Lyin' ex-Rep. George Santos sobs as he learns his fate at sentencing in corruption case
The wayward, openly-gay ex-Long Island pol, who was exposed for fibbing about much of his life story, was sentenced to seven years and three months behind bars by Central Islip federal court Judge Joanna Seybert. He must also fork over $373,000 in restitution as part of the sentence.
Santos, 36, pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud and aggravated identity theft in August, admitting he defrauded donors and used the names of dozens of people, including family and friends, to falsely inflate his number of contributors.
Advertisement
He must surrender to start serving his prison term on July 25.
4 Former Long Island Rep. George Santos was sentenced to years behind bars on Friday.
Brigitte Stelzer
He served less than a year in the House — repping parts of Queens and Nassau County in a seat he flipped red — until he became only the the sixth US Representative to be expelled from office in December 2023.
Advertisement
Santos — who now hawks personalized video messages for $100 a pop on cameo — refused to answer questions from reporters on his way into court Friday, but posted 'Soon' along with prayer hand emojis on X hours before his sentencing.
Prosecutors asked that the flamboyant Ferragamo-wearing former rep get seven years behind bars, the top end of what federal sentencing guidelines recommended. He faced a minimum of two and a maximum of 20 years in prison.
The feds argued in recent court filings that Santos' social media posts showed he was 'not genuinely remorseful.'
Those missives included a barrage of attacks toward the Department of Justice that Santos recently posted on X, including one claiming he was a 'scapegoat.'
Advertisement
But Santos' lawyers fired back, explaining the lyin' ex-congressman was attacking what he thought was an unnecessarily harsh sentencing recommendation and maintained he still remained 'profoundly sorry' for what he did.
4 Santos pleaded guilty last year to fraud and identity theft.
Brian Zak/Page Six
Santos was elected in 2022, but it quickly emerged that he had repeatedly lied about everything from his work credentials to his educational background while he was on the campaign trail.
He claimed he graduated from New York University and Baruch College and that he worked at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. In reality he didn't graduate from college and he never 'directly' worked for the companies.
Advertisement
In May 2023, the feds hit him with a 23-count indictment accusing him of laundering campaign funds and defrauding donors from October 2021 to October 2022.
4 Santos was accused of lying to Congress and using campaign funds to live large.
Instagram / @georgesantosny
Prosecutors alleged he lied to Congress about his wealth, collected unemployment benefits while he was actually working and used campaign funds to live large — including buying designer duds, getting Botox injections and taking luxe vacations.
Santos' former campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks, was also charged in the case. She pleaded guilty to one fraud conspiracy charge and is slated to be sentenced next month at a hearing where the feds have said they will recommend she receive three-and-a-half years to four years imprisonment.
4 Santos was expelled from office in December 2023.
Rod Lamkey – CNP
On Tuesday, Santos said in an interview with NY1 that he hopes he is kept in protective custody while in the clink 'because I do fear for my safety.'
He also told the outlet he didn't have the money to pay the restitution he agreed to fork over as part of his plea agreement with the feds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Texas House Passes Trump-Backed Map That Favors GOP - The Source with Kaitlan Collins - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Texas House Passes Trump-Backed Map That Favors GOP The Source with Kaitlan Collins 44 mins The Texas House just passed the congressional map President Trump explicitly asked for. The map is designed to delver him five more seats in Congress. The state Senate is expend to put its final stamp of approval on the map tomorrow.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.
