China's wind, solar capacity exceeds thermal power for first time, energy regulator says
*
China's wind, solar capacity tops thermal capacity for first time
*
Grid access still a challenge for renewable energy providers
*
China still commissioning high-emitting coal-fired power plants
SINGORE, - China's wind and solar power generation capacity surged to 1,482 gigawatts by the end of March, exceeding fossil fuel-based thermal power capacity for the first time in its history, the country's energy regulator said on Friday.
Though China is one of a small number of countries still commissioning new carbon-intensive coal-fired power, it has embarked on a rapid renewable power expansion programme, with new installations reaching record levels in recent years.
It set a goal to raise wind and solar capacity to 1,200 GW by 2030, and met the target six years early last year. Campaigners have urged Beijing to double the target.
Grid access remains a problem. While the share of renewable capacity in China's power mix has risen, its share of power generation has not increased accordingly, with grid firms still prioritising electricity supplied by fossil fuel plants.
The National Energy Administration said on Friday that wind and solar accounted for 22.5% of the electricity delivered to consumers in the first quarter of this year, even though they make up more than half of total installed capacity.
Researchers with the French investment group Natixis said this year that waning overseas demand for China's turbines and panels, driven in part by rising protectionism, had encouraged it to "front-load" new renewable energy capacity at home, even though its grids were not yet equipped to receive it. As a consequence, much of its wind and solar energy has been going to waste.
Though China has pledged to reduce its dependence on coal, the country started building another 99.5 GW of coal-fired power capacity in 2024. It says new coal-fired projects will provide "baseload" support for renewables, which partly rely on intermittent sources of energy.
China is the world's biggest carbon dioxide emitter, and owns the largest fleet of coal-burning power plants in the world.
It has promised to reduce coal consumption over the 2026-2030 period, and aims to bring CO2 emissions to a peak before the end of the decade.
It has also pledged to the United Nations' Paris Agreement to cut 2005 levels of carbon intensity - emissions generated per unit of GDP growth - by 65% before 2030.
It remains "badly off track" on the targets and newly commissioned coal plants could continue to "crowd out" clean energy, said Lauri Myllyvirta, senior fellow with the Asia Society Policy Institute.
"After several years of slow progress, delivering China's headline commitment under the Paris agreement will be difficult," Myllyvirta said in a report published by Dialogue Earth on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Pakistan defence minister declares Simla Agreement ‘dead', says disputes to be dealt with ‘multilaterally'
The remarks come amid heightened tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours, and following the military hostilities along the LoC and International Border last month in the wake of the launch of Operation Sindoor by India in retaliation to the 22 April Pahalgam terror attack. The minister told a private television channel Wednesday that Pakistan has reverted to the position held in 1948, when the United Nations recognised the Line of Control (LoC) as a ceasefire line rather than a de facto border. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line, following the ceasefire and resolutions,' he said. New Delhi: Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement 'a dead document', signalling a return to a multilateral approach to the Kashmir dispute, and a departure from decades of bilateral engagement with India. Pakistan no longer considers the bilateral framework with India viable and 'going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally', Asif said, citing strained relations. Asif also cast doubt on the durability of other longstanding agreements with India—'whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over.' Signed in the aftermath of the 1971 India-Pakistan war, the Simla Agreement was intended to serve as a cornerstone of peaceful dispute resolution between the two nations, committing both to resolving issues via bilateral dialogue—a principle India continues to uphold. Asif also addressed Pakistan's nuclear posture, asserting that the country remains on high alert. He said that nuclear weapons would only be considered in the event of a 'direct threat' to Pakistan's existence. Speaking about the rising regional tensions, the Pakistan defence minister warned that the threat of conflict with India remains real. 'Pakistan does not seek war, but if it is forced upon us, our response will be stronger than ever before.' He revealed that Islamabad had consulted with key regional and international stakeholders, including Gulf allies and China, and had briefed the United Kingdom and the United States on the situation. 'Some of our friends in the Arabian Gulf have talked to both sides,' he said, without naming any countries. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: Amid India's bid to fix onus for Pahalgam, Pakistan made vice-chair of UNSC counter-terrorism panel
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
G7 is no more than a relic of the past. India should focus more on G20, BRICS
It's worth remembering how the G7 began. A 'fireside chat'-turned-'Library Group' started by US treasury secretary George Shultz in 1970 to address currency turbulence bloomed into G6 five years later. On 15 November 1975, about five months after Indira Gandhi had imposed Emergency in India, leaders of six democracies — the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan — met at the Castle of Rambouillet near Paris. By keeping India out, Canada has missed a golden opportunity to reset bilateral ties and make a new beginning for peace and development. The exclusion is not only unfortunate but might prove to be a great setback for the G7's own ambitions, whether it is addressing climate change and global inequality or building cooperation with emerging economies, agendas it has taken up in the last three decades or so. Canada, which took over the G7 presidency from Japan in December 2024, has made a surprising and controversial decision: to exclude India from the upcoming G7 summit. At a time when the world's economic centre of gravity is shifting towards Asia, and when India has proven its leadership on multiple global platforms — including its recent G20 presidency — this move is not just irrational, it may be self-defeating. Today, none of the leaders from the 'Summit of the Six' — James Callaghan (UK foreign secretary), Henry Kissinger (US secretary of state), Gerald Ford (US president), Takeo Miki (Japan prime minister), Helmut Schmidt (German chancellor), Jean Sauvagnargues (French foreign minister), Valery Giscard d'Estaing (French president), and Mariano Rumor (Italian foreign minister) — are alive, and most of the countries no longer dominate the global economy. The G6 became the G7 in 1976 with Canada's inclusion, and the G8 between 1997 and 2013 with Russia onboard— until Russia's suspension after the Crimea annexation in 2014. Collectively, the group expressed concern about their respective economies, donned the mantle of the 'white man's burden' to discharge their responsibilities toward the 'Third World', and decided to meet again. Fifty years later, none of the world's problems have been solved by these countries, and except for the US, the rest are no better off than the countries of the 'poor South.' Also read: India is walking a geopolitical tightrope. It can shape New Delhi's diplomatic power G7's expanding mandate, shrinking impact Over the years, G7 summits have taken on a broad agenda: gender equality, global health, climate change, and sustainable development. In 2021, the UK-led summit committed itself to a 'green revolution' and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Germany's 2022 presidency established a 'Climate Club' to implement the Paris Agreement, and the 2023 Hiroshima summit reaffirmed commitment to phasing out fossil fuels. India participated in all these meetings, contributing immensely to the resolution and their implementation. Ironically, it was Donald Trump-led 'G1 within G7' that derailed consensus, dismissing global warming as a 'hoax.' Now, with Trump 2.0 back in the mix and India 3.0 out, can the G7's green agenda survive? Patronising rhetoric, no real support The G7's agenda of connecting with emerging economies and adopting an inclusive approach has often rung hollow. Italy included an 'African Segment' in the 2001 summit, but without serious financial commitments and steps to resolve issues of poverty and migration. African leaders left disappointed, questioning the G7's sincerity. In contrast, India, during its G20 presidency, successfully pushed for the African Union—representing 55 African countries—to become a permanent G20 member. Who, then, is more relevant and committed to inclusive global development: the G7 or the G20? The 2021 G7 summit in London also introduced the Global Minimum Tax (15 per cent), aiming to rewrite international tax rules and discourage multinational corporations from taking undue advantage of lower taxes in smaller or developing economies. This again faced serious objections, with critics arguing that the G7 had no democratic legitimacy to act as the captain of the global economy. India: From Bandung to BRICS India's global economic role didn't begin yesterday. New Delhi has emerged as the fulcrum of Asian economic development since hosting the 1947 Asian Relations Conference and leading the Bandung Conference in 1955, where the foundation of the Non-Aligned Movement was laid. Now, it has positioned itself at the centre of South-South Cooperation. The successful Indian presidency of the G20 followed by its developmental agenda with IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa) are proof of India's unique leadership position in the geo-economic dynamics of Asia and South Asia. It has also championed inclusive global governance in a way that the G7 often only gestures toward. Time to re-evaluate the relevance of G7 The economic, political, and cultural divides of the 1950s and 1960s are out of syllabus, phased out of academic discourse due to globalisation and rapid rise of 'Southern' economies. Between the 19th and the 21st century, there was a total metamorphosis that has left several centuries-old theories, perceptions and ideas redundant. The old binaries of the Cold War — East vs West, North vs South — have blurred into insignificance in the face of a new and emerging global economic order, necessitating a new approach to the contemporary history of global economic development. The G7, once seen as the anchor of global economic stability, is no more than a relic of the past today. India would do well to invest its diplomatic energy elsewhere: G20, BRICS, IBSA, and regional platforms that better reflect the world as it is, not as it was. Let the G7 gently go into oblivion — and take the outdated and irrelevant worldview it represents with it. Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
UNGA set to push for two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
The United Nations chief on Thursday urged world leaders and officials attending an upcoming UN conference on ending the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict to keep the two-state solution alive. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told reporters that the international community must not only support a solution where independent states of Palestine and Israel live side-by-side in peace but materialize the conditions to make it happen. France and Saudi Arabia are co-chairing the conference, which the U.N. General Assembly is holding from June 17 to June 20 in New York. French President Emmanuel Macron will attend and other leaders are expected, but Israel will not be there. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the creation of a Palestinian state, a position that was overwhelmingly adopted by Israel's parliament in a vote last year. We won't be taking part in a conference that doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages brutally taken by Hamas in Gaza, which along with the massacring of 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals on Oct. 7, 2023, was what triggered this conflict to begin with, Jonathan Harounoff, the Israeli Mission's international spokesperson, told The Associated Press. Netanyahu has also opposed a one-state solution, which would reduce Israel's Jewish majority with the West Bank and Gaza's Palestinian populations. Instead, he has advocated for annexing large parts of the West Bank, without including Palestinians. Guterres said the current violence makes a two-state solution all the more necessary. My message to world leaders and delegations is that it is absolutely essential to keep alive the two-state solution perspective with all the terrible things we are witnessing in Gaza and the West Bank," Guterres said. And for those that doubt about the two-state solution, I ask: What is the alternative? the secretary-general said. Is it a one-state solution in which either the Palestinians are expelled or the Palestinians will be forced to live in their land without rights? That would be totally unacceptable. At a May 23 preparatory meeting, both co-chairs called for action, not more words. Anne-Claire Legendre, Middle East adviser to Macron, said that while the international community must support efforts to end the war in Gaza and release the hostages, it must also urgently put a political solution front of mind. Manal Radwan, an adviser to Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry, said action is critical because the conference is taking place at a moment of historic urgency and unimaginable suffering in Gaza. Israel's military campaign since Oct. 7, 2023, has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The offensive has destroyed large parts of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population of roughly 2 million Palestinians. This conference must be the beginning of the end of the conflict, Radwan said. And Israel's occupation must end for peace and prosperity to prevail in the region. The co-chairs said in a document sent to U.N. members before the preparatory meeting that the primary goal of the conference is to identify actions by all relevant actors to implement the two-state solution and, more importantly, to urgently mobilize the necessary efforts and resources to achieve this aim, through concrete and timebound commitments. One of the aims at the conference is to increase the number of countries recognizing Palestine as an independent state. So far, more than 145 of the 193 U.N. member nations have done so. The Palestinians view their state as encompassing Gaza and the West Bank with east Jerusalem as the capital. Macron has said France should move toward recognizing a Palestinian state. "And therefore in the coming months we will,? he told broadcaster France-5 in April after he returned from a trip to Egypt, where he pressed for a ceasefire in Gaza. Netanyahu said in a statement after talking to Marcon on April 15 that he strongly objected to establishing a Palestinian state, saying it would be a huge reward for terrorism after the Oct. 7 attacks and would be a stronghold of Iranian terrorism minutes away from Israeli cities. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
