logo
U.S., China announce a trade agreement - again. Here's what it means

U.S., China announce a trade agreement - again. Here's what it means

Associated Press5 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. and China have reached an agreement — again — to deescalate trade tensions. But details are scarce, and the latest pact leaves major issues between the world's two biggest economies unresolved.
President Donald Trump said late Thursday that a deal with China had been signed 'the other day.'' China's Commerce Ministry confirmed Friday that some type of arrangement had been reached but offered few details about it.
Sudden shifts and a lack of clarity have been hallmarks of Trump's trade policy since he returned to the White House determined to overturn a global trading system that he says is unfair to the United States and its workers.
He's been engaged for months in a battle with China that has mostly revealed how much pain the two countries can inflict on each other. And he's racing against a July 8 deadline to reach deals with other major U.S. trading partners.
The uncertainty over his dealmaking and the cost of the tariffs, which are paid by U.S. importers and usually passed on to consumers, have raised worries about the outlook for the U.S. economy. And although analysts welcomed the apparent easing of tensions with China, they also warned that the issues dividing Washington and Beijing are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.
What did the two sides agree to?
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday that the Chinese had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Beijing had slowed exports of the materials amid a bitter trade dispute with the Trump administration.
Without explicitly mentioning U.S. access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that 'China will, in accordance with the law, review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items. In turn, the United States will lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.''
The Chinese have complained about U.S. controls on exports of advanced U.S. technology to China. But the ministry statement did not specifically say whether the United States planned to ease or lift those controls.
In his interview on Fox Business Network's 'Mornings with Maria,' Bessent mentioned that the United States had earlier imposed 'countermeasures'' against China and 'had held back some vital supplies for them.''
'What we're seeing here is a de-escalation under President Trump's leadership,'' Bessent said, without spelling out what concessions the United States had made or whether they involved America's export controls.
Jeff Moon, a trade official in the Obama administration who now runs the China Moon Strategies consultancy, wondered why Trump hadn't disclosed details of the agreement two days after it had been reached.
'Silence regarding the terms suggests that there is less substance to the deal than the Trump Administration implies,″ said Moon, who also served as a diplomat in China.
Wait. This sounds familiar. How did we get here?
The agreement that emerged Thursday and Friday builds on a 'framework'' that Trump announced June 11 after two days of high-level U.S.-China talks in London. Then, he announced, China had agreed to ease restrictions on rare earths. In return, the United States said it would stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on U.S. college campuses.
And last month, after another meeting in Geneva, the two countries had agreed to dramatically reduce massive taxes they'd slapped on each other's products, which had reached as high as 145% against China and 125% against the U.S.
Those triple-digit tariffs threatened to effectively end trade between the United States and China and caused a frightening sell-off in financial markets. In Geneva, the two countries agreed to back off and keep talking: America's tariffs went back down to a still-high 30% and China's to 10%. That led to the talks in London earlier this month and to this week's announcement.
Where does all this leave U.S.-China economic relations?
If nothing else, the two countries are trying to ratchet down tensions after demonstrating how much they can hurt each other.
'The U.S. and China appear to be easing the chokeholds they had on each other's economies through export controls on computer chips and rare earth minerals, respectively,' said Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University. 'This is a positive step but a far cry from signaling prospects of a substantial de-escalation of tariffs and other trade hostilities.''
Trump launched a trade war with China in his first term, imposing tariffs on most Chinese goods in a dispute over China's attempts to supplant U.S. technological supremacy. Trump's trade team charged that China was unfairly subsidizing its own tech companies, forcing U.S. and other foreign companies to hand over sensitive technology in exchange for access to the Chinese market and even engaging outright theft of trade secrets.
The squabbling and negotiating of the past few months appear to have done little to resolve Washington's complaints about unfair Chinese trade practices and America's massive trade deficit with China, which came to $262 billion last year.
This week's agreement 'includes absolutely nothing related to the U.S.'s concerns regarding China's trade surplus or non-market behavior,'' said Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'If the two sides can implement these elements of the ceasefire, then they could begin negotiations on issues which generated the initial escalation in tensions in the first place.''
What is happening with Trump's other tariffs?
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has made aggressive use of tariffs. In addition to his levies on China, he has imposed 'baseline'' 10% taxes on imports from every country in the world . And he's announced even higher taxes — so-called reciprocal tariffs ranging from 11% to 50% — on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit.
But after financial markets sank on fears of massive disruption to world trade, Trump suspended the reciprocal levies for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate reductions in their barriers to U.S. exports. That pause lasts until July 8.
On Friday, Bessent told Fox Business Network that the talks could extend beyond the deadline and be 'wrapped up by Labor Day'' Sept. 1 with 10 to 12 of America's most important trading partners.
Trump further played down the July 8 deadline at a White House press conference Friday by noting that negotiations are ongoing but that 'we have 200 countries, you could say 200 countries-plus. You can't do that.'
Instead of new trade deals, Trump said his administration would in coming days or weeks send out a letter where 'we're just gonna tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States.''
Separately, Trump took sudden aim at Canada Friday, saying on social media that he's immediately suspending trade talks with that country over its plan to impose a tax on technology firms next Monday. Trump called Canada's digital services tax 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.'
The digital services tax will hit companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users. It will apply retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2 billion bill due at the end of the month.
____
AP Writers Didi Tang and Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WWII Army Ranger from NEPA honored with Congressional Gold Medal
WWII Army Ranger from NEPA honored with Congressional Gold Medal

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WWII Army Ranger from NEPA honored with Congressional Gold Medal

Jun. 27—HAWLEY — At 100 years old, World War II veteran Sgt. Joseph Drake of Hawley is a living testament to courage and sacrifice, U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan Jr. said this week. Rep. Bresnahan, R-Dallas Township, joined Congressional leaders and Presidential Cabinet members to honor Sgt. Drake with the Congressional Gold Medal — the highest honor presented by Congress. Sgt. Drake and Pfc. John Wardell accepted the medal on behalf of all WWII Army Rangers. "Today, we honor Sgt. Joseph Drake for his valor and service to our country as a WWII Army Ranger," said Bresnahan. "As a WWII Army Ranger, Sgt. Drake answered the call of duty with extraordinary bravery, scaling cliffs and storming enemy lines so that others might live in freedom. His service with the 2nd Ranger Battalion reminds us of the extraordinary bravery that helped secure our freedom." The ceremony included remarks from U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and others. The Congressional Gold Medal is the highest honor given by Congress. It recognizes individuals or groups whose achievements have made a lasting impact on American history and culture. Since the first medal was awarded to George Washington in 1776, it has honored military leaders, scientists, artists and others who have shaped our nation. To date, the award has been presented to less than 200 recipients. "This medal is not only a symbol of Sgt. Drake's heroism, but a testament to the sacrifice, grit and unbreakable spirit of every Ranger who fought beside him," said Bresnahan. "It is an immense honor to pay tribute to him today, and I am incredibly proud to represent him in Congress. Sgt. Drake's legacy and service drive the work I do in Congress every day." Bresnahan was joined in Washington, D.C., by Pennsylvania State Rep. Dane Watro, R-Hazleton. State Rep. Jeff Olsommer, who represents Sgt. Drake in the Pennsylvania State House and worked with Bresnahan to ensure the award was received, could not attend the ceremony in person. "Mr. Drake is a true local hero," said Olsommer. "It was an honor to meet him, and when I learned that he was still waiting to receive his Congressional Gold Medal, I was deeply concerned. I shared those concerns with our Congressman, Rob Bresnahan. He and his team responded immediately and worked diligently to ensure Mr. Drake received the recognition he so greatly deserves. I'm proud to have played a small part in that process. I'm thrilled for Mr. Drake and his family — and I'm incredibly proud to have him as a constituent of the 139th District." "It was a privilege to witness Sgt. Drake receive the Congressional Gold Medal today," said Watro. "He is an American patriot whose legacy will inspire generations to come and his service is an example of the extraordinary strength of our WWII heroes. I am pleased I was able to join him today for this incredible ceremony, and I thank Rep. Bresnahan for inviting me to witness this great honor." Drake was drafted on April 30, 1943, and sent to Camp Shelby, Mississippi, with the newly formed 69th Infantry Division. He later joined the Ranger Company A, 2nd Ranger Infantry Battalion, where he patrolled the area around the landing sites in search of enemy troops. He fought in some of the fiercest campaigns of the war, including the Battle of Brest, the Huertgen Forest, and the Battle of the Bulge. He was honorably discharged in December 1945 after the deactivation of the 2nd Ranger Battalion. The Congressional Gold Medal is awarded to the World War II Army Rangers in recognition of their extraordinary bravery, sacrifice and critical contributions during the war. This medal serves as a lasting symbol of the nation's gratitude. It honors not only the courage of the Army Rangers during one of the most critical moments in modern history but also acknowledges the enduring legacy of an elite group that once numbered 7,000 and now includes just five living members. Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.

Senate barrels toward weekend vote on Trump agenda as GOP support still in limbo
Senate barrels toward weekend vote on Trump agenda as GOP support still in limbo

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

Senate barrels toward weekend vote on Trump agenda as GOP support still in limbo

President Donald Trump's push to pass his massive agenda in the Senate is hanging by thread as GOP leaders barrel toward a critical vote this weekend that, as of Friday night, is still short of the support to pass. Just hours after Senate Majority Leader John Thune informed senators they would take a critical first vote on Saturday, a key GOP centrist senator warned he would vote against proceeding to the package unless there are major changes – and several other holdouts are uncertain on how they'll land. That warning shot came from Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who is up for reelection next November and has been one of the most vocal critics of the Medicaid cuts used to help pay for Trump's tax cuts and spending cuts package. Speaking to reporters Friday, Tillis again raised concerns over the bill's 'fundamentals' and cuts to Medicaid and suggested his vote wouldn't change unless the measure 'transforms radically overnight.' Losing Tillis on Saturday's expected procedural vote – which will be closely watched by Trump – would be a major blow to Senate GOP leaders, who can only afford to lose three Republican votes to advance the bill. Thune and GOP leaders have spent months building to this moment, racing to draft the bill as quickly as possible in an effort to ensure Trump's agenda is on his desk by the Fourth of July. If the bill fails its first procedural vote on Saturday, GOP leaders will have to retool the package, amounting to a huge setback for Trump. And it's not just about that Independence Day timeline: GOP leaders fear that any delay in passing Trump's agenda would embolden the party's critics to seek more changes – which could lead their fragile coalition to fall apart. Already, outspoken fiscal hawk Sen. Rand Paul is planning to vote against it over the plan's inclusion of a $5 trillion debt-limit increase. And Tillis is not the only Republican threatening to oppose the bill over the proposed cuts to Medicaid. Sens. Josh Hawley, Lisa Murkowski, Jerry Moran and Susan Collins have all made similar remarks as they've worked with leadership to trim those provisions. But simply restoring that Medicaid funding may not be enough to win Thune those votes on the floor – it could also cost him votes among Senate GOP hardliners. Sen. Ron Johnson has railed on how the bill is projected to balloon the budget deficit, and another fiscal hawk, Sen. Mike Lee, has suggested he and Johnson along with Sen. Rick Scott could vote as a bloc on Saturday. None have yet to say how they'll vote on the key initial procedural vote Saturday. If all goes to plan, Senate leaders will land the 51 GOP votes to formally begin debating Trump's agenda and then tee up one of the chamber's storied traditions: a series of round-the-clock amendment votes known as vote-a-rama. Democrats will use this overnight session to push on any number of GOP weak points on the bill, particularly Medicaid and other safety net programs. The Senate could then vote on final passage sometime in the middle of the night Saturday or Sunday morning. And if successful, the House would return mid-week to take up the bill with the hope of Trump signing it at the White House on July 4. One of the biggest hurdles for Republicans is the race to rewrite text in compliance with the Senate's complex budget rules, which are governed by the nonpartisan parliamentarian. In recent days, the parliamentarian has ruled against key GOP provisions – from the so-called provider tax, which helps states fund their Medicaid programs to some provisions of a government spectrum auction. That forces the Senate GOP to dial back those provisions, or else Trump's bill would be subject to a Democratic filibuster. Several Republicans said Friday night they need to see the final bill text – which has not been released – before judging whether they would open debate on the sweeping measure. 'I don't have the bill, how can I vote on something I don't know' what's in it, Johnson said. Hawley, who has been deeply concerned about Medicaid cuts, also said the vote hinges on what's in the bill: 'Got to see the text.' Senate GOP leaders hope to release a mostly final version of the bill Friday night or Saturday morning, but the full version may not be ready before the anticipated Saturday vote to open debate, since the Senate Finance Committee is still furiously working to make sure its language complies with the budget rules. The Finance provisions are key because of both tax and health provisions – specifically, Medicaid. 'I still don't have final language from Finance yet, which obviously is of tremendous concern to me given the Medicaid provisions,' Collins said. Multiple GOP senators dismissed concerns about speeding ahead with the vote without final text in hand. 'We discussed this thing ad nauseam,' Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno said, estimating that Republicans have met on this bill for 'thousands' of hours so far this year. 'The final tax is not out. But we know where we are going.' Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri added: 'When you have legislation like this, you're going to have things you need to work through until the very end.' This story has been updated with additional details.

Berkeley City Council approves zoning change to encourage "middle housing"
Berkeley City Council approves zoning change to encourage "middle housing"

CBS News

time16 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Berkeley City Council approves zoning change to encourage "middle housing"

In a unanimous vote Thursday night, the Berkeley City Council approved a zoning change designed to make it easier to build small apartment buildings across much of the city—part of a broader effort to address the region's ongoing housing affordability crisis. Dubbed the Middle Housing Ordinance, the new policy streamlines the permitting process for residential buildings such as duplexes, triplexes, and three-story multi-family homes. City officials and housing advocates said the change could increase housing options for middle-income residents who have been increasingly priced out of the market. "These types of units will get a streamlined, 'by-right' approval," said District 1 Councilmember Rashi Kesarwani, who championed the policy. "So if [a project meets] the development standards, they don't go above three stories, and they have setbacks and open space, they can get approved over the counter." The new zoning rules, however, will not apply to the Berkeley Hills, where fire-risk concerns have limited development. Supporters of the ordinance argued that increasing housing supply is essential for reducing costs and giving younger and middle-class residents a foothold in the city's expensive real estate market. "I could not afford one of these houses," said Andrea Horbinski, a renter in the Berkeley Hills with a Ph.D. "And I don't think that is going to change. So hopefully, [developers will] build different housing, new housing, smaller size that I could afford." Horbinski was one of the residents who spoke in favor of the ordinance at the council meeting. "The more the merrier," she said. "The more housing there is, the more prices will come down, the more things will be more affordable for more people." Berkeley's real estate market remains one of the priciest in the region. According to the Bay East Association of Realtors, of the 66 single-family homes sold last month in Berkeley, the median price was $1,812,500. "With what we're projecting, in terms of 50 to 100 homes per year, that's an incremental change," Kesarwani said. "So it'll give us the opportunity to adapt and adjust." Still, not everyone is on board. Some residents fear the zoning change could alter the character of Berkeley's neighborhoods and put added strain on infrastructure. "Why Berkeley, which is already so densely populated and already so hard to get around in?" asked longtime resident Clifford Fred. "It just doesn't make any sense to me." Fred said he's concerned about traffic congestion and limited parking. "Older people who don't have driveways, people need their parking spaces," he said. "I don't think it's selfish for people to have parking spaces near their home." Opponents also criticized the ordinance for not including specific requirements for affordable housing units. But supporters like Horbinski remain hopeful that smaller, lower-cost units will eventually make ownership more attainable. "I think eventually I'll be able to get to a place where I could have a condo or a unit in one of these sort of missing-middle type places," she said. The zoning change is expected to take effect in November. Berkeley follows in the footsteps of Sacramento, which passed a similar measure last year. Santa Rosa is reportedly considering a comparable proposal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store