US Democrats introduce resolution to check Trump's use of military against Iran
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation, accompanied by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Pool/File Photo
US Democrats introduce resolution to check Trump's use of military against Iran
WASHINGTON - Three Democratic lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a war powers resolution on Monday to check President Donald Trump's use of military force against Iran after U.S. strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites over the weekend.
Trump's Republican Party holds a majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate and it is unlikely any resolution restricting Trump's actions could pass both chambers.
Iran targeted a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation. The Israel-Iran war, which began on June 13 when Israel attacked its regional rival, further raised tensions in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023.
The joint statement issued late on Monday by Democratic U.S. Representatives Jim Himes, Gregory Meeks and Adam Smith came hours after Trump claimed on social media Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire.
"President Trump must not be allowed to start a war with Iran, or any country, without Congressional approval," the lawmakers said, adding that Trump ordered the strikes "without meaningful consultation or Congressional authorization."
Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers had called on Congress to rein in Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent U.S. involvement in the conflict. Many Democratic U.S. lawmakers said Trump's actions were unconstitutional and that it was Congress that had the power to declare war on foreign countries.
House Speaker Mike Johnson said earlier on Monday it was not the time to consider a war powers resolution.
Trump's allies insist he had the authority to take unilateral action against Iran to eliminate what they called a potential nuclear threat posed by Tehran.
The Democratic lawmakers said Trump's actions appeared broader.
"The president has posted on social media about regime change, undermining any claim that this was a narrowly tailored operation to eliminate a nuclear threat," the Democratic lawmakers said, referring to a Sunday post in which Trump raised the prospect of overthrowing Iran's government.
"No thoughtful deliberation nor careful planning occurred here - and serious actions demand serious debate, not presidential impulse," they added.
Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons and says its war against Iran aims to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons.
Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while Israel is not. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Netanyahu says Israel has agreed to Trump's proposal for ceasefire with Iran
FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a meeting where Trump announced nuclear talks with Iran, Washington, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt/File Photo/File Photo Netanyahu says Israel has agreed to Trump's proposal for ceasefire with Iran JERUSALEM - Israel has agreed to U.S. President Donald Trump's proposal for a ceasefire with Iran after it achieved its goal of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said in a statement on Tuesday. "Israel thanks President Trump and the United States for their support in defense and their participation in eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat," the statement said. "In light of the achievement of the operation's goals, and in full coordination with President Trump, Israel agreed to the President's proposal for a mutual ceasefire," the statement added. Trump said on Tuesday a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was now in place and asked both countries not to violate it, only hours after Iran launched waves of missiles, which Israel's ambulance service said killed at least four people. Netanyahu, who will deliver a statement later on Tuesday, also said Israel would respond forcefully to any violation of the ceasefire. Israel, joined by the United States on the weekend, has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, after alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons programme, but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to, world leaders "wouldn't be able to stop us". REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Snap Insight: Iranian response in Qatar was specifically targeted at Washington – ‘We are done'
SINGAPORE: A dizzying morning of events in the Middle East on Tuesday (Jun 24) has raised hopes that all sides involved can now claim some measure of victory and begin climbing off the escalatory ladder. Iran went first, retaliating against American strikes on three of its nuclear facilities over the weekend with a volley of seven missiles towards the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which houses United States troops. The first missiles were intercepted and destroyed over the sea as they entered Qatari airspace. Shortly after, a reported 12 Iranian missiles were fired in a second wave of attacks at the air base, according to Qatari officials. This time, 11 missiles were intercepted, while one hit the target. Iran duly claimed victory, with a spokesman for its armed forces stating that its attack was a warning to 'our enemies that the era of hit and run is over'. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said later in an X post that 'those who know the Iranian people and their history know that the Iranian nation isn't a nation that surrenders'. It was clear, however, that the Iranians telegraphed their intentions to avoid inflaming the situation: Warnings of their impending strikes came ahead of time, when Doha announced the temporary closure of its airspace, following messages from Britain's Foreign Office and the US Embassy in Qatar for their nationals to take shelter. These recommendations, made 'out of an abundance of caution', were echoed by a reassurance from Qatar's Foreign Ministry that the 'security situation… remains stable'. IRAN'S MESSAGE: NO APPETITE FOR A WIDER WAR Iran's retaliation against the US was clearly a calculated, face-saving measure designed to ensure that it was seen to respond, but with minimal damage. All but one of the Iranian missiles in the second volley of strikes were intercepted, and the one that did get through fell harmlessly. Satellite imagery also showed that planes and drones had been cleared off the Al Udeid base's tarmac before the strikes, another hint that they were pre-orchestrated. More eyebrow-raising is the fact that the aircraft and equipment from Al Udeid base were moved to Saudi Arabia – the only Gulf Arab country where air movement was business as usual. This hints that the Saudi leadership was sufficiently confident that the Kingdom would remain outside of the missile zone. Nevertheless, Tehran can now claim a political victory by having targeted the US' largest base in the region – one that is in a Gulf nation that it arguably has the closest ties with, and with which it shares the world's largest gas field. This provides cover for the fact that minimal damage was caused. The message from Tehran was clear: There is no appetite for a wider regional war. WILL THE CEASEFIRE HOLD? The US can also claim a win. President Donald Trump, in typical credit-grabbing fashion, called the Iranian attack a 'weak response' for which Washington was given 'early notice'. But he also added that the attack allowed Tehran to get the US strike 'out of their system', and followed up by extending an olive branch. In a subsequent post, Mr Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel and claimed credit for bringing peace to the two archrivals. 'An official end to the 12-day war will be saluted by the world,' he said. In doing so, he left out a key fact: Qatar, the target of Iran's retribution, reportedly helped mediate the ceasefire deal. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later signalled an openness to a truce, and state media later confirmed that a ceasefire was in place. That leaves Israel, which can also claim victory. Tel Aviv, on accepting the ceasefire proposal, said it did so after "achieving the objectives" of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat. Israel had "inflicted severe damage on the military leadership, and destroyed dozens of central Iranian government targets", said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a statement. Mr Netanyahu had said two days earlier on Jun 22 that Israel was 'very, very close' to realising its goals in the conflict. Continued strikes against other targets, including installations of state control such as the notorious Evin Prison which houses political detainees, surely allowed him to claim that all of his objectives were met. Just before the confirmation of the ceasefire deal, there were reports of both Iran and Israel exchanging fire. These can probably be put down to the proverbial 'last bursts of fire' that usually accompany ceasefire deadlines. There remain two major questions that will determine whether a lasting truce will hold. The first is whether there is sufficient pressure applied on Israel by the US to adhere to one. More importantly, it will depend on whether Washington and Tehran can come to a diplomatic agreement that ensures Iran's nuclear programme remains off the table. Reports of direct talks since last Sunday's US strikes between Mr Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and Mr Araghchi may provide optimism, but Tehran will need further assurances, having been stung twice in quick succession – first, when Israeli strikes scuttled the sixth round of nuclear talks; and second, when US attacks on nuclear facilities took place after Mr Trump himself tabled a two-week negotiating window. Now that all sides can claim victory in public – but with Iran clearly having come off second-best – there is now perhaps more optimism that cooler heads will finally prevail.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
French prime minister to meet with pension negotiators after talks fail
FILE PHOTO: French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou speaks during the questions to the government session at the National Assembly in Paris, France, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Sarah Meyssonnier/File Photo PARIS - Months-long talks between French trade unions and employers over reforms to the pension system collapsed late on Monday, prompting Prime Minister Francois Bayrou to call a meeting with both sides to find a way out of the deadlock. Negotiators were unable to reach an accord, seen as "last chance" talks, over discussions to amend an unpopular 2023 overhaul of the pension system that will gradually raise the retirement age to 64 years from 62 years. Unions wanted an agreement that would allow workers that had physically taxing jobs to retire early, and maternity leave to be better taken into account, while employers were wary of concessions that could weigh on the retirement system's fragile finances. Bayrou now faces a possible no-confidence vote from opposition lawmakers. "We know well that the difficult search for new solutions is a long road and in that long road, the next steps are often the most demanding, but they are also the most important," Bayrou said in an early-morning speech that lasted less than five minutes. He said he would meet with the negotiating parties "this morning" without elaborating. Bayrou, a centrist and long-time debt hawk, has said all options were on the table as long as any modifications ensure a pensions funding gap is plugged by the end of the decade. He called for the pensions "conclave" earlier this year in a bid to win support from lawmakers from the Socialist party to survive previous no-confidence votes. Bayrou took over from his predecessor Michel Barnier in December, after lawmakers from the far-right and far-left joined to oust him over budget cuts they said went too far and spurned their priorities. Barnier's government lasted just three months. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
