West Northamptonshire Council failed homeless man for second time
A council has been ordered to pay £750 to a homeless man and told to make service improvements after it failed to provide him with emergency accommodation for a second time.West Northamptonshire Council apologised for refusing the man's homelessness request and for any distress caused.The individual, referred to as Mr X, had also complained that the Conservative-controlled authority repeated failures from a previous incident in 2023, when he was forced to sleep in his car for a fortnight after he said his mother had assaulted him.The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) said the council had "further compounded" the stress the man was under.
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the man had again approached the authority for homelessness assistance in August 2024 after he was forced to return to the same place where he had experienced domestic abuse.He told West Northamptonshire Council he had returned to sleeping in his car and had tried to take his life several times.In response, the council recommended he contact his landlord to ask to move into his tenancy, which was due to start in September, early. It said it recognised he was temporarily homeless, but that Mr X did not meet the priority need criteria for temporary accommodation.
'Significant fault'
The LGSCO report said: "The ombudsman has already found significant fault with this council for its handling of Mr X's case when he previously fled domestic abuse."It said the council "should have considered his approach as a homelessness application, not a request for advice" and "the council's actions amount to a fault".The investigator added that the council's actions and improvements promised after the 2023 incident had not addressed "the underlying issue" of failing to properly identify and assess homelessness applications.The watchdog asked the council to provide evidence that it has given its staff further training, told it to circulate the investigation and apologised to the individual for their faults.West Northamptonshire Council said it was "committed to learning from this [case]" and had "begun taking steps to implement the ombudsman's proposed actions, including further training to our housing and homelessness teams".
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
18 hours ago
- Daily Record
Probe into murder of 'Good Samaritan' dad could expose 'systemic failings'
"Good Samaritan" Alan Geddes was killed by Stuart Quinn after he let Quinn stay at his home a day after he was released from prison. Scottish Government ministers have been urged to widen scrutiny laws so incidents like the horrific murder of a Scots dad "will never be repeated". Alan Geddes, 56, was stabbed 40 times by Stuart Quinn in December 2019 after he had offered him a room for the night at his home in Aberdeen. The "Good Samaritan" had met Quinn, who was homeless, during an evening out. Quinn had only just been released from prison a day earlier and went to a homeless unit, only to find it closed. He was sentenced to a minimum of 18 years behind bars for murdering Alan Geddes. The Geddes family called for a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into his death, but their requests were denied despite "obvious failures" leading to Quinn's release without being given any support in the community, reports Aberdeen Live. However, North East MSP Douglas Lumsden has since called on justice secretary Angela Constance to increase the remit for statutory inquiries. Ms Constance said a review of the fatal accident system "as it relates to death in custody" commenced in January this year. During justice questions at Holyrood, Conservative MSP Mr Lumsden said: "The question was concerning deaths outside of custody settings. "In 2019 Aberdeen father and good Samaritan Alan Geddes was murdered by a man released from prison just hours earlier. "In 2023, the Mental Welfare Commission released its damning report, highlighting a list of failures in the runup to the release of Stuart Quinn and if government agencies had acted differently, the outcome could have been different. "Alan's sister Sandra continues the fight for answers and this case is crying out for a Fatal Accident Enquiry. "Would the cabinet secretary agree with me that when someone commits murder just hours after release from prison there has obviously been failures and the criteria for a statutory FAI must be widened to cover these situations?" He has previously tried to seek amendment to the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Act 2023, which would have meant offenders released from prison would have access to a post-custody outreach service. However, this was voted down. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Ms Constance responded: "I know that Mr Lumsden has been a keen advocate on behalf of his constituent, Sandra Geddes, who I had the pleasure of meeting as a result of an intervention from Mr Lumsden when the bail and release bill was going through parliament, and there was a number of changes at that time in and around through-care standards in legislation and of course, the imperative nature of good release planning. "Whilst the current review that I have commissioned is focused on deaths in custody, I should say to Mr Lumsden any wider learning points from the review will be given due consideration, in a broader context." Mr Lumsden later added: "There's clearly been systemic failings around the release of a man who went on to commit this horrific crime. "That's why I'm calling for a fatal accident inquiry so that we can learn why it all went so badly wrong, so it will never be repeated. "And so no other family have to go through what the Geddes family have had to go through."
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it feels like there are more f-words in Shetland
All of a sudden, people were phoning up the broadcaster to say there were 'lots more' f-words in the Sunday night police drama. 'So I went through the compliance forms from the previous series,' Allen said — in remarks first reported by comedy site Chortle — 'and it was the same [amount]. But it's just that this series there was a female detective, and people get worked up more about a woman swearing.' DI Jimmy Perez, played by Douglas Henshall, was replaced by Ashley Jensen as DI Ruth Calder. And that, for some viewers, made all the difference. I thought of that — though without the underlying current of misogyny — when I read a recent blog by former Labour MP Tom Harris. He was in the party for 34 years, joining under Neil Kinnock, becoming a minister under Tony Blair, and staying loyal (if sometimes uneasily) through Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband. It was Jeremy Corbyn who finally broke him. In 2017, he quietly voted Conservative. By 2019, he was publicly backing Boris Johnson — to the horror of some of his family. This year, he is back voting Labour — though it is fair to say his support is hardly enthusiastic. It's weird that this is worth noting, but it is. Parties and, to be fair, we political hacks often forget this: most voters are not like activists. They do not pick a team and stick with it no matter what. They switch. They weigh up who makes sense. They ask: Has this party fixed the thing I care about? Are they listening? Do they seem like they know what they are doing? Are they better than the other lot? While there may not have been more f-words in Shetland, one word I've heard a lot more of recently — especially in relation to Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse- is scunnered. It has been the word of the by-election campaign. How much Thursday's vote tells us about the 2026 Holyrood election is hard to say. It is a snapshot of where people in South Lanarkshire are just now. We should be careful about overanalysing. There has been relatively little scrutiny of the SNP's long record in government — something they will not be able to avoid next year. And by then, Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government will have been in office for two years, making more of their tough choices - the Chancellor's spending review next week might tell us more than anything said in this campaign, about their chances in Holyrood. All that said, if there is one clear message from the battle in South Lanarkshire, and from Tom Harris' blog and from the TV exec in Belfast, it's this: There might not be more f-words. But sometimes, it feel like there are. Right now, voters feel like there are. The party who wins next year, will be the one who convince the scunnered that they're on their side.
Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Gangland violence 'out of control' John Swinney is told
The First Minister was challenged about justice policy following the killing of two Scottish drug gang leaders in Spain. Eddie Lyons jnr and Ross Mnaghan were shot dead at a bar in Fuengirola last Saturday night. READ NEXT: Glasgow's drug consumption centre is working says health secretary At First Minister's Questions, Conservative leader, Russell Findlay, said gangs have been allowed to operate as 'the Scottish Parliament has failed to tackle organised Crime' He branded the gang leaders parasites and cowards and highlighted policing and sentencing policy that he claimed led to a failure to tackle the problem. Findlay said: 'Two Scottish drug dealers have now been shot dead in Spain.' Referring to the ongoing, decades long, feud between the rival Daniel and Lyons gangs in Glasgow, he said: 'Their gang has waged a turf war on Scotland's streets since the dawn of devolution. 'And this has mutated to include proxy groups, including the US US-sanctioned Kinahan cartel. 'These parasites grow rich by preying on societies most vulnerable, these cowards cause terror and death with guns, knives and firebombs. 'These thugs go after journalists, politicians, businessmen, police and prison officers. 'Organised Crime is out of control and communities are living in fear.' READ NEXT: 'Don't blame us': Taxis hit back in Glasgow city centre transport row Findlay said police numbers have been cut by almost 1000, Under 25 sentencing guidelines are part of the problem and proceeds of crime law failed to recover the rtrue wealth drug dealers accumulate. He said police say 'Organised crime groups' are 'coercing young and vulnerable people to carry out some of these crimes because they are under reduced risk of imprisonment.' On Proceeds of crime, he added: 'According to the Crown Office, one drug dealer made £126m but they can only find £118,000 of assets' and called for a review. The First Minister said the government and justice authorities were tackling organised crime, which he said was 'intolerable' and 'unacceptable'. He said he did not agree it was 'out of control' and said , 'Tt requires the forensic attention of our police and criminal justice authorities to tackle it and that is being undertaken within Scotland on a relentless basis.' Swinney said there were 'flaws' with Findlay's arguments. He said: 'There are a high number of organised crime participants who are currently incarcerated for a very long time in the jails of Scotland, contributing to the significant congestion that is in our prison system just now.' On sentencing, he said he could not allow the remarks to stand. He said:' It is misleading to say to the public there are no consequences for criminal activity under the age of 25. 'There are very serious consequences which involve imprisonment.' He added: 'Scottish Crime Campus is viewed across the world as one of the most innovative and successful measures of bringing together all of the intelligence gathering in one place. And he said: 'It has to be acknowledged that the criminal justice authorities have been successful in apprehending, imprisoning, interrupting and disrupting organised crime in this country. 'That will be sustained in the years to come.'
