Prince Harry US visa documents released in redacted form over harassment fears
Judge Carl Nichols ordered the release of the documents after a freedom of information (FoI) request by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative US thinktank. The Heritage Foundation argued that the Duke might have concealed past illegal drug use – discussed in his memoir Spare – which should have disqualified him from obtaining a US visa.
Applicants for US visas are asked about current and past drug use and admissions can lead to applications being rejected, but immigration officers have discretion to make a final decision based on a number of factors.
The prince's visa form has not been released, with the redacted documents released on Tuesday as it was argued that there was not a strong enough public interest argument to disclose the Duke's immigration records in full.
The documents read: 'To release his exact status could subject him to reasonably foreseeable harm in the form of harassment as well as unwanted contact by the media and others.'
It continued: 'There is the potential of harm in the form of harassment if his exact [REDACTED] is revealed. Thus, there is significant privacy interests involved in the records.
'Plaintiffs have not established public interest, as defined by the FOIA, in disclosure of the records.'
'While the plaintiffs had argued the records should be disclosed to establish whether the Duke was granted preferential treatment when applying for a US visa, the speculation by plaintiffs does not point to any evidence of government misconduct,' it added.
Prince Harry admitted to using drugs in his bestselling memoir, Spare. He wrote that he had first tried cocaine at the age of 17.
'At someone's house, during a shooting weekend, I was offered a line, and I'd done a few more since. It wasn't much fun, and it didn't make me particularly happy, as it seemed to make everyone around me, but it did make me feel different, and that was the main goal. Feel. Different. I was a deeply unhappy 17-year-old boy willing to try almost anything that would alter the status quo.'
Marijuana, he wrote, was different. 'That actually really did help me.' He described smoking it at Eton, along with others, in a tiny bathroom. 'You'd take a hit or two, blow the smoke out of the window … Then we'd all head to one of our rooms and giggle ourselves sick over an episode or two of a new show. Family Guy.'
In another extract, he described, while high, looking out of the window at a fox. 'Maybe it was the weed – undoubtedly it was the weed – but I felt a piercing and powerful kinship with that fox.'
Harry has also revealed he once had a 'delightful trip' on magic mushrooms at a party at the Friends star Courteney Cox's Los Angeles house. After spotting a 'huge box of black diamond mushroom chocolates' and consuming some, he went to the bathroom and hallucinated that the pedal bin was a head. 'I stepped on the pedal and the head opened its mouth,' he wrote. 'A huge open grin. I laughed.'
Harry and his wife, Meghan, moved to California in 2020 having briefly lived in Canada at the start of the year after their decision to step down as working royals and leave the UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Katie Price's sister Sophie furiously slams neighbour as husband's van is 'targeted'
Katie Price's younger sister, Sophie, admitted she was 'really p****d off' after finding an angry note taped to the windscreen of her husband Harry's van last night Katie Price's sister, Sophie, admitted she was fuming after finding a furious note on her husband's van last night. Sophie, who works with Katie, 47, on her podcast: The Katie Price Show, said her anonymous neighbour was "taking the p**s" with the message, which warned her husband, Harry, to "park somewhere else!" Sophie shared a photo of the note, which read: "We do not appreciate you waking us all up when you park or the view of your van all day. Surely your 'Insta house' has parking? Please use it or get a permit. Thanks!" Filling in her followers on all the drama on her street, Sophie nursed a huge cup of coffee, as she explained in an Instagram Story video: "What a night! Did not expect that letter on Harry's van. Normally I would never usually say anything, but do you know when you're like: 'No, you're taking the p**s now.'" It comes after Sophie sister, Katie, responded to Peter Andre's explosive claims about the glamour icon. Addressing her neighbour directly, Sophie added: "So if you so see this, feel free to come and knock on the door and have a chat with us instead of leaving letters on our vehicles." Responding to the screenshot of the note, Sophie claimed her family have been 'victimised' since moving into the street, sharing: "Since we've lived on this road, we've had multiple attacks to our cars. They've been keyed multiple times and spray painted. It doesn't happen to anyone else on the road and it's been hard to swallow, to be honest. "We've got lovely neighbours and have made a nice life here so it's a real shame. As you know, Harry works nights and tonight, he got into his van to this [the note]. "This neighbour has never approached us about this issue and has gone straight for this aggressive approach." Claiming it was the same neighbour who Sophie says emailed Harry's boss about his parking, she continued: "We're assuming it's the same neighbour who emailed Harry's boss about his 'inappropriate parking a while back. Again, why not come round and just have a chat?" It comes after Sophie's former brother-in-law, Peter Andre, shocked fans when he released a brutal statement about his ex-wife, Katie, after 'staying silent' for almost two decades. The Mysterious Girl singer, 52, took to his Instagram Stories this week to shed light on his tumultuous relationship with Katie after she made claims about their children's 'welfare'. The singer shares Princess, 18, and Junior, 20, with the former glamour model but have been at loggerheads for years. After Katie slammed those producing Princess' debut reality series, where the teen was seen with her dad multiple times but not so much with Katie, she asked Peter to sit down to end their feud. Responding, Pete hit back: "For sixteen years, I have stayed silent in the face of repeated lies from my ex-wife and her family, out of respect for my children and loved ones, but staying silent has been incredibly frustrating. That ends today."
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Trump's nominee for Bureau of Labor Statistics was Jan 6 ‘bystander' outside Capitol, says White House
Donald Trump 's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics was a 'bystander' outside the Capitol as the Jan. 6 insurrection unfolded, according to the White House. The president on Monday nominated Dr. E.J. Antoni to lead the BLS after firing the agency's commissioner earlier this month, accusing her of manipulating jobs data. In recent days, videos have emerged of the 37-year-old economist from the right-wing Heritage Foundation think tank among a mob of Trump supporters who swarmed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Antoni is not believed to be among those who entered the building, and the video does not show him crossing barricades or demonstrating. The footage places Antoni at the Capitol about an hour after rioters tore down police barricades, as other insurrectionists poured onto its grounds. In U.S. Capitol Police surveillance video unearthed by NBC News, Antoni was spotted outside the Capitol building among a sea of supporters waving 'Stop the Steal' and 'Trump 2020' flags. In the clip, Antoni is seen walking away from the crowd on the building's west side as chants of 'USA' ring out and tear gas plumes in the background. Far-right radio host Alex Jones can be heard speaking over a megaphone. Other footage shows Antoni at the Capitol's east side, walking away from the building, according to NBC News. The video was initially released by the GOP-led House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight and archived from the social media website Parler. A White House official told NBC News Wednesday that Antoni was in Washington, D.C. for in-person meetings with his then employer, which, according to his LinkedIn profile, was the conservative think tank, the Committee to Unleash Prosperity. 'These pictures show EJ Antoni, a bystander to the events of January 6th, observing and then leaving the Capitol area,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told the broadcaster in an email statement. He added it was 'wrong and defamatory to suggest EJ engaged in anything inappropriate or illegal.' While Antoni has not been accused of any wrongdoing, more than 1,500 rioters were charged with crimes connected to the attack on the Capitol building. On his first day back in office on January 20, Trump granted clemency to almost all of the defendants. Trump announced his intentions to install Antoni as BLS commissioner after removing Erika McEntarfer, whom he accused of using 'phony' numbers in the July jobs report that showed private companies adding just 73,000 positions, below projections. Under Antoni's stewardship, Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday that the numbers released would be 'HONEST and ACCURATE.' Antoni, who will face Senate confirmation, wrote on X last week that the bureau, part of the Labor Department, needed to revise its methods to 'rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years.' However, his nomination has intensified fears among critics that Trump wants a partisan supporter at the helm of a bureau to manipulate data to support his policies. Antoni was a contributor to the group's Project 2025, a controversial blueprint document outlining many of the moves the Trump administration has taken in office.
Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
What is the point of Nicola Sturgeon's memoir?
Nicola Sturgeon's memoir Frankly, finally published today, is already looking like the most ill-advised autobiography since Prince Harry's Spare. Her attempts to denigrate her former mentor, the late Alex Salmond, have rebounded disastrously. Her teasing about her 'non-binary' sexuality sounded contrived. Her complaints of victimhood ring hollow coming from a politician who had a relatively easy ride during her time in office, not least because the metropolitan left and much of the media chose to idolise her as a Caledonian Jacinda Ardern and scourge of Boris Johnson. She even picked a pointless new fight with J.K. Rowling. In her memoir she accuses the author of having made her feel 'less safe' in 2022 at the height of the trans self-ID row by wearing a t-shirt suggesting the FM was a 'destroyer of women's rights'. Rowling is now proposing to auction a copy of Frankly defaced with her comments for the benefit of For Women Scotland. The pettiness is what really surprises. Whatever you thought about her policies, in nearly 20 years at the summit of politics – eight of them as first minister – Sturgeon was widely regarded as a class act. She was always well briefed; a gifted communicator who rarely put a foot wrong – until her adoption of radical transgender ideology. But even here, most believed she was at least sincere in her LGBT advocacy, if disastrously misguided in her conviction that men could change sex (and that a double rapist, Isla Bryson, could in any sense be called a woman). However, in the pages of her memoir and in the interviews she has given in advance of its publication, Scotland's leading living nationalist emerges as an inveterate gossip with a casual attitude to the truth and a rather tasteless inclination to defame the dead. She even boasts about trading salacious sexual tittle-tattle about Salmond with the late Queen Elizabeth II who, we learn, 'loves a bit of gossip'. This may well be true, but is too much information. But it is the distortions of historical fact that are most disturbing. Sturgeon says Alex Salmond was 'implacably opposed' to the same-sex marriage legislation passed in 2012 while he was first minister. 'Fiction' says Alex Neil, the former SNP health secretary who actually piloted the legislation through Holyrood. Salmond, he tweeted, was a firm supporter of this ground-breaking legislation. In her ITV interview, Sturgeon described her 'cold fury' that Salmond had not bothered to read the 2013 independence white paper, 'Scotland's Future', the final draft of which she had prepared with a team of researchers and civil servants. She writes: 'I knew his good intention [to read it] would not survive contact with the first glass of in-flight champagne.' She says he later phoned her inebriated from a racecourse. Shock, horror. It is true that Salmond was a betting man and wrote a newspaper column on horse racing, but the idea that the then first minister of Scotland, who had been leader of the SNP since 1990 and had taken the party of independence to its first election victory in 2007, and then its first landslide in 2011, was ignorant about SNP policy on independence is just risible. Salmond negotiated the Edinburgh Agreement with David Cameron which led to the independence referendum in the first place. What possible motive could Sturgeon have had for telling a tale that has been contradicted by legal experts such as the former SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC and the former justice secretary Kenny MacAskill, who says it is 'laughable'. Sturgeon comes across as a pedantic wannabe with surprisingly little grasp of the big picture. Indeed, in a little-noticed passage in Frankly, she reveals that she is no longer committed to the very independence project she was supposed to have been fighting for. She forecasts, approvingly, that in 20 years, Scotland, Wales and even Ireland''will join with England – enjoying the benefits of the home rule it will gain as a result – in a new British Isles confederation of nations.' That is not the sovereign, Norway-style independence the SNP has always envisaged. It sounds more like the 'devo max' that she excoriated during the 2014 independence campaign. Her assaults on Salmond are all the more tasteless because he can't respond. Nor can he rebut the claim she makes in Frankly that he may have leaked to a tabloid newspaper the story about his alleged sexual misconduct. This was rebutted for him on Sunday by the former Daily Record political editor, David Clegg, who wrote the story about the Scottish government's investigation into Salmond's alleged misconduct. Stuegeon's claim is just 'not credible', he says. Sturgeon, of course, led the Scottish government to subsequent humiliation over this botched investigation in the Court of Session in 2019. What is all this intended to achieve? Is this supposed to humanise her in the eyes of the London media circles she hopes to join? She is considering relocation to London. Nationalist luminaries have lined up to dissociate themselves. Joanna Cherry says she will set the record straight in her own book later this year. Kenny MacAskill fired both barrels at Sturgeon's integrity. 'She is without both shame and honour,' he told BBC Scotland. But what is perhaps more significant than these comments from nationalist politicians who were not exactly close allies has been the deafening silence from SNP politicians, supportive journalists and the party membership. Though, if you listen, you can just hear the squirms of embarrassment.
