Formula E Set to Sign Exclusive Long-Term Deal With FIA
Formula E is poised to extend its exclusive agreement with motorsport's global governing body, the FIA — a move that will ensure it remains the world's only fully electric championship under official sanction for decades to come.
The championship, which began in 2014, currently operates under a 25-year license. That exclusivity looks set to continue well into the future.
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem hinted at the extension during the recent British Grand Prix at Silverstone, telling reporters that the renewed agreement is 'done" and would be formally announced 'soon."
Official Confirmation Expected in London
While nothing has been confirmed on paper yet, Formula E CEO Jeff Dodds told Reuters on Friday, ahead of the Berlin double-header, that announcements can be expected at the season finale in London later this month.
'We've got quite a lot of exciting things lined up for London," Dodds said.
Formula E is set to shrink from 11 teams to 10 next season, with McLaren expected to bow out at the end of the current campaign to concentrate on endurance racing programs.
The team had been seeking new ownership to remain in the series, but Dodds confirmed the timing was too tight for a deal to materialize.
'As it stands, unless something changes — and I never say never in Formula E or motorsport — their last race would be London," he said.
Formula E enters its final season with the Gen3 car in 2025–26, before introducing the next-generation Gen4 platform in 2026–27 — a car expected to be faster and more powerful.
Rowland Eyes Title as Formula E Nears Season Climax
On the competitive front, Nissan's British driver Oliver Rowland has the chance to secure the 2024–25 championship during this weekend's double-header in Berlin.
If successful, Rowland would become the 10th different champion in Formula E's 11-season history.
(with Reuters inputs)
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Banks brace for key UK Supreme Court ruling on car finance commissions
LONDON, - The UK's Supreme Court will announce a long-awaited ruling on car finance commissions on Friday that could influence whether major banks face a multibillion-pound compensation bill. British lender Close Brothers and South Africa's FirstRand want to overturn a landmark Court of Appeal judgment which said brokers must have fully informed consent from customers in order to receive a commission from lenders. The ruling in three linked cases sent shockwaves through the 40 billion-pound a year motor finance industry and has weighed heavily on the stocks of the most exposed players, such as Close Brothers and Lloyds. Lloyds has set aside 1.15 billion pounds for potential payouts, while Banco Santander's UK arm has set aside 290 million pounds and Barclays 95 million pounds. The Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the sector, is mulling a redress scheme that analysts have warned could end up costing the banking industry tens of billions of pounds. The FCA has said it will confirm whether it will implement a redress scheme within six weeks of the Supreme Court's ruling. The Court of Appeal said in October 2024 that lenders are liable to consumers when the commission is "secret", and can be liable when disclosure of the commission is insufficient to obtain informed consent. Lawyers for the FCA argued at April's Supreme Court appeal that the Court of Appeal went "too far", boosting lenders' hopes that any hit they face may be pared back. The potential wider impact of the case was highlighted by media reports that British finance minister Rachel Reeves might legislate to prevent lenders from taking a financial hit, which in turn could hurt her attempts to boost economic growth. The Treasury did not respond to a request for comment. The Supreme Court will give its ruling after 1535 GMT on Friday, once financial markets have closed in London. The court said: "No inference should be drawn from the timing of the hand-down as to the outcome of the appeals." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
Explained: Which gene test is required for athletes to compete in women's events at World Athletics
The Sebastian Coe-led World Athletics intends to conduct the gene tests in the build-up to the Athletics World Championships that will be taking place from 13 to 21 September in Tokyo, Japan, hoping to ensure 'there is no biological glass ceiling'. read more Netherlands' Femke Bol, Great Britain's Nicole Yeargin and Jamaica's Stacy-Ann Williams run the anchor leg of the women's 4x400m relay at the 2023 Athletics World Championships in Budapest, Hungary. Reuters The participation of trans athletes in the women's division has been a contentious issue in sport, as has been that of female athletes with high levels of testosterone. Keeping that in mind, World Athletics has made it compulsory for track and field athletes aiming to take part in the female category in elite competitions to undergo a gene test from September. The Monaco-based organisation intends to conduct the tests in the build-up to the Athletics World Championships that will be taking place from 13 to 21 September in Tokyo, Japan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is really important in a sport that is permanently trying to attract more women that they enter a sport believing there is no biological glass ceiling,' said World Athletics president Sebastian Coe. 'The test to confirm biological sex is a very important step in ensuring this is the case.' What is the SRY gene test that female athletes will have to undergo? But what exactly is this gene test that track and field athletes participating in women's competitions will have to undergo a month from now? The test for the SRY gene, which is part of the Y chromosome and causes male characteristics to develop, can be done by a cheek swab or a blood test. If the athlete tests negative for the Y chromosome they are eligible to compete in the female category in world ranking competitions. The World Athletics Council has approved new regulations concerning eligibility conditions to compete in the female category for world ranking competitions. The new regulations come into effect on 1 September 2025 and will be applied to the World Athletics Championships Tokyo 25… — World Athletics (@WorldAthletics) July 30, 2025 If it is positive, they can only compete in the female category in non-world ranking competitions or in another category other than the female one. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The test will be administered by member federations. World Athletics says the test is 'extremely accurate', adding: 'The risk of false negative or positive is extremely unlikely.' The SRY test is the same one adopted by World Boxing when it brought in mandatory sex testing for all competitors this year. Coe said in a statement on Wednesday: 'We are saying, at elite level, for you to compete in the female category you have to be biologically female. 'It was always very clear to me and the World Athletics Council that gender cannot trump biology.' The sport of athletics has long considered introducing eligibility criteria for women's events, amid questions over biological advantages for transgender athletes and those with differences of sex development (DSD). Transgender women who have gone through male puberty are currently banned by World Athletics from competing in women's events, while the federation requires female DSD athletes whose bodies produce high testosterone levels to take medication to lower them in order to be eligible. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With AFP inputs
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Gus Atkinson comes roaring back at The Oval as fortune continues to smile on England
Gus Atkinson came roaring back on Thursday, finishing Day 1 at The Oval with figures of 2/31 from 19 overs – miserly almost underselling his economy rate of 1.63. However the rest of English day one success owed much more to luck than judgement, England wasteful of the gifts bestowed upon them by the cricketing gods. read more Gus Atkinson, making his first appearance of the five-match Test series against India, was the pick of the English bowlers on Day 1 at The Oval with figures of 19-7-31-2. Reuters 1 in 32, or 3.125 per cent – the odds of India losing all five tosses in this series. In the art of guessing the toss of the coin correctly, England it is fair to say, have been lucky. Perhaps never more so than on , the greenish tinge to the pitch and the miserable grey skies could not have said bowl first any more clearly if they had been screaming it from the top of their lungs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bowl first is exactly what England did and from the score at the close of play – India 204/6 – you might well imagine that they'd enjoyed a good day. In reality they simply managed to extend that luck at the toss for most of the day. Atkinson back with a bang Barely able to trouble the word count is what England did well on Day 1, but an unmistakable bright spot was the return of Gus Atkinson. After a dream introduction to Test cricket last summer, featuring bags of wickets and a Test match hundred, injury has ruled Atkinson out of all of this series so far. On Thursday he came roaring back, finishing the day with figures of 2/31 from 19 overs – miserly almost underselling his economy rate of 1.63. To cap things off he ensured another big slice of English luck was capitalised on – run-glutton Shubman Gill's decision to set off for a suicidal run ending in ignominy for the Indian captain as Atkinson threw down his stumps with Gill well short of his ground. React. Pick-up. Strike. Clinical from Gus Atkinson 👌 — England Cricket (@englandcricket) July 31, 2025 However the rest of English day one success owed much more to luck than judgement, England wasteful of the gifts – both meteorological and geological – bestowed upon them by the cricketing gods. Atkinson aside only Chris Woakes bowled with the sort of consistency expected from an international pace attack. It is unlikely that Jamie Smith will look back on this day with much fondness, time and time again sent sprawling on the damp Oval turf as his teammates sprayed the ball all over the place – the final count finishing at 16 wides and four byes by the close of play. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tongue and Overton guilty of waywardness It is difficult to split the efforts in unpredictability from Josh Tongue and Jamie Overton, both guilty of having incredibly wayward radars. The former though probably takes the prize, his first over included 11 runs conceded in wides after all, doing his best to appear like a Steve Harmison that England had bought cheaply at a dodgy market stall. To England's great fortune though there were two moments of magic in-between the dross, Sai Sudharsan and Ravindra Jadeja both victims of near-unplayable deliveries that swung away and took the outside edges of their bats – a reminder of how much trouble England could have had India in had they produced anything like a competent performance with the ball. Even more profligate and without the figure-flattering pair of wickets was Overton. His selection ahead of bowlers with longer domestic track records – like Matthew Potts and Sam Cook – had already raised a few eyebrows in the build up to this Test, he did nothing to lower them over the course of Day One. England pace-bowling all-rounder Chris Woakes left the field with his left arm in a sling, having hurt his left shoulder after putting in a dive in an attempt to prevent a boundary. AP However England's luck would run out fairly abruptly before the day was done, Woakes appearing to dislocate his shoulder as he dived to prevent a boundary in the outfield. His loss would be huge for England, reducing them to three fast bowlers – and on the evidence of the day leaving them with just one who could be trusted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The tourists will return tomorrow on 204/6, a more than respectable position given how tilted things were in England's favour, combine that with England almost certainly losing their most experienced bowler and India might decide that actually the luck was with them all along.
