logo
‘Ape,' ‘monkey' and worse: Former Chick-fil-A employee accuses coworkers of monstrous racist abuse

‘Ape,' ‘monkey' and worse: Former Chick-fil-A employee accuses coworkers of monstrous racist abuse

Independent21-05-2025
A Black employee at a Chick-fil-A franchise in Idaho says he endured more than a half-year of racist abuse from coworkers who, among other things, called him the 'n-word,' referred to him as an 'ape,' a 'monkey' and threatened to cage him like an animal, according to a harrowing discrimination lawsuit obtained by The Independent.
'Of course he works at Chick-fil-A; he's Black, so he loves chicken,' one of Thomas Wade's colleagues allegedly said as he stood by in shock.
After Wade went to higher-ups about the vile abuse, which his complaint contends also included at least one simulated 'slave whipping,' he was promptly fired. Meanwhile, management let multiple instances of sexual harassment slide because the accused happened to be the boss's son, according to Wade's complaint, which was filed March 13 in a federal court in Pocatello, Idaho.
On Tuesday, a Chick-fil-A spokesperson told The Independent, 'This matter involves a franchisee, not Chick-fil-A, Inc. Franchisees are independent operators responsible for all employment decisions in their restaurants. Chick-fil-A, Inc. is not involved in or aware of their employment matters.'
The franchisee, Lauren Mosteller, Inc. of Woodstock, Georgia, responded in court to the allegations on May 7, denying 'each and every' one of Wade's claims. Apart from calling for dismissal on a slew of technicalities, the response deemed the offending conduct 'groundless,' and 'isolated and sporadic,' and thus, 'insufficient to establish a hostile work environment.'
The lawyers representing Mosteller, Inc., listed in court papers as 'doing business as Chick-fil-A,' did not respond to requests for comment.
In an email, attorney Ryan Dustin, who is representing Wade, told The Independent, '[D]ue to the ongoing litigation, we have no comment at this time.'
A conservative fast-food chain founded in 1967 by a devout Southern Baptist who decreed all stores would be closed in Sundays, Chick-fil-A's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion webpage proudly states that its 'corporate purpose' is 'To glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us. To have a positive influence on all who come into contact with Chick-fil-A.' In 2020, the founder's son, Chick-fil-A chairman Dan Cathy – who has been extremely vocal about his opposition to marriage equality – spoke out in support of the Black community following the death of George Floyd while in police custody.
'Let's be moved to action,' Cathy wrote on his personal LinkedIn profile. 'Let's join together to build a world that reflects God's love for all of us.
At the same time, Chick-fil-A franchises in various parts of the U.S. have faced accusations of anti-Black bigotry. Last year, a Maryland man went public after a Chick-fil-A drive-thru order was labeled with the word 'monkeys,' rather than his name, Marquise. In Pennsylvania, a Chick-fil-A manager reportedly forced a Black employee to stand outside in a violent thunderstorm while calling others back into the store. Still, the mere existence of its DEI program has drawn the ire of the American right for being too 'woke.'
Wade began working as a cook on the 'back of house crew' at an Idaho Falls Chick-fil-A in December 2022, according to his complaint.
Shortly after getting hired, Wade applied to take part in Chick-fil-A's ' Leadership Development Program,' but was passed over in favor of a white male employee, the complaint states.
The next couple of months went by largely uneventfully, according to the complaint. Then, in March 2023, Wade stepped in after seeing two coworkers, one of them his supervisor's son, 'antagonizing a third employee,' the complaint goes on.
'In response to his attempts to intervene and diffuse the situation, [the son] told [Wade], 'Shut up ape, before I put you in a cage,'' the complaint continues.
When Wade replied that he would report their behavior to management, the supervisor's son called him 'monkey-looking-ass,' and warned him that 'my parents own this store,' according to the complaint. But, it maintains, when Wade told his supervisor about what had happened, the manager 'did nothing.'
The supervisor, Eric Ibarra, and his family are not named as defendants in Wade's lawsuit. Ibarra was unable to be reached for comment.
Distressed, the complaint says Wade took two days off 'to give himself some space.' When he went back to work, several other of Ibarra's relatives, who all worked at the same Chick-fil-A, 'resumed making racist comments, which occurred over the next seven months.'
In addition to them calling Wade the n-word and likening him to an ape, and a monkey, they at one point told him he was a piece of 'antique farming equipment,' in reference to slavery, according to the complaint.
On one occasion, the complaint says Wade walked in on another of Ibarra's sons whipping a colleague with a towel, after which they told Wade that 'he would know about getting whipped since he is Black.' In another instance, Wade heard one of Ibarra's three daughters say he 'look[ed] like a monkey, [and] act[ed] like a monkey,' the complaint alleges. Over the summer of 2023, Wade was subjected to a barrage of racist taunts and remarks, called a 'back of house monkey,' and was shocked to find a variation of the n-word written on the kitchen freezer, according to the complaint.
It says Wade's formal grievances continued to go nowhere. However, Ibarra's family members went on acting out with apparent impunity, the complaint asserts. In July 2023, when another one of Ibarra's sons was suspended for sexually harassing a coworker, and continued to do so upon his return, he was fired, according to the complaint. Yet, a month later, he was hired back, the complaint states.
In all, Wade made between 25 and 30 reports to Chick-fil-A management about the nonstop racism he was experiencing, according to the complaint. On October 16, 2023, Wade was terminated 'because [he] refused to tolerate and continued to report racist behavior and comments by his coworkers,' the complaint concludes.
It alleges the company 'believed it would be easier to terminate [Wade's] employment than take any action to stop the other employees' discriminatory behavior.'
This February, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued Wade a 'right to sue' letter, allowing him to initiate the legal process.
The following month, he did.
Wade's lawsuit seeks to hold Lauren Mosteller, Inc., 'doing business as Chick-fil-A,' for discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, in addition to two sections of Idaho's Human Rights Act.
He is seeking compensatory, general, statutory, and punitive damages, plus court costs and attorneys' fees. An in-court status conference is scheduled for July 7.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jenelle Evans fires back at her SON Jace, 16, after he exposed her shocking text messages
Jenelle Evans fires back at her SON Jace, 16, after he exposed her shocking text messages

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Jenelle Evans fires back at her SON Jace, 16, after he exposed her shocking text messages

Teen Mom alum Jenelle Evans pushed back after her 16-year-old son Jace publicly shared a tense text exchange amid a row she said is the result of teenage angst. The tense situation involving the MTV alum, 33, erupted Tuesday when Jace shared some of the family's dirty laundry with more than 41,100 Instagram followers. 'I am finally putting out how my mother really is,' Jace said, accompanied by a text exchange in which he complained about his living situation and called his mother Jenelle 'crazy.' The Teen Mom 2 personality welcomed Jace with ex-boyfriend Andrew Lewis in August of 2009. Jenelle is also mom to Kaiser Orion Griffith, 11, with ex-boyfriend Nathan Griffith; and daughter Ensley Jolie Eason, eight, with ex-husband David Eason. Jenelle rocketed to reality TV fame in 2010 while on the popular MTV show 16 and Pregnant during her pregnancy with Jace, then was added to the Teen Mom cast the following year. Daily Mail has reached out to Jenelle via Instagram for further comment on the story. Jace said to his mother, 'I don't need you, you don't need me and I don't understand why ur doing this just because I'm telling you the truth, ur crazy.' The 16 and Pregnant alum replied to her son in the text thread, '[You're] the one saying you're going to have my custody taken. F*** YOU.' The text also included references to Jenelle's ex-husband David Eason, as she claimed Jace lied that he had tried to strangle him. Jace said he 'never lied' and that Eason had indeed 'tried to' physically assault him. Jenelle on Tuesday posted a lengthy response via Instagram Stories, telling her 3.1 million followers that it's been challenging parenting her first-born child as he deals with health and legal issues. 'My children are my whole world,' she said. 'And everything I do is to try to protect, guide and love them. Like any parent, I set rules and boundaries ... and sometimes that isn't easy. 'Jace posting our private texts was his reaction to being rightfully disciplined and while it hurts to see those moments shared publicly, I know it comes from a place of struggle.' Jenelle said she hopes fans can empathize with the difficult family situation she finds herself in, vowing to to stand by her son. Jace called his mother Jenelle 'crazy' and 'really unstable' on Instagram Tuesday 'Navigating Jace's different [medical conditions] has not been easy but I have never stopped fighting to make sure he has the resources love and support he needs. Jenelle said: 'I will always stand by him, no matter what challenges come our way and I will continue to work on being the best mom I can be to all three of my kids.' Jenelle asked the public for 'empathy, kindness, and prayers during this time,' adding, 'not just for me, but for Jace and our family as we work through this together.' She continued: 'Recently, he's also been in trouble with the law these past few months and is having a hard time adjusting to the rules set before him. 'I've been trying to help him navigate it, but we are butting heads in the process.' Jenelle ended her emotional statement in saying, 'Please give him grace at this time ... this is hard on all of us,' adding emojis of a crying face, a broken heart and prayer hands.

US appeals court sides with medical marijuana users in challenge to gun ban
US appeals court sides with medical marijuana users in challenge to gun ban

Reuters

time5 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US appeals court sides with medical marijuana users in challenge to gun ban

Aug 20 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday that a federal law that bars illegal drug users from owning guns potentially could be deemed unconstitutional when it is applied to medical marijuana users. A three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, opens new tab that a group of Florida residents who use medical marijuana had plausibly alleged that the law as applied to them violates their right to keep and bear arms under the U.S. Constitution's 2nd Amendment. It relied on the 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen holding that gun restrictions must be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation." The Florida plaintiffs, who originally sued alongside then-Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, a Democrat, before she left office, argued that keeping guns from users of medical marijuana in states that have authorized its use is not consistent with that historical tradition. Florida legalized medical marijuana in 2016. While the drug remains illegal at the federal level, the plaintiffs noted the U.S. Department of Justice is barred under the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment from using funds to interfere with state medical marijuana programs, including to prosecute individuals. The U.S. Department of Justice argued that barring marijuana users from having guns was nonetheless consistent with a long-standing tradition of disarming convicted felons or dangerous individuals. A lower-court judge agreed. But U.S. Circuit Judge Elizabeth Branch, writing for the panel, said at most, the plaintiffs were committing a federal misdemeanor by using marijuana, had not had been convicted of a crime and not been shown at this stage in the case to pose such a danger as a result of their drug use they should be disarmed. "Accordingly, the Federal Government has failed, at the motion to dismiss stage, to establish that disarming Appellants is consistent with this Nation's history and tradition of firearm regulation," she wrote. Branch said her opinion was consistent with a decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year holding that a pot-smoking gun owner in Texas could not be constitutionally prosecuted for violating the federal ban. Her opinion was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Robert Luck, a fellow appointee of Republican President Donald Trump, and Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Gerald Tjoflat, an appointee of Republican President Gerald Ford. William Hall, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at Jones Walker, in a statement welcomed the ruling, saying it vindicated their position. "As we have argued from the beginning of this case, the 2nd Amendment does not permit the federal government to categorically deem all medical marijuana patients to be too dangerous to exercise their core constitutional rights," he said. The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment. The case is Florida Commissioner of Agriculture v. Attorney General of the United States, 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-13893. For the plaintiffs: William Hall of Jones Walker For the federal government: Steven Hazel of the Justice Department Read more: Marijuana user cannot be banned from gun ownership, US court rules Medical marijuana users challenge federal gun ban at US appeals court

Vile mommy's boy grovels in court after bodyslamming doctor over his mother's prescription
Vile mommy's boy grovels in court after bodyslamming doctor over his mother's prescription

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Vile mommy's boy grovels in court after bodyslamming doctor over his mother's prescription

A Florida man has groveled in court after bodyslamming his mom's doctor over her prescription. Ventura Pérez del Castillo, 20, was arrested last October after he assaulted his mother's doctor, Steven Silvers, 69, at a medical center in Miami Beach. Security footage captured the horrifying attack, which left Silvers unconscious in the hospital hallway. The doctor spoke in court at Castillo's sentencing hearing on Tuesday, telling the judge, 'Your Honor, I still to this day suffer from the physical assault and the mental anguish,' local NBC affiliate WTVJ reported. 'What did I do to deserve this brutal beating except care? I did nothing that could ever excuse or justify this'. Castillo issued an apology to his victim in court, telling his mother's doctor that he was sorry to him and his family for the harm he caused. 'I just hope that with time you can forgive me. Please, I am so sorry,' he added. Castillo has been in custody since his arrest last October and was sentenced to 364 days in jail. He was also ordered to serve two years of house arrest, probation, and mental health treatment. Castillo previously told police that Silvers grabbed his phone and initiated the brawl before pleading guilty. Silver's son testified in court that his father endured gruesome injuries from the attack, including facial trauma, fractures to his collar bones, a concussion, a hematoma on his face, and a brain bleed. Castillo's arrest report stated that he wanted to confront the doctor about prescribing his mother narcotics after a procedure she had in June. His mother, Carolina Perez, previously testified in court that she had trauma from drugs, which her son was aware of. She tearfully admitted that she couldn't be prescribed narcotics. Perez added that she didn't know her son was planning on confronting her doctor at the hospital. The defendant's family declined to speak to reporters outside of the courtroom, but Dr. Silvers said he was relieved the case was ending. The doctor told reporters after the sentencing hearing that he was relieved to be finished with the case Circuit Court Judge Alberto Milian presided over the case, calling the altercation a 'brutal attack on a 69-year-old man. 'For over 35 years, I have had the privilege of bringing joy to new parents and caring for women in our community,' Silvers said in a statement after his attack. 'My commitment extends beyond local boundaries, as I have actively volunteered both here and globally for over 35 years as well.' 'I continue to work because I am passionate about my patients and my profession. This situation, however, has been incredibly difficult for both me and my family.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store