National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks
Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media
The establishment of the broad-based steering committee to oversee and guide the National Dialogue is expected to be finalised in the next two weeks.
The National Dialogue's first national convention at the University of SA's main campus in Pretoria on Saturday could not finalise constituting the steering committee.
Mandisa Khanyile, a member of the convention organising committee, said some formations or sectors are not yet ready to make a decision regarding who they are going to have as their steering committee nominees
'What we have decided to do is that we are going to allow a period of two weeks post this convening for those sectors to make that decision,' she said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Khanyile added that sectors should provide two or three nominees for the steering committee or one of its subcommittees. She said organisations and sectors will meet over the next two weeks and include not just people present during the national convention.
'There was a complaint that there were people who are not in this room, that we haven't had access to, this is the time to bring them into the conversation,' Khanyile explained.
She said the organising committee wanted the process to be made public.
'If you are going to, for example, have a meeting, that meeting must be available for people online who want to join so that they can see the transparency within the process,' Khanyile added.
She clarified that this is a 100% voluntary engagement. 'No one is going to get remunerated for their time. You will not be paid to do this work.
'It is going to be up to you and your organisation and your personal pocket how you fund your participation in this process,' said Khanyile, adding that involvement will be based on ability to participate without necessarily needing compensation.
The Rastafari Nation Council representing 26 organisations of Rastafarians and seven orders of the Church of His Majesty or the churches of Rastafari opposed capping the number of steering committee members at 50.
A representative of the council from Limpopo said half of the social or civil society movements present at the national convention are already speaking on behalf of the process and there is overrepresentation on their side.
'We have a National Assembly of 400 people, so it shouldn't be a problem having a steering committee as widely representative as possible than to be limiting it to a particular number,' the Rastafari council representative stated.
He explained that as long as there is broad representation and inclusivity, they will be happy with that.
The Rastafaris claim to be a significant minority of about three million in South Africa.
'We would like to humbly request that we be defined as Rastafari, not grouped with faith-based communities, not grouped with any other groupings because faith plays a smaller role within that. We are also one of the communities which are very much historically marginalised,' the representative added.
loyiso.sidimba@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Pull the plug and start dialogue over
It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans
The South African
12 hours ago
- The South African
ANC spokesperson shamed for 'overeating' at National Dialogue
eNCA news anchor Andrew Barnes has issued a public apology to ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu after he shamed her for overeating at the National Dialogue. The convention – which is open to the public – kicked off on Friday, 15 August at the University of South Africa (UNISA)'s main campus in Pretoria. It will continue for several months and will facilitate direct communication between the government and the public. In a clip that has gone viral on social media, eNCA's Andrew Barnes commented on ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu's appearance at the National Dialogue. He said during a live segment: 'I hope the ANC spokeswoman is no longer hungry. She helped herself no less than twice to the crew's sandwiches'. He added, 'Love her'. The clip left many government officials outraged over the journalist's comments. Gauteng Premier Penyaza Lesufi posted on X: 'I hope eNCA will act decisively. He will never say this to Helen Zille or AfriForum'. The president's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, added, 'This is outside of free speech and totally uncalled for.' Mahlengi Bhengu responded to being fat-shamed at the National Dialogue, tweeting: 'Self-entitled condescension at its pitiful level. Embarrassed at such a lack of class. 'The ANC Communications has a great rapport with ENCA colleagues. The sandwich Marshall cannot fathom'. Bhengu also demanded a public apology. Following the backlash, eNCA's Andrew Barnes issued a public apology via his X account. He said, 'At the time, I thought I was being cheeky and clever, but I've since been made to understand just how very deep those comments cut, not just to the ANC national spokesperson but for women across the country. '[The National Dialogue] touched on the very issues we're talking about at the national convention: race, identity, and a lack of respect. But they also cut very personally, and I never go out to intentionally hurt anyone's feelings. But I'm sorry.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
14 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Marikana Massacre: SA govt receives backlash from EFF and BOSA
JOHANNESBURG – The South African government is facing criticism for its silence on the 'Marikana Massacre' as the country remembered 34 mineworkers who were gunned down by police in 2012. Saturday marked 13 years since the incident took place at the Lonmin Platinum Mine – now known as Sibanye-Stillwater - in the North West province during a wage protest Although a commission of inquiry had been conducted, no one has faced prosecution for the tragedy to date. Several organisations and political parties honoured and commemorated the lives that were lost during the tragic incident that occurred 13 years ago - and renewed their calls for accountability. For its part, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) pointed out that many families lost fathers, brothers and sons - men who were fighting for their basic human rights and for dignity. ALSO READ: The party also criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa, a shareholder at the time at Lonmin, and the African National Congress (ANC) for failing to deliver justice. Build One SA (BOSA) also called on Ramaphosa to commemorate the massacre with a National Day, in honour of those breadwinners who were killed 13 years ago. The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) also reiterated their demands for justice. And the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) emphasised that true justice could only come through successful prosecutions.
