logo
My young comrade died in my arms. It would be immoral if those soldiers who survived were now betrayed - former Special Forces soldier in Northern Ireland speaks out amid Mail campaign

My young comrade died in my arms. It would be immoral if those soldiers who survived were now betrayed - former Special Forces soldier in Northern Ireland speaks out amid Mail campaign

Daily Mail​a day ago
Britain's Government is on the brink of a decision that defies explanation.
It is choosing to side with former terrorists against veterans of the Armed Forces.
Our politicians risk betraying every soldier who served to keep the peace in Northern Ireland during the decades of the Troubles, when both Republican and Loyalist extremists were intent on mayhem and murder.
And, for me, this is deeply personal. One of my men died in my arms, a youth of 20, killed while doing his job.
For his killers, and people like them, to be allowed to continue their campaign of hatred through the courts is utterly immoral.
With exceptional bravery, professionalism and dedication, men and women from Special Forces, as well as the regular Army, risked their lives every hour to try to bring an end to this senseless violence.
And now they are being punished for it. While the terrorists have long been granted immunity under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, many soldiers could face prosecution for doing the job they were sent to Ulster to do.
Some of them never came back. The rest live in dread of receiving a summons, and the threat of jail, for doing their duty.
The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later.
If that protection is abolished, every major anti-terrorist operation against the IRA would likely be rebranded as a war crime.
It is beyond iniquitous – this is outright political insanity, or worse. Labour's ministers, and, most of all, Sir Keir Starmer, desperately need to rediscover their moral compass.
If the Prime Minister had witnessed what I saw 42 years ago, he would never have lost his ability to distinguish between right and wrong. The difference would be burned into his memory.
I was a 21-year-old Second Lieutenant leading a patrol on the streets of West Belfast. This was a day after the 1983 General Election at which Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams was elected as an MP for the first time.
That morning, Adams was holding a press conference. Though counting had not yet
finished, and he had no intention of taking up his seat in Westminster, his election win was a foregone conclusion.
The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later, writes the former SAS soldier
My men and I were patrolling part of a nationalist estate a short distance from the publicity event. We were in four units of four, known as 'bricks'.
I was in the forward position with three soldiers, accompanied by two Royal Ulster Constabulary officers.
One of the men in my brick was Private Geoffrey Curtis, a fresh-faced 20-year-old lad with a heart of gold. As we reached a junction, a girl of about five came running out, stared at us, and scooted off.
We carried on – but, two or three seconds later a massive blast rocked the street. I turned to see Private Curtis mortally wounded. The other two soldiers in my brick suffered superficial injuries.
Later, we learned that a 15lb bomb concealed in a lamppost beside a wall had been detonated by a 'command wire' – a thin cable with a battery to trigger the explosion. Private Curtis took the full force of the blast.
This type of bomb is a cold-blooded ambush device, set off by a watcher concealed nearby.
A terrorist murderer had been lying in wait for our patrol. He pressed the button to detonate the bomb, and watched Geoff Curtis die before fleeing like the coward he was. No one has ever been charged with this atrocity.
I believe my life was saved by that little girl. Private Curtis was not the target. It was me, and the two policemen.
But the IRA killers did not dare risk harming the child, because earlier in the year one had died in a bombing by another terrorist group, the INLA, and local families had reacted with fury.
The bomb was meant to send a bloody message to Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government, which had just been re-elected.
Despite Sinn Fein's success at the polls, the IRA had no intention of achieving its aims by democratic means. The terrorists intended to step up their campaign of slaughter.
It's inconceivable to me that Gerry Adams did not know about this bombing in advance. It cannot, however, be proven and never will be.
Yet the Labour Government is now considering the prosecution of veterans who served in Northern Ireland.
Some of them are my former colleagues in Special Forces.
After six years as an infantry officer, I applied for duties with 14 Intelligence Company, which is now renamed the Special Reconnaissance Regiment.
In the 1980s, 14Int was made up of servicemen and women from the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, and its selection procedure was exceptionally tough. Of the 260 volunteers who applied in my intake, only 11 finished it.
Our role was to blend into the streets and countryside and carry out surveillance on terrorists, building a picture of the operations they were planning.
The death of Private Curtis was a major motivating factor for me, because I knew the IRA would never come to the negotiating table as long as they believed they could succeed through violence.
Soldiers, whether they are officers or not, think about the wider implications of the job they are expected to do.
My experiences showed me it had to be ballots, not bullets, that secured peace. Special Forces, along with MI5 and the RUC Special Branch, led the campaign that forced the terrorists to lay down their weapons. It took courageous, principled men and women to effect this.
All aspects of what was accomplished were considered and measured. We were not above the law. But, importantly, we were directed by senior generals and civil servants – and it was the instructions of politicians and Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher that ultimately dictated our strategy and action.
Mrs Thatcher took a keen interest and visited us on operations on several occasions.
The generals, politicians and civil servants do not face the possibility of prosecution. It is the retired soldiers, who were young then and doing their job for the right reasons, who do.
Today's Labour Government has, it seems, sympathy with Adams and the former terrorists – so much so that, while 100 Special Forces soldiers have been required to give evidence, very few terrorist volunteers and none of their leaders have been asked to explain their actions.
The simple truth is that we all sleep tight in our beds because of the bravery of our Armed Forces.
Everyone who accepts that fact should support the petition to Parliament to stop any proposed legal changes that would enable prosecution of the brave men and women who did their duty.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce
Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce

Sir Keir Starmer has rendered his flagship welfare cuts legislation 'pointless' in a farcical climbdown to win the support of Labour rebels. A planned crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip), which helps disabled people with extra costs, was dropped just 90 minutes before the crunch vote. The late concession came when it appeared dozens of rebels were still willing to vote down the package, even though it had already been gutted last week to appease critics. Even with the change, 49 Labour MPs voted against the Bill – the biggest rebellion of the Starmer premiership, which marks its one-year anniversary this week. Government ministers faced ridicule from Labour critics, who dubbed the handling of the changes 'shambolic', 'unedifying' and a 'total clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions'. The U-turn means that almost all of the £4.6 billion of annual savings the Bill was meant to deliver have been lost, increasing the chance of new tax rises this autumn. Labour Left-wingers are expected to seize on Sir Keir's weakness and push for further policy changes, such as a new raid on wealth or relaxed rules on immigration. The mishandling of the welfare package, despite a working majority in the House of Commons of 165, is also likely to fuel Labour calls for an overhaul in Number 10. The Prime Minister threw his support behind Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff blamed by some welfare rebels, in Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said: 'This is an utter capitulation. Labour's welfare Bill is now a total waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does not control spending. 'It's pointless. They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, said 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office.' He added: 'This isn't serious government, it's chaos. Labour has bottled welfare reform, left a multi-billion-pound hole in the nation's finances, and set the country on course for higher taxes or a debt spiral. It doesn't have to be this way.' The total disability and incapacity benefits bill is set to continue rising, from £76 billion last year to £98 billion by the end of the decade, piling pressure on the public finances. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, faces a black hole that some estimates suggest could run to tens of billions of pounds, meaning she risks being forced into a new tax raid in her autumn Budget. Helen Miller, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the changes would not save any money by 2029-30. She said: 'This is a Government with a majority of 165 that is seemingly unable to reform either pensioner winter fuel payments or working-age disability benefits. That doesn't bode well for those hoping this Government will grasp the nettle and address the deeper, structural challenges facing the UK public finances.' Labour rebels, some of whom are emboldened by forcing billion-pound changes on the Starmer administration, told The Telegraph they will push for new wealth taxes this autumn. One Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I'd say the new review will last longer than the PM. His sell-by date just got a lot closer after this week.' Andy McDonald, a Labour MP who voted against the welfare plan, said of wealth taxes: 'It is the broadest shoulders argument. 'Distributed to each according to his need.' That's not Marx, it's the Bible.' A second Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I think it is inevitable. I don't think the Chancellor has got any options left.' Sir Keir had been facing a huge rebellion last week when 127 Labour MPs – around one in four – signed an amendment to effectively block the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. In an attempt to quash the revolt last week, Mr McSweeney, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, personally negotiated a compromise that meant all current recipients of disability benefits would not be affected by the changes. Instead, the new system would kick in from November 2026. A review of the most contentious part – toughening the eligibility for Pip – would also return that autumn. But on Tuesday afternoon, ministers were forced to make yet another alteration, removing the entire section of the Bill referring to changes to Pip. The sudden extra concession, which removed the most important part of the legislation just before the key vote, suggested government whips were not confident the legislation would pass. It eventually did by 335 votes in favour and 260 votes against - a much tighter result than expected given how drastically it had been watered down. As well as the 49 Labour MPs who voted against the Bill, 19 abstained. The concession was announced by Sir Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, during the Commons debate just 90 minutes before votes were due to be called. It came just hours after Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had insisted there would be no further changes. Ms Kendall, who told broadcasters there were 'lessons to learn' after the result, was the driving force behind the Bill and is likely to face questions over her position. Labour rebels were left infuriated that the Government was continuing to force through a Bill which had lost the vast majority of its major elements, rather than pulling the legislation entirely. Paula Barker, the Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree: 'Whilst grateful for the concessions, this has further laid bare the incoherent and shambolic nature of this process. It is the most unedifying spectacle that I have ever seen.' Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, urged the Government to withdraw the 'hodgepodge of a Bill which means nothing to nobody'. Ms Lavery said: 'This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man. This Bill isn't fit for purpose.' 'I went out for a banana – and the whole thing changed' Mary Kelly Foy, the Labour MP for the City of Durham, expressed shock at what had happened after she returned to the Commons after leaving for a snack. Ms Foy said: 'I popped out for a banana earlier on and, when I came back in, things had changed again. So I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on.' The Tories were also critical of how the legislation had been handled. Simon Hoare, the Conservative MP for North Dorset: 'I have never seen a Bill butchered and filleted by their own sponsoring ministers in such a cack-handed way. 'Nobody can understand the purpose of this Bill now. In the interest of fairness, simplicity and natural justice, is it not best to withdraw it, redraft it and start again?' Around 800,000 claimants of Pip had been expected to lose money under the original cuts package, including 370,000 current recipients. The changes have now been shelved. It means the Government is still expected to spend £28.5 billion on Pip by the end of the decade. Already 3.8 million people get the payments, according to official figures. Sir Stephen will continue with his review, announced last week as part of the initial concessions deal, into Pip eligibility and report back in Autumn 2026. But government sources were unable to say if any of the original changes would be kept. That includes the most contentious element, which was to increase the number of points someone must get in an assessment for the payments. The legislation still contains the halving of the health top-up in Universal Credit for new claimants and the scrapping of the work capability assessment, as well as an increase in the amount of standard Universal Credit.

Starmer survives rebellion as watered down welfare cuts pass key vote
Starmer survives rebellion as watered down welfare cuts pass key vote

Sky News

time17 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Starmer survives rebellion as watered down welfare cuts pass key vote

Sir Keir Starmer's controversial welfare bill has passed its first hurdle in the Commons despite a sizeable rebellion from his MPs. The prime minister's watered-down Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill, aimed at saving £5.5bn, was backed by a majority of 75 on Tuesday evening. A total of 49 Labour MPs voted against the bill - the largest rebellion since 47 MPs voted against Tony Blair's Lone Parent benefit in 1997, according to Professor Phil Cowley from Queen Mary University. After multiple concessions made due to threats of a Labour rebellion, many MPs questioned what they were voting for as the bill had been severely stripped down. They ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to Universal Credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the bill voted through "is not expected to deliver any savings over the next four years" because the savings from reducing the Universal Credit health element for new claimants will be roughly offset by the cost of increasing the UC standard allowance. Just 90 minutes before voting started on Tuesday evening disabilities minister Stephen Timms announced the last of a series of concessions made as dozens of Labour MPs spoke of their fears for disabled and sick people if the bill was made law. In a major U-turn, he said changes in eligibility for the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability payment to help pay for extra costs incurred, would not take place until a review he is carrying out into the benefit is published in autumn 2026. An amendment brought by Labour MP Rachael Maskell, which aimed to prevent the bill progressing to the next stage, was defeated but 44 Labour MPs voted for it. 4:31 A Number 10 source told Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby: "Change isn't easy, we've always known that, we're determined to deliver on the mandate the country gave us, to make Britain work for hardworking people. "We accept the will of the house, and want to take colleagues with us, our destination - a social security system that supports the most vulnerable, and enables people to thrive - remains." But the Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride called the vote "farcical" and said the government "ended up in this terrible situation" because they "rushed it". He warned the markets "will have noticed that when it comes to taking tougher decisions about controlling and spending, this government has been found wanting". 1:02 Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: "I wish we'd got to this point in a different way. And there are absolutely lessons to learn. "But I think it's really important we pass this bill at the second reading, it put some really important reforms to the welfare system - tackling work disincentives, making sure that people with severe conditions would no longer be assessed and alongside our investment in employment support this will help people get back to work, because that's the brighter future for them." Yesterday she made further concessions in the hope the rebels' fears would be allayed, but many were concerned the PIP eligibility was going to be changed at the same time the review was published, meaning its findings would not be taken into account. Her changes were: • Current PIP claimants, and any up to November 2026, would have the same eligibility criteria as they do now instead of the stricter measure proposed • A consultation into PIP to be "co-produced" with disabled people and published in autumn 2026 • For existing and future Universal Credit (UC) claimants, the combined value of the standard UC allowance and the health top-up will rise "at least in line with inflation" every year for the rest of this parliament • The UC health top-up, for people with limited ability to work due to a disability or long-term sickness, will get a £300m boost next year - doubling the current amount - then rising to £800m the year after and £1bn in 2028/29.

Tributes paid to elderly sisters killed in collision while on ‘morning walk'
Tributes paid to elderly sisters killed in collision while on ‘morning walk'

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tributes paid to elderly sisters killed in collision while on ‘morning walk'

A family has paid tribute to two elderly sisters who died after they were hit by a car while out together for their usual morning walk. The women, aged 70 and 68, both died after colliding with the blue Volkswagen Tiguan on Peppard Road in Caversham, Reading, at around 7.55am on Friday, Thames Valley Police (TVP) said. In a statement shared by the force on Tuesday, the family of the victims, named as Sandra and Sylvia, said they were 'two of the most loving, caring women you would ever meet'. They said: 'It is such a tragedy that these two lives have been taken away and knowing they were taken whilst they were doing what they loved best – their morning walks, it just hits harder. 'Every Friday morning, the sisters would go for a walk, down to the town and back home. But unfortunately this Friday was different. 'They were both healthy and full of life, with future plans. They both had holidays, adventures and were soon welcoming new additions, great grandchildren, to the family. 'They are and will forever be missed and loved more than ever by family and friends.' The surnames of the victims were not released by the family. A 47-year-old woman from Reading has been arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving in connection with the incident, TVP said. Investigating officer PS Matthew Cadmore said on Friday: 'An investigation has been launched and we have already made an arrest. 'I am appealing to anyone who witnessed this incident and hasn't already come forward, to please get in touch. 'I am also appealing to anyone with dash-cam, CCTV or doorbell footage, or any information that may assist our investigation, to please contact us.' Anyone with information has been asked to call 101 or make an online report quoting reference number 43250319754, or to contact independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store