logo
JU alumnus detained in Del for March attack on education min's convoy

JU alumnus detained in Del for March attack on education min's convoy

Time of India4 days ago
1
2
Kolkata: A former student of Jadavpur University, Hindol Mazumdar, now pursuing his PhD in Spain, was detained at the Delhi airport on Wednesday due to a lookout circular issued against him for his alleged involvement in the attack on the convoy of education minister
Bratya Basu
at the JU campus in March.
The
Delhi Police
detained him at 10.30am upon his arrival.
Mazumdar was a student in pharmaceutical technology at JU and is currently pursuing a PhD at the University of Granada. He was in Spain during the attack on Basu's convoy at JU. He last visited Kolkata in Nov 2024. A senior police officer said, "Hindol, and two others, all based abroad, were involved in funding people who were part of the incident. A Kolkata Police team will leave for Delhi immediately to speak to him."
You Can Also Check:
Kolkata AQI
|
Weather in Kolkata
|
Bank Holidays in Kolkata
|
Public Holidays in Kolkata
|
Gold Rates Today in Kolkata
|
Silver Rates Today in Kolkata
Hindol's parents are both retired professors from JU. His father, Chandan Majumdar, said, "An FIR was supposedly filed against my son after the incident with Bratya Basu. Following this, a lookout notice was issued. Delhi Police informed that Hindol was arrested based on that allegation. He will then be handed over to the Kolkata Police."
Hindol had received a notice on March 16 prompting him to mail the police, saying, "Since Nov 2023, I have been living in Spain, and working towards my doctoral thesis under the EU Marie Sklodowska Curie Action Fellowship.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
On March 1, 2025, I was in Spain and, therefore, the question of my presence in Jadavpur or Kolkata on the material day does not and cannot arise at all."
The Calcutta High Court had, on March 8, questioned the police about how a minister's convoy was attacked. This had prompted the Bengal govt to upgrade Basu's security to Z category.
Mazumdar was a student in pharmaceutical technology at JU and is currently pursuing a PhD at the University of Granada. He was in Spain during the attack on Basu's convoy at JU
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protests erupt in Chennai over SC order on removal of street dogs in Delhi-NCR
Protests erupt in Chennai over SC order on removal of street dogs in Delhi-NCR

The Print

time8 hours ago

  • The Print

Protests erupt in Chennai over SC order on removal of street dogs in Delhi-NCR

Police said the demonstrations in Delhi were organised despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), formerly Section 144 of the CrPC, which is currently in force as part of security measures ahead of Independence Day. According to officials, the protests turned unruly when police attempted to disperse the demonstrators, leading to clashes at some sites. The protests in Chennai came days after similar demonstrations in the national capital. On Friday, Delhi Police registered four FIRs in connection with protests held by dog lovers without prior permission on August 11 and 12 in the New Delhi district. Chennai: Animal lovers and rights activists staged a protest in Chennai on Sunday against the Supreme Court's order directing that all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR be moved to shelters within eight weeks. 'Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law,' the Delhi Police said. One viral clip from the protests shows the Station House Officer of Tughlaq Road police station being manhandled by protesters, while another video shows a confrontation between a woman sub-inspector and a female demonstrator inside a bus. The protests followed the Supreme Court's August 11 order directing authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs. The court had ruled that captured animals should not be released back onto the streets. On Thursday, a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the directive. The bench said it would pass an interim order after hearing arguments from all sides. At the outset, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Delhi government, said there was a 'loud vocal minority' opposing the order, while a 'silent suffering majority' supported action. 'In a democracy, there is a vocal majority and one who silently suffers. We had seen videos of people eating chicken, eggs, etc., and then claiming to be animal lovers. It was an issue to be resolved. Children were dying… Sterilisation did not stop rabies; even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children,' Mehta submitted. Citing World Health Organisation data, the Solicitor General said 37 lakh dog bites were reported in 2024, with 305 rabies deaths, most among children under 15 years of age. 'Dogs do not have to be killed… they have to be separated. Parents cannot send children out to play. Nobody is an animal hater,' he added. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing an NGO, questioned whether municipal authorities had created enough shelter homes for the dogs. 'Now dogs are picked up. But the order says once they are sterilised, do not leave them out in the community,' he argued, seeking a stay on the August 11 order. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi also opposed the directive. He said, 'Dog bites exist, but there have been zero rabies deaths in Delhi this year. Of course, bites are bad, but you cannot create a horror situation like this.' The bench observed that the core problem was the failure of local bodies to implement the Animal Birth Control Rules. Justice Nath remarked, 'Rules and laws are framed by the Parliament, but they are not followed. Local authorities are not doing what they should be doing. On the one hand, humans are suffering, and on the other hand, animal lovers are here.' In its detailed order, the court stressed that the August 11 decision was not taken on a 'momentary impulse' but after two decades of authorities failing to address a matter directly affecting public safety. A separate bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Madadev noted that the issue concerns both human welfare and animal welfare. 'This is not personal,' the bench said. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also read: How Delhi is mobilising to save its street dogs — shelters, safe houses, and watch patrols

Man kills wife in Delhi's Seelampur, walks into police station to confess crime
Man kills wife in Delhi's Seelampur, walks into police station to confess crime

Hans India

time10 hours ago

  • Hans India

Man kills wife in Delhi's Seelampur, walks into police station to confess crime

In a shocking incident, a man allegedly killed his wife in Delhi's Seelampur and later walked into the police station to confess to his crime on Sunday. The person turned up at the Seelampur Police Station and informed that he had killed his wife, Delhi Police said. Acting on the information about the confession, a police team rushed to the spot and found the body of a 24-year-old woman. Crime and Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) teams processed the scene and collected evidence. The body of the deceased was sent to GTB Hospital for post-mortem examination. A case under the relevant section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has been registered. The accused has been arrested, and further investigation is in progress to ascertain the motive behind the crime, said an official. The national capital had recorded several murder cases in recent months. In August, a man allegedly killed his wife and two daughters. The accused, identified as Pradeep Kumar, was arrested last week. Pradeep killed his wife, Jayshree, and daughters over a dispute. Jayshree's brother claimed that his sister's husband was a drunkard and a gambler, due to which there was a dispute between the couple. In July, a woman and her son were murdered by her husband's employee in Delhi's Lajpat Nagar. The police said that the accused committed the crime hours after he was scolded by his employer's wife, Ruchika Sewani. To avenge the insult, he killed Sewani and her son. In another incident in July, two men stabbed each other in Delhi's Tilak Nagar area. The police said that the accused Sandeep and Arif had an argument, which later took an ugly turn. Both men stabbed each other to death. In a shocking incident in April, a 20-year-old youth was shot dead in the Seelampur area of North East Delhi. According to police sources, Sameer, a resident of the Jogis' colony in Seelampur, was attacked by unknown bike-borne shooters who fled the scene immediately after firing at him.

Protests in Chennai over Supreme Court order on relocating stray dogs in Delhi
Protests in Chennai over Supreme Court order on relocating stray dogs in Delhi

Hindustan Times

time10 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Protests in Chennai over Supreme Court order on relocating stray dogs in Delhi

Animal rights activists and dog lovers took to the streets in Chennai to stage a protest on Sunday, days after the Supreme Court ordered the stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to be moved to shelters within eight weeks. Dog lovers and activists attend a protest rally, after India's top court last week ordered authorities to relocate all stray dogs in Delhi.(REUTERS) Protests in Chennai followed similar demonstrations seen in the national capital previously. Protestors were seen holding placards that read 'Save Delhi Dogs' and 'Their Lives Matter', with pictures of stray dogs on. People taking part in the protests were also seen holding some dogs and puppies in their arms. On Saturday evening, people gathered near India Gate against the SC's order. Earlier, on Friday, Delhi Police registered four FIRs in connection with the protest held without prior permission on August 11 and 12 in New Delhi, reported ANI. According to the police, demonstrations were organised despite prohibitory orders imposed under Section 163 of BNS (formerly known as Section 144), which was in force due to the security measures ahead of Independence Day. Also read: Humane solution to street dogs: It's as simple as ABC Police officials also claimed that the protest turned unruly when police tried to disperse the demonstrators. "Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law," the Delhi Police said. Protests have been ongoing since August 11, when the Supreme Court directed authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs. The court had ruled that captured animals should not be released back onto the streets. Following this, a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the directive. The bench said it would pass an interim order after hearing arguments from all sides. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing from the side of the Delhi government, said that there is a 'loud vocal minority' opposing the order, while the 'silent suffering majority' are supporting it. He said that people eat chicken and then claim to be animal lovers. He said that children were dying and sterilisation did not stop rabies, 'even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children," Mehta added further. Meanwhile, Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the NGO, questioned whether municipal authorities had created enough shelter homes for the dogs. "Now, dogs are picked up. But the order says once they are sterilised, do not leave them out in the community," he argued, seeking a stay on the August 11 order. The bench observed that the core problem was the failure of local bodies to implement the Animal Birth Control Rules. Justice Nath remarked, "Rules and laws are framed by the Parliament, but they are not followed. Local authorities are not doing what they should be doing.' In a detailed order, the court clarifies that the August 11 decision was not taken on a "momentary impulse" but after two decades of authorities failing to address a matter directly affecting public safety.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store