
Saviour to Satan: The seeds of Iran-US hostility
Tehran, November 4, 1979. The winter air burnt with rage, a smouldering fire of angry chants and angry fists pounding the sky. 'Death to America!' roared the crowd. 'Destroy the Big Satan,' fumed Iran's spiritual leader.Amid the chaos, a tidal wave of students crashed against the iron gates of the US Embassy. Inside, a young attache, hands trembling, clutched a phone, desperately trying to reach Washington: 'They're coming over the walls,' his voice frayed.advertisementUnable to control the rising tide, the gates buckled. The mob surged forward, and a revolutionary flood engulfed the compound. For 444 days, 52 Americans would become pawns in a game of vengeance, their captivity a wound that would scar the souls of two nations, leading to almost five decades of animus.
This is a story of two friends becoming bitter foes. A tale of the US turning from the saviour to the 'Big Satan.' To understand this rupture, we return to the post-World War II era, when oil and Cold War rivalries sowed discord.1949-1952: The Oil ConspiracyDuring the second great war, Iran was an ally of the Allied powers, its sovereignty guaranteed by the English, Americans and Soviets. In the aftermath of World War II, Iran's vast oil reserves had made it a pawn in a global chess game. By 1949, the great rivals of the Cold War, pro-Western and pro-Soviet, circled like vultures, each craving control.advertisementThe young Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, sat uneasily on his Peacock Throne, his rule already scarred by violence. The battle for Iran's oil started with a winter of intrigues and betrayal.Tehran, February 5, 1949The faint echo of Pahlavi's footsteps on the ancient stones of Tehran was shattered by the sound of gunshots. Pahlavi escaped unhurt in the attempted assassination near Tehran University. According to The New York Times, the bid on the Shah's life, allegedly orchestrated by the Tudeh Party (Communists), was a stark warning: Iran was a battleground for pro-Soviet and pro-Western forces, each vying for control of its black gold.In June 1950, General Ali Razmara became Prime Minister in the midst of rising demands for wresting control of Iran's oil fields from the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), later British Petroleum, which had long siphoned wealth to British coffers. Before Razmara could act, he was silenced on March 7, 1951, when an assassin's bullet felled him in a Tehran mosque.Into the breach stepped Mohammed Mossadegh, a nationalist, known for his ascetic life and emotional outbursts. 'The Iranian people will no longer be slaves to foreign interests,' Mossadegh declared. On April 28, 1951, he nationalised AIOC, igniting the ire of the British.advertisementFriction between Mossadegh and the Shah over oil policy reached a breaking point. On July 17, 1952, Mossadegh resigned, and Ahmed Ghavam was sworn in as PM. Tehran erupted. For three days, rioting tore apart the city. Within five days, the Shah, under relentless pressure, bowed to the will of the people and reinstated Mossadegh. The nationalist leader returned, stronger than ever. The stage was set for more bloodbath, and anarchy.1953: The Sinister PlotAcross the seas, in the smoke-filled halls of Washington and London, a different plan was taking shape. MI6 agent Christopher Montague Woodhouse, a key player in the Iran saga, laid out the stakes. 'Mossadegh's nationalisation of Anglo-Iranian Oil is a direct threat to Britain's economy,' he argued. 'If he aligns with Moscow, we lose the Persian Gulf.' (All the Shah's Men: Stephen Kinzer, 2003).By March 1953, the CIA drafted a scheme to topple Mossadegh and install a government more pliable to Western interests. On April 16, a detailed study titled 'Factors Involved in the Overthrow of Mossadegh' concluded that a coup was feasible. In Nicosia, Cyprus, on May 13, CIA and British intelligence officers huddled in secret, sketching the outlines of a plot that would reshape Iran. By June 10, in Beirut, the final coup plan was reviewed, and on June 19, it was submitted to the US State Department and the British Foreign Office. (Based on a timeline published by The New York Times)advertisementCIA Director Allen Dulles approved the plan, codenamed TPAJAX, with a budget of $1 million—peanuts for a nation's fate and its vast reserves. 'We had to act,' Dulles wrote in a CIA memo, declassified in 2013, 'to secure Iran's oil and block communist inroads.' On July 1, Britain's Prime Minister gave his approval, followed by President Eisenhower on July 11. The die was cast.Operation AjaxThe plan was intricate: bribe politicians, sway clerics, organise thugs for street protests, and unleash propaganda. The CIA spent $100,000, buying 'loyalty in parliament, press, and streets,' according to one account. Newspapers, paid by the CIA, vilified Mossadegh as a Soviet stooge. Radio broadcasts, scripted by operatives, warned of godless communism. The West's propaganda machinery churned out lies and rumours, creating a facade of anarchy and anger.On July 25, Princess Ashraf, the Shah's twin sister, arrived in Tehran from France, tasked by the CIA with convincing the monarch to sign a decree dismissing Mossadegh and naming General Fazlollah Zahedi, a lifelong royalist, as premier. It came with a chilling warning from the CIA, revealed later in declassified documents: 'Should the Shah fail to go along Zahedi would be informed that the United States would be ready to go ahead without the Shah's active cooperation.'advertisementMossadegh, sensing the gathering storm, moved decisively. On August 4, he held a referendum to dissolve Parliament, consolidating power amid suspicions of British and American plotting. On August 13, the Shah, under intense CIA pressure, signed the decrees dismissing Mossadegh and appointing Zahedi.A Failed CoupTehran, August 15, 1953. Inside a CIA safehouse, Kermit Roosevelt Jr, the grandson of US President Theodore Roosevelt, and mastermind of Op Ajax, chain-smoked nervously, waiting for the radio to crackle. Disguised as a businessman in sharp linen suits, he had entered Iran a few days ago to oversee the plot to topple Mossadegh. 'We're on the edge of history,' he'd later recall, 'and it could all collapse in a heartbeat.'Colonel Nematollah Nassiri, a Shah loyalist, gripped a royal firman, ordering Mossadegh's dismissal, in his trembling hands. As his jeep halted near the PM's humble residence, a surprise was waiting. Tipped off in advance, Mossadegh had alerted his troops, who immediately arrested Nassiri. The Shah, nervous and indecisive, fled to Baghdad, leaving Tehran to burn. Zahedi also disappeared into a safehouse in the mountains on the border.advertisement'Shah Flees Iran After Move to Dismiss Mossadegh Fails,' The New York Times screamed on August 17. 'The attempt to remove the Premier was made at midnight. The 72-year-old Premier was clearly master of the situationThe Government-authorised story is that alert Army officers foiled a palace guard coup after the plotters had been betrayed by Colonel Muntaz.'But Roosevelt wasn't ready to give up. Ignoring orders to abort the mission, he shot back: 'I'm still in the game.' Within a few days, Roosevelt would roll the dice again.(Next: The Game Begins)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
Like US, will China join Iran-Israel war to support Tehran? Is its army capable of...? Will it be a shocker for...
Like US, will China join Iran-Israel war to support Tehran? Is its arm capable of…? Will it be a shocker for… The United States has recently joined the Iran-Israel war and carried out precision attacks on Iran's nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The sudden attacks by America have escalated tensions in the Middle East. The question arising is: Will China, which is the largest trading partner and oil buyer of Iran, support Tehran during this tough time? Does the People's Liberation Army (PLA) have the capability to fight a war 5,000 km away? Let us know how much military power China has: China-Iran Relations China and Iran share a good bilateral relations with each other. Both the countries have a 25-year strategic cooperation agreement (2021), covering energy, trade, infrastructure and military cooperation. Oil trade: Iran supplies about 2 million barrels of oil to China per day. This accounts 15 percent of the Beijing's oil imports. 90 percent of Iran's oil exports go to China via 'dark fleet' tankers to evade Western sanctions. Strategic Partnership: Iran is China's important partner to counter US influence in the Middle East. Military Cooperation: China has supplied missile technology, drone parts, and rocket fuel to Iran. Will China Enters Iran War? China's Military Power- The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), a massive force of 2 million active personnel and 1 million reservists equipped with advanced weaponry, presents a significant military power. However, its ability to effectively project power into the Middle East, a region 5,000 kilometers distant, warrants examination of both its capabilities and constraints. Soldiers: 9.7 lakh active soldiers. Weapons: 7,000 tanks, 35,000 armoured vehicles and 12,000 artillery pieces. Navy (PLAN) Warships: 425 ships, including 3 aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian), 72 submarines and 150 warships. Missiles: DF-21D and DF-26 'Carrier Killer' ballistic missiles, which has rage of 1800–4000 km, and can destroy naval targets. Capability: The PLAN has an increasing presence in the Indian Ocean. It has only one overseas military base (Djibouti), which is small and surrounded by Western bases. Air Force (PLAAF) Aircraft: 3,200 aircraft, including 600 stealth J-20 fighter jets, 400 J-16s and 250 bombers (H-6K). Missiles: PL-15 air-to-air missile (200 km range) and CJ-20 cruise missile. Rocket Force (PLARF) Missiles: 2000 ballistic and cruise missiles, including the DF-41 ICBM (12000 km range) and the hypersonic DF-17. Cyber and Space Forces China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) possesses sophisticated cyber warfare capabilities, including the ability to disrupt radar and communication systems. Their space-based assets, comprising approximately 400 satellites, offer surveillance and targeting support. While the PLA can provide indirect support, such as intelligence gathering, its direct combat effectiveness remains limited. Limitation: China has restricted itself from supplying advanced weapons like PL-15 missile to Iran as it increases the risk of global sanctions. Logistical Challenge: The People's Liberation Army (PLA) faces significant logistical hurdles in projecting power over long distances. Its current capabilities for maritime and air transport are insufficient to support military operations 5,000 kilometers from its bases. Online commentary suggests the PLA's effectiveness is limited to coastal regions, making it vulnerable in more distant conflicts. Economic Interests: Oil supplies from Iran is a major source of China's energy security. If Israel and US attack Iran's oil refineries, China's economy could be affected. If China joins the Iran war, a military operation 5,000 km away requires massive naval and air support, which Beijing does not have. Its military is inexperienced in foreign warfare and don't have overseas bases. China's foreign policy prioritizes non-intervention, favouring diplomatic engagement and economic assistance over military involvement in international conflicts. While possessing a formidable military, the People's Liberation Army's capabilities are primarily geared towards regional defence, limiting its potential for distant interventions like those in the Middle East. This, combined with China's non-interventionist stance and concerns about US confrontation, further restricts its propensity for direct military action abroad.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘World War 3 is near': After Putin, now Russia foreign minister warns about ‘complete global chaos'
In a stark warning to Western countries, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said that the West's disregard for the UN Charter risks plunging the world into chaos and could lead to a third world war. Quoting President Vladimir Putin, Lavrov said that if every country interprets the UN Charter as it wishes, 'this world would not be a place of peace and order would give way to 'complete chaos which could lead to World War 3 .' Lavrov conveyed Putin's statement that Russia has no intention of isolating itself from its neighbours. 'These are our neighbours,' Putin said, emphasizing the importance of regional ties. He described any talk of shared human values and a common space stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific as 'laughable,' accusing the West of cutting off Russian energy supplies to the detriment of their own populations. Highlighting the consequences of Western actions, Putin condemned the terrorist attack on the Nord Stream pipeline, which he said has cost hundreds of billions of euros and damaged the European Union's economic and social well-being. According to Putin, the EU is maintaining aggression primarily 'to keep their population in check,' while the West has repeatedly 'shown their true face.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Former Russian president on US's Iran strikes In a related development, former Russian President and current Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev claimed that several countries are now prepared to supply Iran with nuclear warheads following recent American airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. In a series of posts on X, Medvedev criticized the US strikes on sites in Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow, arguing that they failed to achieve their objectives and instead strengthened Iran's resolve. Live Events 'What have the Americans accomplished with their night-time strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran?' Medvedev asked. He asserted that 'the critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage,' and that 'enrichment of nuclear material—and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons—will continue.' Medvedev further warned, 'A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' although he did not specify which countries. He described the strikes as an unintended consequence that politically strengthened Iran's regime, stating, 'The people are rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it.' Trump's Noble peace prize aspirations He also mocked former US President Donald Trump , saying, 'Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war,' and sarcastically remarked on the possibility of Trump receiving a Nobel Peace Prize . Medvedev warned that the US is 'entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon,' while regional instability grows. 'Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking,' he wrote. Iranian FM to meet Vladimir Putin Following the strikes, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced plans to travel to Moscow for talks with President Putin. 'I'm going to Moscow this afternoon,' Araghchi told Russian media, adding he would hold 'serious consultations with the Russian president tomorrow morning.' He emphasized the close strategic partnership between Iran and Russia, saying, 'We always consult with each other and coordinate our positions.' The visit follows a phone call between Araghchi and Lavrov, during which Lavrov condemned Israel's use of force and reiterated Russia's willingness to help de-escalate the conflict. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated that Moscow remains prepared to continue efforts to resolve issues around Iran's nuclear program. The US strikes, confirmed by Trump as the first direct American military action in the Iran-Israel conflict, involved six B-2 bombers dropping 12 precision-guided bombs. US officials have reportedly assured Iran that the operation was limited in scope and not intended to pursue regime change. Despite these assurances, tensions have escalated. Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks on Israel, prompting further Israeli strikes on Iranian territory. Iran's Foreign Minister earlier warned that any US involvement in attacks against Iran would be 'very, very dangerous.'


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Why Putin's Russia can't openly support Iran after US attack on nuclear sites
After Israel's 'Operation Rising Lion'—a large-scale airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities and top military leadership—Russia offered to mediate between the two sides to de-escalate tensions. The US attack on three Iranian nuclear sites marks a direct intervention in the Israel-Iran war, pushing an already fragile West Asia deeper into crisis. Washington sees the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea axis as a major threat to its regional and global interests. Moscow's response to this rapidly evolving conflict now holds major implications for regional stability. Russia's first move: Condemnation, calls for diplomacy President Vladimir Putin held separate calls with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and US President Donald Trump. Moscow swiftly condemned the Israeli operation, citing violations of international law and the UN Charter. Putin's spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, called the strikes 'unprovoked' and warned of conflict escalating at a 'galloping' pace. Russia also blamed Israel for derailing already-stalled negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Putin reiterated that Iran's nuclear aspirations must be addressed diplomatically, and suggested Russia could help develop a peaceful programme that addresses Israel's security concerns. These remarks reflect Russia's broader geopolitical aim of positioning itself as a responsible global power and regional stabiliser, contradicting the US and Western depiction of Russia as the aggressor in Ukraine. Moscow has stood its ground to assert NATO's eastward expansion and insensitivity of the Western powers towards Russia's security concerns as the reason for the Russia-Ukraine war, which is now in its fourth year. Also read: Will Russia & China back Iran after US strikes? They're quiet, calculating allies Russia's strategic opportunity or diplomatic dilemma? Russia's reputation as a regional power in West Asia was shaken after the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2024, despite its support for his regime since 2015. The Israel-Iran conflict gave the Kremlin an opportunity to reassert itself as a key player through high-level engagement with all the actors, including Washington. This scenario brought back memories of post-9/11 cooperation, when Russia provided the US overflight and transit rights for its war in Afghanistan in 2001. But US-Russia ties today remain deeply strained, despite the personal rapport between Trump and Putin. With Iran, Russia is facing a diplomatic dilemma given their close bilateral ties. Moscow and Tehran signed a comprehensive 20-year strategic partnership treaty in January. While the agreement lacks a joint military clause akin to NATO's Article 5, Tehran might now expect tangible support from Moscow. So far, Russia hasn't committed military assistance and has only sent out strong rhetoric against Israel and the US. The Iranian leadership, under immense pressure, may view rhetorical support as insufficient, considering how it backed Russia during the Ukraine war by providing Shahed combat drones and assistive technology. Also read: Iran's Khamenei sends foreign minister to Moscow to ask Putin for more help after US strikes Nuclear speculation and regional fallout On 22 June, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev stirred controversy by claiming that several nuclear-armed states might supply Tehran with nuclear warheads. Although he did not name the countries, speculation points toward North Korea and Pakistan—not Russia. But given Russia's nuclear arsenal—estimated at 4,380 warheads as per the SIPRI 2024 report—Iran may hope for more decisive backing from Moscow. Russia's cautious stance likely stems from multiple considerations. Any military support to Iran could jeopardise Moscow's working ties with Tel Aviv and Washington. Moreover, Russia's Ukraine war has already stretched Moscow militarily and diplomatically. Escalating involvement in a West Asian war could further strain its resources and political bandwidth. The situation places Putin in a difficult position. Should Israel and the US succeed in delivering a decisive blow to Iran, it could undermine Russian credibility. On the other hand, visible hesitation to support Tehran may strain the Russia–Iran alliance, especially given Iran's past military aid to Russia. From the Kremlin's perspective, the Pentagon's involvement in the Israel–Iran conflict also raises the spectre of a regime change agenda—a scenario that evokes long-standing Russian anxieties about Western interventions. This is viewed in a similar light as NATO's expansion into what Russia considers its sphere of influence. Iran's Foreign Minister landed in Moscow on 23 June to meet Putin. While detailed outcomes might not be publicly disclosed—barring a joint statement criticising the US attack on Iran, thereby placing the region under a grave danger—it is plausible that discussions would encompass potential military aid, US threats, oil market stability, security around and access through the Caspian Sea, and shared regime change concerns. The last concern might push Moscow to come to Iran's aide. Russia's next moves, whether rhetorical, diplomatic, or material, will have profound implications for West Asian geopolitics. Indrani Talukdar is a Fellow at the Chintan Research Foundation (CRF), New Delhi. She tweets @TalukdarIndrani. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)