Impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma in next Parliament session: Govt sources
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The government is set to move an impeachment motion against Allahabad High Court's Justice Yashwant Varma in Parliament and will seek to build an all-party consensus for action against the judge facing allegations of corruption after the discovery of a large amount of cash from his official residence in Delhi.Government sources on Tuesday said Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has begun consultations as part of efforts to get leaders of different parties on board for the impeachment motion against Varma following his indictment by a three-member probe committee constituted by the Supreme Court.A fire incident at Varma's residence in the national capital in March this year, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of cash at the outhouse.Though Varma claimed ignorance about the cash, the Supreme Court-appointed committee indicted him after speaking to a number of witnesses and recording his statement.The then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, is believed to have prodded him to resign but Varma dug in his heels. The apex court has since transferred him to his parent cadre of the Allahabad High Court, where he has not been assigned any judicial work.Khanna then wrote to the President and the Prime Minister, recommending the impeachment motion, which is the procedure for axing members of the higher judiciary from service.Parliament's monsoon session is expected to begin around the third week of July when the government will move the motion against him, sources said.The impeachment motion has to be brought in the Lok Sabha as well as the Rajya Sabha, and will need the support of two-thirds of the MPs for passage.At least 50 members in the Rajya Sabha and 100 in the Lok Sabha have to sign the motion before it is admitted by the Chair.The motion is moved by the Law Minister, and the government will seek signatures and subsequent support of members of different parties, including the opposition, to send a message of united parliamentary resolve against alleged judicial corruption after the sensational videos of burnt cash at Varma's house sent shockwaves through the country and its institutions.The motion is first introduced in one House and is then admitted in the other House only after the procedural formalities are successfully completed there. So far, there have been only two instances of Parliament taking up the impeachment motion, a constitutional necessity to remove a sitting high court or Supreme Court judge.Former Supreme Court judge V Ramaswami was the first to face it for alleged misuse of public fund, but the motion could not get the required support in Parliament in 1993.Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta High Court resigned in 2011 after the Rajya Sabha passed an impeachment motion against him, rendering the exercise irrelevantOpposition members were vocal in the last session of Parliament in seeking action against Varma after the cash discovery incident hit headlines, while the government waited for the Supreme Court to firm up its stand on the issue.The apex court had set up a three-member committee of Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Justice G S Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, for the inquiry into the allegations Varma.The committee submitted its report to the Chief Justice of India on May 4, and its findings have not been officially disclosed yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Same sex couples can constitute a family: Madras High Court
Though the Supreme Court may not have legalised marriage between same sex couples , they can very well form a family, the Madras High Court has held and allowed a young woman to join her female partner and said the two women can constitute a family. A division bench of Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan said the expression "family" has to be understood in an expanded sense. Hearing a writ petition seeking to produce before court a 25-year old woman and set her at liberty, the bench said: "To a specific question from us, the detenue (the 25-year old woman) replied that she is a lesbian and in relationship with the writ petitioner." She made it clear to the court that she wanted to go with the petitioner. She confirmed the allegation that she is being detained against her will by her natal family. "It appeared that she was forcibly taken to her home and beaten. She told us that her natal family members forced her to undergo certain rituals so that she will become "normal". She even apprehended danger to her life." In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner has nowhere described the true nature of her relationship with the detenue." Even in her complaint to the police, the petitioner called herself as the detenue's close friend. We can understand the hesitation on her part." Live Events Further, the court said: "While Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs Union of India (Supreme Court) may not have legalised marriage between same sex couples, they can very well form a family. Marriage is not the sole mode to found a family." The concept of "chosen family" is now well settled and acknowledged in LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence, the court said adding the petitioner and the detenue can very well constitute a family. Justice Anand Venkatesh, Judge of Madras HC, in Prasanna J Vs S Sushma approved a "Deed of familial Association" that purported to recognise the civil union entered into between LGBTQAI+ partners. The Supreme Court, in NALSA and Navtej Johar case, declared that sexual orientation is a matter of individual choice and that it is one of the most basic aspects of self-determination, dignity and freedom. It is an integral part of personal autonomy and self-expression and falls within the realm of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. The High Court, in its judgment dated May 22, 2025 said: "Since we have satisfied ourselves that the detenue wants to join the petitioner and that she is being detained against her will, we allow this Habeas Corpus petition and set her at liberty. We also restrain the detenue's natal family members from interfering with her personal liberty." Also, the court directed the police to provide protection to the detenue as well as the petitioner as and when required. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Drone survey in Aravalis under SC scanner reveals network of roads used by miners
Gurgaon: It wasn't just one road that helped miners carry illegally mined stones from Nuh's Basai Meo village to Rajasthan. A drone survey carried out for the first time in the area on Wednesday revealed two more inter-state roads – each stretching approximately 3km – that connect Basai Meo and Rawa in Haryana to Chhapra and Nangal villages in Rajasthan. This discovery was made days after the Supreme Court pulled up a senior Haryana official over illegal mining in Nuh and construction of a road built through protected Aravalis in Basai Meo. The anti-corruption bureau, which got involved in the investigation only last month, carried out the drone survey along with the forest department. "We have identified certain routes. We are in the process of verifying land use details. We plan to carry out more surveys if needed. Currently, the investigation is going on. Will submit our findings soon," said Anshu Singla, SP (ACB). A govt official involved in the probe told TOI that the two new roads, though just a few kilometres from the one on which a petition was filed in the Supreme Court, were not detected until now because the forest department had only conducted site inspections. "Previously, no such drone survey was conducted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Also, the first road was discovered earlier as it lay within the forest department's jurisdiction. The two other routes do not fall under sections 4 and 5 of PLPA (Punjab Land Preservation Act, which restricts construction in Aravali forests), so the department had no prior knowledge of them," the official said. He added that monitoring the region is also problematic because of its rocky terrain. Since the state boundary crosses this area, it isn't obvious where Haryana ends and where Rajasthan begins, the official said. Miners misuse this feature because of the lack of uniformity in rules. Mining the Aravalis is banned in Nuh, but Rajasthan does not have any such prohibition. It was in Oct 2024 that a 6km road was carved through protected Aravali forests of Basai Meo. A month later, villagers filed a petition, alleging that this road allowed the mining mafia to quarry stones in nearby Rawa village of Nuh, and transport them to stone crushing units in Gadhaner, Rajasthan. Apparently unafraid, miners blasted a hillock in Rawa to pieces just weeks later, TOI had reported in Dec 2024. The forest department, which had started looking into the allegations, dug up trenches to block the road in Jan this year. It also ordered that an FIR should be registered against three revenue officials in Nuh for allowing this illegal construction. Meanwhile, the petition by Basai Meo villagers came up before SC, which directed the central empowered committee (CEC) to inspect the site. CEC, in its report, confirmed the violations and recommended action against erring officials. Last month, Haryana's chief secretary filed an affidavit that said the state's forest department did not act against violations. The top court disagreed, and in its latest hearing on May 29, it pulled up the chief secretary for "passing the buck" to the forest department and not taking action against other govt officials. "It appears that (mining) mafia is strong enough to protect not only its members but also the officers of the state govt who acted in collusion with them," Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said. But miners, it appears, are undeterred still. The road that was originally blocked by the forest department months ago had been rebuilt. On June 2, officials brought in earthmovers and blocked it again. "These unauthorised routes have long enabled the extraction and transportation of Aravali stones in violation of environmental regulations. We have repeatedly alerted the concerned departments about these roads. The matter is now in SC and it is being investigated by ACB," a senior forest official said. Nuh deputy commissioner Vishram Kumar Meena, asked about action in the case, said the former sarpanch of Basai Meo who was allegedly involved in this illegal construction was suspended under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act. "We have taken the findings of the CEC very seriously. An illegal road passing through forest land cannot be tolerated. After preliminary inquiry and legal vetting, the sarpanch was suspended for dereliction of duty and enabling this environmental crime," Meena said.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
‘Scolding Or Workload Alone Not Abetment To Suicide': Allahabad HC Grants Bail To MLA
Last Updated: The court gave bail to Jahid Baig, a Samajwadi Party MLA from Uttar Pradesh's Bhadohi, in a case involving the suicide of an 18-year-old domestic help The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to Jahid Baig (aka Jahid Jamal Beg), a Samajwadi Party MLA from Uttar Pradesh's Bhadohi constituency, in a case involving the suicide of an 18-year-old domestic help, Nazia, who had been working in his home for nearly a decade. The bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh, while allowing the bail plea, held that there was no prima facie evidence to establish abetment of suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, by the legislator or his family members. The incident occurred on the night of September 8-9, 2024, when Nazia was found hanging in a storeroom on the third floor of the MLA's residence. Her death sparked concerns of child labour and alleged harassment in a politically sensitive setting. Another minor girl, Moni alias Sania, was rescued from the same household the next day during a joint raid ordered by the district magistrate. According to Moni's statement, both girls were often overburdened and scolded, sometimes even slapped. However, the court observed that such statements, while concerning, did not amount to instigation under the law. Nazia's father Imran and cousin Zubair initially refrained from making any accusations against the applicant. Later, Nazia's mother submitted an application under Section 173(4) BNSS against a young man named Abhishek Saroj, claiming that Nazia had been in a relationship with him and was being blackmailed over intimate photographs, which allegedly led to her suicide. The single-judge bench placed weight on Nazia's call records, which showed extended conversations with Abhishek in the hours leading up to her death. It noted that these details, combined with the mother's complaint, 'supported and corroborated" the theory that the alleged blackmail may have triggered her suicide. Further undermining the prosecution's case was the unexplained five-day delay in lodging the FIR, despite the police and district officials visiting the scene on September 10, a day after the suicide. 'As per statement of Moni with whom deceased-Nazia was working in the house of the applicant, that sometimes applicant scolded the deceased for work. Even assuming the same as correct at this stage, the same cannot be categorised as instigation or abetment to commit suicide," the court held, adding that there was no suicide note, no direct incitement by the applicant, and no allegations of abetment from the deceased's parents. However, the court emphasised that its findings were restricted to bail and should not influence the merits of the ongoing trial. Jahid Baig, who had been in custody since September 19, 2024, was directed to cooperate with the proceedings and barred from leaving the country. First Published:
