PHC seeks replies on Kurram unrest
During a hearing on the petition, a bench comprising Justice Arshad Ali and Justice Waqar Ahmad was informed by the petitioner's counsel, Advocate Ali Azim Afridi, that the situation in Kurram remains tense. He stated that peace has yet to be restored in the area and that internet and mobile services are still virtually unavailable.
The court noted that despite a previous order seeking a government response, no reply had been submitted. Justice Arshad Ali inquired about which parties had failed to respond. Advocate Afridi informed the court that both the Chief Secretary and the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) had not yet submitted their replies.
The court gave the concerned officials 14 days to submit their responses and adjourned further proceedings on the petition.
In a separate case, the PHC has issued notices to the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council and the Pakistan Bar Council in response to a petition seeking an audit of the K-P Bar Council's funds.
The same bench — Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Waqar Ahmad — heard the petition. The petitioner's counsel argued that the audit should be conducted by a chartered accountant, as mandated under Section 18 of the Pakistan Bar Council Act. He also requested that copies of the audit report be provided to all practicing lawyers.
The Assistant Attorney General recommended that it would be appropriate to issue notices to both bar councils. Accepting this suggestion, the court issued the notices and adjourned the hearing.
Meanwhile, a special Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) has issued bailable arrest warrants for three senior officials of the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) for failing to comply with court orders.
The warrants were issued by ATC Judge Muhammad Iqbal Khan after the officers — AIG CTD, SP CTD, and Inspector Iftikhar Khan — failed to appear in court during proceedings initiated under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
The court noted that despite multiple notices, the three officers failed to produce records in terrorism case No 63. Their repeated non-compliance prompted the court to begin legal proceedings under Section 174 CrPC. Subsequently, bailable arrest warrants were issued, and senior police officials were directed to ensure the officers' appearance at the next hearing.
The hearing has been adjourned until June 14.
In a separate development, the Peshawar ATC ordered the release of a suspect allegedly linked to a banned organization. The suspect was granted bail following legal arguments presented by his counsel, Advocate Khizar Hayat Khazana.
According to the prosecution, the accused, Qari Imran, was arrested by CTD during an operation and was alleged to have promoted the ideology of a proscribed outfit, encouraging others to join. After reviewing the arguments, the court approved his bail request and ordered his release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Justice system's credibility rests in fairness of decisions and timeliness: SC
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court declared that a justice system's credibility rests not only in the fairness of its decisions but also in the timeliness with which those decisions are rendered. A two-judge bench comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ayesha A Malik stated the courts must evolve into engines of timely, transparent, and citizen-focused justice. This relates to auction of an immovable property carried out by a bank in execution of a money decree dated 26.04.2010. The auction took place in 2011. The petitioner promptly raised objections the same year, which were dismissed. He then filed an appeal before the Peshawar High Court (PHC), which remained pending for 10 years, and ultimately decision was delivered in 2021. The case then reached the Supreme Court in 2022 and was taken up in 2025. The glaring aspect of the case is that after 14 years since the auction and due notice, neither the petitioner nor any authorised representative appeared before the apex court to pursue the petition. The bench, however, dismissed the petition on merits as well as for non-prosecution, and directed the SC office to dispatch a copy of this order to the parties for information and record. The judgment noted that in this case the appeal of the petitioner kept pending before the High Court for 10 years. 'It is beyond cavil that delay in adjudicating cases by the courts at any tier of the justice system corrodes public confidence in the judiciary, undermines the rule of law, and disproportionately harms the weak and vulnerable who cannot afford the cost of prolonged litigation. Delay in adjudication carries severe macroeconomic and societal consequences: it deters investment, renders contracts illusory, and weakens the institutional legitimacy of the judiciary.' The judgment said that the issue of delay is not merely administrative, it is constitutional. The right to access to justice is guaranteed by Articles 4, 9 and 10A of 1973 Constitution. It encompasses within it the right to a fair and timely trial. Delay that renders a remedy ineffective; or a right illusory amount to a denial of due process. Justice, to be real, must be both just and timely. The judgment highlighted that over 2.2 million cases are currently pending before courts across Pakistan, including approximately 55,941 cases before this Court alone, in spite of enhancing the number of judges at the Court. These figures are not abstract; they represent disputes suspended in time. Delay in adjudication is not merely a by-product of docket congestion or branch-level inefficiencies; it is a deeper, structural challenge of judicial governance. The court, as a matter of institutional policy and constitutional responsibility, must urgently transition toward a modern, responsive, and intelligent case management framework. Such a system must, at a minimum, ensure: the early fixation of cases on a non-discriminatory basis; the elimination of 'queue-jumping' and preferential scheduling; the prioritisation of matters involving constitutional, economic, or national importance without compromising the timely resolution of individual claims; the implementation of age-tracking protocols to automatically identify dormant cases; and the judicious use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to assist in scheduling and triage while preserving the sanctity of judicial discretion. Judicial systems across the world have recognised that delay is not an intractable inevitability but a solvable institutional challenge. Countries such as Singapore, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Estonia, Canada, China, Denmark, and Australia have undertaken comprehensive reforms combining technology, structural innovation, and procedural discipline to reduce backlog and enhance judicial efficiency. Through tools such as e-filing, real-time dashboards, automated scheduling, and transparent digital oversight, these jurisdictions have moved from being passive custodians of dockets to active managers of justice delivery. The judgment said these international experiences underscore a basic truth: delays in justice are not inevitable; they are a product of institutional design, and can be remedied with vision, planning, and resolve. The judiciary of Pakistan must draw upon these global lessons and commit to transformative reform that integrates technological innovation, administrative restructuring, and disciplined case management. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Convicts can't travel abroad, PHC tells Shibli
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday dismissed a petition by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Senator Shibli Faraz against the placement of his name on the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL), ruling that a convicted person cannot be permitted to travel abroad. A two-member bench, comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal, heard the matter. Faraz's counsel, Bashir Khan Wazir, informed the court that while his client's name had been removed from the Exit Control List (ECL), it was subsequently placed on the PNIL. He acknowledged that the petition had been filed before his client's conviction, which had altered the circumstances. Justice Syed Arshad Ali observed that Faraz now had only two legal options, to serve his sentence in jail or seek bail from the court. "We cannot turn a blind eye. How can we allow a convicted person to travel abroad?" the judge remarked. The government counsel submitted a report confirming that Faraz's name had been moved from the ECL to the PNIL. The defense stated that Faraz intended to surrender before the court and requested disposal of the petition. The bench accepted the request and closed the case. Bail extensions for PTI leaders In separate proceedings, the PHC extended the protective bail of PTI Peshawar Region President and MNA Atif Khan, MNA Shahid Khattak, and Senator Mishaal Azam until September 2, barring authorities from arresting them in any registered case. The court also directed the federal government to provide complete details of all cases filed against them. Hearing petitions filed by the three leaders and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Minister Meena Khan, the same bench was told by their counsel that numerous cases had been lodged against them without providing specifics. The Assistant Attorney General admitted the government's report was still pending and assured the court it would be submitted at the next hearing. In Meena Khan's case, the Assistant Deputy Attorney General revealed that three cases were registered against him in Islamabad, with no pending inquiries at NAB or FIA. The court disposed of his petition, advising him to approach the relevant trial courts. Azam Swati moves contempt petition Meanwhile, PTI Senator Azam Swati once again faced a travel ban when stopped at Peshawar Airport. He filed a contempt of court petition through Advocate Ali Azeem against the federal government, FIA, and other authorities, alleging violation of court orders that had directed the removal of his name from all stop-lists. Swati contended that despite the PHC's recent acceptance of his plea to remove his name from the ECL and Passport Control List (PCL), it was added to the PNIL in defiance of the
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Five private members' bills passed, 16 new introduced in ongoing NA session
ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly on Tuesday passed five private members' bills and introduced 16 new bills during its latest on-going session. The Lower House passed five bills: the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025; the National Institute of Health (Re-organization) (Amendment) Bill, 2025; the Acid and Burn Crime Bill, 2024; the Reservation of Special Seats for Deserving Persons in Universities Bill, 2024; and the Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Bill, 2025. According to the statement of objects and reasons for the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025, 'Bar Councils play a pivotal role in upholding constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, and the independence of the judiciary. Therefore, it is deemed judicious to introduce a robust mechanism and transparent criteria for becoming office holders of Bar Councils. These amendments aim to ensure that candidates possess the requisite expertise and experience to fulfil these critical responsibilities effectively. Furthermore, the amendment allocates seats for the newly merged districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, as prescribed in the group of districts listed in the Schedule under sub-section (2)(b) of section 5 of the Act.' According to objects and reasons of another The Acid and Burn Crime Bill 2024, 'acid throwing and burn crimes are increasing year by year. Hundreds of women and children fall victim to this horrendous crime, with no possibility to seek justice and support. Due to the socioeconomic circumstances pertaining to victim, the fear and stigma they are facing as well as the highly complex nature of acid and burn injuries, a specific and comprehensive legislation is needed. This will result in perpetrators facing effective deterrent, victims accessing and obtaining justice, availing free relevant medical and psycho-social rehabilitation services.' The Reservation of Special Seats for Deserving Persons in Universities Bill, 2024 of Pakistan People's Party (PPP) described that the universities shall reserve at least 15 percent seats for poor students of undergraduate and postgraduate on merit base. The universities shall ensure the students enrolled against the special seats shall fulfil one of criteria; (a) financial need, (b) social or ethnic background, (c) disability status, (d) academic merit, where applicable and (e) other criteria as determined by the university's admission policy. According to objects and reasons of Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Bill, 2025, 'the proposed amendment aims to remove outdated terminology and align the language of the Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980.' The bills which were included the Islamabad Capital Territory Food Fortification Bill, 2025, the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill,2025) (Section 498D and Schedule II), the Public Interest Disclosures (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Articles 1, 51, 59, 106, 154, 175A, 198 and 218), the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Section 498D and Schedule II), the Elections (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Articles 140A and 160A), the Guardians and Wards (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Prevention of Obscenity and Indecency in Digital Media Bill, 2025, the Allied Institute, Multan Bill, 2025, the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the National Database and Registration Authority (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Islamabad Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Bill, 2025, the Multi-Vendor Electricity Distribution Bill, 2025 and the Toll Plaza Rationalization and Equity Bill, 2025. The bills were introduced by Shaista Pervaiz, Shazia Marri, Dr Sharmila Faruqui, Muhammad Riaz Fatyana, Sahibzada Sibghatullah, Awais Haider Jakhar, Nosheen Iftikhar, Shahida Rehmani, Khawaja Izharul Hassan, Sohail Sultan, Sehar Kamran, and Syed Abrar Ali Shah in the House. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
