logo
‘Dog Man' Could Ease Box Office Slump Heading Into February

‘Dog Man' Could Ease Box Office Slump Heading Into February

Yahoo30-01-2025

'Wolf Man' wasn't the early-year hit that Universal had hoped for at the box office … but what about a 'Dog Man'?
DreamWorks' adaptation of 'Captain Underpants' creator Dav Pikey's police dog will try to turn a modest theatrical profit from families looking for a nice time in theaters with the hopes of legging out its run into the Valentine's/Presidents Day weekend.
Current projections have the film earning an opening weekend total in the $20 million range, topping out at $27 million against a reported $40 million budget on an animated film produced by British company Jellyfish Pictures.
That would put 'Dog Man' in similar territory to the $23.8 million opening of 'Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie' in 2017, a film that went on to gross $73.9 million domestically. The 2022 animated film 'DC League of Super-Pets' also opened in that range at $23 million.
With overall grosses expected to remain low between now and the release of 'Captain America: Brave New World' in mid-February, any films that can stem the tide will be welcomed by theaters. Universal is banking on positive word-of-mouth building up over the next two weeks, allowing 'Dog Man' to play through February and possibly top the domestic run of 'Captain Underpants.'
Meanwhile, Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema are hoping they have a new cult horror hit on their hands with Zach Cregger's 'Companion,' a film starring Sophie Thatcher and Jack Quaid about a weekend getaway that turns twisted when it is revealed that one of the people on this getaway is actually a companion robot.
Made on a reported $39 million combined production and marketing budget, 'Companion' is projected for a $9 million opening weekend but could show some legs if audiences are as enthused about the mix of twists and biting satire that has left critics raving. Currently, the film has a 94% Rotten Tomatoes score, possibly giving it the early buzz that could make it the next breakout fright flick like 'Nosferatu' or 'Longlegs.'
The post 'Dog Man' Could Ease Box Office Slump Heading Into February appeared first on TheWrap.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘How To Train Your Dragon' Soaring Toward No. 1 Debut At Box Office
‘How To Train Your Dragon' Soaring Toward No. 1 Debut At Box Office

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

‘How To Train Your Dragon' Soaring Toward No. 1 Debut At Box Office

The live-action remake of How to Train Your Dragon, starring Gerard Butler, is knocking Lilo & Stitch off the top of the domestic box office perch this weekend. Lilo & Stitch, a live-action remake of the 2002 Disney animated hit has been No. 1 at the domestic and worldwide box office since its debut in theaters on May 23. Since that time, the PG family hit has been outperforming such heavy hitters as Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, Karate Kid: Legends and From the World of John Wick: Ballerina. With the release of How to Train Your Dragon, however, Lilo & Stitch has finally met its match. Deadline projected Friday that the DreamWorks/Universal Pictures film will earn $82.5 million from 4,356 North American theaters through Sunday to become the new No. 1 film domestically. Butler, who voiced the role of Chief Stoic the Vast in the animated film, plays the character in the live-action version of How to Train Your Dragon. Mason Thames plays the role of his haphazard son, Hiccup, who bonds with a Night Fury dragon he names Toothless; while Nico Parker takes on the role of Hiccup's teen Viking rival-turned-ally Astrid. Lilo & Stitch, meanwhile, is projected by Deadline to earn $16 million from 3,675 theaters domestically. If the forecast holds, it will boost the film's worldwide take to $367 million. Dakota Johnson and Pedro Pascal in "Materialists." A24 Also new in theaters this weekend is Past Lives' Oscar-nominated filmmaker Celine Song's romantic comedy Materialists, which stars Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans. Deadline projects Materialists, which is an A24 release, will earn $12 million from 2,844 North American theaters through Sunday. Paramount Pictures' Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning and Lionsgate's John Wick spinoff movie Ballerina are in a battle for the No. 4 spot, as Deadline projects both films will earn about $9 million each. The Final Reckoning is playing in 2942 North American theaters this weekend, while Karate Kid: Legends is in 3,008 venues. Should the projections hold, it will up Ballerina's domestic tally to $41.4 million, and boost The Final Reckoning's North American box office take to $165.2 million. Note: This box office report will be updated throughout the weekend with the most current numbers as they become available. The final numbers for this weekend's box office will be released on Monday.

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter
Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

Atlantic

time11 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

There's a coincidental yet meaningful connection between two of this summer's buzziest movies. The new Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon are both remakes; beyond that, they're both live-action adaptations of animated films—each of which happened to have been co-directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders. Lilo & Stitch has made a fortune at the box office since its late-May debut; How to Train Your Dragon, which opens today, seems similarly poised for success. The two features are, if a little lacking in visual stimulation compared with their forebears, reliably entertaining. But taken together, they signal something rather alarming in Hollywood's ongoing crisis of imagination: The timeline for nostalgia is growing shorter. Since Tim Burton's big-budget take on Alice in Wonderland grossed more than $1 billion in 2010, the live-action remake has become an inevitable, pervasive cinematic trend. Fifteen years later, it seems that capturing similar financial success requires a studio to look at progressively more recent source material to work with. Disney's attempt to update the nearly 90-year-old Snow White failed at the box office earlier this year; the company shuffled efforts such as a new Pinocchio and Peter Pan off to streaming, despite the recognizable directors and casts involved. The muted response to these modern takes on decades-old classics perhaps explains the move toward reviving properties that resonate with much younger generations instead. The original Lilo & Stitch is 23 years old; How to Train Your Dragon, produced by DreamWorks Animation, is only 15. Next year, a remake of Moana will hit theaters less than a decade after the original film's release. Is that even enough time to start feeling wistful about it? Clearly, the answer is yes, given how audiences have flocked to similar adaptations. The sentimental fervor around franchises such as How to Train Your Dragon is particularly unsettling to me, because the first entry premiered when I was fully an adult; the DreamWorks canon (which also includes such films as Shrek and Kung Fu Panda) was established when I was past the ideal age to become invested. However, I've seen How to Train Your Dragon many times because my daughter is a fan; that intense familiarity helped me out as I watched the live-action version, looking for anything that might feel different about it—which would thus justify its creation. Not so much. DeBlois, who also directed the two How to Train Your Dragon sequels, makes his live-action debut by adapting his own feature; as such, the end result is wildly similar to the earlier work. The new film is again set in a Viking village that is constantly besieged by different kinds of dragons. The plucky teen son of the chief, a boy named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames), befriends a sleek black dragon named Toothless and learns that fighting the beasts isn't the only answer. The actor who voiced Hiccup's father in the animated film, Gerard Butler, returns to perform the role on-screen; in all other cases, the film uses well-suited performers to replace the voice cast. To my own surprise, I liked the new version of How to Train Your Dragon about as much as I do its ancestor. Both, to me, are above-average bits of children's entertainment that struggle with the same problems: They start to sag near the end and suffer a little from their murky color palette. I got a little choked up at the exact same point that I do while watching the 2010 Dragon, when Hiccup and Toothless take to the sky together; the boy rides on a saddle he's made for his fire-breathing pal, and the composer John Powell's excellent score soars into inspirational mode, all strings and bagpipes. If there's a difference between these redone scenes and their inspirations, it's a remarkably minor one; only good theater decorum stopped me from pulling out my phone and running the two Dragon s side by side. Hollywood is struggling to get people to buy movie tickets, so I understand the impulse to offer something that a broad swath of viewers already knows and likes. But there's simply no sense of risk in making something like How to Train Your Dragon —nothing that will convince said theatergoers that the medium has a future beyond recycling. Yes, visual-effects technology is up to the task of re-creating a cartoon on a larger scale and dotted with real actors, and yes, these redos tend to turn a profit for their makers. These shouldn't be the only reasons for art to exist. Lilo & Stitch, at least, diverges somewhat from its source material. Because most of the characters are human beings, its world seems easier to translate to one composed of flesh and blood. The film, like How to Train Your Dragon, is about a shiftless youngster (Lilo, a Hawaiian girl who has been acting out since the death of her parents) bonding with a fantasy creature (Stitch, a blue alien experiment designed as a weapon of destruction). The director Dean Fleischer Camp's tweaks for his rendition didn't particularly click for me, however. One amusing character (another alien who is searching for Stitch) is absent entirely, and the revised ending has prompted some pushback, though Fleischer Camp has tried to defend it. In theory, I should be pro-change, given that I found the carbon-copy nature of How to Train Your Dragon so irksome—except that Lilo & Stitch doesn't really commit to its big alterations. The animated versions of Lilo and her older sister, Nani, forge a closer connection after meeting Stitch and his extraterrestrial hunters; the live-action Lilo enters the care of family friends at the end of the film, so that Nani can go off to study in California. These adjustments to the girls' relationship are a bit bold, because the prior film is so emotionally focused on their frayed sisterhood, yet the remake quickly undercuts their separation with the revelation that Nani can just visit Lilo anytime she wants, thanks to some space technology that Nani has borrowed. Such a cop-out is the underlying, depressing reality with all of these remakes: No change can be too daring, no update too significant. It's heartening that Sanders, a co-director of the original Dragon and Stitch, is one of the few people working in animation who's still committed to innovation. Last year, he directed The Wild Robot; much like How to Train Your Dragon, it is an adaptation of a children's book upon which Sanders found an exciting visual spin. The movie was a critical success, a box-office hit, and an Academy Award nominee. Cinema needs more entries like The Wild Robot —novel works that take chances and trust the audience to follow along. If nothing else, they provide fodder for more live-action remakes in the near future. Hollywood can't have these nostalgic adaptations without something to redo in the first place.

Why 'Wicked: For Good' team is 'nervous' about sequel
Why 'Wicked: For Good' team is 'nervous' about sequel

New York Post

time11 hours ago

  • New York Post

Why 'Wicked: For Good' team is 'nervous' about sequel

Can 'Wicked: For Good' be 'Wicked: As Good'? That's the pressure facing the filmmakers behind the sequel to 'Wicked,' which set a box-office record as the highest-grossing movie adaptation of a Broadway musical after its release last November. 'Everybody's thrilled that the first movie was so incredibly well received and had such cultural impact,' composer Stephen Schwartz, 77, exclusively told The Post on the red carpet of the Songwriters Hall of Fame induction ceremony — where he received the Johnny Mercer Award — on Thursday night. 4 Stephen Schwartz is still 'working really hard' on the 'Wicked' For Good' sequel just five months before its release. ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 4 Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo return as Galinda/Glinda and Elphaba, respectively, in 'Wicked: For Good.' ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 'But it does raise the bar,' he admitted of the film that received 10 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture. 'So we're all a little nervous.' Indeed, Schwartz is still 'working really hard' on the sequel — once again starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande as Elphaba and Galinda/Glinda, respectively — just five months before its release on Nov. 21. 'I'm still doing scoring,' he said. 'We have our orchestral recording sessions next month, so gotta get ready for that.' Schwartz is also busy working on another Broadway musical that will reunite him with Kristin Chenoweth, who originated the role of 'Galinda/Glinda' in the stage version of 'Wicked' in 2003. 'We have a new Broadway show opening in November, 'The Queen of Versailles,' ' he said. 'Again, we're working very hard. We had a really good tryout last summer, but we learned a lot from it and are, you know, continuing to make improvements. But we feel like we're ready to go a few months from now.' 4 Stephen Schwartz was honored by Kristin Chenoweth and Mary Kate Morrissey for receiving the Johnny Mercer Award. Getty Images for Songwriters Hall Of Fame For those expecting more of 'Wicked' in his new musical, Schwartz explained that we're not in Oz anymore. 'It's contemporary America and a little bit of 17th century France, so not Oz at all,' he said. 'Kristin obviously will still be using that enormous gift of hers vocally and her comic gifts. So in that there will be a continuity, but it's a very, very different character, and you see another side of Kristin.' 'It's always great to work with Kristin,' he went on. 'We do a lot of stuff. We did some concerts together, and I've done classes for her Broadway Bootcamp. We're friends.' 4 Stephen Schwartz performed his 'Pippin' tune 'Corner of the Sky' after receiving the Johnny Mercer Award. Getty Images for Songwriters Hall Of Fame Indeed, Chenoweth showed up for her friend at NYC's Marriott Marquis, bringing the house down on the 'Wicked' duet 'For Good' with Mary Kate Morrissey — who ended her run as Elphaba on Broadway in March — before giving Schwartz his latest SHOF honor on Thursday. 'It's amazing just to be here tonight when so many amazing songwriters are being celebrated,' said Schwartz, who was previously inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame in 2009. 'I looked at the list of the Johnny Mercer Award winners, and it's just all the great musical theater writers of the last, I don't know, 40 years or so,' he added. 'The fact that my name will be on that list now is so stunning to me and so humbling. They are writers who I've listened to all my life, who I've learned from, I've stole from. And I am forever grateful to the Songwriters Hall of Fame.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store