Freedom from gadgets
For someone who has spent most of her life working in the media, the constant news barrage took its toll on my health.
So, many years ago, I decided to spend one precious day a week without using my mobile, a digital detox for my sanity.
I deliberately shut out the world, silencing notifications from my mobile and embracing the quiet.
Twenty-five years of this practice has given me immense joy, peace and stability.
People always tell me that I look happy and younger than my age!
Going offline has also taught me patience and endurance, making me a better person, ready for any challenges that life has to offer. I continue to 'detox' to this day, especially during weekends. The irony of it - I am happiest whenever I am not touching my mobile.
Prioritising my mental health above all is the best decision I've ever made in my life.
- Nanju Francisco, 59, Filipino media specialist
2.
Living a day without the phone? Unthinkable, right?
Trust me, it is both liberating and refreshing. Ironically, I attempted this a few weeks ago and felt refreshed albeit just for a day but it was worth it. Jumped out of bed, resisted the urge to 'Wordle', instead dived into the newspaper with my cuppa. The GDN it was!
Then hopped on my bicycle for a long ride into oblivion; soaked in nature, listened to the many tunes of happy birds and got doused with a spray of water from a garden sprinkler, gone wild. Liberating! Withdrawal symptoms sans phone? Sure! Not checking it constantly for updates on social media made me calmer and Zen-like as I immersed myself in other hobbies.
As the day progressed, I got restive and called friends I had not seen in a while on my landline. Sadly, a gadget meant to connect us is losing its flavour as it slowly disconnects us from the real world and real people. No thanks to social media, the 'digital drug' that's getting us hooked.
I plan to make phone-free days a habit rather than a one-off challenge.
– Sheela Pai, 63, retired Indian banker
3.
The digital detox challenge is something I do regularly.
I often take time away from gadgets. Even on a daily basis, I have set a time limit after which phone usage is only to attend to important calls. Instead of spending hours scrolling , I love to read and write.
For news updates, I prefer to listen to the radio or read the newspaper. Going for regular evening walks with my son Parth is a must, which gives us time to connect with nature, observing the sunset and sunrise, listening to chirping birds from dawn to dusk - it uplifts me. And, I never carry the phone.
Meditating on a regular basis also helps me distract myself from screens.
I am happy, calm and relaxed when I step away from my device. I have observed that I don't crave screentime and continue to pursue my hobbies and have meaningful interactions with loved ones.
– Parul Sharma, 40, Indian homemaker and part-time teacher
4.
GDN and GulfWeekly reporter Nader Adnan also accepted the challenge! Here's what he had to say.
Going into this challenge. I avoided all screen time, except occasionally checking my phone for urgent or work-related messages.
I avoided social media in its entirety, and learned very quickly that I did not miss it.
It was refreshing going through the day without negativity or doom scrolling. Instead, I went through my camera – photography is one of my hobbies – and discovered a couple of new settings and features I've never seen before!
I like going for walks and usually do so with headphones. No screen time however meant no music, and it felt weird walking around the neighbourhood without songs in my ears. I ended up actually observing my surroundings more mindfully.
I realised that other than a couple of instances here and there, I did not really miss my phone that much, although it did feel weird paying for something in cash instead of BenefitPay!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
4 days ago
- Gulf Insider
The American Academy Of Pediatrics: Mining Children
American healthcare is currently providing us with an excellent lesson in what capitalism looks like in the absence of a moral framework. The biggest losers are America's children… The Union Profiting from Childhood Sickness The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the major professional association of North American pediatricians, has overseen the rising rates of chronic illness and medicating of American children over recent decades. With 67,000 members in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, AAP distinguished itself during Covid-19 for its strident insistence that children's faces should be covered and they should be injected with modified RNA vaccines, despite knowing from early 2020 that severe Covid-19 was very rare in healthy children. Funded by sources including Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Eli Lilly, and other pharmaceutical companies, the AAP's members are the cornerstone of the rapidly increasing pediatric pharma market in North America – by far greater than any other region. As a professional organization dedicated to ensuring income for its members, the AAP is like any similar professional association or union and acts in this manner. The loss of trust in the medical profession since 2020 is fortunately removing the misconception that AAP-like medical societies were primarily altruistic, dedicated to the welfare of others rather than their members. The recent publication of AAP priorities, developed by its membership, should reinforce this loss of trust and so, despite its unusual callousness of approach, serve ultimately to strengthen public health by exposing more clearly the motivations of those profiting from rising illness. The AAP's first stated priority is to remove parents from any authority when it comes to decisions on whether to inject their children with various substances produced commercially by its sponsors. While this should be ridiculous, it has some chance of succeeding as the ultimate beneficiaries, apart from pediatricians, are the same pharmaceutical manufacturers who heavily sponsor the election campaigns of most members of the US Congress. Of relevance, promoting or abetting chronic disease in children ensures almost certain chronic disease through adulthood. The AAP is therefore helping to set up lifelong pharmaceutical consumers. Pharma companies are purely for-profit entities, and this is exactly what their CEOs and executives are charged by their shareholders with promoting. The AAP is simply acting as a very willing enabler. The AAP considers that bodily autonomy is subservient to State-imposed requirements and that the post-World War II human rights of non-coercion and informed consent are subservient to the opinion of someone receiving money to perform an injection. Its approach coincides with the pre-War technocracy movement or medical fascism (in which a declared 'expert' decides on imposing healthcare measures rather than the patient themselves choosing it). However, before discussing bodily autonomy and coerced medicine further, it is worth commenting on the priority list of the AAP overall, as it is fascinating, coming from a group that insists publicly on prioritizing the health of children. Firstly, what is not there. Among the ten priorities of the AAP of which the elimination of parental rights or religious or cultural exemptions over vaccination of children is the highest, there is not a single mention of what are perhaps the three most prominent issues facing children today, and widely discussed publicly; increasing obesity and the epidemic of autism that the CDC heralds as of extraordinary proportions. While the AAP notes this problem elsewhere, it concentrates on identification and management rather than cause identification. Nowhere among its ten priorities is there any expression of interest in identifying and addressing the causes of rising chronic illness. The closest is a mention of lower costs for childhood insulin injections. The AAP's priority list ignores diet and reducing levels of physical activity while actively promoting medicalization, seemingly oblivious to the quite catastrophic reduction in health status of the very populations they claim to be serving. Unsurprisingly for a purely marketing organization, but inconsistent with a science-based healthcare body, the priorities include nothing regarding very obvious concerns of the impact of over 70 vaccinations, with their associated adjuvants and preservatives, now given to children by ten years of age. This number has grown from just a few 40 years ago in association with the deterioration in child health outcomes. The only interest expressed in vaccines is to remove choice from those concerned about such things, and force compliance. For a society of thinking, truth-seeking people this would be extraordinary. The justification reported from AAP President Kyle E. Yasuda, M.D., FAAP for removing any remaining personal choice regarding prophylactic medical treatment (vaccination) is 'the measles outbreaks' in North America in recent years. Jesse Hackell, MD, chair of the AAP's Committee on Pediatric Workforce, notes that they were associated with the deaths of two children, the first in 'many years.' The AAP simply states, regarding safety, that vaccines are 'safe,' a stupid claim in medicine and biology in that adverse events do occur to injected organic substances and metal salts, and they vary from person to person (if rare events occur, then 'safe' is a relative term). Associations with recent DTP injection and sudden infant death are, for example, fairly well documented. Regarding measles, it is likely that many AAP members mean well, but are genuinely misinformed regarding the impact of mass vaccination. In wealthy countries including the United States, nearly all measles mortality ceased before mass vaccination was commenced. This is not controversial – it was once stressed in medical school and is well established in national health statistics. An underlying improvement in nutrition, particularly in micronutrient deficiencies, was a likely reason. Mass vaccination then greatly reduced circulation of the measles virus, but could have only a limited impact on overall mortality. Therefore, weighing costs of vaccination (adverse events) against a very low likelihood of averting early death or disability is a real issue, and to ignore it by just reiterating 'safe and effective' is ignorant and foolish. Measles vaccination is good at stopping transmission because it is very effective at preventing infections from being established. This efficacy is significant to the argument that having many vaccinated is a public good. Nearly all vaccinated people will be protected, and at no risk from the unvaccinated. Thus, mass measles vaccination really only makes sense if it is accepted that people should not have freedom to choose over their own bodies and healthcare, or that of their children. The very low measles mortality, far lower than drowning even before mass vaccination commenced in the United States, effectively removed an argument for overriding parental rights. Unless, of course, we are also going to ban children from swimming or walking near rivers or on a beach. Lastly, regarding concerns over vaccination, many parents are uncomfortable with the role of cells harvested from induced aborted fetuses, often still alive at the time of harvesting. Again, many AAP members may believe the rhetoric that this is untrue, but nonetheless it is factual. It is how we derive cell cultures to develop many vaccines, so the DNA of these dead unborn humans can still contaminate the injection. The AAP, as an institution, officially holds that cultural and religious concerns arising from this should be overridden. So, in the end, the AAP's argument seems to come down to one of two possible drivers. Either (1) they have an ideological belief that they should simply be the authority or decision-makers on children's healthcare rather than parents (a medical-fascist approach), or (2) they see their role as promoting an extremely lucrative market for their sponsors, from which they also directly benefit, and setting children up for an entire lifetime of chronic illness and pharmaceutical consumption. It is challenging to decide which is less noble. A third possibility is also possible. Most AAP members are simply going with the flow and have not actually stopped to think through the implications of their union's policies. However, the motivation for willfully ignoring rational thought probably does come down to a mixture of money and ego, which goes back to the two potential drivers mentioned above. The AAP will almost certainly continue its path of child polypharmacy, blind adherence to protocols based on the products of their sponsors, and denigration and exclusion of the opinions of parents who recognize the stark reality of deteriorating health in North American children. Parents reading the AAP's list of priorities would be foolhardy to then entrust their children to such care. Providing that politicians retain integrity and respect freedoms that most assumed were guaranteed in the US Constitution and through basic human rights norms, the AAP will fail in its endeavors and become increasingly irrelevant to public discourse. If they get their way, we will return further toward an approach we thought we had fought wars to overcome. Fundamental rights of each human to make their own way in life, and protect and oversee their children, underpin any decent societal model. In fascist societies, such decisions are removed and taken into the hands of experts and authoritarian institutions. The people must simply comply as slaves. Medical professions and their academies have a long history of supporting such approaches, and the AAP seems increasingly determined to replicate that path. It should receive all the respect that such an indecent approach deserves. Also read: Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says
Daily Tribune
30-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
Philippine Embassy and Al Hilal Healthcare Group Launch ‘Healthy Pinoy 2025' Offering Free Health Screenings
TDT I Manama The Al Hilal Healthcare Group, in partnership with the Philippine Embassy, has launched the 'Healthy Pinoy Campaign 2025,' a monthlong initiative providing free health checkups to the Filipino community across the Kingdom. The campaign, which builds on the success of last year's program, was announced at an event attended by Her Excellency Anne Jalando-on Louis, Ambassador of the Republic of the Philippines to the Kingdom of Bahrain. She was joined by senior embassy officials, including Consul Bryan Jess T. Baguio and Labor Attaché Orville Ballitoc, as well as Al Hilal Healthcare Group CEO Dr. Sharath Chandran and Vice President Mr. Asif Mohammad. Campaign With the campaign, throughout the month of August, all Filipino nationals in Bahrain can receive free health screenings at any Al Hilal branch. The official campaign will kick off on Friday, August 1, 2025, at the Al Hilal Medical Center in Manama. The launch event will feature free blood testing from 7:30 AM, covering key health indicators such as blood sugar, total cholesterol, kidney function (creatinine), liver screening (SGPT), and uric acid. Complimentary doctor consultations will be available to evaluate the results. In conjunction with the health services, the Philippine Embassy will conduct a Consular Outreach, with representatives from the Migrant Workers Office (MWO), Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), and Social Security System (SSS) present to provide support. A special health awareness talk on preventing hypertension and diabetes will also be held from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM. Ambassador Louis expressed her gratitude for the partnership, confirming its long-term nature. Health and welfare 'For the Embassy, the health and welfare of our nationals is a top priority,' she stated. 'We want the Filipino community to know that the Healthy Pinoy Campaign will now be held every August in collaboration with Al Hilal Healthcare Group.' Dr. Sharath Chandran, CEO of Al Hilal Healthcare Group, reaffirmed his organization's commitment. 'As a leading healthcare provider in the Kingdom, Al Hilal is committed to supporting the Filipino community through continued access to quality healthcare,' he said. 'I would also like to extend my sincere appreciation to Her Excellency Ambassador Anne Jalando-on Louis for her inspiring leadership and dedication to the welfare of the Filipino people in Bahrain.'
Daily Tribune
16-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
Indian Man Dies Flying Home
TDT I Manama A 27-year-old Indian expatri- ate from Kerala tragically died on board a flight from Bah- rain to Kozhikode on Tuesday after reportedly falling ill mid- air while travelling home for medical treatment. Muhammad Afsal, a native of Punnathala in Malappuram district, had boarded the flight earlier in the day. During the journey, he experienced dis- comfort, and after landing at Calicut International Airport, he was rushed to a nearby private hospital. Despite efforts by medical staff, he was declared dead shortly after arrival. Afsal had moved to Bahrain just two months ago and was working at a cold storage facili- ty. According to sources close to the family, he had been suffer- ing from fever for several days prior to the trip and had visited a private clinic for consultation. Concerned over his health not improving, Afsal reportedly decided to return home for fur- ther medical care. It was during this journey that his condition deteriorated. The sudden passing has left his family and the local expa- triate community in deep grief. Funeral arrangements are un- der way in his hometown.
