Man arrested for murder of wife who vanished in 2017, allegedly faked birthday text to her dad
A Pennsylvania man has been arrested for allegedly killing his wife who vanished in 2017, prosecutors said.
Anna Maciejewska, a Poland native, moved to the U.S. in 1997 and married Allen Gould in 2006, according to the criminal complaint. The couple's son was 4 years old when she disappeared.
On April 11, 2017, Maciejewska, 43, was reported missing by a co-worker and a friend; the next day, Gould also reported her missing, the Chester County District Attorney's Office said Wednesday.
MORE: Mother allegedly buys ammunition, tactical gear for son's planned 'mass targeted violence' at middle school: Officials
But evidence including phone records, financial records and witness accounts point to Maciejewska stopping her normal routine on March 29, and the last time anyone saw her or heard from her was March 28, prosecutors said.
On March 30, Maciejewska's dad in Poland received a text from his daughter's phone with a birthday message in Polish that had grammatical errors, prosecutors said. "Police later determined the same message was researched via Google Translate, despite that Maciejewska spoke Polish fluently," prosecutors said in a statement.
A printout of that same Google Translate message was found in Gould's home, according to the criminal complaint.
Gould told police he last saw his wife on the morning of April 10 when she left for work, but her car's internal system showed it was never driven that day, according to the criminal complaint. Maciejewska's car was discovered in May in an apartment complex parking lot nearly 2 miles from their home, the complaint said.
When officers responded to their home for the missing persons report, they noticed Maciejewska's iPhone and iPad were on the kitchen table and her phone was "in a startup/update status, as if it had been reset," according to the criminal complaint. Gould allegedly told police his wife was updating her phone on the morning she went missing but it was taking too long to finish updating so she left it at home when she rushed out the door to work, the document said. All of her belongings were left at home besides the keys to her car, the document said.
Officers found divorce paperwork at the couple's home, the complaint said, and Maciejewska was taking a "Divorce 101" class.
Maciejewska's friend told police that Maciejewska wasn't happy with her marriage and that the couple disagreed on how to raise their son, according to the criminal complaint. Maciejewska allegedly told the friend she wanted a divorce but her husband disagreed; she also allegedly told the friend she and Gould "set a firm date to discuss a divorce," according to the criminal complaint.
A friend of Maciejewska told police that their son having dual citizenship and a Polish passport was a "point of contention" because Gould "feared he would have no parental rights" if she took the child to Poland, the complaint said.
MORE: Menendez brothers win resentencing fight: What's next for their case?
Maciejewska "visited over 150 websites pertaining to divorce, signs of emotional abuse, psychological abuse, emotional blackmail, emotional abuse, narcissistic personality disorder, domestic abuse vs. normal martial conflict, and how to divorce an emotionally abusive husband," the complaint said.
Gould allegedly told police "they had spoken about a divorce" but decided to use their townhouse "as a place to decompress rather than separate completely," according to the complaint.
After Gould reported Maciejewska missing, he allegedly "stopped helping police attempt to locate his wife, wrote a check for a criminal defense attorney, clicked on an article about strangulation" and got a second cellphone, according to the complaint.
Gould, 60, was arrested Wednesday and is being held without bail on charges including first-degree murder and tampering with physical evidence, prosecutors said. His preliminary hearing is set for May 27.
"He's been living under the specter of this for eight years," Gould's defense attorney, Evan Kelly, told ABC News. "At this point he just wants to clear his name in the court of law."
Kelly declined to comment on any details of the case.
Maciejewska's body has never been found, according to the criminal complaint.
Man arrested for murder of wife who vanished in 2017, allegedly faked birthday text to her dad originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Most Likely to Suffer Extortion Scams
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. While Gen Z might have grown up immersed in technology, they are now the number one target for extortion scammers, according to a new report. In Malwarebytes's new Mobile Scam Report, Gen Z was deemed the top extortion target, with 28 percent of the age group experiencing extortion scams. This was far higher than both Gen X and baby boomers, at 15 and 7 percent, respectively. Why It Matters Extortion scams are criminal schemes where the fraudster attempts to blackmail a victim for money or personal information. While scammers might threaten physical harm, the digital age has ushered in a new type of scammer, with many targeting younger people with threats of releasing sexually explicit photographs or videos to the world. They also may claim to be the police, requesting money or personal data if the victim wants to avoid arrest. In this photo illustration, a 13-year-old boy looks at an iPhone screen display on May 21 in Bath, England. In this photo illustration, a 13-year-old boy looks at an iPhone screen display on May 21 in Bath, To Know In 2023, the FBI reported 48,000 extortion victims, a 22 percent jump from 2022, and many of the victims are Gen Zers. Those born in the generation—from 1997 to 2012—were more likely to encounter extortion scams than older age groups. Roughly 58 percent of Gen Z and 52 percent of millennials had countered an extortion scam, whereas only 35 percent and 23 percent of Gen X and boomers had, according to the new Malwarebytes report. Gen Z was also much more likely to actually fall for the scams, with 28 percent experiencing one. Roughly 13 percent of these scams were virtual kidnapping, while another 13 percent were attributed to deepfakes. Sextortion cases made up 11 percent. "The woman asked for a small amount of money which I was reluctant to give, but she harassed me, so I decided to," one Gen Z survey respondent said. "Then she wanted to send me money to send to her friend. I accepted the money, but then alarms went off and I never sent it to her friend. I later learned about money mules. She then threatened to kill me because I had taken $1k when she only got $300. I then blocked her and called the police because I was scared." Much of the higher risk for Gen Z and millennials comes down to how they use their digital devices. By sharing personal data with apps and websites, fraudsters are able to more easily target them. "This isn't a Gen Z problem - it's a societal and political failure," Bryan Driscoll, HR consultant who specializes in generational differences, told Newsweek. "Parents, schools, tech companies, and policymakers have dropped the ball. We failed to teach boundaries, privacy, or skepticism. Instead, we taught them to post everything, trust algorithms, and chase validation in likes and follows." Roughly 90 percent of mobile users shared deep levels of personal data with apps and websites, according to the survey. And younger users were the most permissive, with 91 percent of Gen Zers and millennials saying they grant apps access to their location, camera, photo library, and/or contacts compared to 80 percent for Gen X and older. "A generation - and society - that normalizes surveillance, has a fractured sense of privacy, and is increasingly vulnerable to manipulation is doomed," Driscoll said. "If we don't build genuine protections - and it doesn't look like we're going to based on current federal policy proposals to explicitly ban any AI regulation for a decade - this will only get worse." What People Are Saying Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "There's a misconception that older Americans are most in danger when it comes to mobile scams. The reality is Gen Z finds themselves at the top of most rankings when it comes to falling for digital deception. While they may be younger and more tech savvy, Gen Z are also connected to their devices more frequently and may fall for scams based on impulse." Driscoll also told Newsweek: "I'm not surprised Gen Z is the top target. It's the logical outcome of growing up with the world at your fingertips without appropriate digital literacy or regulation to match. The platforms Gen Z has known their entire lives are designed to manipulate behavior, harvest data, and reward oversharing. We've handed them the internet with no roadmap or guardrails and then act shocked when predators, scammers, and AI exploit that vulnerability." Drew Powers, founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "When you first hear this, it may seem counterintuitive given that Gen Z has grown up with the Internet, social media, and mobile communications, but it actually makes perfect sense. Baby Boomers and Generation X can vividly recall the days before the Internet, and therefore we have a built-in distrust around most anonymous electronic communications. Gen Z on the other hand, is far more comfortable with and trusting of these platforms." What Happens Next To lower the rate of younger Americans falling for extortion scams, an increased emphasis likely needs to be on teaching literacy for younger generations. Just because they grew up with technology does not mean they are more prepared against scams, Beene said. "We need to quit assuming this group can navigate through digital waters because of their youth and experience with technology," Beene said. "If anything, the younger you are, the more you need to go through training on potential scams that could target your identity and money."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jury acquits Pensacola 20-year-old in 2023 killing of Angel Bailey
An Escambia County jury took just a few hours June 11 to acquit a Pensacola man charged with murdering 32-year-old Angel Bailey in 2023. The jury found Nathaniel Cunningham Jr. not guilty of second-degree murder at the end of a two-day trial June 10 and 11. Following Cunningham's acquittal, his attorney Greg Whibbs told the News Journal this case was a "big win" for his client as it kept Cunningham from a potential life sentence in a Florida prison. According to Willie Agee, the owner of the Mission Road home in which the incident took place, the shooting occurred after an argument about Bailey's cellphone. "Agee stated he was in his room watchin TV when Bailey and Cunningham Jr. came to his room arguing because Bailey was accusing Cunningham Jr. of stealing her iPhone," a report said. "Agee stated that he let Bailey borrow his phone so that she could call to report her phone stolen." Agee told law enforcement he heard gunshots roughly four to five minutes later. During Agee's recorded 911 call in 2023, he told the operator that he thinks his grandson "Nate" killed Bailey. In another 911 recording McGraw played during the trial, Bailey is speaking with a dispatcher about reporting her phone as stolen. During the call, Bailey begins screaming and saying, "No! Please don't shoot me." Throughout the trial, Whibbs asked questions of witnesses pertaining to the person named "Nate" from the 911 call made by Agee. Whibbs told the jury there were multiple people who use the nickname "Nate" who were at or near the Mission Road home March 25, 2023, when the shooting occurred. That coupled with the fact crime scene technicians did not find any DNA evidence or fingerprints at the scene directly linking Cunningham to the shooting seemingly led the jury to acquit the 20-year-old. Evidence presented during the trial showed that Cunningham's cellphone saved tracking data that placed him at the 2900 block of Mission Road just minutes before the shooting took place, but Whibbs argued that evidence does not prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt as that just shows a phone's location, not who is in possession of the phone. This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Nathaniel Cunningham not guilty of murdering Angel Bailey
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein guilty of sexual assault after New York retrial
Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of sexual assault in New York, after a sex crimes conviction in the state was overturned last year. A panel of seven female and five male jurors deliberated for five days in the six-week trial before unanimously voting to convict the disgraced film mogul on one of three counts. The jury found him not guilty of an additional sexual assault charge, and have yet to return a verdict on a charge of rape. The conviction is in addition to a 16-year sentence that Weinstein has yet to serve after being convicted of sex crimes in Los Angeles. The trial was based on the testimony of three women - former television production assistant Miriam Haley, actress Jessica Mann, and model Kaja Sokola. All three accused Weinstein of using his power in the entertainment industry to sexually abuse them. On Wednesday, the jury found Weinstein guilty of assaulting Ms Haley, but found him not guilty of assaulting Ms Sokola. They have yet to return a verdict on a rape charge involving Ms Mann, and plan to resume deliberations on Thursday. An appeals court overturned Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York last April, finding the 73-year-old did not receive a fair trial in 2020 because a judge allowed testimony from women who made allegations against him beyond the charges at hand. Weinstein was then indicted on new sexual assault charges in the state in September. In a statement, Weinstein's spokesperson said the trial was "fair until we got to the jury deliberations". "More than one juror had complained that other jurors had preconceived notions and are using their beliefs of Harvey's life as evidence of guilt," the spokesperson said. "We believe there are serious appellate issues and they will be explored." Jury deliberations have been plagued with tensions over the past week. This week, the foreperson accused some jurors of "attacking" other people and trying to change their minds. He said jurors were considering Weinstein's past and other allegations outside the realm of the case in making decisions. There were also allegations that one juror had threatened to fight another juror. In the end, the judge said he would give the jury an instruction about only considering the allegations in the case, and nothing else. Weinstein - who has cancer and diabetes - stayed at Bellevue Hospital rather than Riker's Island jail during the course of the trial. He sat in a wheelchair for the proceedings. 'For the sake of truth': A Weinstein victim's decision to take the stand again Jurors in Harvey Weinstein trial reportedly fighting among themselves Harvey Weinstein begs for earlier retrial for sex crimes Harvey Weinstein timeline: How the scandal has unfolded The retrial in New York centred on two women who brought allegations against Weinstein for his 2020 trial, Ms Mann and Ms Haley. It also included new allegations from Ms Sokola, a Polish former model and actress, who accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting her when she was 19. The jury on Wednesday found him not guilty in that assault. Reacting to the verdict, Ms Sokola said she was 'relieved that Harvey Weinstein will be held accountable for some of his crimes'. 'Coming forward was the hardest thing I've ever done. I owed it to myself, and to the other women who survived him, to make sure that the world knows what kind of man Harvey Weinstein is. 'Speaking out was an act of power and it allowed me to reclaim the pride and confidence he tried to take from me,' she added in a statement. The three women testified for days about the sexual abuse they alleged they endured at the hands of Weinstein. All three said they met Weinstein when they were young and looking for work opportunities in the entertainment industry. He then forced himself on them during private meetings at hotels and his homes, the women alleged. His legal team argued that his sexual encounters with the women were all consensual and a sort of "friends with benefits" arrangement. Weinstein's attorneys attempted to chip away at the credibility of the women, showing warm messages some of the women exchanged with the film mogul after the alleged assaults. In total, Weinstein has been accused of sexual misconduct, assault and rape by more than 100 women. While not all reports resulted in criminal charges, the California conviction means he is likely to spend the rest of his life in prison. The decision by his accusers to come forward, and his subsequent conviction in New York, galvanised the #MeToo movement against sex abuse by powerful men. Before the allegations against him emerged, Weinstein and his brother Bob were among Hollywood's ultimate power players. Weinstein co-founded Miramax film studio, whose hits included Shakespeare in Love, which won best picture at the Academy Awards, and Pulp Fiction. Weinstein has also faced a number of civil lawsuits, including from a group of women who accused him of sexual harassment and rape. The case resulted in a $19m (£14.2) settlement in 2020. Weinstein accuser breaks down under cross-examination in retrial Weinstein used 'unfettered power' to sexually abuse women, rape retrial hears Weinstein begs for leniency as he is jailed for rape 'A hard day' - Ashley Judd on quashed Weinstein conviction