someone who's 'conflicted' in his business dealings. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Trump wrote in an Aug. 7 social media post. Tan took over Intel in March, as the company was locked in negotiations with the Trump administration to shift its chip-making plants to a Taiwanese rival. Intel is seen by many as the best chance for the U.S. to compete with global rivals like TSMC, and the Ohio plant would help the country make sure it can make high-end semiconductors on home soil. However, it has struggled amid stagnant sales and ongoing losses in recent years, with the likes of Nvidia surging ahead. Already under Tan it has announced plans to lay off 20% of its staff to pare back bureaucracy within the company. The funding under the Chips Act was meant to be directed to fortify Intel's domestic computer chip manufacturing with new projects including the Ohio plant, and was supposed to be dispersed over time. A deal with the government would not necessarily mean significantly more cash, but it could mean the company gets hold of it faster. Trump announced a new 100% tariff on semiconductor imports earlier in August, but included an enormous caveat that could spare tech firms like Intel. U.S. companies that have planned a domestic spending spree in the country are likely to avoid the sizable import tax. Intel has stated it will pour $100 billion in new U.S. corporate spending over the next five years, a move it had announced before the 2024 election. Intel and U.S. government did not immediately respond to Quartz's requests for comment.
