Canada's first LNG plant expected to start up soon in Kitimat, B.C.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto
Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto originally appeared on TheStreet. On Aug. 7, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at what the administration characterizes as the ideological "debanking" of crypto individuals and organizations from U.S. banks. The order explicitly instructs federal banking regulators to eliminate 'reputational risk' as a basis for scrutinizing or severing relationships with customers. The White House argued that this vague term — often used by the Federal Reserve and FDIC — has been weaponized to cut off crypto firms from the U.S. financial system. 'The digital assets industry has also been the target of unfair debanking initiatives,' the White House said in a fact sheet. 'These practices erode public trust in banking institutions and regulators, harm livelihoods, freeze payrolls, and impose significant financial burdens on law-abiding Americans.'Trump's move directly targets what the crypto industry has long described as 'Operation Choke Point 2.0' — a term popularized by Castle Island Ventures co-founder Nic Carter in 2023 to describe an alleged backdoor campaign by regulators to isolate crypto businesses from the banking sector. The original Operation Choke Point was a 2013 DOJ initiative that pressured banks to de-risk from entire industries like payday lenders and firearm can't blacklist crypto The executive order mandates that federal agencies such as the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC remove 'reputational risk' considerations from their internal guidelines and training materials. The Fed previously defined reputational risk as the 'potential that negative publicity regarding an institution's business practices… will cause a decline in the customer base.' Crypto advocates say that definition allowed regulators to subtly discourage banks from servicing crypto firms without having to admit bias. The order further directs regulators to audit prior debanking incidents and provide a report detailing whether any financial institution denied services unlawfully based on ideology. Those found guilty could face sanctions, including fines and restitution. Gemini-JPMorgan dispute intensified pressure The executive order comes weeks after a public clash between crypto exchange Gemini and JPMorgan, where the bank refused to onboard the exchange. Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss accused JPMorgan of carrying out a 'modern-day Operation Choke Point,' aimed at suffocating fintech innovation. Ten exchanges reportedly sent a joint letter to President Trump shortly after the incident, urging the administration to act. The August 7 order appears to be a response. Financial institutions regulated by the Small Business Administration are also now required to review accounts previously closed on ideological grounds — and reinstate them where appropriate. Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With TX lawmakers in toe, CA Dems tie redistricting efforts to Trump opposition
Six Texas state Democrats appeared in Sacramento on Friday, backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, and said despite legal threats, they would not back down from their efforts to retaliate against Republican efforts to recarve congressional districts. In June, Trump began pressing Texas Republican leaders to consider redrawing their congressional districts to ensure the GOP retained its razor-thin House majority in the 2026 midterms. Dozens of Texas Democrats fled Austin Sunday to California, New York, Illinois and Massachusetts to break the Republicans' quorum and stop them from moving forward. In response, Texas GOP leaders have issued arrest warrants, issued the lawmakers $500 daily fines, and filed lawsuits to force them from office. 'We are running from nothing,' Texas Rep. Ann Johnson said during a press conference with Newsom, Pelosi, and other California Democrats. 'We are running to the front lines to stand with other Democrats across the state of Texas, across the state of California, across this nation, to ensure that each and every individual has the opportunity to pick, to decide that government is for the people by the people, and not the politicians selecting them.' Newsom has become the Democrats' most public champion to respond in kind by asking the legislature to approve a November special election that would ask California voters to temporarily approve new congressional boundaries. He and state leaders tied their efforts, which would move more liberal voters to five districts currently held by Republicans, to voters' growing discontent with Trump on issues like immigration enforcement, tariffs, and a $1 billion fine that his administration levied on UCLA this week, which Newsom called 'extortion.' 'That's what's at stake with this all about elevating the deeper consciousness of the line that Donald Trump continues to cross,' Newsom told reporters. 'It's not about him playing by a different set of rules. There are no rules for Donald Trump. This is a serious moment in American history.' Pelosi compared the absconding Texas Democrats to the Founding Fathers, calling them 'defenders of democracy.' 'We thank you not only for your courage, but for your patriotism,' she said. 'At the beginning of our country, Thomas Paine said, 'The times have found us.' And now the times have found us, especially our Texas delegation, to save our constitution.' Legislative Democrats overcame their initial reticence and have thrown their weight behind Newsom, who has asked that new maps be drawn for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 election cycles. If he succeeds, congressional redistricting power would revert back after 2030 to the independent Citizen Redistricting Commission. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Friday that the map would come out next week, ahead of the Aug. 22 deadline that Secretary of State Shirley Weber set for lawmakers to decide if the election will take place. The Legislature returns from summer break on Aug. 18, and is expected to immediately begin work on related legislation. The Republican effort to redraw districts in their favor has now expanded to Indiana, Missouri, and Florida, all states where redistricting power lies with Republican-held legislatures, making it likely that even if California successfully redistricts, it won't be enough to offset the GOP's gains. Newsom said few other states could act with the 'scale and scope' of California: 'It's always the right thing to do the right thing.' 'California has to be prepared to respond. It is our sacred responsibility to California, to our country, and we know that there is no bottom to Trump's dystopian plan,' said Senate President pro Tem Mike McGuire, D-Santa Rosa. 'I'm firm in my belief that if the legislature puts a redistricting initiative on the ballot, I believe the people of the Golden State will do the right thing. I trust the voters of California more than I would ever trust Trump and his lackeys in Texas.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump seeks $1-billion fine against UCLA. Newsom says 'we'll sue,' calling it extortion
Hours after the Trump administration demanded that the University of California pay a $1-billion fine to settle federal accusations of antisemitism in exchange for restoring frozen grant funding to UCLA, Gov. Gavin Newsom called the proposal "extortion" and said the state will go to court to protect the nation's premier university system. "We'll sue," Newsom said during a news conference with Texas legislators over California's effort to counter a contentious Republican redistricting plan in that state. President Trump is "trying to silence academic freedom" by "attacking one of the most important public institutions in the United States of America," Newsom said, adding that he would "stand tall and push back against that, and I believe every member of California Legislature feels the same way." Read more: UCLA should not bend 'on their knees' to Trump in grant negotiations, Newsom says The federal government on Friday said UC should pay the billion-dollar fine in installments and contribute $172 million to a fund for Jewish students and other individuals affected by alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The statute covers illegal discrimination related to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, including Jewish and Israeli identity. In addition, the Trump administration demanded sweeping campus changes encompassing protests, admissions, gender identity in sports and housing, the abolition of scholarships for racial or ethnic groups, and submission to an outside monitor over the agreement, according to four UC senior officials who have reviewed the proposal. "He has threatened us through extortion with a billion-dollar fine, unless we do his bidding," Newsom said. "We will not be complicit in this kind of attack on academic freedom on this extraordinary public institution. We are not like some of those other institutions," he said. The governor appeared to be referring to controversial and costly deals the Trump administration secured from Columbia and Brown universities over charges similar to those facing UCLA, deals Newsom criticized a day earlier in public remarks. In a statement Friday that UC was "reviewing" the terms, UC President James B. Milliken, who oversees the 10-campus system that includes UCLA, also seemed to rebuff the demand. Read more: Newsom welcomes Texas Democrats who fled to foil Trump's redistricting plan "As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians," Milliken said. "Americans across this great nation rely on the vital work of UCLA and the UC system for technologies and medical therapies that save lives, grow the U.S. economy, and protect our national security.' UC Regents Chair Janet Reilly told The Times the university was still willing to negotiate with the Trump administration but not on "unacceptable" terms. "Demand for a $1 billion payment from UCLA, coupled with conditions that contradict the university's values, is unacceptable," Reilly said, describing it as a "financial burden" that would be "catastrophic for our students, research, our patients and the people of California. "The university remains willing to engage in a constructive and good faith dialogue with the federal government but the University of California will always stand firm in protecting the integrity and values of our institution," Reilly said. A spokesperson for UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk referred The Times to Milliken's statement. Federal negotiations are being handled on a UC-wide level. UC is grappling with how to restore $584 million in frozen medical and science grant funds to UCLA. If the deal was accepted, it would be the largest settlement between a university and the Trump administration, far surpassing a $221-million agreement that Columbia University announced last month. Harvard is also reportedly considering a settlement involving a hefty fine. "We would never agree to this," said one of the UC officials who is involved in the deliberations with the Trump administration. "It is more money than was frozen at UCLA. So how does that make sense?" But another senior UC official said the figure was understandable if it resolved all federal investigations across the system, even if UC may not ultimately agree to it. The federal proposal focuses on UCLA only, not all campuses. Any payment would be a political liability for the university and state leaders in deep-blue California, where Trump's policies are highly unpopular. A billion dollars would be a financial burden for a university system that is already facing a hiring freeze, budget squeezes, deferred state funding and scattered layoffs. Read more: UC says Trump's grant suspensions at UCLA total $584 million, a 'death knell' for research UC and individual campuses are under multiple federal investigations into alleged use of race in admissions, employment discrimination against Jews, civil rights complaints from Jewish students and improper reporting of foreign donations. UCLA has faced the most charges from the government of any UC or public university, many of them tied to a 2024 pro-Palestinian encampment. The encampment, which unsuccessfully demanded the university divest from weapons companies tied to Israel's war in Gaza, was targeted in a violent overnight attack last spring and was later the subject of federal lawsuit by pro-Israel Jewish students. The students, along with a professor, accused UCLA of enabling antisemitism by not shutting down the encampment, which plaintiffs said blocked pro-Israel Jews from campus pathways. UCLA settled the suit for $6.45 million, including more than $2 million in donations to Jewish nonprofits. The Trump administration's Friday offer follows a similar playbook to agreements it reached with Columbia and Brown universities to restore federal funding and resolve allegations of civil rights violations against Jewish and Israeli students. Trump wants to remake universities, which he has called "Marxist" hotbeds of liberalism and anti-Israel sentiment. During his second term, federal agencies have suspended or canceled billions in federal medical and science grants related to gender, LGBTQ+ issues or in response to campuses it accuses of being antisemitic. The White House has also attacked campus diversity programs and admissions practices as being illegal discrimination against white and Asian Americans. University leaders have challenged the notion that cutting medical research helps protect Jewish people. "This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination," Frenk, the UCLA chancellor, said in a campus letter this week. At UCLA, Trump's demands include an end to scholarships that focus on race or ethnicity, the sharing of admissions data with the government and changes to campus protest rules. The Trump administration is also proposing that UCLA Health and the medical school cease gender-affirming care for transgender people. UC has already overhauled practices in some areas called for by the Trump administration — including a ban on protest encampments and the abolition of diversity statements in hiring. The Trump administration is also saying it wants an outside monitor to oversee the agreement. The proposal came one day after Newsom said UC should not bend "on their knees" to Trump. Newsom, a Democrat, has fashioned himself as a national anti-Trump figure and is considering a presidential run in 2028. The university system, run by Milliken — who assumed his role only last week — and the Board of Regents, is independent under the state Constitution. But the governor can exercise political sway over the regents, whose members he appoints. Newsom also holds an ex-officio seat on the board. Kaleem reported from Los Angeles and Wilner from Washington. Times staff Writer Taryn Luna in Sacramento and Seema Mehta in Los Angeles contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
