CB judge questions identical wording in ATC rulings
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar observed that the wording in the verdicts of Anti-Terrorism Courts (ATCs) in Lahore and Islamabad regarding the transfer of May 9 accused to military custody was identical. This prompted Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel to remark that it seems ATC judges were weak in English.
A seven-member Constitutional Bench led by Justice Amin ud-Din Khan heard intra-court appeals challenging the trial of civilians in military court.
At the outset of the hearing, Civil Society lawyer Faisal Siddiqui argued that commanding officers had submitted requests to transfer the May 9 accused for military trial. He noted that the request began with a sentence that it was an official secret case as per initial investigation, said Faisal Siddiqui.
"This is an admission by the commanding officer that the investigation was incomplete," Siddiqui asserted. He further argued that the ATC's reasoning for transferring the accused to military custody fare absurd.
He said the ATC administrative judge issued order for handing over of accused's custody for military trials. The ATC declared the accused guilty before completion of the investigation.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked that the use of words in the verdict of Anti-Terrorism Courts Lahore and Islamabad was identical. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel added it seems the judges of Anti-Terrorism Courts were weak in English.
Faisal Siddiqui said the court can hand over the custody of the accused to military but not the administrative judge. The military can take over the custody of military officials involved in murder and other crimes from civil court under Army Act Section 59 (1).
Later, the court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Five AVLC cops held for kidnapping
Malir Cantt police raided the Anti-Vehicle Lifting Cell (AVLC) office in Khawaja Ajmer Nagri, rescuing an abductee and arresting five AVLC personnel, including a sub-inspector. Reportedly, the victim, Madad Ali, had gone missing from near his residence in Bilawal Jokhio Goth. After failing to locate him, his family registered a complaint at the police station. Then, acting on intelligence, police raided the AVLC office and recovered Madad Ali, who had been detained on the station's rooftop for three days. The arrested personnel were identified as Constables Abdul Ghaffar, Riyaz, Khalid, Naeem, and Sub-Inspector Rashid Ali. They allegedly demanded a ransom of Rs500,000 from the victim's family for his release. Another individual reportedly involved was also taken into custody. During interrogation, the officers confessed to keeping the victim in illegal detention and attempting to extort ransom money. Further investigations are ongoing.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Proscribed outfits barred from hides collection
The Punjab Home Department has imposed a ban on 84 banned outfits from collecting sacrificial animal skins by roaming neighbourhoods across the province including Rawalpindi, using social media, or through their offices and homes. A circular regarding this ban has also been issued. The detailed data and list of all these banned organisations have been shared with the police stations across the Rawalpindi district, Special Branch, Civil Defence, and intelligence agencies. A warning notice has been issued stating that any violation of the ban, including attempts to collect or encourage the collection of skins, will result in cases being registered under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA).
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
PHC seeks replies on Kurram unrest
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has sought responses from the Chief Secretary and the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) regarding a petition highlighting the deteriorating law and order situation in Kurram district. During a hearing on the petition, a bench comprising Justice Arshad Ali and Justice Waqar Ahmad was informed by the petitioner's counsel, Advocate Ali Azim Afridi, that the situation in Kurram remains tense. He stated that peace has yet to be restored in the area and that internet and mobile services are still virtually unavailable. The court noted that despite a previous order seeking a government response, no reply had been submitted. Justice Arshad Ali inquired about which parties had failed to respond. Advocate Afridi informed the court that both the Chief Secretary and the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) had not yet submitted their replies. The court gave the concerned officials 14 days to submit their responses and adjourned further proceedings on the petition. In a separate case, the PHC has issued notices to the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council and the Pakistan Bar Council in response to a petition seeking an audit of the K-P Bar Council's funds. The same bench — Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Waqar Ahmad — heard the petition. The petitioner's counsel argued that the audit should be conducted by a chartered accountant, as mandated under Section 18 of the Pakistan Bar Council Act. He also requested that copies of the audit report be provided to all practicing lawyers. The Assistant Attorney General recommended that it would be appropriate to issue notices to both bar councils. Accepting this suggestion, the court issued the notices and adjourned the hearing. Meanwhile, a special Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) has issued bailable arrest warrants for three senior officials of the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) for failing to comply with court orders. The warrants were issued by ATC Judge Muhammad Iqbal Khan after the officers — AIG CTD, SP CTD, and Inspector Iftikhar Khan — failed to appear in court during proceedings initiated under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The court noted that despite multiple notices, the three officers failed to produce records in terrorism case No 63. Their repeated non-compliance prompted the court to begin legal proceedings under Section 174 CrPC. Subsequently, bailable arrest warrants were issued, and senior police officials were directed to ensure the officers' appearance at the next hearing. The hearing has been adjourned until June 14. In a separate development, the Peshawar ATC ordered the release of a suspect allegedly linked to a banned organization. The suspect was granted bail following legal arguments presented by his counsel, Advocate Khizar Hayat Khazana. According to the prosecution, the accused, Qari Imran, was arrested by CTD during an operation and was alleged to have promoted the ideology of a proscribed outfit, encouraging others to join. After reviewing the arguments, the court approved his bail request and ordered his release.
